Arkanova Energy Company · OTC:AKVA

Arkanova Energy — Investor Presentation (2007)

38 slides from Arkanova Energy's investor presentation, 2007

  1. Slide 1: Agenda

    AGENDA PROJECT BACKGROUND PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 LEASEHOLD VERIFICATION SUPPORT SEISMIC ACQUISITION DRILLING GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  2. Slide 2: North American Shale Plays

    16 0 °W North American Shale Plays 1 40 °W 12 0 °W 10 0 °W 8 0° W 60 °W 4 0 °W 7 0 °N 20 °W 20°W B e a uf o rt S e a GRE E NLAN D B af f i n B ay V ic U . S. A . to r ia I sl Ba Da A l a s ka an f f in vi d I s la sS nd t ra it 160°W Yu k o n N o rth W e s t T e rr i to r ie s L ab r ad or S e a N u

  3. Slide 3: Fayetteville Shale Facts

    Fayetteville Shale Facts Cumulative Production 05 and 06 = 20 BCFG Current Production Rates = 130 MMCF/D Industry Expected to Drill 600 Wells in 2007 Estimated 58-65 Bcf/Section Fayetteville Shale Play The Fayetteville Shale is contemporaneous with the Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin of Texas,

  4. Slide 4: Estimated Ultimate Recovery

    EUR ESTIMATED ULTIMATE RECOVERY VERTICAL WELLS 20 – 388 MMCF AVERAGE 109 MMCF HORIZONTAL WELLS 239 MMCF - 4.5 BCF AVERAGE 1.1 BCF Calculated from production, 2004- 2007 GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  5. Slide 5: Mississippian Age Shale Gas Plays

    MISSISSIPPIAN AGE SHALE GAS PLAYS GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  6. Slide 6: Fayetteville Play Leasing Activity

    a Arkanova ENERGY CORPORATION Fayetteville Play Leasing Activity + ‘ Lovett 1-7 Discovery Well a SF . ‘Thompson 1-32 Discovery Well Byers 1-3H Discovery Well NS i aN. 25 \ 4 Serge, & +> 2 ~~ ar * Arrington Helena Port Well ~ = Texas Gas Proposed Pipeline Drilled and Permitted Wel Since May, 2006) Mi

  7. Slide 7: Acreage Position

    ACREAGE POSITION GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  8. Slide 8: Phase 2: Play Potential

    PHASE 2 PLAY POTENTIAL PROPERTY IN ACTIVE PLAY FRONTIER FAYETTEVILLE SHALE WELLS 1. EURS 1.3 – 1.7 BCFG 2. AVERAGE INITIAL PRODUCTION 2.5 MMCFPD 3. $1.4 – $1.8 MILLION FOR HORIZONTAL COMPLETION 4. PROXIMITY TO PIPELINES GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  9. Slide 9: Risks in the Eastern Extension of the Fayetteville Shale Play

    RISKS IN THE EASTERN EXTENSION OF THE FAYETTEVILLE SHALE PLAY 1. WAS THE FAYETTEVILLE SHALE DEPOSITED? 2. HAS THE FAYETTEVILLE BEEN ERODED? 3. IS STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY AN ISSUE? 4. INFLUENCE of REELFOOT RIFT? GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  10. Slide 10: Paleogeography of the U.S.A., Late Mississippian Time

    Paleogeography of the U.S.A., Late Mississippian Time Shallow-marine shelf depositional setting in Arkansas- Mississippi area post Fayetteville Shale deposition GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  11. Slide 11: AOI shown on tectonic map of Arkansas and Mississippi

    AOI shown on tectonic map of Arkansas and Mississippi Note: AOI is near potentially deformed Paleozoic rocks. Deformation front of Fold and Thrust belt is closer to AOI based on gravity and magnetic GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES data. AOI is southeast of Reelfoot Rift.

  12. Slide 12: General Stratigraphy

    GENERAL STRATIGRAPHY PRODUCING AND Shales and COMPLETED FORMATIONS Sandstones Bold Gas Symbols ADDITIONAL TARGET INTERVALS Limestones and Cherts GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  13. Slide 13: Fayetteville Shale Productive Interval

    FAYETTEVILLE SHALE PRODUCTIVE INTERVAL COVE CREEK FIELD 3,000 Fayetteville 4,000 Fields PERFS FAYETTEVILLE SHALE Cove Ck Cove Creek Bosnick #1 Field Harrison #2-11 Faulkner County From SEECO Bosnick #1 Lee GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES County

  14. Slide 14: Well #1 Horizontal Frac Site

    WELL #1 HORIZONTAL FRAC ea SITE Frac Detail Tee * GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES LLC

  15. Slide 15: Risks in the Eastern Extension of the Fayetteville Shale Play

    RISKS IN THE EASTERN EXTENSION OF THE FAYETTEVILLE SHALE PLAY 1. FAYETTEVILLE SHALE WAS BELIEVED DEPOSITED ACROSS ENTIRE REGION 2. SUBSURFACE AND OUTCROP OCCURENCES INDICATE FAYETTEVILLE SHALE PRESENT IN THE GREATER AREA 3. STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY EXPECTED TO BE COMPARABLE TO EXISTING FIELDS 4. REELFO

  16. Slide 16: Conclusions

    CONCLUSIONS 1. THE PROPERTY IS AN EXPLORATION PLAY OF UNPROVEN POTENTIAL 2. PRODUCING INTERVAL IS PROBABLY PRESENT 3. STRUCTURAL RISK APPEARS SIMILAR TO EXISTING FIELDS 4. STRUCTURAL RISK HIGHER SOUTH OF TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH 5. EXPLORATION ACTIVITY IS APPROACHING THE PROPERTY 6. INDUSTRY INTEREST VERY H

