Stag Industrial, Inc. · NYSE:STAG

Stag Industrial — Investor Day (June 2015)

67 slides from Stag Industrial's investor day presentation, June 2015

  1. Slide 1: Investor Day – June 2015

    STG INDUSTRIAL INVESTOR DAY — JUNE 2015

  2. Slide 2: Legal Notices

    LEGAL NOTICES The following presentations, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by STAG Industrial, Inc. (the “Company”), contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Se

  3. Slide 3: Agenda

    AGENDA I. INTRODUCTION 1 Geoffrey G. Jervis - EVP/Chief Financial Officer II. INVESTMENT THESIS 4 Benjamin S. Butcher – Founder/Chief Executive Officer & President III. ORIGINATION PLATFORM 14 Stephen C. Mecke – EVP/Chief Operating Officer IV. UNDERWRITING – MARKETS & BUILDINGS 23 David G. King – EV

  4. Slide 4: Investment Thesis

    INVESTMENT THESIS Benjamin S. Butcher Founder/Chief Executive Officer & President 4

  5. Slide 5: History of the Investment Thesis

    HISTORY OF THE INVESTMENT THESIS  Probabilistic assessment of RE risk and a focus on cash flow were influential in developing the STAG thesis  Single tenant net lease mortgage transactions were largely confined to the CTL arena  The ‘binary risk’ associated with transactions that did not meet CTL

  6. Slide 6: Focus – Single Tenant Industrial

    FOCUS – SINGLE TENANT INDUSTRIAL  Attractive Characteristics of the US Industrial Market  Large - $750 billion to a trillion dollar market (approximately half single tenant) but with “bite-sized” assets  Non-homogenous assets – relatively low correlation among individual transactions  Fragmented

  7. Slide 7: Cash Flow Isn't Everything, It's the Only Thing

    “CASH FLOW ISN’T EVERYTHING, IT’S THE ONLY THING” Imperfect Information Renewal Future Market Capital Needs Tenant Credit Market Rent Probability Conditions  Virtually all the factors that will influence future cash flow derived from owning a RE asset are subject to analysis  These factors must be

  8. Slide 8: Modeling Exposure to Market / Downtime

    MODELING EXPOSURE TO MARKET / DOWNTIME EVERY MONTH PREDICTED VACANCY CREATES EXPOSURE TO MARKET Current Tenancy Probability of Vacancy Exposure to Market Probability of Vacancy Exposure to Market Probability of Vacancy Exposure to Market Vacancy Can Occur From:  Credit Default Probability  Non-Ret

  9. Slide 9: Term as the "Holy Grail"

    TERM AS THE “HOLY GRAIL” BB 12yr Purchase Price $5,000,000 Free Cash Flow Rent $3.00 $500,000 Market Rent $3.00 Contractual Yearly Rent Increases 2% Cap Rate 6.0% $400,000 SF 100,000 $300,000 $200,000 Free Cash Flow $  Building assumed to be well located, modern structure $100,000 subject to projec

  10. Slide 10: Mispriced Assets?

    MISPRICED ASSETS? BB 7yr BB 12yr Purchase Price $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Free Cash Flow Rent $3.00 $3.00 $600,000 Market Rent $3.00 $3.00 Contractual Yearly Rent Increases 2% 2% $500,000 Cap Rate 8.0% 6.0% SF 133,200 100,000 $400,000 Free Cash Flow $ $300,000  Buildings assumed to be the $200,000 same

  11. Slide 11: Cumulative Cash Flows

    CUMULATIVE CASH FLOWS Cumulative Free Cash Flow $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 Free Cash Flow $ $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Year BB Credit Tenant - 7yr Lease BB Credit Tenant - 12 Yr Lease Rigid Decision Rules Do Not

  12. Slide 12: Diversification and Simulation

    DIVERSIFICATION AND SIMULATION  Individual binary risk assets have high potential volatility in cash flow  Like a multi-tenant industrial park, a portfolio of single tenant industrial assets reduces that risk  Single asset risk/volatility assessed “Monte Carlo” simulation  Portfolio diversificat

