Cytokinetics, Incorporated · NASDAQ:CYTK

Cytokinetics — Investor Presentation (April 2022)

63 slides from Cytokinetics's investor presentation, April 2022

  1. Slide 1: Empowering Muscle, Empowering Lives

    Sarcomere Directed Therapies EMPOWERING MUSCLE EMPOWERING LIVES Nefertari, diagnosed with heart failure Jillian, diagnosed with HCM Chuck, diagnosed with ALS CYTOKINETICS® and the C-shaped logo are registered trademarks of Cytokinetics in the U.S. and certain other countries Copyright©2022 CYTOKINET

  2. Slide 2: Forward-Looking Statements

    Forward-Looking Statements This Presentation contains forward-looking statements for purposes of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Cytokinetics disclaims any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements and claims the protection of the Act's Safe Ha

  3. Slide 3: Our Mission

    Sarcomere Directed Therapies OUR MISSION To bring forward new medicines to improve the healthspan of people with devastating cardiovascular and neuromuscular diseases of impaired muscle function. 3

  4. Slide 4: Vision

    Achieve regulatory approvals for at least two drugs arising from our pipeline Build commercial capabilities to market and sell our medicines reflective of their innovation and value VISION Our vision is to be the leading muscle biology biopharma company that Generate sustainable and growing revenues

  5. Slide 5: Executing On Our Vision

    Executing On Our Vision • Positive Phase 3 results from • Scientific innovation driven by GALACTIC-HF modulating cardiac myosin • Phase 3 trial, SEQUOIA-HCM, • First-in-class myosin activator enrolling patients with oHCM • Next-in-class myosin inhibitor • Cohort 4 of Phase 2 trial, • Expansion beyon

  6. Slide 6: Sarcomere Directed Drug Development

    Sarcomere Directed Drug Development The sarcomere is a molecular structure found in skeletal and cardiac muscle that enables cardiac myocytes to contract and generate force ACTIVATE INHIBIT INHIBIT ACTIVATE ACTIVATE ACTIVATE Troponin Omecamtiv Reldesemtiv CK-136 CK-601 Aficamten CK-271 Mecarbil (Car

  7. Slide 7: Pipeline of Novel Muscle-Directed Drug Candidates

    Pipeline of Novel Muscle-Directed Drug Candidates Research Pre-Clinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 CARDIAC MUSCLE Omecamtiv Mecarbil (Heart Failure) NDA Filed PDUFA: 11/30/22 Aficamten (oHCM, nHCM, HFpEF) CK-271 CK-136 (Heart Failure, other) SKELETAL MUSCLE Reldesemtiv (ALS)* CK-601 Additional Skeletal

  8. Slide 8: Cardiac Muscle

    Sarcomere Directed Drug Development CARDIAC MUSCLE Omecamtiv Mecarbil Aficamten 8

  9. Slide 9: Contractile Dysfunction Underlies Cardiac Diseases

    Contractile Dysfunction Underlies Cardiac Diseases Increased / Preserved Decreased Cardiac Cardiac Contractility Contractility • Non-obstructive • Heart Failure with Hypertrophic Reduced Ejection Cardiomyopathy (nHCM) Fraction (HFrEF) • Obstructive Hypertrophic • Genetic Dilated Cardiomyopathy (oHCM

  10. Slide 10: Omecamtiv Mecarbil

    Omecamtiv Mecarbil Omecamtiv mecarbil is an investigational agent and has not been approved for use by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or any regulatory agency. The safety and effectiveness of this product has not been established. 10

  11. Slide 11: Heart Failure Is a Public Health Epidemic

    Heart Failure Is a Public Health Epidemic ~6.5M Americans ≥20 years of age have HF; 1M new HF cases occur annually 1 High cost burden driven by hospitalizations; mean cost for each hospital stay ~$17K2 46% 127% 50% ~900,000 24% 49% Increase in Cost increase of HF patients who will Annual HF Patients