  17. Slide 17: Recommendation

    RECOMMENDATION THE PROPERTY IS AN EXPLORATION PLAY OF UNPROVEN POTENTIAL IF EXPLORATION RISK IS ACCEPTABLE EXERCISE OPTION ON PROPERTIES GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  18. Slide 18: Phase 3

    PHASE 3 1. Review available 2D seismic 2. License representative seismic data 3. Obtain regional gravity and aeromagnetic surveys 4. Identify structural framework of Area of Interest (AOI) GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  19. Slide 19: Review Available 2D Seismic

    Review Available 2D Seismic 1. Identified 14 2D seismic lines (295 line miles) in vicinity of AOI 2. QC’d 6 seismic lines (200 line miles) 3. Selected part of 3 lines (43 miles) to license for interpretation GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  20. Slide 20: License Seismic Data

    License Seismic Data 1. Selected part of 3 lines (43 miles) to license for interpretation 2. Received licensed data June 6, 2006 3. Loaded one line to interpretation workstation 4. Delivered field data to be reprocessed 5. Reprocessed data expected late June 2006 GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  21. Slide 21: Gravity & Aeromagnetic Surveys

    Gravity & Aeromagnetic Surveys 1. Gravity data – U.S.G.S. PP-1474 2. Aeromagnetic survey – N.U.R.E. GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  22. Slide 22: Structural Framework of AOI

    Structural Framework of AOI Gravity shows: 1. Reelfoot Rift 2. Areas of thicker sedimentary section 3. Fold – Thrust Belt GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  23. Slide 23: Structural Framework of AOI

    Structural Framework of AOI Available seismic suggests: 1. Thickness of sedimentary section 2. Depth to Cretaceous - Paleozoic unconformity 3. Low amplitude folds in Paleozoic section GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  24. Slide 24: Play Qualities

    PLAY QUALITIES 1. Contemporaneous with Barnett Shale, Caney Shale, and Floyd Shale Intervals 2. Actively Explored 3. Analogous Stratigraphy 4. Analogous Production 5. Infrastructure GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  25. Slide 25: Activity in the Eastern Fayetteville Play

    ACTIVITY IN THE EASTERN FAYETTEVILLE PLAY GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  26. Slide 26: Gravity Structural Features

    Gravity Structural Features Reelfoot Rift Areas of thicker sediments Fold-Thrust Belt GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  27. Slide 27: Aeromagnetic Structural Features

    Aeromagnetic Structural Features Area of N.U.R.E. aeromagnetic survey Aeromagnetic data corresponds with gravity data GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  28. Slide 28: Seismic Data Reviewed

    Seismic Data Reviewed Location of seismic data reviewed on gravity map with drilled and permitted wells GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  29. Slide 29: Seismic Data Detail

    Seismic Data Detail Blue seismic data reviewed (200 miles) Green seismic data licensed (43 miles) GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  30. Slide 30: Phase 4

    PHASE 4 1. LICENSE ADDITIONAL 2D SEISMIC 2. REPROCESS ADDITIONAL SEISMIC 3. INTERPRET GEOPHYSICAL DATA 4. UPDATE LAND MAPS 5. RECOMMEND WELL SITES GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  31. Slide 31: Seismic Data and Acreage

    Seismic Data and Acreage GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  32. Slide 32: Sketch of Seismic Line SEI-12X

    Sketch of Seismic Line SEI-12X 14 Miles Quaternary Cretaceous Sediments -0.500 0.500- 2800 Feet 2900 Feet -1.000 1.000- 4200 Feet 5000 Feet Unconformity TWT in Seconds TWT in Seconds -1.500 1.500- Zone of Low Amplitude Folds (Paleozoics) -2.000 2.000- 2.500- -2.500 Flat lying Quaternary and Cretaceo

  33. Slide 33: Top of Pre-Cretaceous Unconformity

    2500 Top of Pre-Cretaceous Unconformity 2250 2000 1750 1500 1250 1000 750 500 250 0 -250 -500 0 -750 50 -1000 -1 -1250 -1500 -1750 00 - 20 -2000 -2250 -2500 -2750 0 50 -3000 -2 00 -3250 -20 -3500 -3750 -4000 00 - 30 -4250 -4500 00 -30 - 35 00 0 - 4 00 0 -400 -4500 0 94,817 FEET PETRA 5/9/2007 3:32:5

  34. Slide 34: Proposed Seismic Survey

    Proposed Seismic Survey a2 + t jah | | halal LINZ | INS E Arkanova ENERGY CORPORATION a Hcceer t : + : 4s 12 a + +—4 + . | | |} : sews 4 isle. t } 1 } Legend ——— Proposed Seismic Survey =] Arkanova Acreage G GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  35. Slide 35: Drilling

    DRILLING WELLS #1 AND #2 $1,600,000 Drilling, Evaluation and Logging of multiple horizons that have potential and other horizons that are thought to have potential in the region. GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  36. Slide 36: Budget

    BUDGET Commissions $ 600,000 Legal Fees and Closing Costs 25,000 Repay Bridge Loan, w/ interest 615,000 Acreage Payments 3,400,000 Drilling 2 Exploratory Wells* 1,600,000 Seismic Program 200,000 Employee & Consultant Comp. 500,000 Professional Fees 150,000 General & Administrative 250,000 General Wo

  37. Slide 37: GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

    — ——._N Arkanova ENERGY CORPORATION G GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

  38. Slide 38: GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

    —_ ——._N CORPORATION G GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES

Arkanova Energy — Investor Presentation (2007) on 6ix