Quarter 3 - financial statement for 2025

Corporate Information i-iii

Results at a glance iv

Freefloat Status v

Statement of Corporate Responsibility for the financial statements vi

Certification By Company Secretary vii

Certification pursuant to section 60(2) of Investment and Securities Act No 29 viii

Corporate Governance Report ix-x

Statement of Significant Accounting Policies and notes to the financial statements 1 - 37

Statement of Financial Position 38

Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive income 39

Statement of Changes in Equity 40 -41

Statement of Cash Flows 42

Other notes to the financial statements 43- 64

Plot 16, ACME Road Ogba Industrial Estate Ikeja

Lagos State.

Tel: (234) 01 - 2120557

E-mail: info@lasacoassurance.com Website: https://www.lasacoassurance.com

8, Alhaji Bashorun Street

Off Norman Williams Crescent, South West, Ikoyi

Lagos

Telephone: 01- 873928, 7401444-5

Mobile No: 07046126698

Bankers Guaranty Trust Bank Limited First Bank of Nigeria Limited Ecobank Nigeria Limited Zenith Bank Nigeria Plc

United Bank for Africa Plc Polaris Bank Limited Sterling Bank Plc

Auditor BDO Professional Services (Chartered Accountants) ADOL House, 15 CIPM Avenue Central Business District Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos.

P.O.Box 4929,GPO, Marina Lagos. https://www.bdo-ng.com

Lagos Nigeria

9, Arapasanwu Street, off oluwaloimu Off Amore Street,

Toyin Street, Ikeja

13, Ogunlana Drive , Surulere, Lagos

10 Marina Onikan Lagos.

Lagos.

7 Gray Street

Behind Yaba Chief Magistrate Court Yaba Lagos.

WAICA Reinsurance Pool

We are committed to be the Insurance and Financial Services Company of choice in Nigeria, providing Products and Services of Superior Quality, using modern tools and a well motivated workforce to create long term value for all our Stakeholders.

LASACO Assurance Plc is committed to delivering Insurance and Financial Services Of Superior Quality, surpassing customers expectations and ensuring strict compliance with regulatory/statutory requirements.

We are committed to continually improving the effectiveness of our Quality Management System.

We establish measurable goals and objectives at Departmental levels which we review as the need arises ensuring timely, effective implementation of Company strategy.

Shareholding Structure/Free Float Status

Declaration:

LASACO Assurance Plc with a free float percentage of 47.49% as at 30th September 2025, is compliant with The Exchange's free float requirements for companies listed on the Main Board.

Further to the provisions of section 405 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA), 2020, we, the Managing Director/CEO and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify the financial statements of Lasaco Assurance Plc for the year ended 30 September, 2025 as follows:

1. That we have reviewed the unaudited financial statements of the Company for the year ended 30 September 2025.

2. That the audited financial statements do not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact which would make the statements misleading, in the light of the circumstances under which such statement was made.

3. That the audited financial statements and all other financial information included in the statements fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company as of and for, the year ended 30 September, 2025.

4. That we are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls and have designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to the officer by other officers of the company, during the year 30 September 2025.

5. That we have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls within 90 days prior to the date of audited financial statements, and certify that the Company's internal controls are effective as of that date.

6. That there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our evaluation, including any corrective action with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

7. That we have disclosed the following information to the Group and Company's Auditors and Audit

   Committee:

   1. There is no fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the

      Company's internal control.

   2. There are no significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarise, and report financial data, and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls.

In my capacity as Company Secretary, I hereby certify, in terms of the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020, that for the period ended 30 September 2025, the Company has lodged all such returns as are required of a Company in terms of this Act, and that all such returns are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, correct and up to date.

We the undersigned hereby certify the following with regards to our Unaudited Financial Statements for the period ended 30 September 2025 that:

• We have reviewed the report;

• To the best of our knowledge, the report does not contain:

  • Any untrue statement of a material fact, or

  • Omit to state a material fact, which would make the statements, misleading in the light of circumstances under which such statements were made;

• To the best of our knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in the report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the year presented in the report.

• We:

  • Are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls.

  • Have designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to such officers by others within those entries particularly during the year in which the periodic reports are being prepared;

  • Have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls as of date within 90 days prior to the report;

  • Have presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of our internal controls based on our evaluation as of that date;

• We have disclosed to the auditors of the Company and audit committee:

  • All significant deficiency in the design or operation of internal controls which would adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarise and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditor any material weakness in internal controls, and

  • Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant

    role in the Company's internal controls;

• We have identified in the report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT .

In accordance with the general requirements of the Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance 2018 (NCCG Code) and the Securities and Exchange Commission Corporate Governance Guideline (SCGG), we hereby highlight those key principles and practices that form the basis of the high standards of corporate conduct for which LASACO is known for.

At LASACO, we conduct our business activities in accordance with the highest degree of ethical standards of good governance, integrity and in full compliance with the law, while taking into account the interest of stakeholders. We reach out to our employees, business partners, associates and stakeholders at large to secure their commitment and participation in upholding high standards of conduct in the performance of their duties.

The Board of Directors are responsible for setting, reviewing and guiding corporate strategy, major plans of action, risk policy, annual budgets and business plans; setting performance objectives, monitoring implementation and management performance; and overseeing major capital expenditures, acquisitions and investments. In order to fulfill their responsibilities, we ensure that Board members have access to accurate, relevant and timely information and that Board Members devote sufficient time to their responsibilities and duties.

We have completed and submitted the new Financial Reporting Council Template for reporting compliance with Nigerian Code of Corporate Governance 2018 and uploaded it on the NGX Issuers portal.

The Matters Reserved For the Board

The Board of Directors' major performance enhancing and direction-setting responsibilities include the following matters:

1. Strategy formulation, policy thrust and Management policies

2. Integrity of financial controls and reports

3. Risk assessment and internal controls

4. Board and top executive appointments

5. Creating and sustaining appropriate relationships with all stakeholders

6. Selection, Performance Appraisal and Remuneration of Executive Directors

7. Succession Planning

8. Corporate Responsibility through the approval of relevant policies

9. Approves and reviews the matters reserved for the Board and the terms of reference for Board

10. Determines the remuneration for Non-Executive Directors

11. Sets the procedure for determining the remuneration of the company's Independent Auditors

12. Nominates members of the Board committees and determines the scope of delegated authority

13. Develops and enforces a code of conduct for Non-executive Directors and a binding Statement

14. Ensures compliance with all relevant laws and regulations by the Company and its officers.

The Board was made up of Five Non-executive Directors, One being Independent Director and Three Executive Directors. At LASACO, the position of the Chairman is separate and distinct from that of the Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer. The Chairman is a Non-executive Director.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board performs its various duties and responsibilities through Four (4) Committees: the Finance, General Purposes and Investment Committee, the Establishment and Corporate Governance Committee, the Audit, Risk Management and Compliance Committee and the Statutory Shareholders' Audit Committee. All Board Committees make recommendations for consideration and approval by the full Board.

At the management level, a Management Committee presided over by the Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer and comprising the Deputy Managing Directors, General Managers and a Principal Manager meet regularly once in a fortnight.

1. FINANCE, GENERAL PURPOSES AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

   The Committee was chaired by a Non-executive Director and made up of Three other Non-executive Directors and the three Executive Directors for a total membership of seven (7) members.

