Bank Of Greece Sa · ATHEX:TELL

Bank Of Greece Sa — Technical Presentation (September 2022)

43 slides from Bank Of Greece Sa's technical presentation, September 2022

  1. Slide 1: What Are the Labor and Product Market Effects of Automation? New Evidence from France

    What Are the Labor and Product Market Effects of Automation? New Evidence from France Philippe Aghion, College de France Celine Antonin, OFCE Simon Bunel, Banque de France and PSE Xavier Jaravel, London School of Economics Workshop ESCB Research Cluster 2 September 2022 Any opinions and conclusions

  2. Slide 2: Motivation

    Motivation Why did major technological revolutions (steam engine, electricity) not generate mass unemployment anticipated by some? I Luddites in 1811-1812 I Keynes (1930): technological unemployment Policy implications: robot tax (Bill Gates, Andrew Yang, Benoît Hamon) Tradeoff: displacement vs. pro

  3. Slide 3: This paper: Main Findings

    This paper: Main Findings Consistent with productivity effect: I Automation ↑, marginal cost and prices ↓, demand ↑, employment ↑ Data: French manufacturing industry between 1995 and 2017 Estimates indicate that: I At firm-level, a 1% increase in automation at year t leads to a 0.2% increase in empl

  4. Slide 4: Literature

    Literature Labor Market / Industry-level studies find mixed results I Industrial robots: Acemoglu and Restrepo 2019, Michaels and Graetz 2018, Dauth et al. 2021 I Automation (patents): Dechezleprêtre et al. 2021, Mann and Puttmann 2020 Recent/ongoing work studies robots at firm level I Acemoglu et a

  5. Slide 5: Data: Worker/Firm Data

    Data: Worker/Firm Data Detailed information on workers and firms available from French administrative data I Matched employer-employee data (DADS) and balance sheet data (Ficus/Fare) covering all firms in French manufacturing industry from 1995 to 2017 I Firms: employment, sales, industry, etc. I Wo

  6. Slide 6: Data: Measuring Automation

    Data: Measuring Automation First measure: Balance sheet value of industrial machines I "All machines used for extraction, processing, shaping, packaging of materials or supplies" I Stock of industrial machines at firm level I Distinguishes between (i) industrial machines, (ii) land, (iii) buildings

  7. Slide 7: Data: Measuring Automation

    Data: Measuring Automation Second measure: Acemoglu-Restrepo (2022)’s automation measure I Defined as a "range of technologies that relate to industrial automation" I Based on imported intermediate goods, defined as products whose two-digit HS code correspond to : F Industrial robots F Dedicated mac

  8. Slide 8: Examples

    Examples (a) Chemicals (b) Paper (c) Food 7 / 23

  9. Slide 9: Data: Measuring Automation

    Data: Measuring Automation Advantages: I Covers broader set of automation technologies than IFR definition of an industrial robot, i.e. an "automatically controlled, reprogrammable multipurpose manipulator programmable in three or more axes" (ISO 8373) 50 20 40 Sectoral share, in euros (%) Sectoral

  10. Slide 10: Event studies

    Event studies Question: when a firm relies more extensively on automation, what happens to employment, prices and sales? Implementation of event studies: I Event defined as a major investment in automation technologies a given year 9 / 23

  11. Slide 11: Event studies: Specification

    Event studies: Specification n log Lit = α + ∑ βk 1t−Ei =k 1Investi >pX (Invest) + µi + λst + εit k=−n with employment Lit , firm F.E. µi and industry-year F.E. λst (mitigate potential correlated shocks) Specification allows for delayed response of employment to increased automation Pre-trends (lead

  12. Slide 12: Event studies: Employment

    Event studies: Employment Total Employment 1 .8 Estimated Semi-Elasticity -.2 0 .2 -.4 -.6 .4 .6 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Year relative to change Treated = Top 10% - Controlling for 5-digit-industry by year F.E. + Firm F.E. 11 / 23

  13. Slide 13: Event studies: Employment - AR's automation measure

    Event studies: Employment - AR’s automation measure 12 / 23

  14. Slide 14: Event studies: Prices

    Event studies: Prices Export Price .2 .1 Estimated Semi-Elasticity -.2 -.1 -.3 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Year relative to change Treated = Top 10% - Controlling for CN8-Product by year F.E. + Country by year F.E. + Firm F.E. 13 / 23

  15. Slide 15: Event studies: Sales

    Event studies: Sales Total sales 1 .8 Estimated Semi-Elasticity -.2 0 .2 -.4 -.6 .4 .6 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Year relative to change Treated = Top 25% - Controlling for 5-digit-industry by year F.E. + Firm F.E. 14 / 23

  16. Slide 16: Shift-Share IV

    Shift-Share IV Limitation: event studies cannot rule out potential demand/supply shocks in contemporaneous period Ideal experiment would randomly assign purchasing prices for machines across firms Approximate with a shift-share research design, leveraging two components: 1 Variation in the cost of i

