MRE Upgrade at Pitfield Titanium Project

About this update from Empire Metals Limited

[{"type":"text","content":"\n \n Empire Metals Limited / LON : EEE, OTCQX: EPMLF / Sector: Natural Resources \n   \n 19 August 2026 \n Empire Metals Limited \n (\"Empire \" or \"the Company\") \n   \n MRE Upgrade Confirms Pitfield Project as the World's Largest Titanium Resource \n   \n Empire Metals Limited, the AIM-quoted and OTCQX-traded exploration and development company, is pleased to report an upgraded Mineral Resource Estimate ( 'MRE' ) at its Pitfield Project in Western Australia ( 'Pitfield' or the 'Project' ), confirming the Project as the world's largest titanium resource. The MRE is reported in accordance with the Joint Ore Reserves Committee ( 'JORC' ) 2012 Code (The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources, and Ore Reserves) and includes Measured, Indicated and Inferred categories. \n   \n Highlights \n ·    World's largest titanium resource 1 : upgraded MRE of 8.16 billion tonnes at 4.3% TiO 2 for 349 million tonnes of contained TiO 2 , across the Thomas and Cosgrove deposits \n   \n ·    Including Resource Classifications: \n o  Measured: 374 million tonnes at 5.8% TiO 2 for 21.6 million tonnes of contained TiO 2 \n o  Indicated: 3.65 billion tonnes at 4.3% TiO 2 for 154.7 million tonnes of contained TiO 2 \n o  Inferred: 4.2 billion tonnes at 4.1% TiO 2 for 173 million tonnes of contained TiO 2 \n   \n ·    First Measured Resource declared at Pitfield, defines high-grade material coupled with \n Indicated Resources, strengthens confidence to progress mine planning and economic studies \n   \n ·    Near-surface, in-situ weathered zone of 4.39 billion tonnes at 4.4% TiO 2 for 194.5 million tonnes of contained TiO 2 : comprising soft, friable material from surface containing naturally formed anatase and rutile, with minimal overburden and no inter-burden, supporting simple, efficient mining methods \n   \n ·    High-grade TiO 2 cores define early mining targets with continuous zones averaging above 6% TiO 2 over a 5km strike length and up to 1.25km width at Thomas, and over a 4.0km strike length at Cosgrove \n   \n ·    Flowsheet based on conventional processing steps with direct access to global markets : integrated flowsheet demonstrated to produce high-purity (99%+) TiO 2 targeting pigment and titanium sponge feedstocks (announced 11 June 2026), with established rail links to deep-water ports serving Asia, the USA, Europe and Saudi Arabia \n   \n 1 Source: US Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2025, World Resources of Titanium Minerals; comparison against publicly reported JORC (or equivalent) titanium MRE statements on a contained TiO 2 basis. USGS national inventory figures are not reported under the JORC Code.         \n   \n Shaun Bunn, Managing Director, said: \"This upgraded MRE is a landmark moment for Empire Metals and confirms Pitfield as the world's largest titanium resource. To have defined 8.16 billion tonnes at 4.3% TiO 2 , containing 349 million tonnes of TiO 2 , underlines the sheer scale of this discovery. \n   \n \"The scale is only part of the story. The declaration of our first Measured Resource of 374 million tonnes at 5.8% TiO 2 containing 21.6 million TiO 2 , together with a substantial Indicated component, provides the platform for mine planning and the economic studies that will underpin Pitfield's development. This milestone comes just weeks after we demonstrated an integrated flowsheet based on conventional processing steps, producing TiO 2 at better than 99% purity, targeting both pigment and titanium metal feedstocks. The high-grade weathered zone sits at surface and lends itself to simple, efficient mining methods. We now have both halves of the equation: a titanium resource of exceptional scale, and an integrated processing route designed to produce high-value products. \n   \n \"Pitfield has the hallmarks of a tier-one titanium project: scale, grade, simple mining methods, processing route based on conventional processing steps and direct access to global markets, in a strategically important mining friendly jurisdiction.\" \n   \n \n \n   \n Pitfield Mineral Resource Statement (100% basis) \n The Pitfield MRE incorporates the titanium mineralisation hosted within the interbedded succession of sandstones, siltstones and conglomerates as delineated through Diamond Core ('DD'), Reverse Circulation ('RC') and Aircore (AC) drilling, that is supplemented with geophysical surveys, surface mapping and soil and rock chip sampling. \n   \n The Pitfield MRE is being reported in accordance with the 2012 JORC Code and estimated by a Competent Person as defined by the Code. The Pitfield MRE contains Measured and Indicated categories as well as Inferred, highlighting the elevated confidence level of the resource within the upgraded resource statement. \n   \n The MRE consists of two distinct near-surface in-situ weathered bedrock zones referred to as the Thomas and Cosgrove Deposits, which are defined by an area of 25.5km 2 and 39.8km 2 respectively, for a total MRE area of 65.3km 2 (refer Figure 2). \n   \n The MRE has been subdivided to show the potential mineralisation at each prospect separately. It has been further subdivided to show the range of mineralisation within the in-situ saprolite zone and weathered bedrock zones, both being enriched in titanium dioxide minerals (anatase and rutile) and extending from surface to an average depth of approximately 30m to 50m (Table 1). Additionally, the MRE includes the uppermost portion of the underlying fresh bedrock mineralisation, which is primarily enriched with the titanium mineral titanite, as well as some rutile and titanium-iron oxides, and is completely open at depth. \n   \n Table 1 below summarises the MRE for Pitfield's Thomas and Cosgrove deposits effective as of 19 August 2026 on a 100% basis. Empire owns 70% of Pitfield in a Joint Venture (JV) with Century Minerals Pty Ltd, which holds the remaining 30% JV interest. Empire is manager of the JV and the sole operator of the Project.  Snowden Optiro was engaged to prepare a geological resource model for the MRE for Empire on the Pitfield Project. The MRE was reviewed and signed off in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) by Andrew Faragher (MAusIMM), Exploration Manager for Empire. \n \n \n   \n Table 1.  Pitfield Project Mineral Resource Statement - Updated August 2026 \n \n \n \n \n Mineral Resource Estimate for the Thomas Deposit, Pitfield - August 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n Domain \n \n \n Cut-off \n \n \n Measured \n \n \n Indicated \n \n \n Inferred \n \n \n Total Mineral Resource \n \n \n \n \n \n Material Type \n \n \n TiO 2 (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n TiO 2 \n Tonnes \n (kt) \n \n \n \n \n \n Laterite \n \n \n 2.5 \n \n \n 17 \n \n \n 4.3 \n \n \n 718 \n \n \n 24 \n \n \n 3.7 \n \n \n 909 \n \n \n 11 \n \n \n 3.2 \n \n \n 345 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n 3.8 \n \n \n 1,973 \n \n \n \n \n \n Saprolite \n \n \n 73 \n \n \n 5.8 \n \n \n 4,240 \n \n \n 124 \n \n \n 4.7 \n \n \n 5,826 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n 4.4 \n \n \n 2,612 \n \n \n 257 \n \n \n 4.9 \n \n \n 12,678 \n \n \n \n \n \n Weathered \n \n \n 225 \n \n \n 6.0 \n \n \n 13,570 \n \n \n 523 \n \n \n 4.8 \n \n \n 25,172 \n \n \n 267 \n \n \n 4.3 \n \n \n 11,446 \n \n \n 1,015 \n \n \n 4.9 \n \n \n 50,189 \n \n \n \n \n \n Fresh \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n 5.3 \n \n \n 3,112 \n \n \n 61 \n \n \n 4.5 \n \n \n 2,735 \n \n \n 1,113 \n \n \n 4.4 \n \n \n 48,561 \n \n \n 1,233 \n \n \n 4.4 \n \n \n 54,407 \n \n \n \n \n \n Total \n \n \n   \n \n \n 374 \n \n \n 5.8 \n \n \n 21,640 \n \n \n 732 \n \n \n 4.7 \n \n \n 34,643 \n \n \n 1,451 \n \n \n 4.3 \n \n \n 62,964 \n \n \n 2,557 \n \n \n 4.7 \n \n \n 119,246 \n \n \n \n \n \n  Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cosgrove Deposit, Pitfield - August 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n Domain \n \n \n Cut-Off \n \n \n Measured \n \n \n Indicated \n \n \n Inferred \n \n \n Total Mineral Resource \n \n \n \n \n \n Material Type \n \n \n TiO 2 (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n TiO 2 \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Laterite \n \n \n 2.5 \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n 145  \n \n \n 3.6  \n \n \n 5,172  \n \n \n 53  \n \n \n 3.8  \n \n \n 2,022  \n \n \n 198  \n \n \n 3.6  \n \n \n 7,194  \n \n \n \n \n \n Saprolite \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n 553  \n \n \n 4.4  \n \n \n 24,224  \n \n \n 93  \n \n \n 4.3  \n \n \n 4,027  \n \n \n 646  \n \n \n 4.4  \n \n \n 28,251  \n \n \n \n \n \n Weathered \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n 1,692  \n \n \n 4.3  \n \n \n 72,731  \n \n \n 528  \n \n \n 4.1  \n \n \n 21,499  \n \n \n 2,219  \n \n \n 4.2  \n \n \n 94,231  \n \n \n \n \n \n Fresh \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n 463  \n \n \n 3.9  \n \n \n 17,884  \n \n \n 2,076  \n \n \n 4.0  \n \n \n 82,438  \n \n \n 2,539  \n \n \n 4.0  \n \n \n 100,322  \n \n \n \n \n \n Total \n \n \n \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n -  \n \n \n 2,853  \n \n \n 4.2  \n \n \n 120,011  \n \n \n 2,749  \n \n \n 4.0  \n \n \n 109,986  \n \n \n 5,602  \n \n \n 4.1  \n \n \n 229,998 \n \n \n \n \n \n Combined Mineral Resource Estimates for the Pitfield Project - August 2026 \n \n \n \n \n \n Domain \n \n \n Cut-Off \n \n \n Measured \n \n \n Indicated \n \n \n Inferred \n \n \n Total Mineral Resource \n \n \n \n \n \n Material Type \n \n \n TiO 2 (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n Tonnes (Mt) \n \n \n Grade (%) \n \n \n TiO 2 \n Tonnes (kt) \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Laterite \n \n \n 2.5 \n \n \n 17 \n \n \n 4.3 \n \n \n 718 \n \n \n 169  \n \n \n 3.6  \n \n \n  6,082 \n \n \n 64  \n \n \n 3.7  \n \n \n 2,367   \n \n \n 249  \n \n \n 3.7  \n \n \n 9,167  \n \n \n \n \n \n Saprolite \n \n \n 73 \n \n \n 5.8 \n \n \n 4,240 \n \n \n 677  \n \n \n 4.4  \n \n \n  30,050 \n \n \n 152  \n \n \n 4.4  \n \n \n 6,639 \n \n \n 903  \n \n \n 4.5  \n \n \n 40,928  \n \n \n \n \n \n Weathered \n \n \n 225 \n \n \n 6.0 \n \n \n 13,570 \n \n \n 2,214  \n \n \n 4.4  \n \n \n  97,904 \n \n \n 795  \n \n \n 4.1  \n \n \n  32,945 \n \n \n 3,235  \n \n \n 4.5  \n \n \n 144,419  \n \n \n \n \n \n Fresh \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n 5.3 \n \n \n 3,112 \n \n \n 525  \n \n \n 3.9  \n \n \n  20,619 \n \n \n 3,189  \n \n \n 4.1  \n \n \n  130,999 \n \n \n 3,772  \n \n \n 4.1  \n \n \n 154,729  \n \n \n \n \n \n Total \n \n \n   \n \n \n 374 \n \n \n 5.8 \n \n \n 21,640 \n \n \n 3,585  \n \n \n 4.3 \n \n \n  154,654 \n \n \n 4,200  \n \n \n 4.1  \n \n \n  172,950 \n \n \n 8,159  \n \n \n 4.3  \n \n \n 349,244  \n \n \n \n \n \n   \n Notes: \n The preceding statements of Mineral Resources conforms to the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) 2012 Edition.  All tonnages reported are dry metric tonnes.  Minor discrepancies occur due to rounding to appropriate significant figures. The MRE is reported above a 2.5% TiO 2 cut-off, constrained to a Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction (RPEEE) pitshell. \n   \n \n \n   \n About the Pitfield Project \n  Located within the Mid-West region of Western Australia, near the northern wheatbelt town of Three Springs, the Pitfield titanium project lies 313km north of Perth and 156km southeast of Geraldton, the Mid-West region's capital and major port. Western Australia is a Tier 1 mining jurisdiction, with mining-friendly policies, stable government, transparency, and advanced technology expertise. Pitfield has existing connections to port (both road & rail), HV power substations, and is nearby to natural gas pipelines as well as a wind and solar renewable energy hub, which is under development (refer Figure 1). \n \n Figure 1. Pitfield Project Location showing the Mid-West Region Infrastructure, Services and Regional Projects (Mining and Renewables) \n   \n Thomas and Cosgrove MRE \n The updated MRE has been completed on the Thomas and Cosgrove eposits, which are located approximately 10km south-west and north-west of the town of Three Springs respectively.  