Piraeus Bank S.a. · ATHEX:TPEIR

Piraeus Bank — Earnings Presentation (October 2014)

18 slides from Piraeus Bank's earnings presentation, Oct 26, 2014

  1. Slide 1: Asset Quality Review and Stress Test: Comprehensive Assessment Results

    Asset Quality Review and Stress Test Comprehensive Assessment Results 26 October 2014

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimer

    Disclaimer This presentation has been prepared solely for informational purposes. Any projections or other estimates in this presentation, including estimates on the returns or performance, or the results of our operations and business, are forward-looking statements based upon certain assumptions a

  3. Slide 3: Highlights

    01 Highlights 1.1 Key Takeaways 1.2 Summary Results: CET1 Ratios 1.3 Comprehensive Assessment Underlines Credit Loss Estimates in Line with BlackRock II Diagnostic Lifetime CLP 3 Highlights

  4. Slide 4: 1.1 Key Takeaways

    01 1.1 Key Takeaways  Piraeus is above the Comprehensive Assessment (‘CA’) thresholds post AQR, in the dynamic scenario, as well as in  Projected Loan Loss Reserves (‘LLRs’) in 2016YE reach 24% of gross loans in baseline static and 26% in adverse static, in the static scenario combined with the re

  5. Slide 5: 1.2 Summary Results: CET1 ratios

    01 1.2 Summary Results: CET1 ratios Baseline scenario Adverse scenario CET1 ratio 12.0% 12.4% 11.4% 10.7% € bn buffer CET1 ratio above threshold 8.0% 8.0% € bn buffer 2.8 2.5 2.1 € bn buffer above threshold 1.6 6.7% above threshold € bn buffer 6.1% 1.5 1.7 Threshold above threshold 0.8 8.0% 0.3 Th

  6. Slide 6: 1.3 Credit Loss Estimates in Line with BlackRock II Diagnostic Lifetime CLP

    1.3 Comprehensive Assessment Underlines Credit Loss Estimates in Line with 01 BlackRock II Diagnostic Lifetime CLP Baseline scenario - static Adverse scenario - static (€ mn) (€ mn) LLRs % gross loans 26.4% 29.7% LLRs % gross loans 24.2% 23.8% 22,476 3,647 20,120 1,926 18,399 18,033 2,709 2,709 13,7

  7. Slide 7: AQR Results

    02 AQR Results 2.1 AQR Methodology 2.2 AQR Non Performing Exposures 2.3 AQR Provisions 7 AQR Results

  8. Slide 8: 2.1 AQR Methodology

    02 2.1 AQR Methodology A very thorough process… …coupled with a prudent approach  Selected portfolio for credit file review covered   Prudent definition of NPE exposure, with 50% of total approx. 29% of AQR loan perimeter loan exposure classified as NPE  AQR perimeter covers 84% of total loan ex

  9. Slide 9: 2.2 AQR Non Performing Exposures

    02 2.2 AQR Non Performing Exposures NPL and NPE as % of total loans and total exposure, 31 December 2013 Group NPL to NPE reconciliation, 2013YE Coverage Implied NPE Pre AQR AQR Perimeter Group Perimeter Total 42% NPE Coverage Loan Other (Group Post AQR Implied 56% 51% 50% (a) € bn balances NPLs NPE

  10. Slide 10: 2.3 AQR Provisions

    02 2.3 AQR Provisions Group AQR adjustment to provisions Total Impact on Credit Risk NPE provision adjustments to CET1 ratio RWA coverage ratio Sampled Projection of Collective provisions (gross of tax (€ mn) 2013YE pre-AQR Files findings review (gross of tax) 31 Dec’13) Sovereigns and Supranational

  11. Slide 11: The Stress Test

    03 The Stress Test 3.1 EU-wide Stress Test Methodology 3.2 Overview of the Stress Test Exercise 3.3 PPI Conservatively Estimated 3.4 Prudent Loan and Other Assets Impairment 3.5 CET1 Above Minimum Requirement post SCI (Static) 3.6 CET1 Markedly Above Minimum Requirement (Dynamic) 11 The Stress Test

  12. Slide 12: 3.1 EU-wide Stress Test Methodology

    03 3.1 EU-wide Stress Test Methodology EBA, ECB 130 Banks EC, ESRB 20 Eurozone EU-wide Stress Test NCAs members The EU-wide stress test was carried out to assess the resilience of financial institutions to stress market developments and the Baseline & 3 year time potential for systemic risk to incre

  13. Slide 13: 3.2 Overview of the Stress Test Exercise

    03 3.2 Overview of the Stress Test Exercise Static Dynamic 4,104 Baseline scenario - Capital Impact (€ mn) Baseline scenario - Capital Impact (€ mn) 2,468 367 1,842 (1,862) (135) (632) (1,926) (253) (87) (767) (564) Adverse scenario - Capital Impact (€ mn) 1,927 Adverse scenario - Capital Impact (€

  14. Slide 14: 3.3 PPI Conservatively Estimated

    03 3.3 PPI Conservatively Estimated CA’s PPI vs. Run rates Reference Run- (€ mn)  Conservative assumptions adopted on capital generation capacity CA Estimated 3Y PPI rate of PPI 4,104  Comprehensive Assessment estimates imply substantial haircut to recently reported normalised PPI: 3,540 − Metho

  15. Slide 15: 3.4 Prudent Loan and Other Assets Impairment

    3.4 Prudent Loan and Other Assets 03 Impairment Prudent loan impairment (static approach) Real estate & other impairments (static approach)  Based on flow of new defaults akin to renewed stress over the forecast period (post AQR)  Real Estate impairment post AQR at €0.2 bn in baseline and €0.6 b

  16. Slide 16: 3.5 Static: CET1 Above Minimum Requirement post SCI

    3.5 Static: CET1 Above Minimum 03 Requirement post SCI Static capital position CET1: Baseline Adverse  PPIBaseline: estimated to be significantly lower than the run-rate: 30% lower than annualized 2Q 2014 Static balance sheet % € mn % € mn Adverse: 70% lower than annualized 2Q 2014 3Y adverse stati

  17. Slide 17: 3.6 Dynamic: CET1 Markedly Above Minimum Requirement

    3.6 Dynamic: CET1 Markedly Above 03 Minimum Requirement Dynamic capital position CET1: Baseline Adverse  PPI estimated to be significantly lower than the run-rate in the adverse scenario: Dynamic balance sheet % € mn % € mn Baseline: 16% higher than annualized 2Q 2014 Adverse: 46% lower than annual

  18. Slide 18: Communication

    Communication Anthimos Thomopoulos, CEO George Poulopoulos, CFO Costas Adamopoulos, Head, Business Planning, IR & Economic Analysis George Marinopoulos, Director, Business Planning & IR Chryssanthi Berbati, Head, Investor Relations Vicky Diamantopoulou, Head, Business Planning 4 Amerikis St, 105 64

Piraeus Bank — Earnings Presentation (October 2014) on 6ix