  12. Slide 12: Significant Unmet Need in HFrEF

    Significant Unmet Need in HFrEF Proprietary market research suggests need for novel therapy Market research Drugs that Drugs that Disease Drugs that do Drugs that suggests need do not affect enhance cardiac modifying not affect BP increase QoL for novel therapy renal function performance therapies P

  13. Slide 13: Pivotal Phase 3 Trial Design

    Pivotal Phase 3 Trial Design Second largest clinical trial ever conducted in heart failure Overview Enrolled 8,256 patients at ~1,000 sites in 35 countries Primary Endpoint Composite of time to cardiovascular (CV) death or first HF event*, whichever occurs first Secondary Endpoints • Time to CV deat

  14. Slide 14: Baseline Characteristics

    Baseline Characteristics OM Placebo OM Placebo Characteristic Characteristic (N=4120) (N=4112) (N=4120) (N=4112) Demographics Vitals and Laboratory Parameters 1977 2025 NT-proBNP (pg/mL), median (Q1, Q3) Age (years), median (Q1, Q3) 66 (58, 73) 66 (58, 73) (980, 4061) (1000, 4105) SBP (mmHg), mean (

  15. Slide 15: Positive Primary Composite Endpoint

    Positive Primary Composite Endpoint Treatment effect increased in more advanced patients 8% Relative Risk Reduction in Primary Composite Endpoint Treatment Effect Increased Progressively As (Time to First Heart Failure Event or CV Death)1 Baseline LVEF Decreased2 1.2 Treatment Effect (Ratio) 1.0 0.8

  16. Slide 16: Greater Treatment Effect in Worsening HF

    Greater Treatment Effect in Worsening HF Primary Outcome in Severe HF: HR = 0.80 (0.71, 0.90) Primary Outcome in Patients with LVEF ≤28%: (Severe HF defined as NYHA III-IV, EF ≤30%, HF hosp <6 mos)1,2 HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.77, 0.92 Severe HF-Placebo Not severe HF-Placebo Severe HF-Omecamtiv Not severe H

  17. Slide 17: Similar Risk Reduction in Hospitalized Patients vs. Outpatients

    Similar Risk Reduction in Hospitalized Patients vs. Outpatients Initiating omecamtiv mecarbil in hospitalized patients safe, well-tolerated • Rate of primary outcome higher in hospitalized patients in the placebo group than in outpatients • Effect of omecamtiv mecarbil versus placebo on the primary

  18. Slide 18: Laboratory and Safety Events

    Laboratory and Safety Events Omecamtiv Mecarbil Placebo Relative Risk or Difference Variable (N=4110) (N=4101) (95% CI) Laboratory value change from baseline to Week 24 Systolic blood pressure – mmHg, mean (SD) 1.4 (15.3) 1.5 (15.6) -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6) Heart rate, bpm, mean (SD) -2.1 (12.6) -0.5 (12.8)

  19. Slide 19: Large and Growing Heart Failure Patient Population

    Large and Growing Heart Failure Patient Population Prevalence in Adults (18+, USA) 2020 Estimates 2032 Estimates 6.2M1 8.0M3 Heart Failure Including HFpEF 3.1M2 4.0M3 HFrEF Population 2.0M2 2.6M3 HFrEF & EF ≤30% Proposed Cardiac Function Recent Event GDMT Limitations Omecamtiv Mecarbil Target Patien

  20. Slide 20: High Cost Burden Primarily Due to Hospitalizations

    High Cost Burden Primarily Due to Hospitalizations Omecamtiv mecarbil reduced clinical events, resource utilization & costs related to HF events Omecamtiv mecarbil reduced costs Over next decade, HF cost burden Mostly due to cycle of hospitalizations related to HF events in is expected to increase o

  21. Slide 21: Omecamtiv Mecarbil: Value Proposition

    Omecamtiv Mecarbil: Value Proposition In HFrEF, patients with lower ejection Hospitalization reductions seen in fractions are hospitalized more often clinical trial of omecamtiv mecarbil In HFrEF, every 10 points lower EF, is proven to drive Clinically meaningful and statistically significant higher