The drilling at Thomas was primarily designed to increase the confidence level of the resource, with drilling also designed to identify infrastructure options where no mineralisation occurs. The drilling at Cosgrove was designed to significantly increase the size of the known resource there. Previous drilling had focussed on the central part of Cosgrove, this drilling was to increase geological knowledge and resource size. \n It is important to note that the upgraded MRE presented herein is constrained by the current number, and density of drill holes, geology and extent of TiO 2 mineralisation.  \n \n Figure 2: MRE outlines for Thomas and Cosgrove deposits with background images of airborne gravity survey results with the location of the AC, RC and DD drillholes \n   \n Geology and Mineralisation Style \n Pitfield lies in a unique geological setting along the western boundary of the Yilgarn Craton, within the Yandanooka Basin which consists mainly of interbedded sandstones, siltstone and conglomerates.  The Basin is situated between the Eurella Fault to the west and the Darling Range Fault to the east and is interpreted to be approximately 9km deep. Crustal mapping by Geoscience Australia shows there are several deep crustal faults intersecting beneath the Yandanooka Basin and these faults are potentially the conduits of hydrothermal fluids that have strongly altered the host sediments and provided an upgrade to the titanium mineralisation. \n   \n The titanium mineralisation is associated predominantly with anatase and rutile in the weathered cap and titanite and rutile in the underlying fresh bedrock. Three distinct events have controlled the formation and nature of the titanium mineralisation.  A Ti-rich magmatic intrusion was initially formed, uplifted and eroded into a shallow basin whereby titanium minerals were concentrated into beds as the sediments were sorted by a natural density-based segregation on a significantly larger extent than occurs in surficial mineral sand type deposits. A subsequent hydrothermal event and regional greenschist metamorphism then altered the host sediments and titanium minerals within the sediments and produced an alteration assemblage dominated by titanite (CaTiSiO5), hematite, epidote, carbonate and chlorite. The titanium mineralisation was further upgraded by intense weathering altering the titanite to anatase by removal of the calcium and silica.  The consequence of this geological history has been the upgrading of TiO 2 content in the ore mineralogy ultimately to >95% TiO 2 in the anatase found in the weathered cap. Uniquely, nature has in fact done much of the processing for Empire at Pitfield. \n   \n The mineralisation is completely stratabound and the best mineralisation is found within the in-situ weathered cap whereby the sandstones, siltstone and conglomerates have been altered to saprolite, predominantly quartz and kaolin and the titanite has altered to anatase (TiO 2 ). The weathered bedrock consists of altered rock, but weathering is less intense, quartz and kaolin are predominant but as the weathering profile turns to fresher material there is an increase in chlorite, epidote, mica, hematite and carbonate; the anatase content decreases and the titanite content increases. \n   \n The upgraded Pitfield MRE incorporates the Thomas and Cosgrove deposits. At Thomas the upgraded MRE now has 43% of the resource reporting to the Measured and Indicated categories and the remainder reporting to the Inferred category. At Cosgrove 51% of the resource reports to the Indicated category and the remainder reports to the Inferred category. Thomas and Cosgrove both have large, high-grade central cores as per the block model. The in-situ weathered cap at both Thomas and Cosgrove can now form the basis for economic and engineering studies, targeting mine planning to support a long-life mining operation. \n \n Figure 3.  Thomas Deposit: Location with MRE outline and drill collars by grade \n \n Figure 4. Cosgrove Deposit: Location with MRE outline and drill collars by grade \n   \n Drilling Techniques \n Drilling was undertaken between 2023 and 2026 with all drilling managed entirely by Empire using primarily Wallis Drilling and Strike Drilling. RC holes were drilled at a diameter of 146mm, AC holes were drilled at a diameter of 90mm or 76mm. Diamond core holes were drilled using PQ3 (85mm,) HQ3 (61mm) or NQ2 (51mm) equipment. Drill core was oriented using the industry standard Reflex orientation tool. \n   \n Table 2: Drilling (drillholes with assays) metrics by prospect, year and hole type \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Thomas \n \n \n Cosgrove               \n \n \n Other Areas \n \n \n \n \n Year \n \n \n Hole Type \n \n \n Count \n \n \n Metres \n \n \n Count \n \n \n Metres \n \n \n Count \n \n \n Metres \n \n \n \n \n 2023 \n \n \n RC \n \n \n 11 \n \n \n 1,712 \n \n \n 13 \n \n \n 1,848 \n \n \n 36 \n \n \n 5,343 \n \n \n \n \n DD \n \n \n 1 \n \n \n 408 \n \n \n 1 \n \n \n 400 \n \n \n 1 \n \n \n 408 \n \n \n \n \n 2024 \n \n \n RC \n \n \n 19 \n \n \n 2,926 \n \n \n 20 \n \n \n 3,006 \n \n \n 1 \n \n \n 154 \n \n \n \n \n DD \n \n \n 7 \n \n \n 771 \n \n \n 7 \n \n \n 715 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2025 \n \n \n AC \n \n \n 183 \n \n \n 8,679 \n \n \n 42 \n \n \n 2111 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n RC \n \n \n 40 \n \n \n 3,776 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n DD \n \n \n 8 \n \n \n 745 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n 2026 \n \n \n AC \n \n \n 148 \n \n \n 6,828 \n \n \n 269 \n \n \n 12,140 \n \n \n 224 \n \n \n 8,788 \n \n \n \n \n RC \n \n \n 30 \n \n \n 2,988 \n \n \n 41 \n \n \n 4,100 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Totals \n \n \n   \n \n \n 447 \n \n \n 28,833 \n \n \n 393 \n \n \n 24,320 \n \n \n 262 \n \n \n 14,693 \n \n \n \n \n   \n Since commencing the maiden drilling campaign at Pitfield on 27 March 2023, Empire has completed 1,102 drill holes for a total 67,846 metres comprising: \n   \n •             25 DD drill holes for 3,447 m; \n •             211 RC drill holes for 25,853 m; and, \n •             866 AC drill holes for 38,546 m. \n   \n Sampling Techniques \n Sampling at Thomas and Cosgrove utilised standard procedures employed across all drilling methods, with samples considered representative for the purposes of reporting. \n   \n •             Air core (AC) samples were collected directly from an AC drill rig using a cone splitter at intervals every 2m downhole. \n •             Reverse circulation (RC) samples were collected directly from an RC drill rig using a cone splitter at intervals every 2m downhole. \n •             Diamond core samples were taken from the diamond core (HQ and NQ) that was sawn in half, with half going for assay and other half retained in core tray. Hole drilled with PQ, predominantly for metallurgical samples, were cut in half and then one half cut in quarter. The quarter was sent for assay and the remaining three quarters retained for metallurgical sampling. Samples were taken based on the geological logging of the drill holes. \n   \n Sample Preparation and Assay \n Sample preparation for all AC, RC and DD samples was undertaken at Intertek Minerals laboratory in Maddington WA, where the samples received were sorted and dried. Primary preparation for diamond core samples was to crush each sample in its entirety to 3mm. AC and RC samples were primarily crushed to 3mm. Larger volume samples (>5kg) were split with a riffle splitter. All samples were pulverised via robotic pulveriser. Internal screen sizing QAQC is done at 90% passing 75um. \n   \n Prior to October 2024 a 4-acid digestion was used with ICP-MS finish (procedure 4A/MS48) as the initial assay technique. If the initial Ti values exceeded 2% Ti, the samples were re-assayed using a borate fusion digestion to ensure complete dissolution of Ti-bearing minerals, with a ICP-OES analytical finish (procedure FP1/OM). \n   \n In October 2024 the analytical methodology was modified to reduce the number of initial elements analysed to 33. The samples underwent a 4-acid digestion and were analysed by ICP-OES finish (procedure 4A/OE33). All samples with initial values exceeding 2% Ti were analysed again with an ICP-OES finish, but with a borate fusion digestion to ensure complete sample dissolution and total TiO 2 mineral assaying. \n   \n Certified analytical standards were inserted with sample numbers ending in 00, 25, 50 and 75 within the numbering sequence for all AC, RC and DD samples. \n   \n Duplicates were inserted with sample numbers ending in 20, 40, 60 and 80 sample numbers within the numbering sequence for all AC and RC samples. \n   \n Bulk Density \n A total of 109 bulk density values were collected from diamond drill core from both Thomas and Cosgrove; the samples came from the saprolite, weathered bedrock and fresh bedrock zones and were sent to Terra Petrophysics in O'Connor, Perth. The density determinations were made using conventional laboratory procedures. The buoyancy (specific gravity) method is used to determine bulk rock densities, after the samples are saturated with distilled water for 24 hours. Dry bulk densities are determined by dry weight divided by the buoyancy determined volume of each sample. Porosities are calculated from water saturated weights, dry weights, and the buoyancy-determined volume. \n   \n The accuracy of the buoyancy technique of density measurement is better than 0.1 grams per cubic centimetre. The results of the laboratory density determinations are reported in grams per cubic centimetre. \n   \n   \n   \n Estimation Methodology \n Geological interpretation was completed using Leapfrog Geo (v 2025.2.1) software to construct a material type (cover, saprolite, weathered and fresh rock domains) model, which used a combination of geological logging and element geochemical data. A further geological model representing the principle lithological units was constructed using logging codes to represent the Enokurra sandstone and interbedded conglomerate units present at both deposits. Mineralisation domains were defined using a lower modelling cut-off approximating a 2.5% TiO 2 threshold, with a clear northwest-southeast trending boundary striking through both the Cosgrove and Thomas deposits. \n   \n Exploratory data analysis was then conducted by reviewing multi-element geochemical relationships for TiO 2 with Al, Fe, Ca, Mg, K and Na in each of the forementioned domains. Estimation domains were defined based on weathering intensity and above and below the TiO 2 modelling cut-off. \n   \n Drillholes were composited to 2m increments, representing the typical sampling interval used. Geostatistical analysis and grade continuity modelling was reviewed using Datamine's Snowden Supervisor Software (v8.15.2) and estimation conducted using Datamine's Studio RM Pro (v2.1.125.0). \n   \n The TiO 2 grade was estimated using ordinary kriging, employing a three-pass estimation strategy within parent blocks measuring 50 m(X) by 50 m(Y) by 10 m(RL). Sub-blocking was permitted to 2m in all directions. \n   \n Variograms were modelled separately for each deposit using normal scores transformed data, which was back-transformed on export. At Thomas, the nugget effect was modelled at <20% of total variance, with the remaining three structures modelled at 120m (0.21), 210m (0.25), and 700m (0.37). The variogram is aligned 000->345 for the major direction, 00->255 for the semi-major and 90->000 for the minor (vertical). At Cosgrove, the nugget effect accounted for approximately <25% of variance of the data. The remaining three structures were modelled at 95m (0.23), 542m (0.20) and 1000 m (0.38). The orientations were the same as those used at Thomas. \n   \n Density was assigned to the parent blocks based on bulk densities determined from the Archimedes