Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. · NASDAQ:TMCI

Treace Medical Concepts — Technical Presentation (September 2026)

15 slides from Treace Medical Concepts's technical presentation, September 2026

  1. Slide 1: Radiographic and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Combined MTA and HV Correction

    Radiographic and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Combined Metatarsus Adductus and Hallux Valgus Correction with Early Weightbearing – 2-year Interim Results of a Multicenter Prospective Study Mark E. Easley, M Duke University, Durham, NC D​

  2. Slide 2: Authors

    Authors Easley1, P Dayton2, Santrock1, Chhabra3, Tenorio3, McAleer4, Hatch5, Steinke6, DeCarbo7, Chokan8, White9, M Dayton2, Kaldenberg- Leppert2, Zhao10 1 Duke University, Durham, NC 2 Foot and Ankle Center of Iowa, Ankeny, IA 3 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 4 Jefferso

  3. Slide 3: Introduction: Metatarsus Adductus

    Introduction Metatarsus Adductus • Congenital deformity of the lesser metatarsals • ~0.1% incidence rate in the general population[1,2] • 30-35%[2,3] incidence in patients with symptomatic hallux valgus Preoperative radiographs illustrating the HV + MTA deformity. • Up to 30% hallux valgus recurrenc

  4. Slide 4: Introduction: Instrumented 3-2-1 TMT Correction

    Introduction Interim results from a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the use of an instrumented system for 3-2-1 TMT correction of MTA and HV deformities: • Reproducibility of correctio • Outcomes of early weightbearin • Patient reported outcomes Pre-operative and post-operative radiographs

  5. Slide 5: Study Methods

    Study Methods MTA3D™ prospective multicenter study (8 sites and 10 surgeons Inclusion criteria: • >14 years of ag • Combined MTA and HV (defined as IMA ≥ 8.0° or True IMA > 10°; HVA ≥ 12°; metatarsus adductus angle ≥ 15° Exclusion criteria: • Prior HV surger • Severe osteoarthritis of the 1st, 2nd,

  6. Slide 6: Results: Demographics and Baseline Characteristics

    Results: Demographics and Baseline Characteristics • 66 treated patients • 59 patients reached 1-year follow-up • 35 patients reached 2-year follow-up Characteristic Category Patient Population (N=66) Age (yr), mean (SDa) 41.7 (16.2) Sex (%) Female 58 (87.9%) Male 8 (12.1%) BMIb, mean (SD) 28.7 (5.1

  7. Slide 7: Results: Return to Weightbearing

    Results: Return to Weightbearing Post-Operative Time to Return to Activity/Work Activity Mean (95% Confidence Interval) 7.6 Weightbearing in CAM boot (days) (5.5, 9.7) 38.7 Return to work (days) (31.0, 46.4) 7.9 Return to shoes (weeks) (7.1, 8.7) 3.9 Return to unrestricted activity (months) (3.7, 4.

  8. Slide 8: Results: Radiographic Measures

    Results: Radiographic Measures • There was a statistically significant overall improvement in radiographic measures post-procedure that was maintained through 24 months Radiographic Measures, Mean (95% CI) Visit Baseline Week 6 Month 6 Month 12 Month24 (n=65) (n=66) (n=63) (n=58) (n=34) 29.9 8.3 8.8

  9. Slide 9: Results: Patient-Reported Outcomes

    Results: Patient-Reported Outcomes • Pain measured by VAS showed statistically significant improvement that was maintained through 24 months • There was an overall improvement in all MOxFQ domain scores at 6-, 12- and 24-months post-procedure VAS Score, Mean (95% CI) Baseline Week 6 Month 4 Month 6

  10. Slide 10: Results: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROMIS-29)

    Results: Patient-Reported Outcomes • There was statistically significant improvement in all PROMIS domain scores through 24 months, except for Depression. Statistically significant improvements were maintained through 24 months. PROMIS-29 Scores by Domain, Mean (95% CI)* Baseline 6 Months 12 Months

  11. Slide 11: Results: Complications

    Results: Complications • 4 (6.1%) of the 66 patients required non-elective reoperation due to pain related to the hardware; 1 (1.5%) patient required incisional drainage due to an infection; 1 (1.5%) patient requested hardware removal without medical indication or complication. • 5 (7.6%) patients e

  12. Slide 12: Limitations

    Limitations • Interim results of a multicenter, prospective study • Single arm study without a control or comparison group. • Study sites included surgeons who were considered experienced users of the 3-2-1 multiplanar correction instrumentation system. .​ ​

  13. Slide 13: Conclusions

    Conclusions • Early return to weightbearing in a CAM boot (7.6 days) • Maintenance of IMA, HVA, TSP, MAA correction through 24 months • Clinically significant reduction in pain (VAS) and improvement in patient reported outcomes (MOxFQ, PROMIS-29) through 24 months • Low non-union and overall complic

  14. Slide 14: Acknowledgements

    Acknowledgements Thank you to the participating Principal Investigators and study sites. • Jefferson City Medical Group, Jefferson • Foot and Ankle Center of the Rockies, City, MO Greeley, CO • Jody P. McAleer, DPM, FACFAS • Daniel J. Hatch, DPM, FACFAS • Michael D. Vaardahl, DPM • Foot and Ankle Ce

  15. Slide 15: References

    References 1. Shima H, Okuda R, Yasuda T, Mori K, Kizawa M, Tsujinaka S, et al. Operative Treatment for Hallux Valgus With Moderate to Severe Metatarsus Adductus. Foot Ankle Int 2019;40:641–7. 2. Aiyer AA, Shariff R, Ying L, Shub J, Myerson MS. Prevalence of metatarsus adductus in patients undergoin

Treace Medical Concepts — Technical Presentation (September 2026) on 6ix