  13. Slide 13: STAG Evolution

    STAG EVOLUTION  Started in 2003 – A model idea scratched on the back of an envelope  Focus continues to be on probabilistic risk assessment and the generation of cash flow  The STAG team is expert in:  Sourcing transactions  Closing transactions  Determining model inputs  Operating our portfo

  14. Slide 14: Origination Platform

    ORIGINATION PLATFORM Stephen C. Mecke EVP/Chief Operating Officer 14

  15. Slide 15: Deal Process Flow Chart

    DEAL PROCESS FLOW CHART OFFER CLOSING & TRANSACTION INPUT PRICE & DUE ASSET MODEL SOURCED VALIDATION TERMS DILIGENCE TRANSITION NEGOTIATED INVESTMENT COMMITTEE APPROVAL 15

  16. Slide 16: Investment Committee

    INVESTMENT COMMITTEE BENJAMIN S. BUTCHER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & PRESIDENT STEPHEN C. MECKE DAVID G. KING JEFFREY M. GEOFFREY G. JERVIS EVP/CHIEF OPERATING EVP/DIRECTOR OF REAL SULLIVAN EVP/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER ESTATE OPERATIONS EVP/GENERAL COUNSEL OFFICER ASSET ACQUISITIONS LEGAL ACCOUNTING MA

  17. Slide 17: Underwriting Assumption Validation

    UNDERWRITING ASSUMPTION VALIDATION BENJAMIN S. BUTCHER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & PRESIDENT STEPHEN C. MECKE DAVID G. KING JEFFREY M. GEOFFREY G. JERVIS EVP/CHIEF OPERATING EVP/DIRECTOR OF REAL SULLIVAN EVP/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER ESTATE OPERATIONS EVP/GENERAL COUNSEL OFFICER ASSET ACQUISITIONS LEGAL

  18. Slide 18: Origination Platform

    ORIGINATION PLATFORM CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER DATA + INFORMATION ACQUISITIONS UNDERWRITING DUE DILIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SHARED FINANCIAL ANALYST & INTERN POOLS 18

  19. Slide 19: Positioned for Growth

    POSITIONED FOR GROWTH Acquisitions Years with STAG Team 12 Years 11 Years 11 Years 4 Years 2 Years 1 Year 1 Year 19

  20. Slide 20: Deal Sources

    DEAL SOURCES REAL ESTATE BROKERS PROPERTY OWNERS FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES  Database of over 9,000  Since inception, STAG has  Continuous conversations with industrial brokers closed over 325 transactions investment bankers & with a wide variety of owners business intermediaries  12 year history

  21. Slide 21: Growth of the Pipeline

    STAG GROWTH OF THE PIPELINE INDUSTRIAL $2.08 $1.88 $1.68 $1.48 $1.28 Pipeline Value $1.08 $0.88 $0.68 $0.48 $0.28 $0.08 Q2 2012 Q2 2013 Q2 2014 Q2 2015

  22. Slide 22: 2014 Activity

    2014 ACTIVITY SELECTIVITY DISCIPLINE 1,000+ 350 200 OFFERS UNDERWRITTEN 43 CLOSED CONSIDERED MADE Acquired $429 Million of Properties in 2014 22

  23. Slide 23: Underwriting – Markets & Buildings

    UNDERWRITING – MARKETS & BUILDINGS David G. King EVP/Director of Real Estate Operations 23

  24. Slide 24: Underwriting – Markets & Buildings

    UNDERWRITING – MARKETS & BUILDINGS OFFER CLOSING & TRANSACTION INPUT PRICE & DUE MODEL ASSET SOURCED VALIDATION TERMS DILIGENCE TRANSITION NEGOTIATED 24

  25. Slide 25: Underwriting – Markets & Buildings

    UNDERWRITING – MARKETS & BUILDINGS OFFER CLOSING & TRANSACTION MODEL INPUT PRICE & DUE ASSET SOURCED VALIDATION TERMS DILIGENCE TRANSITION NEGOTIATED 25

