Mondi Plc · LSE:MNDI

Mondi — Technical Presentation (June 2024)

32 slides from Mondi's technical presentation, Jun 5, 2024

  1. Slide 1: Comparing the product impact of alternative solutions – a case study for the beverage industry

    Comparing the product impact of alternative solutions – a case study for the beverage industry and PET grouped bottles Andrea Richardson Anna Erniša Martin Ulrich Business Development Manager, Mondi Corrugated Solutions Senior Project Manager, Mondi Kraft Paper Project Lead LCAs, ESU-services Ltd

  2. Slide 2: Plastic carrier bag ban in 2020

    Plastic carrier bag ban in 2020 The first step leading up to the “Single Use Plastic Ban” under the Green Deal. Sources: https://study.com/blog/which-countries-have-banned-plastic-bags.html 2 Hug&Hold Webinar https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/plastics/plastic-bags_en

  3. Slide 3: Pushing harder: 2020-2030

    2020-2030 Pushing harder: Corporate Plastic Targets Corporate CO2 Targets Consumers PPWR 3 Hug&Hold Webinar

  4. Slide 4: It's time to shrink the plastic shrink wrap footprint

    It’s time to shrink the plastic shrink wrap footprint Europe is a major consumer of plastic shrink wrap for beverage multipacks worldwide. PET bottles used in Western tonnes of plastic shrink Europe in 2022. wrap per year in Western Europe.* Source: Euromonitor, Soft Drinks Packaging 2023 *Scenario

  5. Slide 5: Are you ready to cope with the drivers?

    Are you ready to cope with the drivers? PPWR§: Restrictions on packaging formats Bans for Single Use Plastics for fruit and vegetables Single use plastic for grouped packaging at point of sale 5 Hug&Hold Webinar

  6. Slide 6: What is your journey? 21 months to evaluate alternatives

    What is your journey? 21 months to evaluate alternatives PPWR§: European Elections Council’s final vote PPWR enters into force Citizens of European Union PPWR formally adopted PPWR published in Official PPWR takes effect and countries elect their after the vote of the Journal of the EU and enters ap

  7. Slide 7: Are you ready to cope with the drivers?

    Are you ready to cope with the drivers? Net-Zero commitments around half of the top 2,000 companies in the world by revenue have committed to a science-based long-term goal to reduce their carbon emissions to Net-Zero Source: https://zerotracker.net/analysis/new-analysis-half-of-worlds-largest- 7 Hu

  8. Slide 8: What is your journey? The search for the alternative multi-pack is on

    What is your journey? The search for the alternative multi-pack is on "Which alternative packaging material is ideal for your product, supply chain - and helps reducing the climate change impact?" 8 Hug&Hold Webinar

  9. Slide 9: Paper vs. Shrink Film: A Sustainable Choice?

    Paper vs. Shrink Film: A Sustainable Choice? Paper-based products are already used today in the beverage pack lines – and are PPWR conform. But is paper fit to mimic the relevant properties of shrink film? And is it an attractive alternative? Operational Brand Manager requirements requirements Stabl

  10. Slide 10: The responsible way to deliver your beverages

    H U G & H O L D The responsible way to deliver your beverages Comparing the product impact of alternative solutions – a use case study for the beverage industry and PET grouped bottles

  11. Slide 11: A holistic approach to sustainability

    A holistic approach to sustainability Handle Monomaterials The corrugated handle placed on the bottle necks secures the bottles in place, while offering a comfortable handle for Retail accepted consumers to carry the bottles. It also allows easy separation of the bottles. Consumer accepted Qualified

  12. Slide 12: Guess the answer

    Guess the answer Question: How many kgs can a 80mm paper sleeve, made of Advantage SpringPack Plus support? Write your guess in the chat! 12 Hug&Hold Webinar

  13. Slide 13: Guinness Book of Records Swedish Edition

    Guinness Book of Records Swedish Edition Advantage MF SpringPack Plus holds the record for being the strongest paper in the world, according to the Guinness World Record (2001, Swedish Edition). The strength of this brown MF grade was demonstrated by lifting a 4.2-tonne container on a single sheet.

