Marie-Eve Robinson1, Melita Irving2, Ravi Savarirayan3, Paul Arundel4, Josep Maria de Bergua5, Philippe M. Campeau6, Thomas Edouard7, Svein Fredwall8, Paul Harmatz9, Henrik Irgens10, Jeannette Goh11, Antonio Leiva-Gea12, Helen McDevitt13, Roberta Onesimo14, John Phillips15, Mariana del Pino16, Massimiliano Rossi17, Kim Davis18, Lixin Zhang18, Diana Davydov18, Xinyuan Duan18, David van Veenhuyzen18, Julie Hoover-Fong19
1Shriners Hospital for Children Canada, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; 2Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; 3Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia; 4Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom;
5MIKS Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; 6Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada; 7Children's Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France; 8Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 9UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland, Oakland, United States of America;
10Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, 11KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; 12Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain; 13NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom; 14Fondazione Policlinico A Gemelli IRCCS,
Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; 15Vanderbilt Health, Nashville, United States of America; 16Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; 17Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; 18BridgeBio Pharma, San Francisco, United States of America;
19Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States of America
LB-P2075BACKGROUND
Infigratinib is an oral FGFR1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor under investigation as a treatment for achondroplasia (ACH), an FGFR3-driven skeletal dysplasia characterized by disproportionate short stature1,2
The phase 2 PROPEL 2 trial provided clinical proof-of-concept for the 0.25 mg/kg/day dosing of infigratinib for children with ACH1
Subsequently, the efficacy and safety of infigratinib 0.25 mg/kg/day were demonstrated in the pivotal, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PROPEL 3 trial in children aged 3 to <18 years with ACH2
The primary endpoint was met, with infigratinib demonstrating a significant increase from baseline at week 52 in annualized height velocity compared with placebo (difference in least-squares mean change from baseline [CFBL]: 1.74 cm/year, p<0.0001; difference in observed mean CFBL: 2.10 cm/year)
Treatment with infigratinib also resulted in a significant increase from baseline at week 52 in height z-score compared with placebo (0.32, p<0.0001) and a trend toward improvement in upper-to-lower body segment ratio, which reached nominal significance in children aged 3 to <8 years
Here, we report preliminary findings of the longer-term efficacy and safety of infigratinib in children with ACH across the PROPEL clinical program
METHODS
Mean height z-score continued to numerically increase at each successive annual visit through Year 3
(Figure 2)
Figure 2. Height z-score relative to CLARITY1.28
1.6
0.71
0.50
0.09
1.4
Mean height z-score
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
Baseline Year 1
Visit
Year 2 Year 3
The PROPEL clinical program in children aged 3 years and older with ACH comprises the observational
No. of participants 94 94
22 11
run-in PROPEL study, the phase 2 PROPEL 2 study, the phase 3 PROPEL 3 study, and the open-label extension PROPEL OLE study (Figure 1)
Figure 1. PROPEL clinical program designMean CFBL in height z-score 0.41 0.66 0.92
Error bars indicate the standard error.
Mean upper-to-lower body segment ratio numerically decreased across annual visits through Year 3 (Figure 3)
Figure 3. Upper-to-lower body segment ratio2.07
Mean upper-to-lower body segment ratio
2.2
2.00
1.98
1.84
2.1
2.0
1.9
PROPEL:
Observational run-in study
Participants: Children aged 2.5 to <17 years with confirmed diagnosis of achondroplasia
Observation
PROPEL 2:
Open-label dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 2 study
Participants: Children aged 3 to <11 years with confirmed diagnosis of achondroplasia
Infigratinib
0.25 mg/kg/day Extended treatment period
Infigratinib
0.128 mg/kg/day Extended treatment period
Infigratinib
0.064 mg/kg/day Extended treatment period
Infigratinib
0.032 mg/kg/day Extended treatment period
Infigratinib
0.016 mg/kg/day Extended treatment period
PROPEL OLE:
Open-label extension study
Participants: Children aged 3 to <18 years who completed PROPEL 2 or PROPEL 3, or who are treatment-naïve and
completed ≥6 months in PROPEL
Infigratinib
0.25 mg/kg/day
Children are followed for a minimum of 6 months
PROPEL 3:
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study
Participants: Children aged 3 to <18 years with confirmed diagnosis of achondroplasia
Infigratinib 0.25 mg/kg/day
2:1
Placebo
Followed on treatment until adult height is reached
1.8
1.7
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Visit
No. of participants 94 94 22 11
Eligible participants from PROPEL, PROPEL 2, and PROPEL 3 rolled over to PROPEL OLE to receive infigratinib until adult height is reached
These analyses focused on participants of the PROPEL clinical program who initiated treatment with infigratinib at the 0.25 mg/kg/day dose
Pooled efficacy population
The pooled efficacy analysis included participants who received infigratinib 0.25 mg/kg/day for at least one year
Upper-to-lower body segment ratio = Sitting height
Standing height - Sitting height
Rhizomelic shortening of the limbs relative to the trunk results in the upper-to-lower body segment ratio to be approximately 2.0 in children with ACH, while average stature populations typically reach a ratio of 1.04,5
Sitting height
Standing height
Upper segment
The primary endpoint was absolute value and CFBL in height z-score relative to CLARITY3 reference data, and a key secondary endpoint was absolute value and CFBL in upper-to-lower body segment ratio
Lower segment
Safety population
The safety analysis included participants who received at least one dose of infigratinib in PROPEL OLE
Safety data reported here are all events that had an onset after the first dose of infigratinib on PROPEL OLE
RESULTS
Pooled efficacy population
At data cutoff of 07-November-2025, a total of 94 participants (23 from PROPEL 2 and 71 from PROPEL 3) were included in the pooled efficacy population (Table 1)
Median (range) duration of treatment among participants included in the pooled efficacy population was 433 (353-1236) days
Table 1. Characteristics of pooled efficacy population at baseline of PROPEL 2 or PROPEL 3Characteristic
Pooled efficacy population (n=94)
Age at first dose in PROPEL 2 or PROPEL 3
Mean (SD), years
7.7 (2.6)
Median (range), years
7.3 (3.7-14.4)
Distribution, n (%)
3 to <8 years
56 (60)
8 to <18 years
38 (40)
Sex, n (%)
Female
44 (47)
Male
50 (53)
Race,* n (%)
Asian
16 (17)
Black or African American
4 (4)
White
60 (64)
Multiple
6 (6)
*Not reported (n=8). SD, standard deviation.