  17. Slide 17: Shift-Share IV: Shocks and Exposure Shares

    Shift-Share IV: Shocks and Exposure Shares Shocks are observed across trading partners by HS6 products: I We cannot directly observe changes in foreign machines’ quality-adjusted prices I gn,t is change in imports flows of machines from each trading partners (Germany, Italy, China, etc.) for each HS

  18. Slide 18: Firm SSIV: First Stage

    Firm SSIV: First Stage First Stage .06 5-year Log Change in Industrial Equipment for Linked Firms 0 .02 -.02 .04 -.4 -.2 0 .2 .4 Instrument (foreign supplier productivity shock) 17 / 23

  19. Slide 19: Firm SSIV: Reduced Form

    Firm SSIV: Reduced Form Reduced Form - Employment Reduced Form - Sales .01 -.06 Employment for Linked Firms -.065 0 Sales for Linked Firms 5-year Log Change in 5-year Log Change in -.07 -.01 -.075 -.02 -.08 -.085 -.03 -.4 -.2 0 .2 .4 -.4 -.2 0 .2 .4 Instrument (foreign supplier productivity shock) I

  20. Slide 20: Firm SSIV: Employment

    Firm SSIV: Employment ∆5 Employment (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ∆5 Machines 0.426∗∗∗ 0.425∗∗∗ 0.424∗∗∗ 0.433∗∗∗ 0.433∗∗∗ (0.084) (0.100) (0.100) (0.098) (0.098) First-Stage F 17.65 20.59 21.43 20.88 21.62 Partner-period F.E. X X X X X 4-digit Product-period F.E. X X X X X 2-digit Industry-period F.E. X X X

  21. Slide 21: Firm SSIV: Sales

    Firm SSIV: Sales ∆5 Sales (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ∆5 Machines 0.325∗∗∗ 0.340∗∗∗ 0.340∗∗∗ 0.345∗∗∗ 0.346∗∗∗ (0.131) (0.123) (0.121) (0.114) (0.103) First-Stage F 17.65 20.59 21.43 20.88 21.62 Partner-period F.E. X X X X X 4-digit Product-period F.E. X X X X X 2-digit Industry-period F.E. X X X X X Lagged

  22. Slide 22: Evidence of business stealing

    Evidence of business stealing 21 / 23

  23. Slide 23: Industry-Level Employment and International Competition

    Industry-Level Employment and International Competition ∆ Employment 1996-2017 International Competition All Industries Above Median Below Median (1) (2) (3) ∆ Machines 1996-2017 0.345∗∗∗ 0.404∗∗∗ 0.171 (0.059) (0.055) (0.133) 2-digit industry by year F.E. X X X ∆ Other types of capital 1996-2017 X

  24. Slide 24: Conclusion

    Conclusion Automation increases employment of firms that automate, which indicates that in practice the productivity effect of automation on employment tends to outweigh the displacement effect Automation also increases sales and profits, and reduces prices I Hence overall automation generates gains

  25. Slide 25: Thank you!

    Thank you! simon.bunel@banque-france.fr 24 / 23

  26. Slide 26: Event studies: Employment - Heterogeneity?

    Event studies: Employment - Heterogeneity? 25 / 23

  27. Slide 27: Event studies: Wage

    Event studies: Wage Mean Hourly Wage - p75 1 ° 1 81 1 \ 3 i 2 \ g 1 es cy \ Eo 5 1 a 1 Bg ! a a 381 1 ao 1 8 I El 7 1 \ 2 1 al Ll 8 7 6 5 4 3-2-1012 3 4 «5 6 7 8 Year relative to change Controlling for 4-digit year FE. + Firm FE. - Mean Hourly Wage - Ratio p90/p10 - p75 Mean Hourly Wage - Ratio Indu

  28. Slide 28: Event studies: Job Creation & Job Destruction

    Event studies: Job Creation & Job Destruction 27 / 23

  29. Slide 29: Event studies: Job Creation & Job Destruction Placebo Test with Investments in Real Estate

    Event studies: Job Creation & Job Destruction Placebo Test with Investments in Real Estate 28 / 23

  30. Slide 30: Industry Level Employment

    Industry Level Employment (a) Extensive margin (b) Intensive margin 29 / 23

  31. Slide 31: Industry Level Sales

    Industry Level Sales Total sales i} I I I I I © I I I I I I \ Estimated Elasticity 2 i -4 1 -6 T T T T T T T T T T T T T 6 5 4 3 2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Year relative to change Controlling for year F.E. + 5-digit-industry F.E. + Other types of capital - 2630 observations 30 / 23

  32. Slide 32: Industry Level Wages

    Industry Level Wages Manufacturing Mean Hourly Wage - p50 | .06 .04 02 ae ann eaanee 0 b——1 -.02 Estimated Semi-Elasticity -.04 -.06 -.08 T T T T T T T T T 6 56 4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Year relative to change Controlling for year F.E. + 5-digit Industry F.E. - 1716 observations 31/23

