Benchmark Electronics, Inc. · NYSE:BHE

Benchmark Electronics — Proxy Contest (April 2016)

37 slides from Benchmark Electronics's proxy contest presentation, Apr 22, 2016

  1. Slide 1: Strategy and Leadership Delivering Sustainable Value to All Shareholders

    design develop deliver advanced technology Strategy and Leadership Delivering Sustainable Value to All Shareholders April 2016

  2. Slide 2: Forward-Looking Statements

    Forward-Looking StatementsThis document contains forward-looking statements within the scope of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “predict” and similar expressions, and the negatives thereof, often identify forward- look

  3. Slide 3: Agenda

    Agenda Agenda Engaged Capital’s Claims are Without Merit Best-in-Class Corporate Governance The Benchmark Story Executive Summary design develop deliver advanced technology 3

  4. Slide 4: Executive Summary

    Executive Summary design develop deliver advanced technology 4 Executive Summary ► Strategic plan has delivered strong financial performance, premium valuation and positioned company ahead of future trends► Secure adds capabilities to core portfolio, consistent with strategy, and strong positive fin

  5. Slide 5: The Benchmark Story

    The Benchmark Story design develop deliver advanced technology 5

  6. Slide 6: Continuously Evolving Our Platform ahead of Future Trends

    Continuously Evolving Our Platform ahead of Future Trends – Powering the Next Industrial Revolution Continuously Evolving Our Platform ahead of Future Trends – Powering the Next Industrial Revolution ► Commoditization of legacy markets necessitates continuous evolution in EMS ► IoE, Cloud, and Analy

  7. Slide 7: Advancing Our Long-term Strategy To Drive Shareholder Returns

    Portfolio Management >10% Annual Growth in Higher-Value Markets► Focus on Expansion in Key End MarketsIndustrials (including aerospace and defense)Medical TechnologiesTest & Instrumentation (including semi-capital equipment) Margin Expansion >5% Long-Term Non-GAAP Operating Margin► Advancing Enginee

  8. Slide 8: Shift to Higher-value Mix has Driven Superior Performance

    Shift to Higher-value Mix has Driven Superior Performance Shift to Higher-value Mix has Driven Superior Performance Benchmark Peer median 2011 – 2015Higher-value markets Top 10 customer concentration change1 TSR2 Revenue CAGR %1 Gross margin change1 Non-GAAP operating margin change1,3 FCF margin cha

  9. Slide 9: Strong Track Record and Proven Execution

    Strong Track Record and Proven Execution Strong Track Record and Proven Execution 6.3% 8.9% 9.6% 10.1% 9.8% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013Return on Invested Capital Sources: Company filings, FactSet as of 04/20/16ROIC = [(Non-GAAP income from operations1 plus stock compensation)*(1-Tax Rate

  10. Slide 10: Balanced Capital Deployment Track Record

    Balanced Capital Deployment Track Record Balanced Capital Deployment Track Record Capex 29% M&A 40% Repurchases 31% Cumulative capital allocation FY11– FY15► Continue investing to drive growth and extendbusiness model with Voice-of-Customer inputs aligned for organic growth Disciplined, shareholder-

  11. Slide 11: Building Our Higher-value Market Platforms Organically and Through M&A

    Traditional markets Higher-value markets Organic Growth: 2015 New business wins► Significant new business wins in higher-value markets► Expanding revenue streams towards longer lifecycle products and increasing engineering-led solutions► Significant remaining opportunity for existing and new custome

  12. Slide 12: Secure Acquisition = Significant Growth Potential

    Secure Acquisition = Significant Growth Potential Secure Acquisition = Significant Growth Potential Secure expands our engineering solutions for industrial and defense customers Secure expands our engineering solutions for industrial and defense customers The Markets The Applications The Value The P

  13. Slide 13: Best-in-Class Corporate Governance

    Best-in-Class Corporate Governance design develop deliver advanced technology 13

  14. Slide 14: Benchmark Has Best-in-Class Corporate Governance

    ► Diverse Board with robust independent oversight► Shareholder-friendly corporate governance► Executive compensation aligned with shareholder interests► Culture of transparency and accountability► Continued commitment to governance best practices design develop deliver advanced technology 14 Benchma