water immersion method, conducted at Terra Resources. A total of 109 samples from both deposits were submitted across all weathering types. Density was assigned to the block model on the basis of material type, as per Table 3 below. \n   \n Table 3: Bulk densities applied at Cosgrove and Thomas deposits \n \n \n \n \n Material type \n \n \n Number of samples \n \n \n Applied bulk density t/m 3 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Cover (sand) \n \n \n 1 \n \n \n 1.07 \n \n \n \n \n Laterite \n \n \n 8 \n \n \n 2.35 \n \n \n \n \n Saprolite \n \n \n 22 \n \n \n 2.09 \n \n \n \n \n Weathered sandstone \n \n \n 57 \n \n \n 2.17 \n \n \n \n \n Fresh sandstone/conglomerate \n \n \n 21 \n \n \n 3.05 \n \n \n \n \n Total \n \n \n 109 \n \n \n N/a \n \n \n \n \n Due to the size of the deposits, any un-estimated blocks were hard-coded and were flagged in the model by way of an indicator variable and excluded from classified Mineral Resources. \n   \n Cut-off grade(s) and basis of selection \n A cut-off grade of 2.5% TiO 2 was used and determined from optimisation studies which indicated a break-even cut-off of 2.36% TiO 2 . Grade and tonnes have been reported within a constrained pit shell reported from a Whittle optimisation. The underlying parameters are listed in Table 4. \n   \n This decision was based on a high-level preliminary evaluation of potential modifying factors. \n   \n Table 4: Open pit RPEEE optimisation inputs \n \n \n \n \n Item \n \n \n Units \n \n \n Value \n \n \n Comment \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Factors \n \n \n \n \n Dilution \n \n \n % \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n Snowden Optiro assumption - bulk commodity \n \n \n \n \n Mining recovery \n \n \n % \n \n \n 100 \n \n \n Snowden Optiro assumption - bulk commodity \n \n \n \n \n Process recovery \n \n \n % \n \n \n 70 \n \n \n Empire provided data \n \n \n \n \n Financial \n \n \n \n \n Price - TiO 2 \n \n \n US$/t TiO 2 (FOB) \n \n \n 2,500 \n \n \n Empire provided data to Snowden Optiro based on external expert advice \n \n \n \n \n Costs \n \n \n \n \n Mining \n \n \n US$/t rock \n \n \n 3 \n \n \n Empire provided data \n \n \n \n \n Incremental ore cost \n \n \n US$/t rock \n \n \n 0.5 \n \n \n Snowden Optiro assumption \n \n \n \n \n Processing \n \n \n US$/t rock \n \n \n 38 \n \n \n Empire provided assumption \n \n \n \n \n G&A \n \n \n US$/t rock \n \n \n 1.5 \n \n \n Snowden Optiro assumption \n \n \n \n \n Total ore cost \n \n \n \n \n \n 40 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Product transport \n \n \n US$/t TiO 2 \n \n \n 20 \n \n \n 160 km to Geraldton Port \n \n \n \n \n Royalty \n \n \n % price \n \n \n 2.5 \n \n \n WA state royalty \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Geotech \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Saprolite \n \n \n degrees \n \n \n 40 \n \n \n Snowden Optiro assumption \n \n \n \n \n Weathered/fresh \n \n \n degrees \n \n \n 45 \n \n \n Snowden Optiro assumption \n \n \n \n \n Marginal cut-off calculation \n \n \n % TiO 2 \n \n \n 2.36 \n \n \n Calculation \n \n \n \n \n NB* Calculation derived from Total ore cost / (Process recovery*(Price*(1-Royalty)-Product Transport))*100 \n See JORC Table 1 Section 2 for more detailed explanation. \n   \n Future Drilling, project studies and process flow sheet development to support MRE Upgrade in 2027 \n The MRE model is currently being reviewed to ensure future drilling supports an MRE upgrade in mid CY 2027, focused on conversion of further Indicated Resources to Measured at Thomas and Cosgrove deposits, as well as process flow sheet and economic studies to support a move to Probable Ore Reserves.  A future MRE upgrade would further assist with mine development planning, primarily from increased confidence categories as the Company seeks to progress through to feasibility stage. Future upgrades would require further bulk density work to increase the number of density figures used, ongoing metallurgical test work focused on increasing the confidence level in the Company's process flow sheet and end product specifications. \n   \n The Company is in the process of preparing additional Programme of Works with the WA government's Department of Mining, Petroleum and Exploration to support a bulk sampling program as well as further grid drilling to infill the Cosgrove deposit over the next twelve months to increase the confidence level of the resource.  Empire will consider other on ground activities as part of the supporting process development work and engineering studies. \n   \n Classification \n The MRE has been classified following the guidelines of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, 2012 (the JORC Code). The updated MRE at Thomas has been classified as Measured, Inferred and Indicated on the basis of confidence in geological and grade continuity, the quality of the sampling and assay data, and confidence in the estimation of titanium across the deposit (see Figure 5). This is based on the robustness of the grade estimate as determined from the drillhole spacing, geological confidence and grade continuity. \n   \n The updated MRE at Cosgrove has been classified as Indicated and Inferred on the basis of confidence in geological and grade continuity, the quality of the sampling and assay data, and confidence in the estimation of titanium across the deposit (see Figure 6). This is based on the robustness of the grade estimate as determined from the drillhole spacing, geological confidence and grade continuity. The drilling at Cosgrove is predominantly on a 400m x 200m grid and therefore the MRE classification has lower confidence. \n   \n \n Figure 5.  Thomas Deposit Classification: MRE Outline with Measured, Indicated and Inferred Categories \n \n Figure 6.  Cosgrove Deposit Classification: MRE Outline with Indicated and Inferred categories \n   \n Mineralogy and Metallurgical Factors or Assumptions \n   \n The main titanium minerals at Pitfield are anatase (TiO 2 ) within the saprolite and weathered bedrock and titanite (CaTiSiO 5 ) within the fresh bedrock, rutile (TiO 2 ) is found within all rock types. The minerals have been identified from thin section petrography, SEM and microprobe work.  The microprobe work has identified that there are no deleterious elements within the anatase, rutile or titanite. \n   \n Metallurgical testwork has been undertaken on a range of samples from the exploration and resource drilling programmes. The focus of the testwork has been on the weathered zones, as this is near-surface and extensive. There has been some limited testwork in the underlying fresh bedrock zone and this will continue in subsequent testwork programmes as the flowsheet details start to be confirmed. It is likely that some modifications to the process flowsheet would be required in order to treat the fresh bedrock ore, this assumption will be tested as the project progresses.  \n   \n Multiple samples from Diamond core drilling and AC drilling programmes have been selected for metallurgical testwork. Testwork is being managed by Empire's inhouse technical team with the assistance of external experts and being undertaken at a number of commercial laboratories in Perth, Western Australia. The programme has four key areas: \n ·      Understanding the mineralogy and physical characteristics of the mineralisation that influence metallurgical performance  \n ·      Mineral separation process development \n ·      Elemental extraction process development \n ·      Product finishing to meet industry standard specifications \n   \n Whilst the process flowsheet has been identified through the metallurgical testwork to date, there is still work to be undertaken in this area. The focus has now moved from testing a wide range of potential unit operations to developing a deeper understanding of the selected process, including impact on performance of a range of operating and mineralogical variables. \n   \n Progress results have been reported previously via RNS, including most recently:  \n ·      \"Pitfield Process Flowsheet and Product Development\" 11/06/2026 \n ·      \"Pitfield Project Development Update\" 27/01/26 \n ·      \"Breakthrough in Process development\" 28/08/25 \n ·      \"Team Expansion and Bulk Met testing commences\" 16/07/25 \n ·      \"Exceptional High-Purity TiO 2 Product Achieved\" 09/06/25 \n ·      \"High-Purity TiO 2 Product achieved\" 10/03/25 \n ·      \"Significant Progress Achieved on Process Flowsheet\" 13/02/25 \n   \n   \n   \n Competent Person Statement \n The technical information in this report that relates to the Pitfield Project has been compiled by Mr Andrew Faragher, an employee of Empire Metals Australia Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Empire. Mr Faragher is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Faragher has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Mr Faragher consents to the inclusion in this release of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. \n   \n The scientific and technical information in this report that relates to process metallurgy is based on information reviewed by Ms Narelle Marriott, an employee of Empire Metals Australia Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Empire. Ms Marriott is a member of the AusIMM and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code 2012. Ms. Marriott consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears. \n   \n Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) Disclosure \n Certain information contained in this announcement would have been deemed inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014, as incorporated into UK law by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, until the release of this announcement. \n   \n **ENDS** \n For further information please visit www.empiremetals.com or contact: \n   \n \n \n \n \n Empire Metals Ltd \n Shaun Bunn / Greg Kuenzel / Arabella Burwell \n   \n \n \n  Tel: 020 4583 1440 \n   \n   \n \n \n \n \n S. P. Angel Corporate Finance LLP (Nomad & Joint Broker) \n Ewan Leggat / Adam Cowl \n   \n \n \n Tel: 020 3470 0470 \n   \n   \n \n \n \n \n Canaccord Genuity Limited (Joint Broker) \n James Asensio / Christian Calabrese / Rory Blundell / Charlie Hammond \n   \n \n \n Tel: 020 7523 8000 \n   \n \n \n \n \n Zeus Capital Limited (Joint Broker) \n Harry Ansell / Katy Mitchell \n   \n \n \n Tel: 020 3829 5000 \n \n \n \n \n Tavistock (Financial PR) \n Emily Moss / Josephine Clerkin \n   \n \n \n [email protected] \n Tel: 020 7920 3150 \n   \n \n \n \n \n Chapter One Advisors (Australian Financial PR) \n David Tasker \n   \n \n \n [email protected] \n Tel: +61 433 112 936 \n \n \n \n \n   \n About Empire Metals Limited \n Empire Metals Ltd (AIM: EEE and OTCQX: EPMLF) is an exploration and resource development company focused on the commercialisation of the Pitfield Titanium Project, located in Western Australia. The titanium discovery at Pitfield is of unprecedented scale and hosts the largest titanium resource reported globally (to JORC or equivalent standard), and among the highest grade, with a Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) totalling 8.16 billion tonnes grading 4.3% TiO₂ for 349 million tonnes of contained TiO₂. \n Titanium mineralisation at Pitfield occurs from surface and displays exceptional grade continuity along strike and down dip. \n Conventional processing has already produced a high-purity product grading 99.25% TiO₂, targeting pigment and titanium sponge metal feedstock. With excellent logistics and established infrastructure, Pitfield is strategically positioned to supply the growing global demand for titanium and other critical minerals. \n   \n GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS \n   \n The following definitions are extracted from the JORC Code, 2012 Edition \n   \n \n \n \n \n Indicated Mineral Resource \n \n \n An 'Indicated Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade (or quality), densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes, and is sufficient to assume geological and grade (or quality) continuity between points of observation where data and samples are gathered. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Ore Reserve. \n \n \n \n \n Inferred Mineral Resource \n \n \n An 'Inferred Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade (or quality) are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade (or quality) continuity. It is based on exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to an Ore Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.  \n \n \n \n \n JORC \n \n \n JORC stands for Australasian  Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC). The Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code) is widely accepted as the definitive standard for the reporting of a company's resources and reserves. The latest JORC Code is the 2012 Edition.  \n \n \n \n \n Measured Mineral Resource \n \n \n A 'Measured Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade (or quality), densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes, and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade (or quality) continuity between points of observation where data and samples are gathered. A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral Resource. It may be converted to a Proved Ore Reserve or under certain circumstances to a Probable Ore Reserve \n \n \n \n \n Mineral Reserves or Ore Reserves \n   \n \n \n An 'Ore Reserve' is the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility level as appropriate that include application of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified.  \n \n \n \n \n Mineral Resource \n \n \n A 'Mineral Resource' is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade (or quality), and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade (or quality), continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling. Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories.  \n \n \n \n \n   \n \n \n \n \n   \n JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1 report template \n Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data \n (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.) \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Sampling techniques \n \n \n ·    Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. \n ·    Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. \n ·    Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. \n ·    In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. \n \n \n ·    Air core (AC) samples were collected directly from an AC drill rig using a cone splitter at intervals every 2m downhole. \n ·    Reverse circulation (RC) samples were collected directly from an RC drill rig using a cone splitter at intervals every 2m downhole. \n ·    Diamond core samples were taken from the diamond core (HQ and NQ) that was sawn in half, with half going for assay and other half retained in core tray. Hole drilled with PQ, predominantly for metallurgical samples, were cut in half and then one half cut in quarter. The quarter was sent for assay and the remaining three quarters retained for metallurgical sampling. Samples were taken based on the geological logging of the drill holes. \n ·    Duplicates were inserted with sample numbers ending in 20, 40, 60 and 80 within the numbering sequence and were collected at the same time as the original sample through the chute of the cone splitter. Blanks were inserted at the beginning of each hole and certified reference materials (CRM) were inserted every 25 samples.  The Ti grade range of the CRM's went from <0.5% to <9% Ti to ensure coverage over the range of Ti values that have been seen at Pitfield. \n ·    Sample preparation was undertaken at Intertek Minerals laboratory in Maddington WA, where the samples received were sorted and dried. Primary preparation for diamond core samples, crush each sample in its entirety to 3mm. RC samples were primarily crushed to 3mm. Larger volume samples (>5kg) were split with a riffle splitter. All samples were pulverised via robotic pulveriser. Internal screen sizing QAQC is done at 90% passing 75um. \n \n \n \n \n Drilling techniques \n \n \n ·    Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). \n \n \n ·    Diamond drilling techniques varied dependent on which phase of drilling, during phase 2 rock rollers were used at the top of hole until competent rock intersected and HQ sized core was drilled (63.5mm diameter) to a depth of approximately 100m and then NQ2 sized core was drilled (50.6mm diameter) to the bottom of the hole. \n ·    Drilling in phase 3 and 4 employed PQ size core (83mm diameter) from surface to obtain core for geological, geochemical and metallurgical samples, once PQ core hit competent bedrock HQ size core was drilled to the bottom of the hole. \n ·    Where RC drilling techniques were employed holes were drilled from surface using a nominal 140mm face sampling RC drill bit. \n ·    AC drilling was carried out from surface with a 76mm air core blue bit \n \n \n \n \n Drill sample recovery \n \n \n ·    Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. \n ·    Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. \n ·    Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. \n \n \n ·    Diamond core was reconstructed into continuous runs. Depths were measured from the core barrel and checked against marked depths on the core blocks. Core recoveries are very high with >95% of the drill core having recoveries of >99% \n ·    RC sample quality was monitored by the onsite geologist. The sampling methodology from the rig was consistent throughout the drilling program. \n ·    AC sample quality was monitored by the onsite geologist. The sampling methodology from the rig was consistent throughout the drilling program. \n ·    Overall high drill sample recoveries limit the potential to introduce any sample bias. Duplicate samples are all within tolerance limits and therefore no sample bias has been introduced. \n \n \n \n \n Logging \n \n \n ·    Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. \n ·    Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. \n ·    The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. \n \n \n ·    Detailed diamond drill core logging was carried out, recording weathering, lithology, alteration, mineralisation, structure and mineralogy. Drill core was logged by Empire Metals full time geologists. Drill core logging is qualitative. Drill core was photographed wet and dry in core trays prior to sampling. Core from the entire drill hole was logged. \n ·    Detailed RC drill chip logging of every entire drill hole was carried out, recording weathering, lithology, alteration, veining, mineralisation and mineralogy. RC logging on the project has been carried out by Empire Metals full time geologists and contractors.  RC logging is qualitative. RC chips were collected in chip trays. Photographs of chip trays were captured. \n ·    Detailed AC drill chip logging of every entire drill hole was carried out, recording weathering, lithology, alteration, veining, mineralisation and mineralogy. AC logging on the project has been carried out by Empire Metals full time geologists and contractors.  AC logging is qualitative. RC chips were collected in chip trays. Photographs of chip trays were captured. \n ·    Rock chips were collected as part of a detailed surface geological mapping program. Qualitative field logging of the rocks was completed in the field including assessment of weathering, lithology, alteration, veining, mineralisation and mineralogy by Empire Metals geologists and consultants. \n \n \n \n \n Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation \n \n \n ·    If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. \n ·    If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. \n ·    For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. \n ·    Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. \n ·    Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. \n ·    Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. \n \n \n ·    Air core (AC) samples were collected directly from an AC drill using a static cone splitter at 2m intervals down hole. Both dry and wet samples were collected. Duplicates were inserted with sample numbers ending in 20, 40, 60 and 80 within the numbering sequence. CRM's inserted with sample numbers ending in 00, 25, 50 and 75 within the numbering sequence. Blanks inserted at the beginning of the hole. \n ·    Reverse circulation (RC) samples were collected directly from an RC drill using a static cone splitter at 2m intervals down hole. Both dry and wet samples were collected. Duplicates were inserted with sample numbers ending in 20, 40, 60 and 80 within the numbering sequence. CRM's inserted with sample numbers ending in 00, 25, 50 and 75 within the numbering sequence. Blanks inserted at the beginning of the hole. \n ·    Diamond core samples were taken from the diamond core (PQ, HQ and NQ) that was sawn in half and then one half cut for assay samples and metallurgical samples. Samples were taken based on the geological logging of the drill holes. Standards inserted with sample numbers ending in 00, 25, 50 and 75 within the numbering sequence. \n ·    Sample preparation was undertaken at Intertek Minerals laboratory in Maddington WA, where the samples received were sorted and dried. Primary preparation for diamond core samples, crush each sample in its entirety to 3mm. RC samples were primarily crushed to 3mm. Larger volume samples (>5kg) were split with a riffle splitter. All samples were pulverised via robotic pulveriser. Internal screen sizing QAQC is done at 90% passing 75um. \n ·    Duplicate samples are all within tolerance limits and therefore no sample bias has been introduced. \n \n \n \n \n Quality of assay data and laboratory tests \n \n \n ·    The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. \n ·    For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. \n ·    Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. \n \n \n ·    Sample preparation for all AC, RC and diamond samples was undertaken at Intertek Minerals laboratory in Maddington WA, where the samples received were sorted and dried. Primary preparation for diamond core samples was to crush each sample in its entirety to 3mm. AC and RC samples were primarily crushed to 3mm. Larger volume samples (>5kg) were split with a riffle splitter. All samples were pulverised via robotic pulveriser. Internal screen sizing QAQC is done at 90% passing 75um. \n ·    Prior to October 2024 a 4 acid digest was used with ICPMS finish (4A/MS48) as the initial assay technique, if the Ti assay values were >2% Ti, the samples were re-assayed using a borate fusion digest to ensure complete digest of Ti minerals, these were then analysed by ICPOES (FP1/OM). \n ·    In October 2024 the analytical methodology was altered to reduce the number of initial elements analysed to 33. This was done with a 4-acid digest and samples analysed by ICPOES (4A/OE33). If Ti >2% then the samples were re-assayed using a borate fusion digest used and analysed by ICPOES (FP1/OM). \n ·    Certified analytical standards were inserted with sample numbers ending in 00, 25, 50 and 75 within the numbering sequence for all AC, RC and diamond samples. \n ·    Duplicates were inserted with sample numbers ending in 20, 40, 60 and 80 sample numbers within the numbering sequence for all AC and RC samples. \n \n \n \n \n Verification of sampling and assaying \n \n \n ·    The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. \n ·    The use of twinned holes. \n ·    Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. \n ·    Discuss any adjustment to assay data. \n \n \n ·    Senior technical personnel from the Company (Exploration Manager and Senior Geologist) verified significant intersections. \n ·    Logging and sampling were recorded on digital logging and digital sample sheets. Data validation was completed by geologist on the rig. Information was imported into Empire Metals database after data validation by Empire geologists. Geological