Slide 1: Crush It! Challenge – Technical Presentation
CRUSH IT! CHALLENGE – TECHNICAL PRESENTATION BY GEORGI DOUNDAROV, M.SC., P.ENG., PMP, CCP – PROJECT LEAD GARY MLADJAN – OPTO-MECHANICAL EXPERT EDWARD WIPF – COMMINUTION EXPERT TORONTO, MARCH 3, 2019 1
Slide 2: 1. Project Overview
1. PROJECT OVERVIEW Winning Formula A consortium of partners, with a project lead Georgi Doundarov, M.Sc., P.Eng., PMP, CCP, with a combined experience of more than two centuries in mining, environmental, laser technology, project and risk management, sales, financing, data analytics, and grants.
Slide 3: 2. Project Description
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Major Advantages The proposed solution targets the following areas of the mine operations cycle: Mining: drill and blast Processing: crushing (primary, secondary, tertiary, as applicable) along with the supporting screening, material handling, etc. Indirect positive effect
Slide 4: 3. Project Status – Current Status
3. PROJECT STATUS – CURRENT STATUS Current Status - Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 2 Phase I: Laboratory Test Unit Engineering & Design – detailed engineering documentation for the scan head is 75% started, 40% complete Software Development – started, 20% complete Procurement – not started.
Slide 5: 3. Project Status – Until TRL-6
3. PROJECT STATUS – UNTIL TLR-6 Current Status and Project Development Plan Project Process Group Initiating/Plannning Executing/Monitoring & Control Closing TRL Level TRL-1 TRL-2 TRL-3 TRL-4 TRL-5 TRL-6 Year 2017 2018 2019 May-19 May-20 Aug-19 Aug-20 Dec-19 Nov-19 Nov-20 Mar-19 Mar-20 Sep-19 Sep-20
Slide 6: 4. Methodology – Academic Reference (1)
4. METHODOLOGY – ACADEMIC REFERENCE (1) Thermal Fracturing of Hard Rock P. J. Lauriello and Y. Chen J. Appl. Mech40(4), 909-914 (Dec 01, 1973) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3423186 History: Received August 01, 1972; Revised January 01, 1973; Online July 12, 2010 Abstract: Thermal fracturing of hard crysta
Slide 7: 4. Methodology – Academic Reference (2)
4. METHODOLOGY – ACADEMIC REFERENCE (2) SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 9-12 October, Dallas, Texas Publication Date 2005 Modeling of Laser Spallation Drilling of Rocks for Gas and Oil Well Drilling Authors: Zhiyue Xu(Argonne National Lab)| Yuichiro Yamashita(Argonne National Lab)| C
Slide 8: 4. Methodology – Academic Reference (3)
4. METHODOLOGY – ACADEMIC REFERENCE (3) Adeniji, A.W. (2014). The applications of laser technology in downhole operations-a review. In IPTC 2014: International Petroleum Technology Conference. Agha, K.R., Belhaj, H.A., Mustafiz, S., Bjorndalen, N., and Islam, M.R. (2004). Numerical investigation of
Slide 9: 4. Methodology – Basis of Estimate
4. METHODOLOGY – BASIS OF ESTIMATE Calculation of Quantifiable Reduction in the Energy and Capital and Operating Costs A current Goldcorp advanced stage development project – the NI43-101 Feasibility Study Technical Report for the Coffee Gold Project, Yukon Territory, Canada, 2016, prepared by JDS E
Slide 10: 4. Methodology – Direct Savings
4. METHODOLOGY – DIRECT SAVINGS Connected Average Energy Power Reduction of 31% Area Power, kW Annual, kW Annual, kWh Crushing 1,578 669 5,860,723 an average annual basis or kW draw and kWh consumption (presented in the Coffee FS Plant Total 5,525 2,178 19,075,219 report Table 18.5) as a direct effe
Slide 11: 4. Methodology – Project Economics
4. METHODOLOGY – PROJECT ECONOMICS Financials SUMMARY Feasibility Study Proposed Solution Impact Revenues (CAN$) $ 2,709 $ 2,709 $ - OPEX (CAN$) * $ 1,094 $ 897 $ 197 Notes: ** NPV comparison has been presented on a pre- CAPEX (CAN$) $ 562 $ 509 $ 53 tax basis as the tax regimes presented in the PRE
Slide 12: 4. Methodology – Development Phases (1)
4. METHODOLOGY – DEVELOPMENT PHASES (1) Phase I – Laboratory Test Unit Operate a working model in a laboratory scenario to characterize operating parameters w/Single Fiber Laser and Scan Head Determine Fiber Laser Power necessary for Thermal Fracturing (1 to 7 kW) (using only a 30 foot fiber optic
Slide 13: 4. Methodology – Development Phases (2)
