Telstra Group Limited · ASX:TLS

Telstra — ACORE Annual Forum 2005

13 slides from Telstra's conference presentation, Oct 17, 2005

  1. Slide 1: ASX cover letter: ACORE Annual Forum

    17 October 2005 The Manager Company Announcements Office Australian Stock Exchange 4" Floor, 20 Bridge Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 ELECTRONIC LODGEMENT Dear Sir or Madam Office of the Company Secretary Level 44 242 Exhibition Street MELBOURNE VIC 3000 AUSTRALIA Telephone 03 3634 6400 Facsimile 03 9632 32

  2. Slide 2: Telstra

    Telstra

  3. Slide 3: Principles of regulation

    So seoseesaee | a "elstra « Protect consumers - « Be effective and effi

  4. Slide 4: Telstra Specific Regulation

    Telstra Specific Regu Network Reliabi lity Framework Priority Assistanc Internet Assisi Program Directory Telstra

  5. Slide 5: How did this come about?

    How felie this come abo it , ; | 1 | -etstra = Four unsustainable u = History iiiiiiiiiiiiiii ii iii nit ii (i iii niin;

  6. Slide 6: Is it fair?

    Is it fair? ce : _ L Telstra Clearly not competi stra aa Different r J a y Lil i _ 7 | | | — ee

  7. Slide 7: Dr Tony Warren speech introduction

    Dr Tony Warren Introductory remarks to the The Australian Centre of Regulatory Economics’ (ACORE) annual forum 17 October 2005 University House, ANU Broad forum topic: ‘Introducing Competition in Network industries’ Telecommunications topic: ‘Retail Price Regulation to go!’ Introduction Thanks for t

  8. Slide 8: Principles of regulation

    This first list here is drawn from the ORR and the principles of regulation that underpin the Federal Government Regulatory Impact Statements. According to these principles regulation should: - Generally, protect the interests of consumers and other affected members of the public (‘consumer protecti

  9. Slide 9: Asymmetric regulatory burden and the regulations

    Also | would like to make clear that there are some regulations where we accept the inevitably of asymmetric burden. For example, only Telstra can supply unbundled copper loops to our competitors because by and large we are the only supplier of that service in Australia where competitive neutrality

  10. Slide 10: White Pages, IPND, price controls and USO

    White Pages — Every year Telstra must produce an alphabetical public number directory in all areas which includes all customers of carriage service providers supplied with a standard telephone service, regardiess of which provider supplies the service; and must provide the directory to its own custo

  11. Slide 11: Costs of social policy regulation and competitive neutrality

    The result is that social policy regulation requires Telstra to face costs that are nationally averaged, but competition regulation allows Telstra's competitors access to its network on a geographically de-averaged basis. Again, clearly an example of asymmetric regulatory burden, which if competitiv

  12. Slide 12: Arguments about asymmetric regulation

    asymmetric regulation is every bit as common today as it was in the statutory monopoly period. Third, there is an argument that is increasingly common amongst the regulators and itis an essentially a ‘tax the rich argument’. Basically, the view seems to be that Teistra makes significantly larger pro

  13. Slide 13: USO funding debate and close

    If the debate that has occurred on USO funding over the years is any indication, this will be a debate that our competitors do not want to have — but it is important that we do. Thank you. ACORE speech Page 7 of 7

Telstra — ACORE Annual Forum 2005 on 6ix