consultants were also used for data QAQC. \n ·    Digital data storage is managed by the company at its offices in Perth. \n ·    No adjustments or calibrations have been made to any assay data. \n ·    Two twinned holes were drilled at the Thomas prospect, the original RC holes were twinned with AC holes to determine if the AC would provide equivalent sample integrity and similar grade. The analysis done on the results showed that there was no problem with sample size or integrity and the grade over the length of the same size hole was within 0.5% TiO 2 i.e. 6.5% TiO 2 in original RC hole and 6.1% TiO 2 in twinned AC hole. \n ·    All QAQC samples, blanks, duplicates and CRM's display results within acceptable levels of accuracy and precision. \n \n \n \n \n Location of data points \n \n \n ·    Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. \n ·    Specification of the grid system used. \n ·    Quality and adequacy of topographic control. \n \n \n ·    Drill hole collar locations drilled between March 2023 and February 2025 were surveyed by Empire geologists using a handheld Garmin GPS with the expected relative accuracy of 4m for easting, northing and elevation coordinates. Drill hole collars from March 2025 were picked up by a licenced surveyor using a digital GPS to an accuracy of 20mm in easting, northing and elevation coordinates. Collar locations are recorded in the Empire Metals database \n ·    The grid system used is GDA94. \n ·    Downhole surveys for all angled RC and diamond holes were completed every 10-30m downhole using a Reflex Ez-GyroN tool after the completion of drilling. Downhole azimuth and dip data is recorded in the Empire Metals database. \n ·    Rock chip sample locations are determined by handheld GPS with and accuracy of approximately 4m. \n \n \n \n \n Data spacing and distribution \n \n \n ·    Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. \n ·    Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. \n ·    Whether sample compositing has been applied. \n \n \n ·    Drillhole spacing is considered sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for a Mineral Resource estimation. \n ·    Drillhole spacing is mainly in the range 400m x 200m, closer spaced drilling (100m x 100m) was done to test geological continuity and grade variability whilst also generating samples for bulk metallurgy testwork. \n ·    Rock chip sample spacing has been determined solely by geological mapping and no grade continuity is implied. \n ·    Sample compositing has been applied to reported exploration results of diamond drillholes as the sample length of individual samples varies and therefore a weighted average has been used to provide the TiO 2 intercepts for those holes. \n \n \n \n \n Orientation of data in relation to geological structure \n \n \n ·    Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. \n ·    If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. \n \n \n ·    Angled drilling has been in 2 orientated directions, initially at 270° as strike of underlying rocks not certain and then orientated perpendicular to the strike of the beds (240°). \n ·    No sampling bias is considered to have been introduced by the existing sampling orientation. The grade continuity of the mineral resource has been demonstrated across every hole that has contained mineralisation. \n ·    The orientation of the drilling is not considered to have introduced sampling bias due to the highly homogeneous nature of the deposit. \n \n \n \n \n Sample security \n \n \n ·    The measures taken to ensure sample security. \n \n \n ·    Diamond core samples were collected and placed in calico sample bags pre-printed with a unique sample ID at Empire Metals core facility in Three Springs. 5 calico sample bags were placed in a poly weave bags which was cabled tied closed at the top and put in order in the core yard. \n ·    RC samples were collected directly from the drill rig in calico sample bags which are pre-printed with a unique sample number. 5 calico sample bags were placed in a poly weave bag and cabled-tied closed at the top. Poly weave bags were transported back to Empire Metals core facility in Three Springs and stored there in order before transport to Perth. \n ·    AC samples were collected directly from the drill rig in calico sample bags which are pre-printed with a unique sample number. 5 calico sample bags were placed in a poly weave bag and cabled-tied closed at the top. Poly weave bags were transported back to Empire Metals core facility in Three Springs and stored there in order before transport to Perth. \n ·    Rock chip samples were placed in numbered calico bags which were placed in a poly weave bag and cabled tied closed at the top. Poly weave bags were transported back to Empire Metals core facility in Three Springs and stored there in order before transport to Perth. \n ·    Poly weave sample bags were transported to Intertek Minerals, Maddington WA. Samples were shipped using Empire vehicles or using transport haulage from Geraldton or Perth for larger sample dispatches. \n ·    Refinement of the transportation process meant that the polyweave bags were placed into industrial bulka bags which were individually numbered and the samples contained in the bulka bag recorded on the bag for enhanced chain of custody. \n ·    Sample dispatch orders containing the sample numbers, the amount of samples and the method of analysis were generated by Empire geologists and digitally sent to Intertek in Maddington where the samples had been taken. \n \n \n \n \n Audits or reviews \n \n \n ·    The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. \n \n \n ·    No audits or reviews have been conducted in relation to the current drilling program. \n \n \n \n \n Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results \n (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Mineral tenement and land tenure status \n \n \n ·    Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. \n ·    The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. \n \n \n ·    Exploration Licences E70/5465, E70/5876, E70/6320 and E70/6323 are held in a Joint Venture between Empire Metals Australia Pty Ltd (70%) a wholly owned subsidiary of Empire Metals Ltd and Century Minerals Pty Ltd (30%). \n ·    There are no overriding royalties on the project. \n ·    The project is centred 310km north of Perth and 150km southeast of Geraldton, WA. The tenement area is approximately 1,000km 2 in area. \n ·    Native flora assessments using the WA Governments Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions flora database were completed to identify priority flora species that should be avoided when carrying out exploration. \n ·    There are 2 nature reserves within the tenement package totalling 37 km 2 . \n ·    The tenements sit within the Yamatji Southern Corporation determined land area. There are only 2 registered sites within the main areas of interest. \n ·    The tenements are kept in good standing with all regulatory approvals having been met. There are no known impediments to operate in the area \n \n \n \n \n Exploration done by other parties \n \n \n ·    Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. \n \n \n ·    Between the years 1966-1993 Kennecott, Carpentaria (MIM), BHP and CRA explored for sediment hosted copper deposits in the Pitfield Project area. \n ·    Kennecott (1966) completed surface geochemistry and drilled 10 diamond holes in the vicinity of Baxter's which intersected anomalous copper just outside the Pitfield licence. \n ·    Carpentaria Exploration (MIM) in early 1980's, again focussed their exploration work close the Baxter's mine and adjacent areas towards Arrino, and completed 460 shallow RAB holes over or immediately adjacent to the current Pitfield licence to the SSE of Baxter's. Carpentaria identified maximum copper values exceeding 1000ppm, with a further 44 holes exceeding 500ppm copper. The work defined a clear 2,500m NNW-SSE copper anomalous trend partly on the Pitfield licence and open to the south and east. \n ·    Carpentaria drilled 4 diamond holes which returned strongly anomalous copper including in DH3a, the only hole collared on Pitfield, which returned numerous values exceeding 500ppm up to 1280 ppm Cu with fracture controlled and disseminated native copper and chalcopyrite observed. \n ·    BHP (1984) completed shallow RAB and 4 stratigraphic diamond holes successfully testing the western contact of the Yandanooka basin with basement Mullingarra gneiss. BHP failed to intersect any significant metal anomalism. In addition, BHP completed several lines of IP geophysics over the drilled area. \n ·    CRA (1993) completed soil sampling, auger sampling building on the work of Carpentaria and 2 diamond holes, the southern hole being located on the Pitfield licence recording moderate copper anomalism with a maximum value of 570ppm (4m composite samples of chipped drill core) associated with fracture-controlled malachite and minor native copper. The auger work defined a significant Cu anomaly (plus Ag) over some 7km strike length. \n ·    No other significant exploration happened between 1993 and 2022. \n \n \n \n \n Geology \n \n \n ·    Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. \n \n \n ·    This is a globally unique stratabound sediment hosted titanium deposit. The titanium mineralisation is found within the sediments of the Yandanooka Basin which is located about 350km northeast of Perth. The basin margin in the west is the Mullingarra Complex and in the east the Darling Range, it is interpreted to be Neoproterozoic in age. \n ·    The basin fill comprises coarse to fine grained sandstones, conglomerates and interbedded sandstones and siltstones with the basin interpreted to be up to 9km thick.  The dominant strike of the beds is 330° with beds dipping 45-65º to the east, field work has not identified any major faulting. However, both airborne magnetics and gravity show strong crustal lineaments in the data.  \n ·    The titanium mineralisation is associated predominantly with anatase and rutile in the weathered cap and titanite and rutile in the fresh bedrock. The Ti mineralisation is associated with 3 distinct phases whereby a Ti-rich magma was intruded close to surface and eroded into a shallow basin whereby Ti upgrading happened as the sediments were sorted by a natural density-based segregation. A subsequent hydrothermal event related to regional greenschist metamorphism has altered the host sediments and Ti minerals within the sediments and produced an alteration assemblage dominated by titanite (CaTiSiO 5 ), hematite, epidote, carbonate and chlorite. The mineralisation was further upgraded by intense weathering altering the titanite to anatase by removal of the Ca and Si. \n ·    The mineralisation is completely stratabound and the best mineralisation is found within the weathered cap whereby the sandstones, siltstone and conglomerates have been altered to saprolite, predominantly quartz and kaolin and the titanite (CaTiSiO 5 ) has altered to anatase (TiO 2 ). The weathered bedrock consists of altered rock, but weathering is less intense, quartz and kaolin are predominant but as the weathering profile turns to fresher material there is an increase in chlorite, epidote, mica, hematite and carbonate.  