Originaltext
Diese Übersetzung bewerten
Mit deinem Feedback können wir Google Übersetzer weiter verbessern
icon
    Event Replay Chat
    Heiko Ihle
    Apr 1 2026
    Talking about the lateral extensions in your resource growth, have you seen anything that surprised you? Are there certain areas that maybe deserve some additional focus and if so what/where are they? You currently only need state approval for the site. Can you provide some color on how long it would take to then get the additional approvals which would get rid of the permitting constraints? I assume this is not just a time, but also a money issue, right? But then, presumably, once your site is in operation whatever costs you face should be fairly irrelevant in the grand scheme of things, so the real cost is timing and delays. Is that a fair assumption?
    Don Blyth
    Apr 1 2026
    You have pointed out several sources of upside. I think one of the biggest is increasing gold recovery. By only producing Cu-Au concentrates and shipping offsite for final processing, you avoided having to permit use of cyanide on site. It would be very common to process the flotation tailings through a cyanidation circuit, and you could probably go from 70% gold recovery, up to the 90s. You are discarding 20-25 Koz a year into your tailings. Realizing it might be a bit of a sensitive subject, do you have any opinion on how long you think it might take to permit for use of cyanide in Wyoming?
    paul.obrien
    Apr 1 2026
    can you describe furhter "inferred conversion" and "district scale potential" as referred to under "Resource Expansion Potential"
    Don Blyth
    Apr 1 2026
    There was some cost creep in the Feasibility Study, but no real blowouts. Still a solid, economically-robust project. The huge advantage you have is the short potential timeline to production, being a permitted shovel-ready project. There are not a lot of development projects that can be in production before 2030, and a bit of a glut of projects in the pipeline after that. I think it should attract bidders, but if you don’t get a bid you like, how long would you wait before making a decision to build the mine yourselves?
    jsekelsky
    Apr 1 2026
    It seems the aggregate sale potential continues to serve as an overlooked potential second revenue stream. Are you able to provide any color on how discussions with purchasers here are shaping up - and at what stage do you think you'll be in a position to enter into a formal agreement for monetization?
    paul.obrien
    Apr 1 2026
    you have referred to AISC after by-products and AISC on co-product basis, as well as AISC Au eq in February 2025 PFS. Which AISC reporting method will you continue to use and refer to going forward?
    paul.obrien
    Apr 1 2026
    what net savings were actually made using Jameson cells as was guided?
    Don Blyth
    Apr 1 2026
    Have there been advanced discussions with smelters for final processing of the Cu-Au concentrates? Do you have any guidance of what portion of the required initial capex might come from offtake agreements or pre-sale agreements?
    jordan
    Apr 1 2026
    Will you explore a sale of the mine simultaneously to construction and look to maximize value in the best way possible?
    jordan
    Apr 1 2026
    Is there any value for Keystone in this analysis? i don't think so. Can you put this in a seperae leagal entity so to the extent there is a bid for wyoming investors can still key Keysotne>?
    chris
    Apr 1 2026
    Pls quantify the % of cap ex that might come from state (bonds, etc) andor federal sources potentailly.
    jordan
    Apr 1 2026
    Are you feeling better? thanks for this helpful call

    CK Gold Project Feasibility Study Breakdown with Expert Analyst

    Hosted by U.S. Gold Corp
    Description
    Join the U.S. Gold Corp team as the provide further commentary to the CK Gold Project Feasability Study. They are joined by (Insert analyst name) for a thorough overview followed by a Q&A session.