  22. Slide 22: Small Subset of Cardiologists Manage Majority of Patients

    Small Subset of Cardiologists Manage Majority of Patients HFrEF Patient Concentration in Cardiologists Distribution of High-Volume Cardiologists 100% % of Patients 50% 0% 0% 50% 100% % of Cardiologists Allows for more targeted field team approach, focusing on <10,000 HCPs Symphony APLD (1/1/2019 – 1

  23. Slide 23: Engagement Approach Allows Customizing and Broadening

    Engagement Approach Allows Customizing and Broadening Customizing engagement by different types of customers Digital allows broader reach ~~ illustrative ~~ ~~ illustrative ~~ Targeted Broadening Targeted Community Reach Beyond HF Specialist Cardiologist Initial Target Field & Inside Digital Reimbur

  24. Slide 24: Medicare Is Major Payer with Select Key Players

    Medicare Is Major Payer with Select Key Players Medicare is largest payer; enrollment highly concentrated with nearly 3 of 4 patients in only 5 plans Medicare Part D Enrollment (2019) Estimated Payer Mix Entresto Based Payer Mix on Entresto® (2018) 2018 Data Managed Medicaid 8% Top 5 plans have 75%

  25. Slide 25: Gated Build of Commercial Infrastructure

    Gated Build of Commercial Infrastructure Majority of spending to occur post-approval 2/3 of hiring to occur post-approval Activities initiated upon key de-risking events Underway Pre-NDA filing Market access Commercial leadership Pricing strategy Marketing Distribution approach HEOR Payer engagement

  26. Slide 26: Commercial Supply Chain Operating Model

    Commercial Supply Chain Operating Model Planning, Analytics & Master Data 2021-2022 Manufacturing, Finance Science & Quality Technology 2021-2022 External Commercial Manufacturing 2021-2022 Supply Chain Logistics 2021-2022 Commercial R&D Sales & Marketing Product Strategy 2023+ Not for Promotional U

  27. Slide 27: Aficamten

    Aficamten Aficamten is an investigational agent and has not been approved for use by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or any regulatory agency. The safety and effectiveness of this product has not been established. 27

  28. Slide 28: In US, Large HCM Population With Many Undiagnosed

    In US, Large HCM Population With Many Undiagnosed HCM Prevalence Potential Undiagnosed Patients Currently ~400-800K ~280K diagnosed, 700 – ~190K oHCM 1,100K symptomatic patients Estimated ~400-800K nHCM* 280K Diagnosed Patients un-diagnosed patients oHCM* ~280K Mava success 190K Now Future nHCM: non

  29. Slide 29: Significant Unmet Need in HCM

    Significant Unmet Need in HCM Current therapies do not target underlying disease Current medical HCM is an inherited Surgical intervention therapy does not target cardiovascular disease not permanent solution underlying disease 1 in 500 have genetic mutation Invasive therapy to reduce Indirect mecha

  30. Slide 30: Aficamten: Aspirational Target Profile

    Aficamten: Aspirational Target Profile Potential next-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor Functional Improvement: Improved exercise capacity Efficacy Symptom Improvement: One or two class improvement in NYHA class Quality of Life: KCCQ improvement Minimal drug-drug interactions Safety and Maintain LVE

  31. Slide 31: SAD & MAD Results Support Progression to Phase 2

    SAD & MAD Results Support Progression to Phase 2 Preclinical data translated to healthy participants Shallow Exposure-Response Relationship Observed MAD PK: Steady-State Achieved After 14 Pre-clinically Appears to Have Translated to Humans, Days of Dosing May Enable Flexible Dose Optimization in Hum

  32. Slide 32: REDWOOD-HCM: Cohorts 1 & 2

    REDWOOD-HCM: Cohorts 1 & 2 Patients with symptomatic oHCM on background therapy excluding disopyramide Two sequential dose-finding cohorts Randomization Patients with Aficamten + SoC End of Study Screening symptomatic oHCM, 2 and resting or provoked LVOT 1 gradient ≥ 50 mmHg Placebo + SoC Study Visi