The anatase becomes less and the titanite increases. \n \n \n \n \n Drill hole Information \n \n \n ·    A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: \n o easting and northing of the drill hole collar \n o elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar \n o dip and azimuth of the hole \n o down hole length and interception depth \n o hole length. \n ·    If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Hole_ID \n \n \n Easting \n \n \n Northing \n \n \n RL \n \n \n Total Depth \n \n \n Dip \n \n \n Azimuth \n \n \n Interval \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS001 \n \n \n 369985 \n \n \n 6737084 \n \n \n 323 \n \n \n 68 \n \n \n -60 \n \n \n 240 \n \n \n 60m @ 6.30% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS002 \n \n \n 369796 \n \n \n 6737462 \n \n \n 317 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -60 \n \n \n 270 \n \n \n 48m @ 6.02% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS003 \n \n \n 369631 \n \n \n 6737453 \n \n \n 310 \n \n \n 36 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 32m @ 4.83% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS004 \n \n \n 369912 \n \n \n 6737556 \n \n \n 319 \n \n \n 44 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 24m @ 5.41% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS005 \n \n \n 370062 \n \n \n 6737577 \n \n \n 322 \n \n \n 40 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 34m @ 6.12% TiO2 from 6m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS006 \n \n \n 370139 \n \n \n 6737530 \n \n \n 322 \n \n \n 51 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 6.25% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS007 \n \n \n 370043 \n \n \n 6737496 \n \n \n 324 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 32m @ 6.35% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS008 \n \n \n 369945 \n \n \n 6737464 \n \n \n 323 \n \n \n 46 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 40m @ 4.11% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS009 \n \n \n 369863 \n \n \n 6737419 \n \n \n 320 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 5.04% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS010 \n \n \n 369760 \n \n \n 6737393 \n \n \n 319 \n \n \n 45 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 38m @ 4.20% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS011 \n \n \n 369664 \n \n \n 6737353 \n \n \n 316 \n \n \n 44 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 3.76% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS012 \n \n \n 369703 \n \n \n 6737267 \n \n \n 320 \n \n \n 40 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 34m @ 4.15% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS013 \n \n \n 369792 \n \n \n 6737303 \n \n \n 323 \n \n \n 53 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 53m @ 3.48% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS014 \n \n \n 369889 \n \n \n 6737334 \n \n \n 325 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 5.00% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS015 \n \n \n 369983 \n \n \n 6737369 \n \n \n 326 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 5.23% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS016 \n \n \n 370076 \n \n \n 6737403 \n \n \n 324 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 6.54% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS017 \n \n \n 370169 \n \n \n 6737436 \n \n \n 325 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 6.40% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS018 \n \n \n 370201 \n \n \n 6737339 \n \n \n 327 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 56m @ 5.08% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS019 \n \n \n 370104 \n \n \n 6737305 \n \n \n 326 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 56m @ 5.67% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS020 \n \n \n 370012 \n \n \n 6737272 \n \n \n 328 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 4.23% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS021 \n \n \n 369917 \n \n \n 6737240 \n \n \n 323 \n \n \n 55 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 55m @ 5.77% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS022 \n \n \n 369823 \n \n \n 6737211 \n \n \n 321 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 3.99% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS023 \n \n \n 369730 \n \n \n 6737177 \n \n \n 318 \n \n \n 46 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 36m @ 4.49% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS024 \n \n \n 369726 \n \n \n 6737110 \n \n \n 314 \n \n \n 40 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 40m @ 3.87% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS025 \n \n \n 369860 \n \n \n 6737113 \n \n \n 317 \n \n \n 42 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 42m @ 4.33% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS026 \n \n \n 369953 \n \n \n 6737146 \n \n \n 323 \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 6.22% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS027 \n \n \n 370045 \n \n \n 6737183 \n \n \n 326 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 4.81% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS028 \n \n \n 370144 \n \n \n 6737214 \n \n \n 327 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 56m @ 6.55% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS029 \n \n \n 370238 \n \n \n 6737247 \n \n \n 327 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 56m @ 6.51% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS030 \n \n \n 370270 \n \n \n 6737155 \n \n \n 326 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 60m @ 5.61% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS031 \n \n \n 370175 \n \n \n 6737121 \n \n \n 325 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 6.55% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS032 \n \n \n 370079 \n \n \n 6737086 \n \n \n 324 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 56m @ 4.68% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS033 \n \n \n 369987 \n \n \n 6737054 \n \n \n 322 \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 5.02% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS034 \n \n \n 369891 \n \n \n 6737020 \n \n \n 317 \n \n \n 51 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 51m @ 3.94% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS035 \n \n \n 369933 \n \n \n 6736920 \n \n \n 318 \n \n \n 46 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 3.73% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS036 \n \n \n 370019 \n \n \n 6736959 \n \n \n 320 \n \n \n 46 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 6.81% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS037 \n \n \n 370114 \n \n \n 6736993 \n \n \n 323 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 5.23% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS038 \n \n \n 370207 \n \n \n 6737025 \n \n \n 324 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 6.74% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS039 \n \n \n 370282 \n \n \n 6737058 \n \n \n 325 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 6.24% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS040 \n \n \n 370053 \n \n \n 6736868 \n \n \n 321 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 5.03% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS041 \n \n \n 370148 \n \n \n 6736896 \n \n \n 323 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 5.43% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25COS042 \n \n \n 370242 \n \n \n 6736932 \n \n \n 325 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 56m @ 7.15% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM001 \n \n \n 373330 \n \n \n 6724794 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 59 \n \n \n -70 \n \n \n 270 \n \n \n 59m @ 6.17% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM002 \n \n \n 373699 \n \n \n 6724327 \n \n \n 298 \n \n \n 66 \n \n \n -70 \n \n \n 270 \n \n \n 62m @ 6.39% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM003 \n \n \n 373743 \n \n \n 6724165 \n \n \n 295 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 56m @ 6.16% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM004 \n \n \n 373716 \n \n \n 6724260 \n \n \n 297 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 5.90% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM005 \n \n \n 373679 \n \n \n 6724350 \n \n \n 299 \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 5.80% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM006 \n \n \n 373650 \n \n \n 6724136 \n \n \n 295 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 59m @ 6.36% TiO2 from 1m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM007 \n \n \n 373620 \n \n \n 6724230 \n \n \n 297 \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 5.88% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM008 \n \n \n 373592 \n \n \n 6724327 \n \n \n 299 \n \n \n 62 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 60m @ 6.20% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM009 \n \n \n 373563 \n \n \n 6724421 \n \n \n 300 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 5.92% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM010 \n \n \n 373551 \n \n \n 6724106 \n \n \n 296 \n \n \n 45 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 43m @ 6.59% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM011 \n \n \n 373543 \n \n \n 6724200 \n \n \n 297 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 6.44% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM012 \n \n \n 373329 \n \n \n 6724787 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -70 \n \n \n 270 \n \n \n 56m @ 5.73% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM013 \n \n \n 373188 \n \n \n 6724967 \n \n \n 303 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 5.51% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM014 \n \n \n 373226 \n \n \n 6724839 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 56m @ 6.16% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM015 \n \n \n 373428 \n \n \n 6724168 \n \n \n 299 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 5.79% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM016 \n \n \n 373398 \n \n \n 6724267 \n \n \n 300 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 6.34% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM017 \n \n \n 373369 \n \n \n 6724363 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 6.30% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM018 \n \n \n 373338 \n \n \n 6724459 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 6.66% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM019 \n \n \n 373307 \n \n \n 6724549 \n \n \n 303 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 6.11% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM020 \n \n \n 373281 \n \n \n 6724649 \n \n \n 306 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 5.74% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM021 \n \n \n 373250 \n \n \n 6724747 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 49 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 49m @ 7.49% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM022 \n \n \n 373484 \n \n \n 6724296 \n \n \n 299 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 6.50% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM023 \n \n \n 373457 \n \n \n 6724393 \n \n \n 301 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 5.66% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM024 \n \n \n 373432 \n \n \n 6724487 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 5.70% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM025 \n \n \n 373406 \n \n \n 6724583 \n \n \n 304 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 6.08% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM026 \n \n \n 373381 \n \n \n 6724680 \n \n \n 306 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 6.11% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM027 \n \n \n 373351 \n \n \n 6724773 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 51 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 49m @ 6.06% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM028 \n \n \n 373324 \n \n \n 6724868 \n \n \n 303 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 60m @ 6.09% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM029 \n \n \n 373289 \n \n \n 6724981 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 56 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 5.24% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM030 \n \n \n 373472 \n \n \n 6724709 \n \n \n 307 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 6.02% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM031 \n \n \n 373446 \n \n \n 