REFERENCES: 1. Savarirayan R, et al. Oral Infigratinib Therapy in Children with Achondroplasia. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(9):865-874. 2. Savarirayan R, et al. Phase 3 Trial of Oral Infigratinib in Children with Achondroplasia. N Engl J Med. 2026. Online ahead of print. 3. Hoover-Fong JE, et al. Growth in achondroplasia including stature, weight, weight-for-height and head circumference from CLARITY: achondroplasia natural history study-a multi-center retrospective cohort study of achondroplasia in the US. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):522. 4. Hoover-Fong JE, et al. Age-appropriate body mass index in children with achondroplasia: interpretation in relation to indexes of height. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(2):364-71. 5. Savarirayan R, et al. Growth parameters in children with achondroplasia: A 7-year, prospective, multinational, observational study. Genet Med. 2022;24(12):2444-2452.
FUNDING: These studies were sponsored by BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., San Francisco, CA, US.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors would like to thank all the children and families, and all the investigators and study teams, who participated in the PROPEL clinical program.
PRESENTING AUTHOR DISCLOSURES: Melita Irving has received honoraria and travel-associated expenses from BridgeBio Pharma, BioMarin, Ascendis Pharma, and Tyra Biosciences.
Mean CFBL in upper-to-lower body segment ratio -0.07 -0.15 -0.15
Error bars indicate the standard error.
Safety population
At data cutoff of 07-November-2025, a total of 146 participants who rolled over to PROPEL OLE (33 from PROPEL, 24 from PROPEL 2, and 89 from PROPEL 3) were included in the safety population (Table 2)
Median (range) duration of treatment in PROPEL OLE among participants included in the safety population was 109 (2-725) days
Table 2. Characteristics of safety population at baseline of PROPEL OLECharacteristic
Safety population (n=146)
Age at baseline of PROPEL OLE
Mean (SD), years
8.6 (2.6)
Median (range), years
8.2 (4.0-15.9)
Distribution, n (%)
3 to <8 years
68 (47)
8 to <18 years
78 (53)
Sex, n (%)
Female
61 (42)
Male
85 (58)
Race,* n (%)
Asian
23 (16)
Black or African American
3 (2)
White
101 (69)
Other
14 (10)
*Not reported (n=5).
Infigratinib continued to be well tolerated in PROPEL OLE, with infrequent grade 3 and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and no grade 4 TEAEs or TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (Table 3)
Table 3. Summary of adverse events in PROPEL OLECategory, n (%)
Safety population (n=146)
Any TEAE
102 (70)
Treatment-related TEAE*
5 (3)
Grade 3 TEAE†
5 (3)
Treatment-related grade 3 TEAE
0
Grade 4 TEAE
0
Treatment-related grade 4 TEAE
0
Serious TEAE‡
3 (2)
Treatment-related serious TEAE
0
TEAE leading to dose modification§
4 (3)
TEAE leading to dose interruption
3 (2)
TEAE leading to dose reduction
2 (1)
TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation
0
TEAE leading to death
0
Adverse events include all events that had an onset after the first dose of infigratinib on PROPEL OLE and before the latest dose plus 30 days.
*Treatment-related TEAEs reported in this study included: hyperphosphatemia (n=2), arthralgia (n=1), pain in extremity (n=1), and rash erythematous (n=1). † Grade 3 TEAEs reported in this study included: adenoidal hypertrophy (n=1), delirium febrile (n=1), dental caries (n=1), gastritis (n=1), and meniscus injury (n=1). ‡Serious TEAEs reported in this study represent three of the same grade 3 TEAEs noted in the previous footnote: adenoidal hypertrophy (n=1), delirium febrile (n=1), and gastritis (n=1). §Participants may be included in more than one dose modification category.
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with oral infigratinib 0.25 mg/kg/day led to sustained numerical improvements in height z-score and upper-to-lower body segment ratio in children with ACH; however, the small sample sizes at Years 2 and 3 suggest they should be interpreted with appropriate caution
The safety profile of infigratinib remained consistent with previously reported findings, with no new safety concerns identified in PROPEL OLE
Continued follow-up in PROPEL OLE will further characterize the long-term treatment effects and expand the safety experience with infigratinib
Presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE 2026), September 8-10, Marseille, France