4. METHODOLOGY – DEVELOPMENT PHASES (2) Phase II – Characterization Unit Develop a working model in a simulated production scenario to: Determine that Particle Size for Ore and Waste 0.5 cm3 Refine Projected Operating Costs Determine Durability of Components in a typical Mine Environment Provide
Slide 14: 4. Methodology – Development Phases (3)
4. METHODOLOGY – DEVELOPMENT PHASES (3) Phase III – Operational Unit 30O OFFSET Including a software using: Data Analytics Artificial Intelligence HORIZONTAL SCAN HEAD PIVOT POINT VERTICAL PIVOT POINT Machine Learning 36 MINIMUM 27.00 MINING WIDTH TRACK-O WIDTH 36.00 23.38 9.00 60.62 TRACK-O LENG
Slide 15: 5. Environmental Impact
5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Drill & Blast Eliminating Drill & Blast - solve issues such as: Ground vibrations Air over-pressure Fly-rock, dust, blasting fumes Crushing, Handling Leaching of chemicals in the blast holes and polluting ground water, Health impact on animals and people Elimination
Slide 16: 6. Downstream Impacts
6. DOWNSTREAM IMPACTS There are potentially additional positive impacts on the downstream processes of grinding, flotation/leaching, etc. that have not been tested and quantified to-date, and for the purposes of the current application, they are NOT accounted for neither in the discussion nor in any
Slide 17: 7. Uptake Potential and Scaleability
7. UPTAKE POTENTIAL AND SCALEABILITY The proposed project (Phase I) will result in an operational prototype that can demonstrate all the benefits calculated above. Key Product The key product as a result of this project is a high optical power laser with four heads developed with specifications to s
Slide 18: 7. Uptake Potential and Scaleability
7. UPTAKE POTENTIAL AND SCALEABILITY Scalability The successfully completed Phase I and II will result in a characterization unit that can be scaled to an operational unit (Phase III). The project team has a plan to execute Phase III and has an actual operational unit as detailed in Table 5 of this
Slide 19: 8. Innovativeness
8. INNOVATIVENESS Unique The technology involving high optical power laser for mining is unique and there are no similar projects undertaken in the laser industry in Canada and/or abroad although there are a number of related patents involving mining and the oil and gas industries. gEliminate dr
Slide 20: 9. Economic and/or Social Impact
9. ECONOMIC AND/OR SOCIAL IMPACT Positive Impact The proposed solution is expected to have a positive impact for future mining projects from economic and social point of view: Improved Health and Safety for miners not working at face Two-man crew operating multiple mining faces Reduced manpower r
Slide 21: 10. Risk Assessment and Mitigation (1)
10. RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION (1) Risk Area Risk Event Impact/Consequence S P Risk (S x P) Mitigation Plan Responsible Residual Risk Detiled Cost Management Plan and Change Management Plan and procedures developed and in Over budget can potentially affect place. Highly experienced Project and C
Slide 22: 10. Risk Assessment and Mitigation (2)
10. RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION (2) Risk Area Risk Event Impact/Consequence S P Risk (S x P) Mitigation Plan Responsible Residual Risk Detailed plans in place to incorporate the current Current team of individuals not part team federally in Canada and involve any additional of one company. If an
Slide 23: 10. Risk Assessment - Team Experience
10. RISK ASSESSMENT - TEAM EXPERIENCE Years Experience 120 106 110 100 95 20 40 80 10 75 40 70 70 10 10 60 15 15 55 10 45 10 25 15 10 20 40 30 10 25 3 25 15 20 45 15 11 13 28 25 10 15 20 10 10 10 8 0 Envr. 3 3 Risk PM D.Analytics Financing Mining Laser Sales Grants Georgi Doundarov Maria Christova E
Slide 24: 10. Risk Assessment Versatile Combination of Experience
10. RISK ASSESSMENT VERSATILE COMBINATION OF EXPERIENCE Georgi Doundarov, M.Sc., P.Eng., PMP, CCP – Project Lead 28 years of extensive managerial, operations, technical, project and financial experience in Canada, Europe and Asia, covering the whole life cycle of a mine from studies, engineering, co
Slide 25: Thank You
THANK YOU GEORGI DOUNDAROV, M.SC., P.ENG., PMP, CCP CEO MAGEMI MINING INC. CELL: 647-267-2241 EMAIL: GEORGI@MAGEMI.COM Magemi Mining Inc. 25