6724803 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 6.70% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM032 \n \n \n 373413 \n \n \n 6724899 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 5.74% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM033 \n \n \n 373394 \n \n \n 6724986 \n \n \n 301 \n \n \n 57 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 55m @ 6.29% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM034 \n \n \n 373262 \n \n \n 6725066 \n \n \n 300 \n \n \n 47 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 47m @ 4.41% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM035 \n \n \n 373161 \n \n \n 6725045 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 5.29% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM036 \n \n \n 373359 \n \n \n 6725090 \n \n \n 299 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 7.21% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM037 \n \n \n 373479 \n \n \n 6725024 \n \n \n 299 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 6.72% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM038 \n \n \n 373532 \n \n \n 6724521 \n \n \n 303 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 6.69% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM039 \n \n \n 373506 \n \n \n 6724613 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 51 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 51m @ 7.55% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM040 \n \n \n 373599 \n \n \n 6724639 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 57 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 57m @ 7.48% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM041 \n \n \n 373572 \n \n \n 6724737 \n \n \n 306 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 7.19% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM042 \n \n \n 373547 \n \n \n 6724823 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 7.43% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM043 \n \n \n 373554 \n \n \n 6724948 \n \n \n 301 \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 6.08% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM044 \n \n \n 374399 \n \n \n 6727319 \n \n \n 280 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 3.96% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM045 \n \n \n 374200 \n \n \n 6727300 \n \n \n 284 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 4.69% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM046 \n \n \n 374000 \n \n \n 6727299 \n \n \n 286 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 4.95% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM047 \n \n \n 373801 \n \n \n 6727299 \n \n \n 293 \n \n \n 47 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 47m @ 5.72% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM048 \n \n \n 373600 \n \n \n 6727299 \n \n \n 298 \n \n \n 51 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 47m @ 5.91% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM049 \n \n \n 373399 \n \n \n 6727332 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 42 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 38m @ 2.72% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM050 \n \n \n 373200 \n \n \n 6727299 \n \n \n 304 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 4.03% TiO2 from 6m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM051 \n \n \n 373039 \n \n \n 6727299 \n \n \n 304 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 5.23% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM052 \n \n \n 372984 \n \n \n 6726900 \n \n \n 295 \n \n \n 42 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 42m @ 6.67% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM053 \n \n \n 373228 \n \n \n 6726902 \n \n \n 290 \n \n \n 45 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 45m @ 3.91% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM054 \n \n \n 373401 \n \n \n 6726902 \n \n \n 291 \n \n \n 43 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 43m @ 3.82% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM055 \n \n \n 372601 \n \n \n 6724901 \n \n \n 317 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 3.19% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM056 \n \n \n 372801 \n \n \n 6724902 \n \n \n 311 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 4.08% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM057 \n \n \n 373000 \n \n \n 6724913 \n \n \n 307 \n \n \n 62 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 60m @ 6.22% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM058 \n \n \n 373201 \n \n \n 6724502 \n \n \n 304 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 4.49% TiO2 from 8m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM059 \n \n \n 372999 \n \n \n 6724498 \n \n \n 308 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 4.49% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM060 \n \n \n 372800 \n \n \n 6724499 \n \n \n 313 \n \n \n 30 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 30m @ 4.49% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM061 \n \n \n 372601 \n \n \n 6724500 \n \n \n 323 \n \n \n 35 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 35m @ 0.93% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM062 \n \n \n 373600 \n \n \n 6724901 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 6.00% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM063 \n \n \n 373802 \n \n \n 6724906 \n \n \n 299 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 5.59% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM064 \n \n \n 374000 \n \n \n 6724898 \n \n \n 295 \n \n \n 44 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 40m @ 5.59% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM065 \n \n \n 374156 \n \n \n 6724903 \n \n \n 293 \n \n \n 38 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 38m @ 5.59% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM066 \n \n \n 373999 \n \n \n 6724499 \n \n \n 295 \n \n \n 61 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 61m @ 6.47% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM067 \n \n \n 373301 \n \n \n 6724157 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 5.15% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM068 \n \n \n 372701 \n \n \n 6724101 \n \n \n 308 \n \n \n 29 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 28m @ 1.08% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM069 \n \n \n 372901 \n \n \n 6724101 \n \n \n 305 \n \n \n 29 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 29m @ 0.81% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM070 \n \n \n 372790 \n \n \n 6723699 \n \n \n 292 \n \n \n 18 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 18m @ 1.12% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM071 \n \n \n 373000 \n \n \n 6723701 \n \n \n 290 \n \n \n 57 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 57m @ 1.91% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM072 \n \n \n 373199 \n \n \n 6723701 \n \n \n 287 \n \n \n 57 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 47m @ 4.53% TiO2 from 10m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM073 \n \n \n 373398 \n \n \n 6723700 \n \n \n 287 \n \n \n 53 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 45m @ 4.53% TiO2 from 8m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM074 \n \n \n 373601 \n \n \n 6723702 \n \n \n 291 \n \n \n 51 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 51m @ 5.05% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM075 \n \n \n 373801 \n \n \n 6723702 \n \n \n 286 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 5.82% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM076 \n \n \n 373984 \n \n \n 6723702 \n \n \n 279 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 60m @ 5.26% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM077 \n \n \n 374200 \n \n \n 6723702 \n \n \n 273 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 5.84% TiO2 from 6m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM078 \n \n \n 374298 \n \n \n 6724100 \n \n \n 282 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 5.18% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM079 \n \n \n 374189 \n \n \n 6724094 \n \n \n 283 \n \n \n 51 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 51m @ 5.13% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM080 \n \n \n 373859 \n \n \n 6724096 \n \n \n 292 \n \n \n 57 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 53m @ 6.49% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM081 \n \n \n 373700 \n \n \n 6724098 \n \n \n 294 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 6.55% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM082 \n \n \n 374401 \n \n \n 6723735 \n \n \n 270 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 40m @ 4.11% TiO2 from 10m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM083 \n \n \n 374599 \n \n \n 6723720 \n \n \n 269 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 3.64% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM084 \n \n \n 374804 \n \n \n 6723730 \n \n \n 268 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 4.31% TiO2 from 6m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM085 \n \n \n 374701 \n \n \n 6724099 \n \n \n 277 \n \n \n 47 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 43m @ 4.31% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM086 \n \n \n 374500 \n \n \n 6724098 \n \n \n 278 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 5.52% TiO2 from 6m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM087 \n \n \n 374599 \n \n \n 6724498 \n \n \n 285 \n \n \n 44 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 34m @ 4.86% TiO2 from 10m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM088 \n \n \n 374433 \n \n \n 6724856 \n \n \n 289 \n \n \n 43 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 27m @ 4.12% TiO2 from 16m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM089 \n \n \n 374600 \n \n \n 6724901 \n \n \n 286 \n \n \n 38 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 22m @ 4.25% TiO2 from 16m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM090 \n \n \n 374399 \n \n \n 6724500 \n \n \n 286 \n \n \n 42 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 42m @ 5.42% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM091 \n \n \n 374901 \n \n \n 6722899 \n \n \n 271 \n \n \n 60 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 3.90% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM092 \n \n \n 374802 \n \n \n 6722501 \n \n \n 283 \n \n \n 69 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 69m @ 4.47% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM093 \n \n \n 375000 \n \n \n 6722502 \n \n \n 277 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 3.65% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM094 \n \n \n 374801 \n \n \n 6722150 \n \n \n 287 \n \n \n 42 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 42m @ 4.49% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM095 \n \n \n 375001 \n \n \n 6722099 \n \n \n 287 \n \n \n 46 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 4.06% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM096 \n \n \n 374500 \n \n \n 6722899 \n \n \n 277 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 4.70% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM097 \n \n \n 374299 \n \n \n 6722898 \n \n \n 272 \n \n \n 55 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 51m @ 4.80% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM098 \n \n \n 374131 \n \n \n 6722844 \n \n \n 272 \n \n \n 45 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 41m @ 4.27% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM099 \n \n \n 374402 \n \n \n 6722500 \n \n \n 286 \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 5.08% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM100 \n \n \n 374600 \n \n \n 6722502 \n \n \n 287 \n \n \n 68 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 68m @ 