  26. Slide 26: Three Pillars of Underwriting

    THREE PILLARS OF UNDERWRITING MARKET BUILDING TENANT Healthy Tension Creates a System of Checks & Balances 26

  27. Slide 27: Asset Management Platform

    ASSET MANAGEMENT PLATFORM EVP/DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS ASSET MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING & DISPOSITIONS & LEASING CONSTRUCTION SHARED FINANCIAL ANALYST & INTERN POOLS 27

  28. Slide 28: Underwriting – Two Approaches by Two Teams

    UNDERWRITING – TWO APPROACHES BY TWO TEAMS TOP DOWN BOTTOM UP INPUTS  Market Driven  Asset Driven  Market Rent  Quantitative  Qualitative  Downtime  Market Rent Growth  Tenant Improvements  Leasing Commissions MARKET BUILDING  Building Attributes  Additional Capital Two Independent Teams

  29. Slide 29: Market – Top Down Approach

    MARKET – TOP DOWN APPROACH MARKET LEVEL SUBMARKET LEVEL LOCAL LEVEL  Brokerage House  Brokerage – Unpublished  Brokerage & Primary  CoStar  Pending Development Research  RCA  Pending Vacancy  Comps/”Rent Roll” in Park  Demand Drivers  Internal Comp Database Themes/Trends/Averages Compariso

  30. Slide 30: Building – Bottom Up Approach

    BUILDING – BOTTOM UP APPROACH BUILDING SITE LOCATION RETENTION/RELEASING  Interior – Column  Transportation Network  “Next Tenant” Concerns Spacing, Clear Height, Building Depth,  Labor Pool  Market Sweet Spot Mezzanine  Fit in Tenant’s Supply  Anticipated Capital Costs  Exterior – Access, C

  31. Slide 31: Asset Specific Capital

    ASSET SPECIFIC CAPITAL PASS / FAIL PRIMARY SECONDARY  Unfixable  Roof & Structure  Demising  Unquantifiable  Parking Lot / Site  Lighting Conditions  Sprinkler  Mechanical Systems  Power Walk Away Maintaining Competitiveness, Fixing Deficiencies 31

  32. Slide 32: Real Estate Inputs

    REAL ESTATE INPUTS DISCOVERY MARKET BUILDING CAPITAL INPUTS Iterative Process is Continually Refined – Creates Constant Feedback Loop 32

  33. Slide 33: Underwriting – Tenants

    UNDERWRITING – TENANTS Kurt N. Flionis Vice President, Credit 33

  34. Slide 34: Three Pillars of Underwriting

    THREE PILLARS OF UNDERWRITING MARKET BUILDING TENANT Healthy Tension Creates a System of Checks & Balances 34

  35. Slide 35: Tenant Assessment Overview

    TENANT ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW LEADERSHIP: CO-HEADS STAG EXPERIENCE CREDIT KURT N. FLIONIS, CFA 9 YEARS RYAN E. MURPHY, CFA 5 YEARS  Combined credit underwriting experience of over 17 years  1,800+ companies underwritten CREDIT GOAL:  Best possible assessment of the creditworthiness of prospective an

  36. Slide 36: Differentiated Approach to Credit

    DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO CREDIT  In-depth management calls and discussions with third party references  Every single tenant is assigned a credit rating and every rating is evaluated at least on a quarterly basis  Internal database with over 1,800 historical credit underwritings  Proprietary Ri

  37. Slide 37: Tenant Risk Assessment Factors

    TENANT RISK ASSESSMENT FACTORS TENANT, GUARANTOR, AND NON-GUARANTOR PARENT RATING FACTORS REORG / LIQUIDATION AFFIRM / REJECT CONFIDENCE FACTORS  Market position/scale  Asset Size  Primary/Secondary Facility  Access to information both in  Industry/Competition  Revenue Size quantity and qualit