  33. Slide 33: Patient Enrollment and Dosing

    Patient Enrollment and Dosing Cohorts 1 & 2 41 Total Enrolled Patients Final Dose Achieved (N) 5 mg 10 mg 15 mg 20 mg 30 mg N = 14 Cohort 1 4 5 5 N = 14 Cohort 2 9 4 1 Not for Promotional Use, For Investors Only OV ER V IEW C A RD IAC C AND ID ATES F R A N C H I S E S T R A T EG Y S K E L E T A L C

  34. Slide 34: Baseline Characteristics

    Baseline Characteristics Cohorts 1 & 2 Placebo Aficamten Characteristic (n = 13) (n = 28) Age (Years), Mean (SD) [Range] 57.2 (9.6) [36,69] 56.6 (13.6) [33,78] < 65 Years 10 (77%) 17 (61%) Sex, n (%) Female 8 (62%) 15 (54%) Race = White, n (%) 12 (92%) 28 (100%) NYHA Class, n (%) Class II 11 (85%) 1

  35. Slide 35: Response Rates on Treatment with Aficamten

    Response Rates on Treatment with Aficamten Cohorts 1 & 2 1/13 11/14 13/14 100 Responder # / Total # 7.7% 78.6% 92.9% Not Responder • Consistent, clinically Responder 80 meaningful reductions in LVOT Responder Definition: Resting LVOT-G <30 gradients within two weeks mmHg and post- 60 Valsalva LVOT-G

  36. Slide 36: REDWOOD-HCM: Efficacy

    REDWOOD-HCM: Efficacy Cohorts 1 & 2 Reductions in LVOT gradients Resting LVOT-G Valsalva LVOT-G 80 100 80 Combined Placebo 60 Aficamten: Cohort 1 60 Aficamten: Cohort 2 mmHg mmHg 40 LVOT-G ≥50 mmHg 40 * ** ** ** * 20 ** ** *** *** * P < 0.05 *** ** 20 ** ** ** ** P < 0.001 mean ± SEM *** mean ± SEM

  37. Slide 37: Change from Baseline in NT-proBNP & NYHA Class

    Change from Baseline in NT-proBNP & NYHA Class Cohorts 1 & 2 Change from Baseline NT-proBNPto Week 10 Improvement in Heart Failure Symptoms (NYHA Class) Week 10 Responder Definition: Improvement in NYHA Class ≥1 0 100 31% -200 80 (n=4) 43% (n=6) 64% (n=9) NTproBNP (pg/mL) -400 60 % Total -600 40 69%

  38. Slide 38: REDWOOD-HCM: Cohort 3

    REDWOOD-HCM: Cohort 3 Patients with symptomatic oHCM on background therapy of disopyramide Same doses used in Cohort 3 as in Cohort 1 Patients with End of Study symptomatic Screening oHCM, and resting or provoked LVOT Aficamten + SoC AND disopyramide gradient ≥ 50 mmHg Study Visits Screen W-1* D1 W2

  39. Slide 39: REDWOOD-HCM: Efficacy in Patients on Disopyramide

    REDWOOD-HCM: Efficacy in Patients on Disopyramide Cohort 3 Reductions in LVOT gradients; no patients whose LVEF dropped below safety threshold LVOT Gradients Response Rates Treatment Washout For 53.8% with incomplete response, opportunity for dose escalation in SEQUOIA-HCM Complete Response: Resting

  40. Slide 40: REDWOOD-HCM: Efficacy in Patients on Disopyramide

    REDWOOD-HCM: Efficacy in Patients on Disopyramide Cohort 3 Improvement in functional class and cardiac biomarkers NYHA Response NT-proBNP Hs-Troponin I Geometric mean change from baseline to Week 10 Mean change from baseline to Week 10 Not for Promotional Use, For Investors Only OV ER V IEW C A RD I

  41. Slide 41: REDWOOD-HCM: Cohort 4

    REDWOOD-HCM: Cohort 4 Patients with symptomatic nHCM on background therapy Opened to enrollment in Q1 2022 End of Study Patients with Screening symptomatic nHCM, and resting or Aficamten + SoC provoked LVOT gradient ≥ 50 mmHg Study Visits Screen W-1* D1 W2 W4 W6** W8* W9* W10 W12 W14* Ambulatory Car