  15. Slide 15: ISS Governance Analysis Indicates Benchmark Has the Best Governance Profile

    Company Quickscore Board StructureScore Compensationscore Shareholder Rights Score Audit score 1 2 3 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 4 6 1 7 2 1 3 3 1 2 1 2 1 4 2 4 2 4 6 1 Source: ISS 10 - Most governance risk 1 - Least governance risk ISS Governance Analysis Indicates Benchmark Has the Best Governance Profile Among

  16. Slide 16: Board of Directors

    Name / Title Background David Scheible Chairman of the Board IndependentAge 59 ► Chairman and former CEO of Graphic Packaging (NYSE: GPK), a leading global paper and packaging company► Other Board experience: Graphic Packaging, Flint Group, Cancer Treatment Centers of America Michael Dawson Director

  17. Slide 17: Executive compensation framework

    "At Risk" 70% 30% ► Base salaries and target short-term incentive award opportunities reviewed and approved annually ► Robust stock ownership requirements All Directors and executives are in compliance with stock ownership guidelines ► Practice of making all Board-level compensation decisions on a s

  18. Slide 18: Engaged Capital's Claims are Without Merit

    Engaged Capital’s Claims are Without Merit design develop deliver advanced technology 18

  19. Slide 19: Valuation and ROIC

    Reality ► ROIC can be misleading because several of our peers have significant accumulated deficits, which reduce their Invested Capital and artificially inflate ROIC► Since ROIC is difficult to compare across our peers, it is not used to establish public market valuations— there is poor correlation

  20. Slide 20: ROIC is a Challenging Metric to Compare EMS Companies

    design develop deliver advanced technology 20 ROIC is a Challenging Metric to Compare EMS Companies ROIC is a Challenging Metric to Compare EMS Companies Source: Company filings, FactSet as of 04/20/161 Net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) is calculated as non-GAAP operating income after tax post

  21. Slide 21: Benchmark Trades at a Premium to Its Peers on the Relevant Metrics

    7.9x 2016 P / E113.2x 12.6x 10.3x 9.7x 8.9x PLXS BHESource: Wall Street research, FactSet as of 04/20/161 P/E ratios are expressed on a pre-SBC and pre-amortization basis FLEX CLS SANM JBL Benchmark Trades at a Premium to Its Peers on the Relevant Metrics Benchmark Trades at a Premium to Its Peers o

  22. Slide 22: Working capital and cash conversion cycle

    ► A substantial portion of any cash generated would only be trapped overseas – Benchmark’s current approach drives more shareholder value► Benchmark has been effective at optimizing working capital for higher-value customers, which traditionally have longer CCCsAnnounced working capital improvements

  23. Slide 23: Engaged Capital's Thesis for Working Capital is Flawed

    BHE 1Source: Company filingsNote: Metrics as of Q4’15CY for Benchmark and Q4’15CY for Plexus; A/R days calculated as Q4’15CY accounts receivable divided by Q4’15CY annualized sales times 360 days; Inventory days calculated as Q4’15CY inventory divided by Q4’15CY annualized COGS times 360 days; A/P d

  24. Slide 24: Benchmark Takes Advantage of Discounts, which Drives Greater Shareholder Value

    Source: Benchmark management; Market data as of 04/20/16Note: BHE PF adjustment of ~7 days from foregoing trade discounts1 Based on common shares outstanding of 49.8mm as of 02/25/16 per Benchmark’s 2015 10-K2 P/E-base equity value determined by multiplying PF NOPAT impact of forgoing discounts ($6.