4.57% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM101 \n \n \n 374201 \n \n \n 6722499 \n \n \n 282 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 4.54% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM102 \n \n \n 374402 \n \n \n 6722100 \n \n \n 295 \n \n \n 66 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 66m @ 4.47% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM103 \n \n \n 374565 \n \n \n 6722101 \n \n \n 296 \n \n \n 64 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 64m @ 4.68% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM104 \n \n \n 374200 \n \n \n 6722098 \n \n \n 293 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 5.39% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM105 \n \n \n 374000 \n \n \n 6722098 \n \n \n 291 \n \n \n 62 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 5.39% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM106 \n \n \n 373799 \n \n \n 6722098 \n \n \n 291 \n \n \n 62 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 60m @ 3.45% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM107 \n \n \n 373600 \n \n \n 6722098 \n \n \n 293 \n \n \n 63 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 63m @ 2.25% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM108 \n \n \n 373411 \n \n \n 6722503 \n \n \n 281 \n \n \n 35 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 35m @ 1.17% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM109 \n \n \n 373600 \n \n \n 6722502 \n \n \n 281 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 3.30% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM110 \n \n \n 373799 \n \n \n 6722503 \n \n \n 283 \n \n \n 57 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 55m @ 3.13% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM111 \n \n \n 374000 \n \n \n 6722504 \n \n \n 282 \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 58m @ 4.85% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM112 \n \n \n 373199 \n \n \n 6722099 \n \n \n 291 \n \n \n 29 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 29m @ 0.53% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM113 \n \n \n 373000 \n \n \n 6722102 \n \n \n 291 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 3.02% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM114 \n \n \n 373001 \n \n \n 6722499 \n \n \n 284 \n \n \n 29 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 29m @ 2.90% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM115 \n \n \n 373448 \n \n \n 6722901 \n \n \n 280 \n \n \n 42 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 42m @ 3.72% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM116 \n \n \n 373299 \n \n \n 6722897 \n \n \n 286 \n \n \n 52 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 52m @ 2.09% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM117 \n \n \n 373099 \n \n \n 6722898 \n \n \n 293 \n \n \n 18 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 18m @ 1.21% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM118 \n \n \n 373199 \n \n \n 6725301 \n \n \n 298 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 7.41% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM119 \n \n \n 373300 \n \n \n 6725702 \n \n \n 283 \n \n \n 51 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 45m @ 5.68% TiO2 from 6m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM120 \n \n \n 373502 \n \n \n 6725699 \n \n \n 280 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 5.40% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM121 \n \n \n 373701 \n \n \n 6725702 \n \n \n 276 \n \n \n 37 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 33m @ 4.71% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM122 \n \n \n 373901 \n \n \n 6725702 \n \n \n 274 \n \n \n 42 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 38m @ 5.39% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM123 \n \n \n 374101 \n \n \n 6725702 \n \n \n 271 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 6.01% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM124 \n \n \n 374301 \n \n \n 6725702 \n \n \n 269 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 5.44% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM125 \n \n \n 374502 \n \n \n 6725701 \n \n \n 267 \n \n \n 47 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 43m @ 2.97% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM126 \n \n \n 374425 \n \n \n 6725299 \n \n \n 279 \n \n \n 33 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 33m @ 4.93% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM127 \n \n \n 374201 \n \n \n 6725298 \n \n \n 282 \n \n \n 38 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 38m @ 5.66% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM128 \n \n \n 373990 \n \n \n 6725298 \n \n \n 291 \n \n \n 44 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 5.78% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM129 \n \n \n 373801 \n \n \n 6725298 \n \n \n 285 \n \n \n 58 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 56m @ 6.23% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM130 \n \n \n 373099 \n \n \n 6725699 \n \n \n 287 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 7.84% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM131 \n \n \n 372499 \n \n \n 6726100 \n \n \n 290 \n \n \n 36 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 34m @ 2.76% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM132 \n \n \n 372700 \n \n \n 6726118 \n \n \n 286 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 5.19% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM133 \n \n \n 372898 \n \n \n 6726156 \n \n \n 281 \n \n \n 45 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 37m @ 6.03% TiO2 from 8m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM134 \n \n \n 372504 \n \n \n 6726410 \n \n \n 279 \n \n \n 33 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 23m @ 6.03% TiO2 from 10m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM135 \n \n \n 373600 \n \n \n 6726922 \n \n \n 288 \n \n \n 50 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 50m @ 5.49% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM136 \n \n \n 373097 \n \n \n 6726499 \n \n \n 277 \n \n \n 45 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 41m @ 6.92% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM137 \n \n \n 373295 \n \n \n 6726503 \n \n \n 278 \n \n \n 49 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 47m @ 4.54% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM138 \n \n \n 373501 \n \n \n 6726501 \n \n \n 277 \n \n \n 44 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 4.42% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM139 \n \n \n 373700 \n \n \n 6726501 \n \n \n 278 \n \n \n 46 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 5.45% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM140 \n \n \n 373870 \n \n \n 6726176 \n \n \n 266 \n \n \n 51 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 51m @ 5.34% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM141 \n \n \n 373695 \n \n \n 6726172 \n \n \n 268 \n \n \n 49 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 41m @ 5.86% TiO2 from 8m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM142 \n \n \n 373898 \n \n \n 6726503 \n \n \n 277 \n \n \n 47 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 47m @ 6.11% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM143 \n \n \n 374100 \n \n \n 6726502 \n \n \n 277 \n \n \n 40 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 40m @ 4.94% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM144 \n \n \n 374299 \n \n \n 6726563 \n \n \n 275 \n \n \n 36 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 36m @ 4.19% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM145 \n \n \n 374502 \n \n \n 6726501 \n \n \n 269 \n \n \n 33 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 33m @ 4.46% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM146 \n \n \n 374700 \n \n \n 6726500 \n \n \n 267 \n \n \n 30 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 30m @ 3.51% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM147 \n \n \n 374169 \n \n \n 6726899 \n \n \n 280 \n \n \n 32 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 32m @ 4.69% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM148 \n \n \n 373974 \n \n \n 6726887 \n \n \n 288 \n \n \n 38 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 38m @ 5.60% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM149 \n \n \n 373800 \n \n \n 6726899 \n \n \n 287 \n \n \n 30 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 30m @ 6.17% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM150 \n \n \n 374296 \n \n \n 6726183 \n \n \n 266 \n \n \n 38 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 36m @ 4.44% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM151 \n \n \n 374536 \n \n \n 6726192 \n \n \n 266 \n \n \n 42 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 42m @ 4.71% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM152 \n \n \n 374700 \n \n \n 6726202 \n \n \n 263 \n \n \n 34 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 28m @ 3.39% TiO2 from 6m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM153 \n \n \n 374901 \n \n \n 6726204 \n \n \n 264 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 48m @ 3.33% TiO2 from 6m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM154 \n \n \n 374621 \n \n \n 6727318 \n \n \n 271 \n \n \n 54 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 54m @ 3.51% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM155 \n \n \n 374797 \n \n \n 6727320 \n \n \n 266 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 3.28% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM156 \n \n \n 373103 \n \n \n 6726170 \n \n \n 277 \n \n \n 48 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 22m @ 3.40% TiO2 from 14m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM157 \n \n \n 373297 \n \n \n 6726171 \n \n \n 273 \n \n \n 36 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 38m @ 3.96% TiO2 from 8m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM158 \n \n \n 373501 \n \n \n 6726170 \n \n \n 270 \n \n \n 46 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 34m @ 4.17% TiO2 from 12m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM159 \n \n \n 372799 \n \n \n 6726902 \n \n \n 290 \n \n \n 44 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 7.87% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM160 \n \n \n 372600 \n \n \n 6726899 \n \n \n 287 \n \n \n 36 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 36m @ 4.33% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM161 \n \n \n 372399 \n \n \n 6726899 \n \n \n 289 \n \n \n 44 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 44m @ 4.80% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM162 \n \n \n 372188 \n \n \n 6726897 \n \n \n 289 \n \n \n 19 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 15m @ 4.04% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM163 \n \n \n 371997 \n \n \n 6726895 \n \n \n 290 \n \n \n 20 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 20m @ 1.45% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM164 \n \n \n 372799 \n \n \n 6727299 \n \n \n 298 \n \n \n 36 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 36m @ 6.50% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM165 \n \n \n 372562 \n \n \n 6727301 \n \n \n 300 \n \n \n 37 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 35m @ 3.95% TiO2 from 2m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM166 \n \n \n 372398 \n \n \n 6727298 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 46 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 46m @ 4.24% TiO2 from 0m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM167 \n \n \n 372197 \n \n \n 6727316 \n \n \n 302 \n \n \n 37 \n \n \n -90 \n \n \n 0 \n \n \n 33m @ 5.39% TiO2 from 4m \n \n \n \n \n AC25TOM168 \n \n \n 371997 \n \n \n 6727317 \n \n \n 304 \n \n \n 21 \n \...

View stock analysis, news, and events for Empire Metals Limited