  42. Slide 42: SEQUOIA-HCM: Phase 3 Trial

    SEQUOIA-HCM: Phase 3 Trial Plan to enroll at 115 sites in US, Europe and Asia** Primary endpoint: Change in pVO2 by CPET from baseline to Week 24 Randomization Aficamten + SoC End of Study Patients with Screening Secondary objectives include measuring oHCM treated with SOC with 1 post-Valsalva chang

  43. Slide 43: REDWOOD-HCM: Open Label Extension

    REDWOOD-HCM: Open Label Extension Open for eligible patients who completed REDWOOD-HCM & SEQUOIA-HCM Expect to share data from REDWOOD-HCM OLE in 2022 • Primary endpoint: incidence of AEs & LVEF <50 • Secondary endpoints: measures of long-term effects of aficamten on LVOT-G; assessments of steady-st

  44. Slide 44: Aficamten: Clinical Development Plan for HCM

    Aficamten: Clinical Development Plan for HCM SEQUOIA-HCM enrolling patients with oHCM; REDWOOD-HCM Cohort 4 enrolling patients with nHCM Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Safety, PK & PD Proof of Concept, Dose Finding Pivotal Studies SAD & MAD REDWOOD-HCM Cohorts 1-3 SEQUOIA-HCM Healthy obstructive HCM obstru

  45. Slide 45: Novel Approach May Address Multiple Unmet Patient Needs

    Novel Approach May Address Multiple Unmet Patient Needs No FDA-approved therapies Obstructive HCM oHCM Aficamten (Cardiac myosin Inhibitor) nHCM HFpEF Non-Obstructive HCM Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Not for Promotional Use, For Investors Only OV ER V IEW C A RD IAC C AND ID ATES F

  46. Slide 46: Franchise Strategy

    Sarcomere Directed Drug Commercialization FRANCHISE STRATEGY 46

  47. Slide 47: Launch Guiding Principles Strengthen Franchise Build

    Launch Guiding Principles Strengthen Franchise Build Patient and Creating broad value for cardiac patients and build long-term, deep relationships customer centric with cardiologists with multiple CV medicines Leverage Go-to-Market synergies between multiple CV medicines, enabling Cost-efficient eff

  48. Slide 48: Limited Incremental Cost For Future U.S. CV Launches

    Limited Incremental Cost For Future U.S. CV Launches Building Today … … To Lead Tomorrow To optimize value capture for potential To support future launches and establish launch of omecamtiv mecarbil Cytokinetics as a CV leader • Building deep, long-term relationships • Significant overlap between HF

  49. Slide 49: Go-to-Market Synergies for Omecamtiv Mecarbil & Aficamten

    Go-to-Market Synergies for Omecamtiv Mecarbil & Aficamten Sales Given target overlap, leveraging same sales team Team Commercial Support Utilize resources across brands (e.g., access, analytics, …) Functions Synergy PV of ~ $500M Medical MSLs qualified to cover both HFrEF and HCM Affairs Corporate S

  50. Slide 50: Skeletal Muscle

    Sarcomere Directed Drug Development SKELETAL MUSCLE Reldesemtiv 50

  51. Slide 51: Reldesemtiv

    Reldesemtiv Reldesemtiv is an investigational agent and has not been approved for use by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) or any regulatory agency. The safety and effectiveness of this product has not been established. 51

  52. Slide 52: Phase 2 Clinical Trial in ALS

    Phase 2 Clinical Trial in ALS Results presented at American Academy of Neurology 2019 Annual Meeting Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled: 12 weeks Placebo (n = 110) Parallel group, dose ranging study enrolled 458 patients with ALS in the US, Canada, Australia and 150 mg BID (n = 110) Europe evaluating

  53. Slide 53: Primary Endpoint: SVC

    Primary Endpoint: SVC Change from baseline in percent predicted SVC at week 12 -6.46 -4.97 -4.62 -4.58 0 Percent Predicted SVC Change From -1 Baseline at Week 12 (95% CI) -2 -3 Primary Analysis* -4 P = 0.11 for weighted -5 dose-response relationship -6 -7 -8 * -9 Placebo 150 mg BID 300 mg BID 450 mg

