First Citizens N.b. Upper Sandusky · OTC:FSDK

First Citizens N.b. Upper Sandusky — The First Citizens National Bank — Investor Presentation (December 2022)

68 slides from First Citizens N.b. Upper Sandusky's investor presentation, Dec 8, 2022

  1. Slide 1: 2022 Agriculture Insights

    2022 Agriculture Insights Thursday, December 8, 2022 – 8:30am Hosted by The First Citizens National Bank Ag Lending Team and Dr. Freddie Barnard Welcome!

  2. Slide 2: Welcome!

    Welcome! As the past several weeks have shown, the business climate across the world continues to be tumultuous and uncertain. Because we are a trusted partner in our local communities, we’re honored to provide expert resources to the community through our Business First Content Series. We’re excite

  3. Slide 3: Freddie L. Barnard, Purdue University

    THE FIRST CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK DECEMBER 8, 2022 UPPER SANDUSKY, OH FREDDIE L. BARNARD, PROFESSOR EMERITUS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS PURDUE UNIVERSITY 765-491-3241 barnardf@purdue.edu

  4. Slide 4: Educational tool, general in nature, illustration only

    This power point presentation is an educational tool that is general in nature and for purposes of illustration only. The materials in this presentation are not exhaustive, do not constitute legal and tax advice and should not be considered a substitute for consulting with legal counsel and a tax pr

  5. Slide 5: Agenda

    Common External Factors, but Major Individual Differences Current Situation in Agriculture: Financial Reporting Key Financial Ratios to Determine Strengths and Weaknesses Purdue Spreadsheet: Accrual-adjusted Income Statement Impact on Loan Repayment of Changes Keys to Operating in the Current

  6. Slide 6: Profitable 2006-2013 period followed by lower net farm incomes

     Generally Profitable 2006-2013 Period for Grain Operations, Followed by Multiple Years of Lower Net Farm Incomes…but now Some Relief !  Higher Capital Purchases using Borrowed Funds, Rapid Depreciation Methods during the Profitable Period…Is Now the Time to Buy?!  Principal Payments on Term Debt

  7. Slide 7: Differences across producers

     Financial records vary across producers, as well as manager understanding  Family living withdrawals vary across producers  Crop Yields in 2019, 2020 and 2021, depending on location  Grain prices have improved dramatically, but marketing practices vary across producers  Operating expenses vary

  8. Slide 8: Illinois Farm Business Farm Management Association

     Illinois Farm Business Farm Management Association (FBFM) 5,000+ Cooperators in FBFM  2011 through 2020 Average  Profit Defined as Management Returns/Acre  Top One-third and Bottom One-third  4 Geographic Areas  Northern  Central-High  Central-Low  Southern

  9. Slide 9: Crop costs and power and equipment costs

     Crop Costs:  Fertilizer  Seed  Pesticides  Power and Equipment Costs:  Fuel  Repairs  Machine Hire  Lease Expense  Economic Depreciation

  10. Slide 10: Top third farms: size and yields

     Larger in Size  200 – 800 Acres  Higher Crop Yields  Corn: 9 – 16 bushels/acre  Soybeans: 4 – 6 bushels/acre  Crop Shared a Larger Percent of Acres  7 – 14 Percent Higher Percent

  11. Slide 11: Gross returns, costs and management returns per acre

     Higher Gross Returns  $104/acre - $132/acre  Lower Costs  Crop Costs: $32/acre - $41/acre Lower  Power and Equipment: $34/acre - $43/acre Lower  Management Returns/Acre  $233/acre - $256/acre

  12. Slide 12: Indiana producer record-keeping survey

    Data:  Indiana Producers  72 Farms  2005 Results:  Record-keeper • Respondent or Spouse 78% • Other Family Member 18%  Primary Reason to Keep Records • Income Taxes 99%  Prepare Balance Sheet 80%  Own a Computer 96%  Use Computer for Record-Keeping 87%  Use Accrual Accounting to Measure Pro

  13. Slide 13: Financial Reporting and Credit Analysis

    Financial Reporting and Credit Analysis:  Schedule F vs. Accrual-adjusted Income Statements  Few Monthly or Quarterly Projected Cash Flow Statements, with almost no Actual to Projected Cash Flow Comparisons  Multiple Years of Operating Expenses in one Operating Line, with Few Separate Inventory L