   The following are the key terms of reference of the Finance and Investment Committee:

   1. To review the Company's operational standards and performance.

   2. To oversee financial reporting, policies and processes as well as compliance level.

   3. To oversee internal controls and compliance within the company.

   4. To oversee capital and operating expenditures, specific projects and their financing within the overall Business Plan and Budget approved by the Board.

   5. To ensure that there are no conflicts of interest by Directors and Top Managers in the Company in the conduct of business.

   6. To proffer suggestions on optimal use of the Company's resources.

Membership

• Mr Tobiloba Lawal - Chairman

  Mr Ademola Oshodi Member

  Mr. Abiodun Dosunmu Member

• Mr. Razzaq Abiodun - Managing Director/CEO

• Mr. Ademoye Shobo - ED - Technical

• Mr. Riliwan Oshinusi - Deputy Managing Director (Corporate Services)

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT

1. THE BOARD NOMINATION, REMUNERATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

   The Board Nomination, Remuneration, and Governance Committee consist of Four Non-executive Directors, one of whom chaired the Committee and were joined by the three Executive Directors.

   The Terms of reference of the Board Nomination, Remuneration, and Governance Committee are as follows:

   1. To define the criteria and the procedure for the appointments and promotion of key officers of the company from manager cadres and above.

   2. To oversee proper administration of the Board approved Performance based Appraisal and Remuneration System.

   3. To review from time to time the organizational structure and succession planning proposals of the group and make appropriate recommendations to the full Board

   4. Oversees the implementation of Board approved Performance Goals and objectives for the Executive Directors and Top Management.

   Membership

   • Mr Ademola Oshodi Chairman

   • Mr Tobiloba Lawal Member

   • Mr Abiodun Dousnmu Member

   • Mr. Razzaq Abiodun - Managing Director/CEO

   • Mr. Ademoye Shobo - ED - Technical

   • Mr. Rilwan Oshinusi - Deputy Managing Director (Corporate Services)

     3 AUDIT, RISK MANAGEMENT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE

     The Audit, Risk Management and Compliance Committee was made up of four non-Executive Directors, were joined by the Three Executive Directors.

     The Terms of reference of the Audit, Risk Management and Compliance Committee are as follows:

     1. The Committee shall be responsible for the review of the integrity of the data and information provided in the Audit and/or Financial Reports.

     2. To provide oversight functions with regards to both the company's financial with regard to both the company's financial statement and its internal control and risk management functions.

     3. To review the terms of engagement and recommend the appointment or reappointment and compensation of External Auditors to the Board and the Shareholders.

     Membership

   • Mr Abiodun Dousnmu - Chairman

   • Mr Ademola Oshodi - Member

   • Mr Tobiloba Lawal - Member

   • Mr. Razzaq Abiodun - Managing Director/CEO

   • Mr. Ademoye Shobo - ED - Technical

   • Mr. Rilwan Oshinusi - Deputy Managing Director (Corporate Services)

   1. THE STATUTORY SHAREHOLDERS' AUDIT COMMITTEE

      The Statutory Shareholders Audit Committee was made up of five(5) members comprising two representatives of the shareholders who were re-elected at the 2023 Annual General Meeting held on 25th October 2024 for a period of one year till the conclusion of the 2024 Annual General Meeting; and two representatives of the Board of Directors nominated by the Board.

      The Chairman of the Audit Committee for 2025 was Mr. Matthew Akinlade, FCA, a Shareholders' representative. The meetings of the Committee were attended by the Company's Internal Audit representatives represented by BDO Professional Services, the Company's Independent External Auditors. The Company Secretary is the Secretary of the Committee.

      • Mr. Matthew Akinlade Shareholders representatives

      • Mr. Samuel Olagoke Shareholder's representatives

      • Mrs. Adenike Olatokunbo Shareholder's representatives

      • Prince Jamiu Adio Saka Director's representatives

   The Terms of Reference of the Committee

   The following were the terms of reference of the Committee as provided in section 359(6) of the Companies and Allied Matters Act CAP C20 laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004:

   1. Ascertain whether the accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with legal requirements and agreed ethical practices;

   2. Review the scope of planning of audit requirements.

   3. Review the findings on management matters in conjunction with the External Auditors and departmental responses thereon;

   4. Keep under review the effectiveness of the Company's system of accounting and internal control.

   5. Make recommendations to the Board with regard to the appointment, removal and remuneration of the External Auditors of the Company.

   6. Authorize the internal auditor to carry out investigation into activities of the Company which may be of interest or concern to the committee.

      POLICIES UPLOADED ON THE WEBSITE INLINE WITH THE NIGERIAN CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 2018

      1. WHISTLE BLOWING

      2. SECURITY TRADING

      3. SHAREHOLDERS ENGEGEMENT

      4. STAKEHOLDERS MANAGEMENT

   STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

   The following are the significant accounting policies adopted by the Company in the preparation of these financial statements. These accounting policies have been consistently applied for all years presented.

   1. General Information

      1. LASACO Assurance Plc ("LASACO" or ''the Company") is a public limited liability Company domiciled in Nigeria. The Company's registered and Corporate Office is Plot 16, ACME Road, Ogba Industrial Estate,Ikeja Lagos.

         The Company was incorporated on 20 December 1979 under the Company Decree of 1968. The Company then, known as Lagos State Assurance Company Limited obtained license as an insurer on 7 July 1980 and commenced business on 1 August 1980. It became a public limited liability Company in 1991 when the Company's shares were listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. The Company secured a life insurance business license from National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) in 2007. The Company then separated the life business and transferred the related assets and liabilities to its subsidiary, LASACO Life Assurance Company Limited . On 1 January 2009 LASACO Life Assurance Co. Ltd commenced business. The Company operates from its corporate office in Lagos and whilst it maintains branches in major cities of the Federation.

         The purpose of the merger is to enable the Company operate as a composite Insurance Company as against the group structure in operation before the merger.

         The merger process was concluded on 16 December 2014 with conclusion of the Court Ordered Meeting and final Court approval. This is in line with Section30(1)(b) of the Insurance Act.

         All assets and liabilities of LASACO Life Assurance Ltd have been transferred to LASACO Assurance Plc, hence LASACO Life Assurance Co Ltd cease to operate as an Insurance Company and as a subsidiary of LASACO Assurance Plc with effect from 17 December 2014.

      2. Principal activity

      The Company is principally engaged in the provision of various classes of insurance such as general accident, fire, motor, engineering, marine, bond insurances and life assurance businesses. The Company also transacts insurance business for aviation, oil & gas and other special risks.

      These financial statements were authorized by the Board of Directors on 18th July 2025.

   2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

      The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these Financial Statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.

   3. Going Concern

      These financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis. The Company has no intention or need to reduce substantially its business operations, the management believes that the going concern assumption is appropriate for the Company due to sufficient capital adequacy ratio and projected liquidity, based on historical experience that short-term obligations will be refinanced in the normal course of the business. Liquidity ratio and continuous evaluation of current ratio of the Company is carried out by the Company to ensure that there are no going concern threats to the operations of the Company.

   4. Basis of Preparation and Compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards

      The Group's financial statements for the year ended 31 September 2025 have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020, Insurance Act CAP I17, LFN 2004 and Prudential Guidelines issued by National insurance Commisson and Investment and Securities Act 2007.