  54. Slide 54: Phase 2 Clinical Trial in ALS Results

    Phase 2 Clinical Trial Primary analysis not statistically significant; patients on all doses of reldesemtiv declined less than patients on placebo* SVC Change From Baseline ALSFRS-R Change From Baseline (All Active vs Placebo) (All Active vs Placebo) 0.0 0.0 LS Mean (±SE) of Change in Functional Rat

  55. Slide 55: Subgroup Analyses

    Subgroup Analyses* Percent Predicted SVC ALSFRS-R Total Score No. of Patients LSM Difference No. of Patients LSM Difference (pbo/ reldesemtiv) (95% Cl) Estimate P value (pbo/ reldesemtiv) (95% Cl) Estimate P value Percent predicted SVC at baseline Percent predicted SVC at baseline <80 38/102 1.037 0

  56. Slide 56: Post-Hoc Analyses Inform Potential Path Forward

    Post-Hoc Analyses Inform Potential Path Forward Probability of No New DME Over Time Change From Baseline in ALSFRS-R With Treatment With Reldesemtiv by Progressor Tertiles DME (Durable Medical Equipment): Manual wheelchair, power wheelchair, NIV, Time (weeks) Augmentative Language Device, PEG 0 LS m

  57. Slide 57: COURAGE-ALS Phase 3 Clinical Trial Design

    Phase 3 Clinical Trial Design Plan to enroll 555 patients; interim analysis for futility in 2H 2022 Enrolling patients with ALS in the US, Canada, Reldesemtiv Australia and (N= 555) 300 mg BID End of Study Screening Randomization Europe evaluating 2:1 change from baseline ALSFRS-R Stratification: Ri

  58. Slide 58: Corporate Profile

    Sarcomere Directed Therapies CORPORATE PROFILE 58

  59. Slide 59: Robust Pipeline, Solid Financial Position

    Robust Pipeline, Solid Financial Position Pipeline 1 Potential commercial launch in 2022 2 Programs in Phase 3 trials 3 Potential FDA approvals by 2025 5 Clinical stage programs 10 Development programs by 2025 Heart Failure HCM ALS Ongoing Omecamtiv mecarbil Aficamten Reldesemtiv R&D Programs o Posi

  60. Slide 60: Monetizing Our Pipeline to Bolster Balance Sheet

    Monetizing Our Pipeline to Bolster Balance Sheet Symmetry of deals for omecamtiv mecarbil and aficamten affords synergies for development and potential launches and supports franchise strategies Sold 4.5% royalty Sold 3.5-4.5% royalty Transactions on worldwide net sales of on worldwide net sales of

  61. Slide 61: Balance Sheet & Financial Guidance

    Balance Sheet & Financial Guidance 2021 Condensed Balance Sheet 2022 Financial Guidance As of 12/31/2021 in millions in millions Total Total Cash and investments $623.7* Cash Revenue $20 – 25 Accounts receivable $51.8 Cash Operating Expenses $380 – 400 PPE $73.3 Net ~ $365 - 385 Leased assets $73.1

  62. Slide 62: Expected Milestones in 2022

    Expected Milestones in 2022 Launch omecamtiv mecarbil in the U.S. pending FDA approval in Q4 2022 Continue enrollment in Begin second Phase 3 Expect to share data from Continue enrollment SEQUOIA-HCM trial of aficamten in REDWOOD-HCM OLE in Cohort 4 of through 2022 oHCM in 2H 2022 in 2022 REDWOOD-HC

  63. Slide 63: Thank You

    Sarcomere Directed Therapies THANK YOU Nefertari, diagnosed with heart failure Jillian, diagnosed with HCM Chuck, diagnosed with ALS Copyright©2022 CYTOKINETICS, All Rights Reserved Actual patients who consented to use of their name, image, and condition.

Cytokinetics — Investor Presentation (April 2022) on 6ix