  14. Slide 14: Background, Goals, Current Activities, Recommendations

     Background  Goals  Current Activities  Recommendations

  15. Slide 15: Recommended guidelines

     Recommend Guidelines for …  Financial Reporting  Financial Criteria and Measures  Information Management  Continue a Forum to Address Future Issues

  16. Slide 16: Financial statements

     Balance Sheet  Income Statement: Accrual-adjusted  Statement of Owners Equity  Statement of Cash Flows…But We Often Use the Projected Cash Flow Statement

  17. Slide 17: Interrelationship among financial statements

    Exhibit 1 Agricultural Financial Statements INTERRELATIONSHIP AMONG FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Balance Sheet Statement of — | Cash Flows for XL Statement of Owner Equity Balance Sheet 12/31/X0 for X1 12/31/X1 Accrual-Adjusted Income Statement for X1 Cash Flow Projected Accrual- Projection Projected Balanc

  18. Slide 18: Illinois FBFM data 1996-2002

    Data  Illinois Farm Business Farm Management (FBFM)  1996-2002  Asset Valuation: Market  Income Statement: Accrual-adjusted

  19. Slide 19: Financial measures by age group

    8-year Measure <30 30-39 Age Groups 40-49 50-59 60+ Average All Farms Debt-to- Asset 47.1 40.2 35.9 30.3 15.6 30.2 Current Ratio 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 2.4 1.6 Interest Expense 4.6 6.1 6.6 7.9 5.7 6.6 Debt Servicing 14.0 15.4 15.3 17.3 12.4 Term Debt and Capital Lease Coverage 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.1 1.7 1.4

  20. Slide 20: Family transitions and living withdrawals

     ___________________________________ Help Younger Generation Get In  ____________________________________ Help Older Generation Get Out  ____________________________________ College  ____________________________________ Marriages  ____________________________________ Spouse - Retires  ________

  21. Slide 21: Farm and family sources and uses of dollars

    Table 1. Farm and Family Sources and Uses of Dollars - Average per Farm in Illinois, 2004-2007. Item 2007 2006 2005 2004 Net non-farm income . . . . . . . . . $31,668 $29,614 $27,810 $27,280 Net farm income . . . . . . . . . . . $193,675 $94,756 $55,030 $93,704 FAMILY LIVING EXPENSE: Contributions .

  22. Slide 22: Family living expenses 2007-2020

    2020 2019 2013 2007 No. Farms 1088 1257 1307 xxxx No. Family 2.6 2.6 2.7 xxx Nonfarm Income $47,892 $44,871 $38,019 $31,668 Living Expenses Contributions $2,947 $3,085 $3,874 $2,303 Medical 10,712 10,866 10,417 8,071 Ins., Life & Dis. 5,093 5,174 4,492 3,039 Expendables 57,920 59,769 61,933 46,881 T

  23. Slide 23: Illinois FBFM data 2002-2006

    Data  Illinois FBFM  1045 Farms  2002-2006  Asset Valuation: Market  Income Statements: Schedule F Cash Basis and Accrual- adjusted

  24. Slide 24: Accrual-adjusted vs Schedule F by year

    Year Median Absolute Difference: (Accrual-Adjusted – schedule F)/ Accrual-Adjusted 2002 16,820 56% 2003 31,351 61% 2004 43,223 63% 2005 23,445 52% 2006 45,510 63%

  25. Slide 25: Median absolute difference, years averaged

    Years Median Absolute Difference Averaged (Accrual-adjusted – Schedule F)/ Accrual-adjusted 2002-04 $26,726 52% 2003-05 $30,817 52% 2004-06 $34,770 54% 5-Year 2002-06 $28,253 52%

  26. Slide 26: Difference by revenue growth rate

    Median Absolute Difference: Annual Gross Revenue Growth Rate 2002-06 Years Less than 5% 5-10% Greater than 10% Averaged 2002-04 46% 51% 54% 2003-05 41% 49% 58% 2004-06 41% 50% 61% 5-Year 2002-06 39% 52% 55%

  27. Slide 27: Difference by debt-to-asset level

    Median Absolute Difference: Debt-to-Asset Levels Years Greater than Averaged Less than 20% 20-40% 40% 2002-04 44% 56% 60% 2003-05 45% 56% 61% 2004-06 47% 57% 63% 5-Year 2002-06 44% 55% 60%

  28. Slide 28: Beginning and ending balance sheet, tax return

     Beginning Balance Sheet  Ending Balance Sheet  Income Tax Return  Schedule F  Form 4797

