RenovoRx, Inc. · NASDAQ:RNXT

RenovoRx — SIR 2024

13 slides from RenovoRx's conference presentation, Mar 17, 2024

  1. Slide 1: Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis as a Predictor of Target Artery Thrombosis and TAMP Completion

    Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis as a Predictor of Target Artery Thrombosis and Trans-Arterial Micro Perfusion Treatment Completion Among Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Dr. David Sperling1, Dr. Justin Lee2, Dr. Sandeep Laroia3, Dr. Paula Novelli4, George Andary5, Dr. Ramtin Agah5, Dr.

  2. Slide 2: Chemotherapy is Not Effectively Delivered to Primary Pancreatic Tumors

    Chemotherapy is Not Effectively Delivered to Primary Pancreatic Tumors Dense fibrotic stroma | Sparse tumor cellularity | Hypovascular tumors Liver tumors are vascularized Pancreas tumors are hypovascular • Large tumor feeders – excellent targets for therapy • Inability to identify tumor feeder vess

  3. Slide 3: Trans-Arterial Micro-Perfusion (TAMP): Method of Intra-arterial Delivery of Chemotherapy

    Trans-Arterial Micro-Perfusion (TAMP): Method of Intra-arterial Delivery of Chemotherapy Independent of Feeder Vessels Mechanism: after vessel isolation, increase in Increases Drug Concentration to Target Pathological Site by ~100X* pressure forces drug across the artery wall Compared to IV Administ

  4. Slide 4: Phase III TIGeR-PaC Study design

    Phase III TIGeR-PaC Study: Trans(Intra)-arterial Gemcitabine vs. Continuation of IV Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel following Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer INDUCTION PHASE 1:1 RANDOMIZATION PHASE 4-Months of Treatment with: Continuation IV Gemcitabine + Nab-Pac (SOC) vs IA Gemci

  5. Slide 5: TIGeR-PaC: Tolerability and Safety of Treatment

    TIGeR-PaC: Tolerability and Safety of Treatment Tolerability during active treatment: • 61% of IA patients received all planned treatments at the pre-specified dose vs. 18% of IV (primarily due to AEs or SAEs) • Patients receiving IA therapy had more nausea and abdominal pain events • Patients recei

  6. Slide 6: TIGeR-PaC Primary Endpoint: Overall Survival

    TIGeR-PaC Primary Endpoint: Overall Survival IV Gemcitabine IA Gemcitabine + Nab-Pac IA Gemcitabine Patients n = 23 n = 22 Median OS, months SURVIVING PROBABILITY 15.7 10.1 (95% CI) HR (95% CI) 0.48 (0.2-1.12) IV Gemcitabine + P value p<0.08 Nab-Paclitaxel Censored # of Subjects at Risk STUDY MONTH

  7. Slide 7: Limitation for Repeat Procedure: Arterial Thrombosis

    Limitation for Repeat Procedure: Arterial Thrombosis • At first interim analysis, 61% of TIGeR-PaC IA patients received all planned treatments at the pre-specified dose • Of the 39% that did not receive all planned procedures, the major reason was arterial thrombosis during attempt for repeat proced

  8. Slide 8: Thrombosis in Pancreatic Cancer

    Thrombosis in Pancreatic Cancer Arterial Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients Treated with Apixaban • Patients are at risk of both arterial (ATE) and venous thrombo-embolism (VTE), although the incidence of VTE is higher than ATE • PDAC carries the highest risk of VTE among all cancers, with rates of

  9. Slide 9: Can Risk of Arterial Thrombosis in TAMP be Predicted?

    Can Risk of Arterial Thrombosis in TAMP be Predicted? Key Questions: • Is arterial thrombosis in TAMP patients related to increased hypercoagulable state? Or does it occur independently of patient predisposition for thrombosis, indicating a direct relationship to the TAMP procedure? • Mesenteric vei

  10. Slide 10: Relationship of Baseline MVT to Arterial Thrombosis with TAMP: Methods

    Relationship of Baseline MVT to Arterial Thrombosis with TAMP: METHODS • Utilizing the TIGeR-PaC analysis results, we compared the incidence of arterial thrombosis in consecutive TAMP-randomized study participants with vs. without baseline MVT • The presence or absence of MVT on baseline CT was dete

  11. Slide 11: Relationship of Baseline MVT to Arterial Thrombosis with TAMP: Results

    Relationship of Baseline MVT to Arterial Thrombosis with TAMP: RESULTS • Of the 25 subjects randomized to TAMP therapy, 11 failed to complete 8 cycles of treatment. • Of these 11 patients, 6 failed completion due to thrombosis of the targeted arterial artery (24% of total cohort) • Among those 6 sub

  12. Slide 12: Conclusions

    Conclusions • TAMP is a novel technique for localized chemotherapeutic delivery with promising early clinical data for both survival and decreased side effects compared to conventional chemotherapy in patients with PDAC (TIGeR-PaC interim analysis results) • The major limitation of TAMP for repeated

  13. Slide 13: Extra Slide

    Extra Slide Ss | R= 2024 mren er SIRpass the summit

RenovoRx — SIR 2024 on 6ix