  33. Slide 33: Industry Level Wage Inequality

    Industry Level Wage Inequality 32 / 23

  34. Slide 34: Shift-Share IV: Exposure Shares

    Shift-Share IV: Exposure Shares Exposure shares of French firms: I sin is share of trading partner n in firm i’s total imports of machines in initial period (between 1995 and 1999) I Contemporaneous shares liable to reverse causality: use initial shares instead (and analyze outcomes from 2000 onward

  35. Slide 35: Shift-Share IV: Identification Assumptions

    Shift-Share IV: Identification Assumptions Relevance: need supplier relationships to be sufficiently persistent I Check power with first-stage F-statistic I Standard errors clustered by trading partner Exclusion restriction: firms linked to increasingly productive suppliers should not be unobservabl

  36. Slide 36: Firm SSIV: Profits

    Firm SSIV: Profits ∆5 Profits (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ∆5 Machines 0.995∗∗ 0.824∗ 0.824∗ 0.827∗ 0.828∗∗ (0.448) (0.432) (0.432) (0.424) (0.412) First-Stage F 17.65 20.59 21.43 20.88 21.62 Partner-period F.E. X X X X X 4-digit Product-period F.E. X X X X X 2-digit Industry-period F.E. X X X X X Lagged Fir

  37. Slide 37: Firm SSIV: Labor Cost / Sales

    Firm SSIV: Labor Cost / Sales ∆5 Labor Cost / Sales (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ∆5 Machines 0.00453 0.00604 0.00607 0.00697 0.00686 (0.0164) (0.0173) (0.0172) (0.0166) (0.0157) First-Stage F 17.65 20.59 21.43 20.88 21.62 Partner-period F.E. X X X X X 4-digit Product-period F.E. X X X X X 2-digit Industry-pe

  38. Slide 38: Firm SSIV: Reduced Form - Falsification tests

    Firm SSIV: Reduced Form - Falsification tests Reduced Form - Lagged Employment Reduced Form - Lagged Sales .06 .14 Lagged Employment for Linked Firms Lagged Sales for Linked Firms .13 .05 5-year Log Change in 5-year Log Change in .12 .04 .11 .03 .02 .1 -.4 -.2 0 .2 .4 -.4 -.2 0 .2 .4 Instrument (for

  39. Slide 39: Falsification Test: Lagged Firm Employment

    Falsification Test: Lagged Firm Employment Lagged ∆5 Employment (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ∆5 Machines −0.180 −0.198 −0.199 −0.199 −0.200 (0.219) (0.220) (0.223) (0.220) (0.218) First-Stage F 17.65 20.59 21.43 20.88 21.62 Partner-period F.E. X X X X X 4-digit Product-period F.E. X X X X X 2-digit Industry-

  40. Slide 40: Firm SSIV: Competitors' Employment

    Firm SSIV: Competitors’ Employment ∆5 Competitors’ Employment (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ∆5 Machines −0.00578∗ −0.00920∗∗∗ −0.00920∗∗∗ −0.00914∗∗∗ −0.00913∗∗∗ (0.0032) (0.0033) (0.0032) (0.0033) (0.0033) First-Stage F 17.65 20.59 21.43 20.88 21.62 Partner-period F.E. X X X X X 4-digit Product-period F.E. X

  41. Slide 41: Falsification Test: Lagged Firm Sales

    Falsification Test: Lagged Firm Sales Lagged ∆5 Sales (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ∆5 Machines 0.0274 0.166 0.165 0.155 0.155 (0.202) (0.209) (0.218) (0.214) (0.211) First-Stage F 17.65 20.59 21.43 20.88 21.62 Partner-period F.E. X X X X X 4-digit Product-period F.E. X X X X X 2-digit Industry-period F.E. X

  42. Slide 42: Industry Level SSIV: Employment

    Industry Level SSIV: Employment ∆5 Employment (1) (2) (3) (4) ∆5 Machines 1.080∗∗∗ 1.076∗∗∗ 1.081∗∗∗ 1.091∗∗∗ (0.185) (0.186) (0.190) (0.193) First-Stage F 17.98 18.03 15.53 15.53 Partner-period F.E. X X X X 4-digit Product F.E. X X X X Lagged Industry Controls X X X X Lagged Machines X X X Lagged O

  43. Slide 43: Industry Level SSIV: Sales

    Industry Level SSIV: Sales ∆5 Sales (1) (2) (3) (4) ∆5 Machines 1.309∗∗∗ 1.312∗∗∗ 1.245∗∗∗ 1.207∗∗∗ (0.338) (0.338) (0.337) (0.327) First-Stage F 17.98 18.03 15.53 15.53 Partner-period F.E. X X X X 4-digit Product F.E. X X X X Lagged Industry Controls X X X X Lagged Machines X X X Lagged Other Capit

Bank Of Greece — Technical Presentation (September 2022) on 6ix