      1. Foreign currency translation

         1. Functional and Presentation Currency

            The financial statements are presented in Nigerian currency (Naira) which is the Company's functional currency. Except otherwise indicated, financial information presented in Naira have been rounded to the nearest thousand (₦ '000)

         2. Transactions and balances in foreign currencies

            Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in Naira at the rate of exchange ruling at the date of each transaction. Any gain or loss arising from a change in exchange rates subsequent to the date of the transaction is included in the profit and loss account. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the statement of financial position date are translated at that date. Exchange gains arising from the revaluation of monetary assets and liabilities are recognized in the income statement while those on non-monetary items are recognized in other comprehensive income. For non-monetary financial assets fair value through other comprehensive income, unrealized exchange differences are recorded directly in equity until the asset is disposed or impaired.

      2. Basis of measurement

         The financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis except for the following:

         • Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss;

         • Financial assets classified as FVOCI which are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income;

         • Financial assets which are measured at amortised costs;

         • Land and building (included in property and equipment) which are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income; and

         • Investment properties which are measured at fair value.

         • Insurance contract which are measured in line with the requirements of IFRS 17

   5. Critical Accounting Estimates, Judgments and Assumptions

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRSs requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Company's accounting policies. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Changes in assumptions may have a significant impact on the financial statements in the period the assumptions changed. Management believes that the underlying assumptions are appropriate and that the Company's financial statements therefore present the financial positions and results fairly. The areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are disclosed.

      1. Business model assessment

         For financial assets that are held for the purpose of collecting contractual cash flows, the Company has assessed whether the contractual terms of these assets are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

      2. Allowances for credit losses

         Judgment is required by management in the estimation of the amount and timing of future cash flows when determining an impairment loss for debt instruments measured at amortised cost and fair value through other comprehensive income. In estimating these cash flows, the Company makes judgments about the borrower's financial situation and value of other collateral (where applicable). These estimates are based on assumptions about a number of factors and actual results may differ, resulting in future changes to the impairment allowance.

         A collective assessment of impairment takes into account data from the debt portfolio (such as credit quality, levels of arrears, credit utilisation, loan to collateral ratios etc.), and concentrations of risk and economic data (including levels of unemployment, changes in foreign exchanges, real estate prices indices, country risk and the performance of different individual groups).

         These critical assumptions have been applied consistently to all years presented, except as follows:

         The Company applied the impairment requirements under IFRS 9 since 1 January 2018 and no changes to the assumptions used for the calculation for allowance for impairment in 2023 using the expected credit loss model.

      3. Impairment of financial assets

      The Company has applied some judgment in carrying out an assessment of whether credit risk on the financial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition and incorporating forward-looking information in the measurement of Expected Credit Losses (ECL).

      The impairment requirements of IFRS 9 apply to all debt instruments that are measured at amortised cost. The determination of impairment loss and allowance moves from the incurred credit loss model whereby credit losses are recognised when a defined loss event occurs under IAS 39, to expected credit loss model under IFRS 9, where expected credit losses are recognised upon initial recognition of the financial asset based on expectation of potential credit losses at the time of initial recognition.

      Staged Approach to the determination of Expected Credit Losses

      IFRS 9 outlines a three-stage model for impairment based on changes in credit quality since initial recognition. These stages are as outlined below:

      Stage 1 The Company recognises a credit loss allowance at an amount equal to the 12 month expected credit losses. This represents the portion of lifetime expected credit losses from default events that are expected within 12 months of the reporting date, assuming that credit risk has not increased significantly after the initial recognition.

      Stage 2 The Company recognises a credit loss allowance at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses (LTECL) for those financial assets that are considered to have experienced a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition. This requires the computation of ECL based on Lifetime probabilities of default that represents the probability of a default occurring over the remaining lifetime of the financial assets. Allowance for credit losses is higher in this stage because of an increase in credit risk and the impact of a longer time horizon being considered compared to 12 months in stage 1.

      Stage 3 The Company recognises a loss allowance at an amount equal to life-time expected credit losses, reflecting a probability of default (PD) of 100% via the recoverable cash flows for the asset. For those financial assets that are credit impaired. The Company's definition of default is aligned with the regulatory definition. The treatment of the loans and other receivables in stage 3 remains substantially the same as the treatment of impaired financial assets under IAS 39 except for the portfolios of assets purchased or originated as credit impaired.

      The Company does not originate or purchase credit impaired loans or receivables.

      The determination of whether a financial asset is credit impaired focuses exclusively on default risk, without taking into consideration the effect of credit risk mitigants such as collateral or guarantees. Specifically, the financial asset is credit impaired and in stage 3 when: the Company considers the obligor is unlikely to pay its credit obligations to the Company. The termination may include forbearance actions, where a concession has been granted to the borrower or economic or legal reasons that a qualitative indicators of credit impairment; or contractual payments of either principal or interest by the obligor are pass due by more than 90 days.

      For financial assets considered to be credit impaired, the ECL allowance covers the amount of loss the Company is expected to suffer. The estimation of ECLs is done on a case by case basis for non-homogenous portfolios, or by applying portfolio based parameters to individual financial assets in this portfolios by the Company's ECL model for homogenous portfolios.

   6. Judgments, Estimates and Assumptions

      The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an on-going basis. Revision to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised, if the revision affects only that period or if the revision affects both current and future periods.

      Information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgments in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements are described below:

      1. Income Taxes

         Significant estimates are required in determining the provision for income taxes. There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. The Company recognizes liabilities for anticipated tax issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions.

      2. Retirement Benefits

         The present value of the retirement benefit obligations depends on a number of factors that are determined on an actuarial basis using a number of assumptions. Any changes in these assumptions will impact the carrying amount of gratuity obligations. The assumptions used in determining the net cost (income) for gratuity include the discount rate, rate of return on assets, future salary increments and mortality rates.

         The Company determines the appropriate discount rate at the end of the period. This is the interest rate that should be used to determine the present value of estimated future cash outflows expected to be required to settle the gratuity obligations. In determining the appropriate discount rate, the Company considers the interest rates of high-quality government bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid and that have terms to maturity approximating the terms of the related gratuity liability. Other key assumptions for gratuity obligations are based in part on current market conditions.

         In most cases, no explicit assumptions are made regarding the future rates of claims inflation or loss ratios. Instead, the assumptions used are those implicit in the historical claims development data on which the projections are based. Additional qualitative judgment is used to assess the extent to which past trends may not apply in future, (e.g. to reflect one-off occurrences, changes in external or market factors such as public attitudes to claiming, economic conditions, levels of claims inflation, judicial decisions and legislation, as well as internal factors such as portfolio mix, policy features and claims handling procedures) in order to arrive at the estimated ultimate cost of claims that present the likely outcome from the range of possible outcomes, taking account of all the uncertainties involved.

         Similar judgments, estimates and assumptions are employed in the assessment of adequacy of provisions for unearned premium. Judgment is also required in determining whether the pattern of insurance service provided by a contract requires amortisation of unearned premium on a basis other than time apportionment.

      3. Fair Valuation of Investment Properties

         The fair value of investment properties is based on the nature, location and condition of the specific asset. The fair value is determined by reference to observable market prices. The fair value of investment property does not reflect the related future benefits from this future expenditure. These valuations are performed annually by external appraisers. Assumptions are made about expected future cash flows and the discounting rates.

      4. Liability for remaining coverage (LRC) and Liability for incurred claims (LIC)

         The measurement of a group's liability resulting from the insurance contracts that it issues requires significant use of estimates and judgments. The Company estimates the liability for future insurance contract obligations, taking into account the expected cash flows for fulfilling these contracts. This involves making assumptions about future claim payments, premium income, and discount rates.