  38. Slide 38: Multi-Stage Research, Review, and Refinement Process

    MULTI-STAGE RESEARCH, REVIEW, AND REFINEMENT PROCESS INITIAL INPUTS INTERIM INPUTS FINAL INPUTS Public and Seller Deeper dive on Access to all Available Info Public and Private available private Information and public info Tenant Interview DUE CLOSING & TRANSACTION DECISION TO CONTRACT DILIGENCE

  39. Slide 39: Credit Loss of Less than 0.3% Since IPO

    “Diligence is the mother of good-fortune,” – Miguel de Cervantes Credit Loss of Less than 0.3% Since IPO 39

  40. Slide 40: Tenant Assessment Key Takeaways

    TENANT ASSESSMENT KEY TAKEAWAYS  Differentiated Approach to Credit  Highly vetted, probabilistic inputs  In-depth management calls and discussions with third-party references  Extensive database of historical credit underwritings  Process vs. Outcome  Long-Term vs. Short-term 40

  41. Slide 41: Risk Assessment Model

    RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL Rowan McFeely Vice President, Underwriting 41

  42. Slide 42: Risk Assessment Model

    RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OFFER CLOSING & TRANSACTION INPUT PRICE & DUE MODEL ASSET SOURCED VALIDATION TERMS DILIGENCE TRANSITION NEGOTIATED 42

  43. Slide 43: Risk Assessment Model

    RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OFFER CLOSING & TRANSACTION INPUT PRICE & DUE MODEL ASSET SOURCED VALIDATION TERMS DILIGENCE TRANSITION NEGOTIATED 43

  44. Slide 44: Underwriting Group Structure

    UNDERWRITING GROUP STRUCTURE CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PEOPLE SYSTEMS PROCESSES  CASH FLOW MODEL  PLAYBOOK EVP/CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER  3 Pillars of Value  Repeated Process VP, UNDERWRITING  20-year Horizon  Imbedded QC  Probability Based  Expert Advice DEDICATED SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYSTS  IRR

  45. Slide 45: The Three Pillars of Underwriting

    THE THREE PILLARS OF UNDERWRITING MARKET BUILDING TENANT 45

  46. Slide 46: Model Inputs

    MODEL INPUTS MARKET 5 Inputs BUILDING OUTPUTS & 26 Inputs TENANT / LEASE SENSITIVITY TABLES 21 Inputs GENERAL 10 Inputs 46

  47. Slide 47: Sample Industrial Cash Flow Model

    SAMPLE INDUSTRIAL CASH FLOW MODEL THE MODEL IS USED TO ASSESS THE LONG-TERM CASH FLOW POTENTIAL OF AN ASSET Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 Gross Potential Revenue $X $X $X $X $X $X

  48. Slide 48: The Difference

    THE DIFFERENCE PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENT OF RISK – IMPERATIVE IN AN UNCERTAIN WORLD 48

  49. Slide 49: Probabilistic Credit Approach

    “PROBABILISTIC” CREDIT APPROACH TENANT PERFORMS DEFAULT REORGANIZATION LIQUIDATION EXPOSURE TO MARKET AFFIRM REJECT EXPOSURE TO MARKET 49

  50. Slide 50: The Suite Effect of Credit Default Probability

    THE “SUITE” EFFECT OF CREDIT DEFAULT PROBABILTY MONTH 0 MONTH 1 MONTH 2 ORIGINAL SUITE ORIGINAL SUITE ORIGINAL SUITE Probability of Vacancy Probability NEW SUITE of Vacancy NEW SUITE NEW SUITE Probability of Vacancy NEW SUITE 50

  51. Slide 51: Standard Transaction – Exponential Suite Effect

    STANDARD TRANSACTION – EXPONENTIAL “SUITE” EFFECT Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

  52. Slide 52: Sample Industrial Cash Flow Model

    SAMPLE INDUSTRIAL CASH FLOW MODEL Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 Gross Potential Revenue $ 786,182 $ 797,431 $ 809,012 $ 821,846 $ 835,465 $ 841,058 $ 857,479 $ 871,407 $ 885,117 $

  53. Slide 53: Breakdown of Free Cash Flow – Gross Potential Revenue

    BREAKDOWN OF FREE CASH FLOW – GROSS POTENTIAL REVENUE $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $ Amount $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Investment Horizon - Years Gross Potential Revenue 53