  14. Slide 14: A paper sleeve with strong properties

    A paper sleeve with strong properties The patent-pending sleeve is made of Advantage MF SpringPack Plus, Mondi’s strongest paper grade. Advantage MF SpringPack Plus offers high tensile strength to reliably support the weight of the bottles during transport. In fact, an 80 mm wide sleeve can support

  15. Slide 15: Choosing your custom clip (Hold-it)

    Choosing your custom clip (Hold-it) Sizes ● Each pack is unique – clips are always custom adjusted to the Hole cuts individual bottle type and change of pack dimension in the pack process High performance board Hand-Guard Carrying comfort Automatic application Board Grade Print 15

  16. Slide 16: Slide 16

  17. Slide 17: What is a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)?

    What is a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)? LCA is a method used to assess the environmental impacts throughout a product's life cycle from raw material acquisition to production, use, end-of-life treatment, recycling and final disposal (e.g., cradle-to-grave). Assesses the potential Enables comparisons

  18. Slide 18: What is a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)?

    What is a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)? Life cycle assessment framework: Keypoints: ISO Standards 14040 & 14044 specify the general procedure for LCAs An LCA is only as good as the data used to model the products The interpretation of the results is critical > system boundaries and underlying assumpt

  19. Slide 19: Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Mondi's paper-based Hug&Hold solution to conventional LDPE shrink wrap

    Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Mondi's paper-based Hug&Hold solution to conventional LDPE shrink wrap for bundling and carrying PET bottles Authors: Martin Ulrich, Niels Jungbluth (ESU-services Ltd.) Critical review panel: Michael Sturges, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (lead panelist), Ir

  20. Slide 20: Hug&Hold Webinar

    20 Hug&Hold Webinar

  21. Slide 21: Functional Unit & Input Data

    Functional Unit & Input Data Functional Unit Input Data The packaging required to bundle six 1.5 l PET bottles, excluding the bottles themselves, further transport or Hug&Hold Shrink Wrap product losses. The end-of-life of Hug&Hold is included. Primary data from ecoinvent data were used Mondi sites

  22. Slide 22: Life cycle stages

    Life cycle stages Production of Hug&Hold incl. raw materials Transportation Product application End-of-Life End of Life Scenarios Transport based on Primary data for The following disposal, recovery and real distances and product application recycling rates of paper and plastic Hug&Hold 48.9 g assum

  23. Slide 23: Impact Assessment Method

    Impact Assessment Method Various methods can be used in LCA to quantify the impacts for single issues, e.g., GWP, energy demand, or for several indicators. Environmental footprint (EF) method 3.1 16 environmental indicators, recommended by the European Commission, widely applied in Europe, wide rang

  24. Slide 24: Hug&Hold Webinar

    24 Hug&Hold Webinar

  25. Slide 25: Key results overview: The carbon footprint

    Key results overview: The carbon footprint The carbon footprint of Hug&Hold is: Average LDPE virgin shrink wrap, 17.4g 43% lower* than the virgin plastic shrink wrap (baseline), and Optimised LDPE virgin shrink wrap, 12g Recycled LDPE shrink wrap, 15% lower* than the plastic stretch 100% recycled co

  26. Slide 26: Contribution of Life Cycle Stages: Carbon Footprint

    Contribution of Life Cycle Stages: Carbon Footprint 0,09 0,08 0,07 kg CO2e per unit 0,06 Cradle to gate 0,05 Transport to bottler and 0,04 application 0,03 End-of-life 0,02 0,01 0 Hug&Hold applied, incl EOL Shrink wrap, 0% recycled content, applied, incl. EOL 26 Hug&Hold Webinar

  27. Slide 27: Key results overview: Comparison of environmental impacts

    Key results overview Comparison of environmental impacts There is no overall advantage or Hug&Hold is responsible for lower impacts than virgin plastic shrink wrap in these categories: disadvantage of one option over the other Climate change Freshwater eutrophication Acidification Fossil resource us

  28. Slide 28: Environmental Footprint (EF 3.1) Single Score result

    Single Score result 7 6 Environmental Footprint (EF 3.1) in micro-points per unit 5 4 3 2 1 0 Hug&Hold applied, incl EOL Shrink wrap, 0% recycled content, applied, incl. EOL 28 Hug&Hold Webinar

  29. Slide 29: Key results overview

    Key results overview Hug&Hold’s carbon footprint is: Lower than average LDPE virgin shrink wrap, 17.4 g Lower than optimised LDPE virgin shrink wrap,12 g Lower than the recycled LDPE shrink wrap, 100% recycled content, 23g Functional Unit: The carbon footprint of paper-based Hug&Hold (48.9 g per six

  30. Slide 30: Hug&Hold can be recommended to mitigate climate change impacts

    Hug&Hold can be recommended to mitigate climate change impacts There are impacts in other categories which need to be reduced to show an overall environmental advantage 30 Hug&Hold Webinar

  31. Slide 31: Your journey to responsibly packing your beverage

    Your journey to responsibly packing your beverage 31

  32. Slide 32: www.mondigroup.com

    Andrea Richardson Business Development Manager, Mondi Corrugated Solutions Andrea.Richardson@mondigroup.com Jakub Vilanek Packaging Innovation Scale Manager, Growth & Sustainability, Flexible Packaging Jakub.vilanek@mondigroup.com www.mondigroup.com

Mondi — Technical Presentation (June 2024) on 6ix