      5. Reinsurance contracts

         The Company assesses the impact of the reinsurance contracts that it holds on its financial statements, including estimating the expected recoveries from reinsurers. This involves evaluating the terms of reinsurance agreements, the creditworthiness of reinsurers, and the effect on the measurement of reinsurance contract assets and liabilities.

      6. Fulfillment Cash Flows

         In estimating its liabilities and assets as it relate to insurance and reinsurance contracts, the company makes significant assumptions relating to the future cash flows that will arise from fulfilling insurance contracts, considering variables such as claims experience, lapses, and policyholder behavior. These estimates require judgment and are influenced by historical data and actuarial projections. The Company incorporates, in an unbiased way, all reasonable and supportable information that is available without undue cost or effort at the reporting date. This information includes both internal and external historical data about claims and other experiences, updated to reflect current expectations of future events. The estimates of future cash flows reflect the Group's view of current conditions at the reporting date, using market variables consistent with observable market prices, where applicable.

      7. Risk adjustment

         In the measurement of risk adjustment, the Company makes use of significant judgments including estimations, actuarial projections, and historical data in determining reasonable compensation for bearing non-financial risks as it relates to insurance contracts that its issued. It also employs similar assumptions and methodologies in estimating the expected reinsurance portion or recoverable as it relates to risk adjustment.

      8. IFRS 17 Transition

         The measurement of the Company liability for the IFRS 17 transition resulting from the insurance contracts that it issues requires significant use of estimates and judgments. The Company estimates the IFRS 17 transition insurance contract obligations, taking into account the contract's fulfillment cashflows. The Company has applied the full retrospective approach to the transition to all short-term insurance contracts in force at the transition date.

         For all groups of insurance and Reinsurance contracts for which the full retrospective approach was impracticable modified retrospective approach was adopted. This involves making assumptions about future claim payments, premium income, and discount rates.

      9. Discount rates

         The determination of appropriate discount rates to value future cash flows is critical in the application of IFRS 17. The company considers factors such as the time value of money, credit risks, and liquidity premiums in selecting its discount rates. Significant judgment is used by the Company to ensure that the selected rates reflect the characteristics of the cashflows and the risks associated with insurance contracts.

   7. Changes in Material Accounting Policies

      1. Material Accounting Policy Information

   The Company adopted Disclosure of Accounting Policies (Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2) from 1 January 2023. Although the amendments did not result in any changes to the accounting policies themselves, they impacted the accounting policy information disclosed in the financial statements. The amendments require the disclosure of 'material', rather than 'significant', accounting policies. The amendments also guide the application of materiality to disclosure of accounting policies, assisting entities to provide useful, entity-specific accounting policy information that users need to understand other information in the financial statements. Management reviewed the accounting policies and made updates to the information disclosed in Note 2 Material accounting policies (2022: Significant accounting policies) in certain instances in line with the amendments.

   NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

      Significant accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgements and uncertainties and potentially give rise to different results under different assumptions and conditions.

      The accounting policies set out below have been consistently applied to all periods presented in these financial statements.

   2. CONSOLIDATION

      1. Subsidiaries

         The financial statements of the subsidiary is consolidated from the date the Group acquires control, up to the date that such effective control ceases. For the purpose of these financial statements, subsidiaries are entities over which the Group, directly or indirectly, has power to govern the financial and operating policies so as to obtain benefits from their activities.

         Changes in the Group's interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions (transactions with owners). Any difference between the amount by which the non-controlling interest is adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid or received is recognised directly in equity and attributed to the Group.

         Inter- company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Companies within the Group are eliminated on consolidation. Unrealised losses are also eliminated in the same manner as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment. Accounting policies of the subsidiary has been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group. Investment in the subsidiary in the separate financial statements of the Company entity is measured at cost.

         Acquistion - related costs are expensed as incurred.

         If the business combination is achieved in stages, fair value of the acquirer's previously held equity interest in the acquiree is re- measured to fair value at the acquisition date through profit or loss.

      2. Disposal of subsidiaries

      On loss of control, the Group derecognises the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary, any controlling interests and the other components of equity related to the subsidiary. Any surplus or deficit arising on the loss of control is recognised in profit or loss. If the Group retains any interest in the previous subsidiary, then such interest is measured at fair value at the date that control is lost. Subsequently, that retained interest is accounted for as an equity, accounted investment or as a financial asset under the Amortized Cost or Fair Value Through Other Comprehensive Income category depending on business model intended and the level of influence retained.

   3. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

      Cash and cash equivalents include notes and coins on hand and highly liquid financial assets with original maturities of less than three months, which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in their fair value, and are used by the Company in the management of its short-term commitments. Due to their short-term nature, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value, hence they are carried at fair value in the statement of financial position.

   4. FINANCIAL ASSETS

      In 2018 financial year, the Company has applied IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (as revised in July 2014) and the related consequential amendments to other IFRS Standards that are effective for an annual period that begins on or after 1 January 2018.

      UN AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, 30 SEPTEMBER, 2025 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      1. Recognition and initial measurement

         Financial assets and liabilities, with the exception of other loans and receivables, are initially recognised on the trade date i.e. the date that the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instruments

         This includes regular way trades: purcahses or sales of financial assets that requires delivery of assets within the time frame generally established by regulation or conviction in the market place. Other loans and receivables are recognised when fund are transferred to the policy holder's accounts.

         A financial assets or financial liability is measured initially at fair value or minus, for an item not at fair value through profit or loss, direct and incremental transanctions costs that are directly attributable to its acquisition or issue. Transaction costs of financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value through profit or loss are expensed in profit or loss at initial recognition.

      2. Classification and Measurement

         Initial measurement of a financial asset or liability shall be at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to its purchase or issuance. For instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs shall be recognized immediately in profit or loss. Financial assets include placement with banks, treasury bills and equity instruments.

         The Company classifies its financial assets into the following categories in line with the provisions of IFRS 9:

         1. those to be measured at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)

         2. those to be measured at amortised cost ; and

         3. those to be measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI)

            The classification depends on the Group's business model (ie business model test) for managing financial assets and the contractual terms of the financial assets cash flows(i.e. solely payments of principal and interest -SPPI test.)

            The Company also classify its financial liabilities as liabilities at fair value through profit or loss and liabilities at amortised cost. Management determines the classification of the financial instruments at initial recognition.

            A Classification of Financial Assets

            1. Financial assets measured at amortised cost

               A financial asset is measured at amortised cost if it meets both of the following conditions and is not designated as at FVTPL:

               • The asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows; and

               • The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

               The gain or loss on a debt investment that is subsequently measured at amortised cost and is not part of a hedging relationship is recognised in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised or impaired. Interest income from these financial assets is determined using the effective interest method and reported in profit or loss as 'Investment income'.

               The amortised cost of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at which it was measured at initial recognition minus principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortisation using the 'effective interest method' of any difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount, and minus any loss allowance. The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial instrument (or group of instruments) and of allocating the interest income or expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts over the expected life of the instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period, to the instrument's net carrying amount.

               NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

            2. Financial assets measured at FVTPL

               Financial assets that do not meet the criteria for amortised cost or FVOCI are measured at fair value through profit or loss. The gain or loss arising from changes in fair value of a debt investment that is subsequently measured at fair value through profit or loss and is not part of a hedging relationship is included directly in the profit or loss and reported as 'Net fair value gain/(loss) in the period in which it arises. Interest income from these financial assets is recognised in profit or loss as 'Investment income'.

               In addition, the Company may irrevocably designate a debt financial asset that otherwise meets the requirements to be measured at amortised cost or at FVOCI as at FVTPL if doing so eliminates or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch that would otherwise arise. This is done on initial recognition of the instrument.

            3. Financial assets measured at FVOCI

            The Company subsequently measures all equity investments at fair value. For equity investment that is not held for trading, the Company may irrevocably elect to present subsequent changes in fair value in OCI. This election is made on an investment-by-investment basis at the initial recognition of the instrument. Where the Company's management has elected to present fair value gains and losses on equity investments in other comprehensive income, there is no subsequent reclassification of fair value gains and losses to profit or loss. Dividends from such investments continue to be recognised in profit or loss as dividend income when the Company's right to receive payments is established unless the dividend clearly represents a recovery of part of the cost of the investment. All other financial assets are classified as measured at FVTPL. Changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are recognised in Net fair value gain/(loss) in the profit or loss.

            Business Model Assessment

            The Company assesses the objective of a business model in which an asset is held at a portfolio level because this best reflects the way the business is managed and information is provided to management. The information considered includes:

            1. The stated policies and objectives for the portfolio and the operation of those policies in practice. In particular, whether management's strategy focuses on earning contractual interest revenue, maintaining a particular interest rate profile, matching the duration of the financial assets to the duration of the liabilities that are funding those assets or realising cash flows through the sale of the assets;

            2. How the performance of the portfolio is evaluated and reported to management;

            3. The risks that affect the performance of the business model (and the financial assets held within that business model) and how those risks are managed;

            4. How managers of the business are compensated e.g. whether compensation is based on the fair value of the assets managed or the contractual cash flows collected; and

            5. The frequency, volume and timing of sales in prior periods, the reasons for such sales and its expectations about future sales activity. However, information about sales activity is not considered in isolation, but as part of an overall assessment of how the Company's stated objective for managing the financial assets is achieved and how cash flows are realised.

            The business model assessment is based on reasonably expected scenarios without taking 'worst case' or 'stress case' scenarios into account. If cash flows after initial recognition are realised in a way that is different from the Group's original expectations, the Company does not change the classification of the remaining financial assets held in that business model, but incorporates such information when assessing newly originated or newly purchased financial assets going forward.

            Assessment of whether contractual cash flows are solely payments of principal and interest on principal amount outstanding

            As a second step of its classification process the Company assesses the contractual terms of financial to identify whether they meet the SPPI test.

            'Principal' for the purpose of this test is defined as the fair value of the financial asset at initial recognition and may change over the life of the financial asset (for example, if there are repayments of principal or amortization of the premium/discount). 'Interest' is defined as consideration for the time value of money and for the credit risk associated with the principal amount outstanding during a particular period of time and for other basic lending risks and costs (e.g. liquidity risk and administrative costs), as well as profit margin.

            The most significant elements of interest within a lending arrangement are typically the consideration for the time value of money and credit risk. To make the SPPI assessment, the Company applies judgement and considers relevant factors such as the currency in which the financial asset is denominated, and the period for which the interest rate is set.

            In contrast, contractual terms that introduce a more than de minimis exposure to risks or volatility in the contractual cash flows that are unrelated to a basic lending arrangement do not give rise to contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. In such cases, the financial asset is required to be measured at FVTPL.

            In assessing whether the contractual cash flows are solely payments of principal and interest, the Company considers the contractual terms of the instrument. This includes assessing whether the financial asset contains a contractual term that could change the timing or amount of contractual cash flows such that it would not meet this condition. In making the assessment, the Company considers:

            • contingent events that would change the amount and timing of cash flows;

            • leverage features;

            • prepayment and extension terms;

            • terms that limit the Company's claim to cash flows from specified assets (e.g. non-recourse asset arrangements); and

            • features that modify consideration of the time value of money - e.g. periodical reset of interest rates. Financial assets with embedded derivatives are considered in their entirety when determining whether their cash flows are solely payment of principal and interest.

            B. Classification of Financial Liabilities

            Financial liabilities shall be classified into one of the following measurement categories:

            1. Fair Value through Profit or Loss (FVTPL)

            2. Amortised cost

               1. Financial Liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

                  Financial liabilities accounted for at fair value through profit or loss fall into two categories:

                  Financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss on inception

                  Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss shall be financial liabilities held for trading. A financial liability shall be classified as held for trading if it shall be incurred principally for the purpose of repurchasing it in the near term or if it shall be part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that shall be managed together and for which there shall be evidence of a recent actual pattern of profit-taking. Derivatives shall also be categorized as held for trading unless they shall be designated and effective as hedging instruments. Financial liabilities held for trading also include obligations to deliver financial assets borrowed by a short seller.

                  Gains and losses arising from changes in fair value of financial liabilities classified as held for trading shall be included in the income statement and shall be reported as 'Net gains/(losses) on financial instruments classified as held for trading'. Interest expenses on financial liabilities held for trading shall be included in 'Net interest income'.

                  Financial Liabilities shall be designated at FVTPL when either the designation eliminates or significantly reduces an accounting mismatch which would otherwise arise or the financial liability contains one or more embedded derivatives which significantly modify the cash flows otherwise required. For liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss, all changes in fair value shall be recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income, except for changes in fair value arising from changes in the Company's own credit risk which shall be recognized in OCI. Changes in fair value of liabilities due to changes in the Company's own credit risk, which are recognized in OCI, shall not be subsequently reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Income upon derecognition/extinguishment of the liabilities.

               2. Financial Liabilities at amortised cost

            Financial liabilities that are not classified at fair value through profit or loss fall into this category and shall be measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost shall be debt securities in issue for which the fair value option is not applied, convertible bonds and subordinated debts.

            C. Reclassifications

            The Company reclassifies financial assets when and only when its business model for managing those asstes changes. The reclassifications takes place from the start of the first reporting period following the change. Such changes are expected to be very infrequent and must be significant to the Group's operations.

            When reclassification occurs, the Company reclassifies all affected financial assets in accordance with the new business model. Reclassification is applied prospectively from the 'reclassification date'. Reclassification date is 'the first day of the first reporting period following the change in business model. Gains, losses or interest previously recognised are not restated when reclassification occurs.

            Financial assets are not reclassified subsequent to their initial recognition, except in the period after the Company changes its business model for managing financial assets that are debt instruments. A change in the objective of the Company's business occurs only when the Company either begins or ceases to perform an activity that is significant to its operations (e.g., via acquisition or disposal of a business line).

            The following are not considered to be changes in the business model:

            • A change in intention related to particular financial assets (even in circumstances of significant changes in market conditions)

            • A temporary disappearance of a particular market for financial assets.

            • A transfer of financial assets between parts of the entity with different business models. Financial liabilities are not reclassified after initial classification.

              Financial assets under the amortised cost classification (i.e. business model whose objective is to collect the contractual cash flows) can still be held as such even when there are sales within the portfolio as long as the sales are infrequent (even if significant in value) or insignificant in value both individually and in aggregate (even if frequent).