  29. Slide 29: Spreadsheet website address

     Spreadsheet  Website Address:  www.agecon.purdue.edu/files/EC712.xlsx

  30. Slide 30: Profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, repayment

     Profitability  Liquidity  Solvency  Financial Efficiency  Repayment Capacity

  31. Slide 31: Website addresses

     Website Addresses: www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/finance/benchmark_pdf www.iowafarmbusiness.org/PRES10/2010 www.northlandfbm-morehead.com/reports http://agmanager.info/kfma/

  32. Slide 32: Profitability ratio definitions

     Rate of return on farm assets = (NFI* + farm interest expense – value of operator and unpaid family labor and management)/average total farm assets  Rate of return on farm equity = (NFI* – value of operator and unpaid family labor and management)/average total farm equity  Operating profit margi

  33. Slide 33: Profitability ratios, high and low 20%

    ROA1 ROA ROE2 ROE OPMR*3 OPMR* High 20% Low 20% High 20% Low 20% High 20% Low 20% 2014** 11.0 -5.1 15.1 -13.7 27.0 -16.5 2017** 6.6 -3.7 8.3 -13.2 19.1 -12.2 2018 6.5 -4.4 7.9 -16.2 18.4 -14.9 2020 10.6 -2.5 14.9 -11.2 26.0 -10.1 2021** 14.6 -1.1 21.6 -8.0 32.8 -3.8 * This ratio was calculated using

  34. Slide 34: ROA and ROE by year

    ROA ROE ROA ROE High 20% High 20% Low 20% Low 20% 2014 11.0 15.1 -5.1 -13.7 2017 6.6 8.3 -3.7 -13.2 2018 6.5 7.9 -4.4 -16.2 2020 10.6 14.9 -2.5 -11.2 2021 14.6 21.6 -1.1 -8.0

  35. Slide 35: Liquidity and solvency ratio definitions

     Current ratio = total current farm assets/total current farm liabilities  Working capital to gross revenue* = working capital/gross revenue or value of farm production  Debt-to-asset = total farm liabilities/total farm assets  Equity-to-asset = total farm equity/total farm assets  Debt-to-equi

  36. Slide 36: Current ratio and working capital

    Current Current Working Working Ratio Ratio Capital to Capital to High 20% Low 20% GR GR High 20% Low 20% 2014 2.4 1.3 35.0 18.5 2017 2.2 1.1 40.0 8.0 2018 2.1 1.1 40.2 5.1 2020 2.3 1.2 36.9 12.1 2021 2.7 1.6 47.6 18.3

  37. Slide 37: Solvency ratios

    D/A1 D/A E/A2 E/A D/E3 D/E High 20% Low 20% High 20% Low 20% High 20% Low 20% 2014 33.0 45.0 67.0 55.0 0.48 0.80 2017 36.0 49.0 64.0 51.0 0.55 0.96 2018 35.0 51.0 65.0 49.0 0.53 1.03 2020 38.0 47.0 62.0 53.0 0.61 0.89 2021 42.0 51.0 58.0 49.0 0.71 1.04 1 Debt-to-asset. 2 Equity-to-asset. 3 Debt-to-e

  38. Slide 38: Financial efficiency ratio definitions

     Asset turnover ratio = gross revenue*/average total farm assets  Revenue/full-time laborer ratio = gross revenue*/number of operators and employees  Operating expense ratio = operating expenses (excluding interest and depreciation)/gross revenue*  Depreciation expense ratio = depreciation expen

  39. Slide 39: Asset turnover and operating expense ratios

    ATR*1 ATR* OER*2 OER* High 20% Low 20% High 20% Low 20% 2014 40.9 30.9 70.7 97.7 2017 34.8 30.7 72.1 96.4 2018 35.1 29.8 71.1 97.7 2020 40.6 25.2 68.7 90.8 2021 44.6 29.5 63.5 88.5 * This ratio was calculated using Gross Revenue (GR). 1 Asset turnover ratio. 2 Operating expense ratio.