  54. Slide 54: Breakdown of Free Cash Flow – Collection Loss/Vacancy

    BREAKDOWN OF FREE CASH FLOW – COLLECTION LOSS/VACANCY $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $ Amount $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Investment Horizon - Years Gross Potential Revenue Collection Loss/Vacancy 54

  55. Slide 55: Breakdown of Free Cash Flow – Operating Expenses (Vacancy Only)

    BREAKDOWN OF FREE CASH FLOW – OPERATING EXPENSES (VACANCY ONLY) $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $ Amount $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Investment Horizon - Years Gross Potential Revenue Collection Loss/Vacancy Operating Expenses (Vacancy Only) 55

  56. Slide 56: Breakdown of Free Cash Flow – Leasing Costs

    BREAKDOWN OF FREE CASH FLOW – LEASING COSTS $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $ Amount $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Investment Horizon - Years Gross Potential Revenue Collection Loss/Vacancy Leasing Costs (incl. Default Legal Fees) Operating Expenses

  57. Slide 57: Breakdown of Free Cash Flow – Capital Expenditures

    BREAKDOWN OF FREE CASH FLOW – CAPITAL EXPENDITURES $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $ Amount $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Investment Horizon - Years Gross Potential Revenue Collection Loss/Vacancy Leasing Costs (incl. Default Legal Fees) Operating Ex

  58. Slide 58: Breakdown of Free Cash Flow

    BREAKDOWN OF FREE CASH FLOW $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $ Amount $400,000 $200,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Investment Horizon - Years Unlevered Free Cash Flow 58

  59. Slide 59: Breakdown of Free Cash Flow – Plus the Portfolio Effect

    BREAKDOWN OF FREE CASH FLOW – PLUS THE PORTFOLIO EFFECT PORTFOLIO EFFECT $1,200,000 $50,000,000 $45,000,000 $1,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $800,000 $30,000,000 Single Deal - 2014 Portfolio - Unlevered $600,000 $25,000,000 Unlevered Free Cash Flow Free Cash Flow $20,000,000 $400,000 $15,000,000 $

  60. Slide 60: Monte Carlo Analysis

    MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS MARKET TENANT BUILDING 60

  61. Slide 61: Simulation Analysis: 1000 Iterations

    SIMULATION ANALYSIS: 1000 ITERATIONS % of Iterations 60% 40% Levered IRR Validation of Resulting IRR 61

  62. Slide 62: Risk Assessment Model Takeaways

    RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL TAKEAWAYS  People, Systems, & Processes  Constant improvement  Positioned for growth  Probabilistic Assessment of Risk  Focus on cash flows from properties  Agnostic on underwriting parameters 62

  63. Slide 63: Corporate Perspective

    CORPORATE PERSPECTIVE Geoffrey G. Jervis EVP/Chief Financial Officer 63

  64. Slide 64: Attractive Individual Asset Returns

    ATTRACTIVE INDIVIDUAL ASSET RETURNS Single Tenant Example $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 Free cash Flow ($) $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Investment Horizon - Years Free Cash Flow 10 Year IRR: 8% Unlevered, 10%+ Levered 20 Year IRR: 8% Unlevered, 10

  65. Slide 65: Portfolio Construction is Value Add

    PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION IS VALUE ADD Diversification From Portfolio Construction Leads to Dramatically Different Risk Profile While Maintaining Returns 65

  66. Slide 66: The Power of Acquisitions

    THE POWER OF ACQUISITIONS Typical Transaction Accretion Analysis Single Asset Single Asset $ Invested $10,000,000 Equity $6,000,000 Unlevered IRR 8.00% Share Price $21.50 Capitalization New Shares 279,070 Equity Cap % 60.00% Debt Cap % 40.00% FFO $630,000 Cost of Debt 4.00% FFO/New Share $2.26 Addit

  67. Slide 67: STG

    STG INDUSTRIAL

STAG Industrial — Investor Day (June 2015) on 6ix