Bekaert Sa · EURONEXT:BEKB

Bekaert Sa — Technical Presentation (October 2014)

30 slides from Bekaert Sa's technical presentation, Oct 9, 2014

  1. Slide 1: Numerical Investigations of the Response of a Simplified Burner-heat exchanger System

    Numerical Investigations of the Response of a Simplified Burner-heat exchanger System to Inlet Velocity Excitations Naseh Hosseini, Viktor Kornilov, Joan Teerling, Ines Lopez Arteaga and Philip de Goey COMBURA '14 Combustion Research and Application Kontakt der Kontinenten, Soesterberg, The Netherla

  2. Slide 2: Thermoacoustics

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Thermoacoustics 2

  3. Slide 3: Challenges

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Challenges • Thermoacoustic noise is currently an issue in domestic heating systems • Closer burner and heat exchanger in compact condensing boilers • The industry’s need for design rules to make thermoacoustically stable systems 3

  4. Slide 4: Goal

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Goal • The physics of the interactions between a burner and a heat exchanger from a hydrodynamic and thermoacoustic point of view • In this presentation the method of modelling, implementation of CFD setup, validation of the simulati

  5. Slide 5: Numerical domain

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Numerical domain • Flat multi-slit burner • Plane 2D symmetric • Dimensions in mm 5

  6. Slide 6: The model

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - The model • ANSYS Fluent CFD code • Laminar flow with energy equation  • Species conservation t    Yi   .  vYi  .J i  Ri  Si • Single step reaction CH 4  2  O2  3.76 N2   CO2  2H 2O  7.52 N2 • Arrhenius formulat

  7. Slide 7: Verifications

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Verifications • Pseudo-1D model (0.02  35mm) • Grid independency 26.50 26.25 26.27 26.24 26.13 26.00 SL (CM/S) 25.75 25.83 25.50 25.25 25.00 0.020 SQR 0.025 SQR 0.050 SQR 0.100 SQR ELEMENT SIZE AND TYPE (MM) 7

  8. Slide 8: Verifications

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Verifications • Pseudo-1D model (0.02  35mm) • Grid independency • Equivalence ratio sensitivity 40 35 This Study Lange (1992) 30 Dyakov (2001) Kishore (2008) 25 Sl (cm/s) 20 15 10 5 0 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 Equiva

  9. Slide 9: Verifications

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Verifications • Pseudo-1D model (0.02  35mm) • Grid independency • Equivalence ratio sensitivity 90 80 This Study • Unburnt temperature sensitivity 70 Sharma (1981) 60 Brown (2003) Sl (cm/s) 50 40 30 20 10 0 150 200 250 300 350 400

  10. Slide 10: 2D grid, using 1D conclusions, 165,000 elements

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - 2D grid, using 1D conclusions, 165,000 elements 10

  11. Slide 11: Flame transfer function

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Flame transfer function • Velocity perturbation as input and heat release rate as output • Step increase of 5% with assumed linearity, 40ms relaxation time • The (complex) flame transfer function defined as relative flame response di

  12. Slide 12: Case studies

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Case studies Distance between Burner Deck Inlet Velocity (cm/s) and Heat Exchanger (mm) 25 50 5 Hex05-V25 Hex05-V50 10 Hex10-V25 Hex10-V50 15 Hex15-V25 Hex15-V50 N/A NoHex-V25 NoHex-V50 12

  13. Slide 13: Left: inlet velocity 25cm/s - Right: inlet velocity 50cm/s

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Left: inlet velocity 25cm/s - Right: inlet velocity 50cm/s • Reaction rate (kmol/m3s) • Temperature (K) 17

  14. Slide 14: Flow field through flame and around heat exchanger

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Flow field through flame and around heat exchanger 18

  15. Slide 15: Normalized Heat Release Rate

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement V50-NoHex V50-Hex15 V50-Hex10 V50-Hex05 V25-NoHex V25-Hex15 V25-Hex10 V25-Hex05 2.8 1.07 2.7 1.06 2.6 1.05 2.5 1.04 2.4 V50 1.03 V50 2.3 1.02 Normalized Heat Release Rate 2.2 1.01 Heat Release Rate (kW) 2.1 1.00 2.0 0.99 1.9 1.07 1.8 1

  16. Slide 16: Normalized Heat Release

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Offset for Hex05V50 1.07 1.06 Normalized Heat Release 1.05 1.04 1.03 1.02 NoHex 1.01 Hex15 1.00 Hex10 Hex05 0.99 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Time (ms) 20

  17. Slide 17: Response to square excitation

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Response to square excitation 1.06 1.05 Normalized Heat Release 1.04 1.03 1.02 1.01 1.00 0.99 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Time (ms) 21

  18. Slide 18: Case Studies with Heat Exchanger

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement 2.5 Deck Hex Flame Element Heat Transfer Rate (kW) 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 HEX05 HEX10 HEX15 HEX05 HEX10 HEX15 V25 V50 Case Studies with Heat Exchanger 22

  19. Slide 19: ReacTF - V25

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 1.0 1 Gain Gain 0.8 0.1 0.6 Gain Gain 0.01 0.4 0.001 0.2 0.0 0.0001 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Rea

  20. Slide 20: ReacTF - V25

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 1.0 1 Gain Gain 0.8 0.1 0.6 Gain Gain 0.01 0.4 0.001 0.2 0.0 0.0001 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Rea

  21. Slide 21: ReacTF - V50

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 1.6 1.4 Gain 1 Gain 1.2 1.0 Gain Gain 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.01 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.001 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz

  22. Slide 22: HexTF - V25

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 1.0 1 Gain Gain 0.8 0.6 Gain Gain 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.01 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) HexTF – V25 Hex15 Hex10 Hex0

  23. Slide 23: HexTF - V50

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 1.0 1 Gain Gain 0.8 0.6 Gain Gain 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.01 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) HexTF - V50 Hex15 Hex10 Hex0

  24. Slide 24: DeckTF - V25

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 1.6 1.4 Gain 1 Gain 1.2 1.0 Gain Gain 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) DeckTF –

  25. Slide 25: DeckTF - V50

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 NoHex Hex15 Hex10 Hex05 2.5 Gain Gain 2.0 1 1.5 Gain Gain 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) DeckTF - V50 NoHex He

  26. Slide 26: The possibility of calculating a total transfer function

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - The possibility of calculating a total transfer function Q flame Qhex Q TFflame  TFhex  deck TFdeck Qinput Qinput Qinput Qhex TFflame  TFhex Q flame Qhex TFtotal  TFflame  TFhex Q flame Hex Transfer Function Total Flame Deck - C

  27. Slide 27: The possibility of calculating a total transfer function

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - The possibility of calculating a total transfer function Hex Total Flame Deck 31

  28. Slide 28: Experimental setup

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - Experimental setup 32

  29. Slide 29: Conclusions

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement - The model accurately predicts combustion properties - Absolute heat release changes with approaching hex, but normalized values and flame transfer function don’t - Impingement causes intense flame cooling, counter phase behavior, and

  30. Slide 30: Acknowledgement

    Introduction Numerical Model Results Conclusions Acknowledgement The presented work is part of the Marie Curie Initial Training Network Thermo-acoustic and Aero-acoustic Nonlinearities in Green Combustors with Orifice Structures (TANGO). We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Europ

Bekaert — Technical Presentation (October 2014) on 6ix