  25. Slide 25: Engaged Capital's Claims Are Without Merit

         Engaged Capital’s Claims Are Without Merit Engaged Capital’s Claims Are Without Merit $22.73 $33.46 $5.97 $4.42 $1.89 ($1.55) $35.01 Engaged calculation flawed:$2.42 upside from management’s announced initiatives Already factored into current stock price Speculative Risk to value Benchmark

  26. Slide 26: Secure acquisition and capital allocation

    Reality ► EMS industry must invest continually to strategically position for the future► Market has rewarded Benchmark with a premium valuation relative to peers► Engaged’s logic about the Secure transaction is flawedMultiple paid at low end of Secure’s peer group at the time, and reflected the inhe

  27. Slide 27: Setting the Record Straight on Secure

    Setting the Record Straight on Secure Setting the Record Straight on Secure 3 “In our view, … we believe Mercury Computer, which has adjusted EBITDA margins of 19% and EBIT margins of 6%, may be a good comp for Secure Technology. Although 6X EBITDA may be appropriate for an EMS company, MRCY is curr

  28. Slide 28: Higher-value mix and P/E multiple

    ► Investors reward companies for shifting product mix towards higher-value / low volume end markets ► EMS companies with more exposure to industrials, medical, automotive, aerospace and defense end markets typically have higher valuations ► Portfolio repositioning towards diversified business helps

  29. Slide 29: Most of Benchmark's Cash is Located Offshore

    Most of Benchmark’s Cash is Located Offshore Most of Benchmark’s Cash is Located Offshore 3 JBL CLS BHE SANM PLXS $1,63472% of cash held abroad design develop deliver advanced technology 29 $883 $545 $466 $398 $355 FLEX Based in the U.S. Based overseas ► Tax leakage and loss of shareholder value is

  30. Slide 30: Unwavering Track Record of Consistent Share Repurchases

    Share repurchases over time                                   34                         24                   13                        13                   9           2 So

  31. Slide 31: Executive compensation and ROIC

    Reality ► From 2011 – 2015, shareholders have consistently demonstrated strong support of Benchmark's executive compensation policy with say-on-pay vote results in excess of 90%► ROIC is a poor short-term compensation metric: it risks discouraging smart long-term investments, and it is difficult to

  32. Slide 32: Benchmark Has Sought to Work in Good Faith with Engaged Capital

    Benchmark Has Sought to Work in Good Faith with Engaged Capital over the Past Year design develop deliver advanced technology 32 Benchmark Has Sought to Work in Good Faith with Engaged Capital over the Past Year ► As part of Benchmark's commitment to constructive dialogue with its shareholders, the

  33. Slide 33: Engaged Capital's Proposed Board Candidates Do Not Meet Benchmark's Criteria

    Engaged Capital’s Proposed Board Candidates Do Not Meet Benchmark’s Rigorous Criteria Engaged Capital’s Proposed Board Candidates Do Not Meet Benchmark’s Rigorous Criteria Paul TufanoFormer CFO and COO, Alcatel- Lucent          Yes Michael DawsonFormer CFO, GlobalSantaFe        Yes B

  34. Slide 34: Engaged Capital's Record of Creating Shareholder Value is Weak

    Engaged Capital’s Record of Creating Shareholder Value is Weak design develop deliver advanced technology 34 Engaged Capital’s Record of Creating Shareholder Value is Weak Source: FactSet as of 04/20/16, SEC filings1 Includes all campaigns in which Engaged Capital secured the appointment of a dissid

  35. Slide 35: In Closing: Vote the White Proxy Card

    In Closing design develop deliver advanced technology 35 In Closing Vote the White Proxy Card to support the Benchmark leadership team’s continued strategy to deliver shareholder value Vote the White Proxy Card to support the Benchmark leadership team’s continued strategy to deliver shareholder valu

  36. Slide 36: Appendix

    Appendix design develop deliver advanced technology 36

  37. Slide 37: GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations

    GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations design develop deliver advanced technology 37 GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations ($mm) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Revenue (GAAP) $2,253.0 $2,468.2 $2,506.5 $2,797.1 $2,540.9 Income from operations (GAAP) $41.3 $75.6 $116.5 $100.1 $93.0 Operating margin (GAAP)1 1.8% 3.1%

Benchmark Electronics — Proxy Contest (April 2016) on 6ix