              However, if more than an infrequent number of such sales are made out of a portfolio and those sales are more than insignificant in value (either individually or in aggregate), the Company will assess whether and how such sales are consistent with an objective of collecting contractual cash flows.

              The Company has defined the following factors which will be considered in concluding on the significance and frequency of sale:

            • Definition of Insignificance: The Company considers the sale of assets within the BM1 as insignificant if the total sales constitute a value that is less than or equal to 15% of the current amortised cost portfolio per annum or a 5% per quarter subject to a maximum of 15% per annum threshold.

            • Definition of Infrequent: The Company has decided that any sale not more than once a quarter would be considered as an infrequent sale.

            • Definition of closeness to maturity: The Company defines close to maturity as instruments with three months to maturity

      3. Modifications of financial assets and financial liabilities

         (1) Financial Assets

         If the terms of a financial asset are modified, the Company evaluates whether the cash flows of the modified asset are substantially different. If the cash flows are substantially different, then the contractual rights to cash flows from the original financial asset are deemed to have expired. In this case, the original financial asset is derecognised and a new financial asset is recognised at fair value. Any difference between the amortized cost and the present value of the estimated future cash flows of the modified asset or consideration received on derecognition is recorded as a separate line item in profit or loss as 'gains and losses arising from the derecognition of financial assets measured at amortized cost'.

         If the cash flows of the modified asset carried at amortised cost are not substantially different, then the modification does not result in derecognition of the financial asset. In this case, the Company recalculates the gross carrying amount of the financial asset as the present value of the renegotiated or modified contractual cash flows that are discounted at the financial asset's original effective interest rate (or credit-adjusted effective interest rate for purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets). The amount arising from adjusting the gross carrying amount is recognised as a modification gain or loss in profit or loss as part of impairment loss on financial assets for the period.

         In determining when a modification to terms of a financial asset is substantial or not to the existing terms, the Company will consider the following non-exhaustive criteria:

         Qualitative criteria

         Scenarios where modifications could lead to derecognition of existing financial asset and recognition of a new financial asset, i.e. substantial modification, are:

         • Change in frequency of repayments i.e. change of monthly repayments to quarterly or yearly repayments

         • Reduction of financial asset's tenor

         • Extension of financial asset's tenor

         • Reduction in repayment of principals and interest

         • Capitalisation of overdue repayments into a new principal amount

           On occurrence of any of the above factors, the Company will perform a 10% test (see below) to determine whether or not the modification is substantial.

           Scenarios where modification will not lead to derecognition of existing financial assets are:

         • Change in interest rate

           Quantitative criteria

           A modification would lead to derecognition of existing financial asset and recognition of a new financial asset, i.e. substantial modification, if:

         • The discounted present value of the cash flows under the new terms, including any fees received net of any fees paid and discounted using the original effective interest rate, is at least 10 per cent different from the discounted present value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial asset.

           A modification would not lead to derecognition of existing financial asset if:

         • the discounted present value of the cash flows under the new terms, including any fees received net of any fees paid and discounted using the original effective interest rate, is less than 10 per cent different from the discounted present value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial asset.

           If the terms of a financial asset are renegotiated or modified or an existing financial asset is replaced with a new one due to financial difficulties of the borrower, then an assessment is made of whether the financial asset should be derecognised (see below) and ECL measured as follows:

         • If the expected restructuring will not result in derecognition of the existing asset, then the expected cash flows arising from the modified financial asset are included in calculating the cash shortfalls from the existing asset.

         • If the expected restructuring will result in derecognition of the existing asset, then the expected fair value of the new asset is treated as the final cash flow from the existing financial asset at the time of its derecognition. This amount is included in calculating the cash shortfalls from the existing financial asset that are discounted from the expected date of derecognition to the reporting date using the original effective interest rate of the existing financial asset.

         Modification gain or loss shall be included as part of impairment loss on financial assets for each financial period.

         (2) Financial liabilities

         The Company derecognizes a financial liability when its terms are modified and the cash flows of the modified liability are substantially different. This occurs when the discounted present value of the cash flows under the new terms, including any fees paid net of any fees received and discounted using the original effective interest rate, is at least 10 per cent different from the discounted present value of the remaining cash flows of the original financial liability. In this case, a new financial liability based on the modified terms is recognised at fair value. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability extinguished and the new financial liability with modified terms is recognised in profit or loss. If an exchange of debt instruments or modification of terms is accounted for as an extinguishment, any costs or fees incurred are recognised as part of the gain or loss on the extinguishment. If the exchange or modification is not accounted for as an extinguishment (i.e. the modified liability is not substantially different), any costs or fees incurred adjust the carrying amount of the liability and are amortised over the remaining term of the modified liability.

      4. Impairment of financial assets

         1. Overview of the Expected Credit Losses (ECL) principles

            The Company recognizes allowance for expected credit losses on the following financial instruments that are not measured at FVTPL:

            • cash and cash equivalents.

            • Debt instrument at amortised cost.

            • Other receivables.

            • Statutory deposit.

              The instruments mentioned above are all referred to as 'financial instruments' or 'assets'. Equity instruments are not subject to impairment under IFRS 9.

              The ECL allowance is based on the credit losses expected to arise over the life of the asset (the lifetime expected credit loss or LT ECL), unless there has been no significant increase in credit risk since origination, in which case, the allowance is based on the 12 months' expected credit loss (12m ECL) as outlined.

              The 12m ECL is the portion of LT ECLs that represent the ECLs that result from default events on a financial instrument that are possible within the 12 months after the reporting date. Both LT ECLs and 12m ECLs are calculated on either an individual basis or a collective basis, depending on the nature of the underlying portfolio of financial instruments.

              Loss allowances for accounts receivable are always measured at an amount equal to lifetime ECL. The Company has established a policy to perform an assessment, at the end of each reporting period, of whether a financial instrument's credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition, by considering the change in the risk of default occurring over the remaining life of the financial instrument.

              Based on the above process, the Company groups its financial instruments into Stage 1, Stage 2, Stage 3 and POCI, as described below:

            • Stage 1: When financial assets are first recognised, the Company recognises an allowance based on 12m ECLs. Stage 1 asset also include facilities where the credit risk has improved and the asset has been reclassified from Stage 2.

              • Stage 2: When a financial asset has shown a significant increase in credit risk since origination, the Company records an allowance for the LT ECLs. Stage 2 asset also include facilities, where the credit risk has improved and the asset has been reclassified from Stage 3.

            • Stage 3: Financial assets considered credit-impaired. The Company records an allowance for the LTECLs.

              POCI: Purchased or originated credit impaired (POCI) assets are financial assets that are credit impaired on initial recognition. POCI assets are recorded at fair value at original recognition and interest income is subsequently recognised based on a credit-adjusted EIR. ECLs are only recognised or released to the extent that there is a subsequent change in the expected credit losses.

              If, in a subsequent period, credit quality improves and reverses any previously assessed significant increase in credit risk since origination, depending on the stage of the lifetime - stage 2 or stage 3 of the ECL bucket, the Company would continue to monitor such financial assets for a probationary period of 90 days to confirm if the risk of default has decreased sufficiently before upgrading such exposure from Lifetime ECL (Stage 2) to 12-months ECL (Stage 1). In addition to the 90 days probationary period above, the Company will also observe a further probationary period of 90 days to upgrade from Stage 3 to 2. This means a probationary period of 180 days will be observed before upgrading financial assets from Lifetime ECL (Stage 3) to 12-months ECL (Stage 1).