  40. Slide 40: Depreciation, interest and NFI ratios

    DER*1 DER* IER*2 IER* NFI NFI High 20% Low 20% High 20% Low 20% Ratio* Ratio* High 20% Low 20% 2014 5.0 9.5 2.4 5.8 22.3 -13.3 2017 6.3 7.7 3.2 6.3 18.9 -10.3 2018 6.4 7.3 3.6 6.3 18.8 -11.3 2020 5.2 8.6 3.1 8.1 22.9 -7.5 2021 4.4 7.2 2.4 5.6 29.7 -1.3 * This ratio was calculated using Gross Revenue

  41. Slide 41: Repayment capacity ratio definitions

     Term debt and capital lease coverage ratio = [(NFI + total nonfarm income + depreciation expense + interest on term debts + interest on capital leases) – total income tax expense – withdrawals for family living]/annual scheduled principal and interest payments on term debts and capital leases  De

  42. Slide 42: Term debt coverage ratio

    Term Debt Term Debt Coverage Ratio Coverage Ratio High 20% Low 20% 2014 3.37 -0.45 2017 2.35 -0.16 2018 2.51 -0.22 2020 3.57 0.48 2021 5.31 0.91 * This ratio was calculated using Gross Revenue (GR). 1 Asset turnover ratio. 2 Operating expense ratio.

  43. Slide 43: Sensitivity analysis stress test

     Sensitivity Analysis “Stress Test”  Evaluate Alternatives  Prioritize Alternatives

  44. Slide 44: Scenario assumptions: debt-to-asset 30 percent

     Debt-to-Asset = 30 Percent  Interest Rates on Operating Debt = 3.5  Interest Rates on Term Debt = 5 Percent

  45. Slide 45: Scenario assumptions: debt-to-asset 46 percent

     Debt-to-Asset = 46 Percent  Interest Rates on Operating Debt = 3.5  Interest Rates on Term Debt = 5 Percent

  46. Slide 46: Gross farm income by year

    Year Amount Percent Billions Change 2013 $456.1 ------- 2014 470.3 3.1 2015 422.6 (10.1) 2016 399.4 ( 5.5) 2017 413.2 3.5 2018 414.0 0.2 2019 424.3 2.5 2020 437.2 3.0

  47. Slide 47: Revenue decrease scenarios

     1. Decrease Gross Farm Revenue by 5 percent  2. Decrease Gross Farm Revenue by 10 percent

  48. Slide 48: Production expenses by year

    Year Amount Percent Billions Change 2013 $355.8 ------ 2014 386.0 8.5 2015 355.0 (8.0) 2016 345.6 (2.6) 2017 346.5 0.3 2018 340.1 (1.8) 2019 344.8 1.4 2020 354.1 2.7

  49. Slide 49: Operating expense increase scenarios

     3. Increase Total Operating Expenses by 5 percent  4. Increase Total Operating Expenses by 10 percent

  50. Slide 50: Percentage change in income and expense

    Year Gross Farm Income Prod. Expense ------------------Percentage Change------------ 2013 1.1 2.1 2014 3.1 8.5 2015 (10.1) (8.0) 2016 (5.5) (2.6) 2017 3.5 0.3 2018 0.2 (1.8) 2019 2.5 1.4 2020 3.0 2.7

  51. Slide 51: Combined revenue and expense scenarios

     5. Decrease GFR by 5% and Increase OE 5%  6. Decrease GFR by 5% and Increase OE 10%  7. Decrease GFR by 10% and Increase OE 5%  8. Decrease GFR by 10% and Increase OE by 10%

  52. Slide 52: Scenario results, D/A 30 vs 46

     Scenarios D/A = 30 D/A = 46  Base 3.03 2.01  1 R↓5 2.45 1.65  2 R↓10 1.87 1.30  3 E↑5 2.63 1.77  4 E↑10 2.23 1.53  5 R↓5 E↑5 2.05 1.42  6 R↓5 E↑10 1.64 1.18  7 R↓10 E↑5 1.47 1.06  8 R↓10 E↑10 1.06 0.82

  53. Slide 53: Scenario with higher interest rates

     Debt-to-Asset = 30 vs. 46 Percent  Interest Rates on Operating Debt = 3.5 and 6.0  Interest Rates on Term Debt = 5 and 7.5 Percent  Working Capital to Gross Farm Revenue = 19 Percent

  54. Slide 54: Scenario results, low and high interest

     Scenarios D/A = 30 D/A = 46  Base-Low Int. 3.03 2.01  Base-High Int. 2.50 1.61  1 R↓5 1.99 1.31  2 R↓10 1.49 1.01  3 E↑5 2.15 1.41  4 E↑10 1.80 1.21  5 R↓5 E↑5 1.64 1.11  6 R↓5 E↑10 1.29 0.91  7 R↓10 E↑5 1.13 0.81  8 R↓10 E↑10 0.78 0.61

  55. Slide 55: Fixed term debt scenario

     Debt-to-Asset = 30 vs. 46 Percent  Interest Rate on Term Debt Fixed at 5 Percent when the market is 7.5 Percent  Interest Rate on Operating Debt at 6.0 Percent  Working Capital to Gross Farm Revenue = 19 Percent