              For financial assets for which the Company has no reasonable expectations of recovering either the entire outstanding amount, or a proportion thereof, the gross carrying amount of the financial asset is reduced. This is considered a (partial) derecognition of the financial asset.

         2. The calculation of ECLs

            Expected credit losses are probability-weighted estimate of credit losses over the expected life of the financial Instrument. Credit losses are the present value of the expected cash shortfalls.

            The measurement of the expected credit losses should reflect:

            • An unbiased and probability weighted amount

            • The time value of money

            • Reasonable and supportable information that is available without undue cost or effort.

              IFRS 9 does not prescribe a single method for measuring expected credit losses. Rather, it acknowledges that the method used to measure expected credit loss may vary based on the type of the financial asset and the information available.

              The Company calculates ECLs based on three probability-weighted scenarios to measure the expected cash shortfalls, discounted at an approximation to the EIR. A cash shortfall is the difference between the cash flows that are due to an entity in accordance with the contract and the cash flows that the entity expects to receive.

              The mechanics of the ECL calculations are outlined below and the key elements are as follows:

            • PD: The Probability of Default is an estimate of the likelihood of default over a given time horizon. A default may only happen at a certain time over the assessed period, if the facility has not been previously derecognised and is still in the portfolio.

            • EAD: The Exposure at Default is an estimate of the exposure at a future default date, taking into account expected changes in the exposure after the reporting date, including repayments of principal and interest, whether scheduled by contract or otherwise, expected drawdowns on committed facilities, and accrued interest from missed payments.

            • LGD: The Loss Given Default is an estimate of the loss arising in the case where a default occurs at a given time. It is based on the difference between the contractual cash flows due and those that the lender would expect to receive, including from the realisation of any collateral. It is usually expressed as a percentage of the EAD.

              When estimating the ECLs, the Company considers three scenarios (a base case, an upside and downside). Each of these is associated with different PDs, EADs and LGDs. When relevant, the assessment of multiple scenarios also incorporates how defaulted assets are expected to be recovered, including the probability that the assets will cure and the value of collateral or the amount that might be received for selling the asset.

              Impairment losses and releases are accounted for and disclosed separately from modification losses or gains

              that are accounted for as an adjustment of the financial asset's gross carrying value.

              The mechanics of the ECL method are summarized below:

              • Stage 1: The 12m ECL is calculated as the portion of LT ECLs that represent the ECLs that result from default events on a financial instrument that are possible within the 12 months after the reporting date. The Company calculates the 12m ECL allowance based on the expectation of a default occurring in the 12 months following the reporting date. These expected 12-month default probabilities are applied to a forecast EAD and multiplied by the expected LGD and discounted by an approximation to the original EIR. This calculation is made for each of the three scenarios, as explained above.

              • Stage 1: The 12m ECL is calculated as the portion of LT ECLs that represent the ECLs that result from default events on a financial instrument that are possible within the 12 months after the reporting date. The Company calculates the 12m ECL allowance based on the expectation of a default occurring in the 12 months following the reporting date. These expected 12-month default probabilities are applied to a forecast EAD and multiplied by the expected LGD and discounted by an approximation to the original EIR. This calculation is made for each of the three scenarios, as explained above.

              • Stage 2: When an asset has shown a significant increase in credit risk since origination, the Company records an allowance for the LT ECLs. The mechanics are similar to those explained above, including the use of multiple scenarios, but PDs and LGDs are estimated over the lifetime of the instrument. The expected cash shortfalls are discounted by an approximation to the original EIR.

              • Stage 3: For assets considered credit-impaired, the Company recognizes the lifetime expected credit losses for these assets. The method is similar to that for Stage 2 assets, with the PD set at 100%.

              • POCI: POCI assets are financial assets that are credit impaired on initial recognition. The Company only recognises the cumulative changes in lifetime ECLs since initial recognition, based on a probability-weighting of the three scenarios, discounted by the credit-adjusted EIR.

         3. Debt instruments measured at fair through OCI

            The ECLs for debt instruments measured at FVOCI do not reduce the carrying amount of these financial assets in the statement of financial position, which remains at fair value. Instead, an amount equal to the allowance that would arise if the assets were measured at amortised cost is recognised in OCI as an accumulated impairment amount, with a corresponding charge to profit or loss. The accumulated loss recognised in OCI is recycled to the profit and loss upon derecognition of the assets.

         4. Purchased or originated credit impaired financial assets (POCI)

            At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether financial assets carried at amortised cost and debt financial assets carried at FVOCI are credit-impaired. A financial asset is 'credit-impaired' when one or more events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset have occurred.

            Evidence that a financial asset is credit-impaired includes the following observable data:

            • Significant financial difficulty of the borrower or issuer;

            • A breach of contract such as a default or past due event;

            • The restructuring of a loan or advance by the Company on terms that the Company would not consider otherwise;

            • It is becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization; or

            • The disappearance of an active market for a security because of financial difficulties.

              An asset that has been renegotiated due to a deterioration in the borrower's condition is usually considered to be credit-impaired unless there is evidence that the risk of not receiving contractual cash flows has reduced significantly and there are no other indicators of impairment.

              For POCI financial assets, the Company only recognises the cumulative changes in LT ECL since initial recognition in the loss allowance.

         5. Collateral valuation

            To mitigate its credit risks on financial assets, the Company seeks to use collateral, where possible. The collateral comes in various forms: salary/other terminal benefits for the staff loans etc. The Company's accounting policy for collateral assigned to it through its lending arrangements under IFRS 9 is the same as it was under IAS 39. Collateral, unless repossessed, is not recorded on the Company's statement of financial position.

            However, the fair value of collateral affects the calculation of ECLs. It is generally assessed, at a minimum, at inception and re-assessed on periodic basis as deemed necessary.

         6. Presentation of allowance for ECL in the statement of Financial position

            Loan allowances for ECL are presented in the statement of financial position as follows:

            • Financial assets measured at amortised cost: as a deduction from the gross carrying amount of the assets;

            • Debt instruments measured at FVOCI: no loss allowance is recognised in the statement of financial position because the carrying amount of the asset is its fair value. However, the loss allowance is disclosed and recognised in the fair value reserve in equity (through OCI).

         7. Write - off

            After a full evaluation of a non-performing exposure, in the event that either one or all of the following conditions apply, such exposure is recommended for write-off (either partially or in full):

            • continued contact with the customer is impossible;

            • recovery cost is expected to be higher than the outstanding debt;

            • amount obtained from realization of credit collateral security leaves a balance of the debt; or

            • it is reasonably determined that no further recovery on the facility is possible.

            All credit facility write-offs require endorsement by the Board Risk Management Committee, as defined by the Company. Credit write-off approval is documented in writing and properly initiated by the Board Risk Management Committee.

            A write-off constitutes a derecognition event. The write-off amount is used to reduce the carrying amount of the financial asset. However, financial assets that are written off could still be subject to enforcement activities in order to comply with the Group's procedures for recovery of amount due. Whenever amounts are recovered on previously written-off credit exposures, such amount recovered is recognised as income on a cash basis only.

         8. Forward looking information

            In its ECL models, the Company relies on a broad range of forward looking information as economic inputs,such as , GDP growth, Unemployment rates, Inflation rates and crude oil prices.

            1. Fair value measurement - policy applicable for current and comparative periods

               'Fair value' is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or, in its absence, the most advantageous market to which the Company has access at that date. The fair value of a liability reflects its non-performance risk.

               If a market for a financial instrument is not active, then the Company establishes fair value using a valuation technique. The chosen valuation technique makes maximum use of market inputs, relies as little as possible on estimates specific to the Company, incorporates all factors that market participants would consider in setting a price and is consistent with accepted economic methodologies for pricing financial instruments.

               The best evidence of the fair value of a financial instrument at initial recognition is the transaction price - i.e. the fair value of the consideration given or received. However, in some cases the initial estimate of fair value of a financial instrument on initial recognition may be different from its transaction price. If this estimated fair value is evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument (without modification or repackaging) or based on a valuation technique whose variables include only data from observable markets, then the difference is recognised in profit or loss on initial recognition of the instrument. In other cases, the fair value at initial recognition is considered to be the transaction price and the difference is not recognised in profit or loss immediately but is recognised over the life of the instrument on an appropriate basis or when the instrument is redeemed, transferred or sold, or the fair value becomes observable.

               Fair value of fixed income liabilities is not less than the amount payable on demand, discounted from the first date on which the amount could be required to be paid.

            2. Derecognition of financial assets

               The Company derecognises a financial assets when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire, or when it transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows on the financial asset in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred or in which the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership and it does not retain control of the financial asset. Any interest in such derecognised asset financial asset that is created or retained by the Company is recognised as a separate asset or liability. Impaired debts are derecognised when they are assessed as uncollectible.

               On derecognition of a financial asset, the difference between the carrying amount of the asset (or the carrying amount allocated to the portion of the asset transferred), and consideration received (including any new asset obtained less any new liability assumed) is recognised in profit or loss.

            3. Derecognition of financial liabilities

               The Company de-recognises financial liabilities when, and only when its contractual obligations are discharged or cancelled, or expired. When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognized in profit or loss.

            4. Write off - policy applicable for current and comparative periods

            The Company writes off a financial asset (and any related allowances for impairment losses) when the Company's Credit determines that the assets are uncollectible. Financial assets are written off either partially or in their entirety. This determination is reached after considering information such as the occurrence of significant changes in the borrower/issuer's financial position such that the borrower/issuer can no longer pay the obligation, or that proceeds from collateral will not be sufficient to pay back the entire exposure. If the amount to be written off is greater than the accumulated loss allowance, the difference is first treated as an addition to the allowance that is then applied against the gross carrying amount. Any subsequent recoveries are credited to impairment loss on financial assets.

            However, financial assets that are written off could still be subject to enforcement activities in order to comply with the Group's procedures for recovery of amount due.

   5. TRADE RECEIVABLES

      Trade receivables are initially recognized at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost less provision for impairment. A provision for impairment is made when there is an objective evidence (such as the probability of solvency or significant financial difficulties of the debtors) that the Company will not be able to collect all the amount due based on the original terms of the invoice. Allowances are made based on an impairment model which consider the loss given default for each customer, probability of default for the sectors in which the customer belongs and emergence period which serves as an impairment trigger based on the age of the debt. Impaired debts are derecognized when they are assessed as uncollectible. If in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized, the previous recognized impairment loss is reversed to the extent that the carrying value of the asset does not exceed its amortized cost at the reversed date. Any subsequent reversal of an impairment loss is recognized in the profit or loss.

   6. OTHER RECEIVABLES AND PREPAYMENTS

      1. Other receivables

         Other receivables are made up of amounts due from parties which are not directly linked to insurance or investment contracts. Other receivables are stated after deductions of amount considered bad or doubtful of recovery. When a debt is deemed not collectible, it is written-off against the related provision or directly to the profit or loss to the extent not previously provided for. Any subsequent recovery of written-off debts is credited to the profit or loss.

      2. Prepayments

         Prepayments are carried at cost less amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.

   7. INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

      Investment properties comprises of properties held to earn rental income and/or for capital appreciation. Investment properties are initially measured at cost and subsequently carried at fair value based on valuers hired by the Company. Investment properties are revalued with sufficient regularity by external professional. The valuators value is determined by discounting expected future cash flows at appropriate market interest rates. Changes in fair value of investment properties are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as investment surplus. When investment properties become owner-occupied, the Company reclassifies them to owner-occupied properties at a deemed cost equal to the fair value of properties at the date of reclassification. The difference between the carrying value and fair value of the properties at the date of reclassification to investment properties is recognised directly in equity as a revaluation surplus. Investment properties are derecognised when they have either been disposed off or when they are permanently withdrawn from use and no future benefit is expected from their disposal.

   8. STATUTORY DEPOSIT

      Statutory deposit represents 10% of the paid up capital of the Company deposited with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in pursuant to Section 10(3) of the Insurance Act of Nigeria CAP I17, 2004. This is restricted cash as management does not have access to the balances in its day to day activities. Statutory deposits are measured at cost and interest income earned on the deposit is included in investment income.

   9. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

      Intangible assets comprise computer software licenses, which are with finite lives and are amortised over the useful economic life and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and amortisation method for an intangible asset with finite useful life are reviewed at every financial year end. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected petter of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset are accounted for by changing the amortisation period or method as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. the amortisation expense on intangible assets is recognised in the profit or loss in the expense category consistent with the function of the intangible asset.

      The Company chooses to use the cost model for the measurement after recognition. Amortisation is calculated on a straight line basis over the useful lives as follows:

      IES-Online Software 33%

   10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

       1. Recognition and measurement

          Property, plant and equipment are initially recorded at cost. Land is subsequently carried at revalued amount being the fair value at the date of revaluation,while buildings are subsequently carried at revalued amount being the fair value at the date of revaluation less any subsequent accumulated depreciation and subsequent accumulated impairment losses. Revaluations are made with sufficient regularity such that the carrying amount does not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair value at the end of the reporting date.

          All other property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Any increase in an asset's carrying amount, as a result of revaluation is credited to other comprehensive income and accumulated in Revaluation Surplus within Revaluation reserves in equity. The increase is recognized in profit or loss to the extent that it reverses a decrease of the same asset previously recognised in profit or loss.

       2. Subsequent costs

          The cost of replacing part of an item of property or equipment is recognized in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the part will flow to the Group and its cost can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized. The costs of the day-to-day servicing of property and equipment are recognized in profit or loss as incurred.

       3. Depreciation

          Depreciation is recognized in Profit or Loss and is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets.Depreciation methods, estimated useful lives and residual values are reviewed annually and adjusted when necessary. No depreciation is charged on property, plant and equipment until they are available for use. The average useful lives per class of asset are as follows:

          Assets class Average useful life

          Land - Nil

          Building under Construction - Nil

          Buildings - 2%

          Machinery and equipment - 20%

          Motor vehicles - 20%

          Furniture and fittings - 20%

          Computer equipment - 20%

       4. De-recognition

       An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognized on disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Any gain or loss arising on de-recognition of the asset which is calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset is included in profit or loss in the period the asset is derecognized.

   11. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Trade and other payables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The fair value of a non-interest bearing liability is its discounted repayment amount. If the due date of the liability is less than one year discounting is omitted.Provisions are recognised when the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is more likely than not, that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount can be reliably estimated. Where there are a number of similar obligations, the likelihood that an outflow will be required in settlement is determined by considering the class of obligations as a whole. A provision is recognised even if the likelihood of an outflow with respect to any one item included in the same class of obligations may be small.