  56. Slide 56: Variable vs fixed-term results

     Scenarios Variable Fixed-Term  Base 2.50 2.87  1 R↓5 1.99 2.28  2 R↓10 1.49 1.70  3 E↑5 2.15 2.46  4 E↑10 1.80 2.06  5 R↓5 E↑5 1.64 1.88  6 R↓5 E↑10 1.29 1.48  7 R↓10 E↑5 1.13 1.30  8 R↓10 E↑10 0.78 0.90

  57. Slide 57: Variable vs fixed with working capital

     Scenarios Var.&WC/GR=19 Fixed&WC/GR=50  Base 1.61 2.03  1 R↓5 1.31 1.68  2 R↓10 1.01 1.33   3 E↑5 1.41 1.80  4 E↑10 1.21 1.56  5 R↓5 E↑5 1.11 1.44  6 R↓5 E↑10 0.91 1.20  7 R↓10 E↑5 0.81 1.09  8 R↓10 E↑10 0.61 0.85

  58. Slide 58: Keys to operating: credit standards, profitability, leverage

    1. Do not abandon proven credit standards 2. Focus on profitability – accrual-adjusted income statements • Large operations • Highly Leveraged • Farms in transition 3. Be Aware of the “Wealth Effect” - Purchase of Capital Assets when Profits and Repayment Capacity are Declining 4. Repayment Capacity

  59. Slide 59: Keys: insurance, marketing, liquidity, guarantees

    6. Reduce Production Risk with Crop Insurance 7. Reduce Market Risk with a Disciplined Marketing Plan 8. Pay Attention to Liquidity – Increase Working Capital to Gross Revenue for More Highly Leveraged Borrowers 9. Get Guarantees on Questionable Loans – When is the Best Time to Get a Loan Guarantee?

  60. Slide 60: Thank-you for Your Attendance and Attention!

     Thank-you for Your Attendance and Attention!  Questions?

  61. Slide 61: We Welcome Your Questions!

    We Welcome Your Questions! • We’ll answer as many questions as we can, with both speakers. • Simply raise your hand to ask a question and our speaker and/or moderator will call on you. 61 © 2022 First Citizens National Bank | 2022 Ag Insights Presentation

  62. Slide 62: Key factors FCNB considers when analyzing loans

    Key Factors FCNB Takes Into Consideration When Analyzing Loans • Annual Requirements • Complete Federal AND State Tax Returns • Personally • Any Entity Which Has More Than 20% Ownership • Along with K-1s • Personal or Agricultural Financial Statement • Assets/Liabilities/Net Worth • Current Business

  63. Slide 63: Key factors: repayment capacity, collateral, credit

    Key Factors FCNB Takes Into Consideration When Analyzing Loans • Repayment Capacity (Cash Flow) • Debt Service Coverage (Minimum 1.3x) • Historic Trends • Collateral • Loan-to-Value Ratio • Loan-to-Cost Ratio • Loan-to-Acre Ratio (on Land Loans) • Credit • History • Bureau Score (typically TransUnio

  64. Slide 64: Key factors: mitigating factors

    Key Factors FCNB Takes Into Consideration When Analyzing Loans • Mitigating Factors • Net Worth • Deposit Relationship with FCNB • Repayment History with FCNB • Dec. 31 Carryover (from one tax year into another) vs. Dec. 31 Line of Credit (Operating Debt) Balance • Income • Stored Grain as of 12/31

  65. Slide 65: Key factors: expenses

    Key Factors FCNB Takes Into Consideration When Analyzing Loans • Expenses • One-time Major Expense • Prepaid Inputs 65 © 2022 First Citizens National Bank | 2022 Ag Insights Presentation

  66. Slide 66: Farm Finance Scorecard

    Farm Finance Scorecard 66 © 2022 First Citizens National Bank | 2022 Ag Insights Presentation

  67. Slide 67: Speaker Series Upcoming Event Information

    KEY TAKEAWAYS Speaker Series Upcoming Event Information This concludes our presentation. Visit firstcitizensnational.com/2022-ag-event or use the QR to view and download the presentation. We invite you to follow us on LinkedIn and Facebook to learn more about this series and be the first to know whe

  68. Slide 68: Thank you!

    Thank you! J SUE NATIONAL BANK

The First Citizens National Bank — Investor Presentation (December 2022) on 6ix