Jp Morgan Chase & Co. · NYSE:JPM

Jp Morgan Chase & — Corporate Update (July 2012)

24 slides from Jp Morgan Chase &'s corporate update, Jul 13, 2012

  1. Slide 1: CIO Task Force Update

    July 13, 2012 C I O T A S K F O R C E U P D A T E

  2. Slide 2: Task force scope

    Task force scope  Management review and assessment of circumstances surrounding CIO losses  Assisted by outside counsel  Comprehensive fact-gathering effort  Conducted numerous interviews with JPMC personnel, including Firm Management, CIO Management, other CIO personnel, Risk and other corporat

  3. Slide 3: Summary observations

    Summary observations  CIO judgment, execution and escalation in 1Q12 were poor  Level of scrutiny did not evolve commensurate with increasing complexity of CIO activities  CIO Risk Management was ineffective in dealing with Synthetic Credit Portfolio  Risk limits for CIO were not sufficiently gr

  4. Slide 4: Historical context of Synthetic Credit Portfolio

     Principal objective of Synthetic Credit Portfolio was to provide benefit in a stressed credit environment  Intended to provide a partial hedge to credit exposures  Included long positions to reduce costs of credit protection  Adjusted over time to reflect changes in macro views  Synthetic Cred

  5. Slide 5: 1Q12 strategy and resulting exposures

     In late 2011, Firm Management instructed CIO to reduce Risk Weighted Assets (RWA) as part of annual budgeting process  1Q12: CIO intended to reduce short credit position and lower RWA, while maintaining benefit from individual corporate defaults and optimizing P&L  Increased net long position on

  6. Slide 6: Rapid growth in portfolio size and complexity increased risk

    Rapid growth in portfolio size and complexity increased risk Facts Gross long positions Increase in portfolio size (notional) Dec 30 Mar 30 3x Net notionals Gross short positions Size: Complexity: Increase in tranche positions (notional) Increase in off-the-run indices (notional) 2x 3x Net notionals

  7. Slide 7: Key events through the build-up of positions

     Certain CIO-level risk limits exceeded during 1Q12  Related to credit spread widening  Addressed within CIO  New Synthetic Credit VaR model approved by independent Model Review Group in late January  In response to VaR limit excessions, Firm Management approved temporary increase of firmwide V

  8. Slide 8: Key events between position build-up and 1Q12 earnings release

     Losses increased in late March  Heightened external market visibility of CIO positions including news reports in early April  Firm Management requested review of Synthetic Credit Portfolio  Head of CIO conducted review with regular updates to CFO and CRO  CIO estimated 2Q12 probable P&L range

  9. Slide 9: Key events leading up to new CIO leadership and Management Review

     Late April: Increase in losses prompts detailed review by Corporate Risk Management  Senior Corporate Risk Management team began on site, bottom-up engagement on April 27 and provides daily updates to Firm Management  Corporate Risk Management assumes control of Synthetic Credit Portfolio on Apr

  10. Slide 10: Facts leading to observations

    Facts leading to observations Observations  CIO judgment, execution and escalation in 1Q12 were poor  Level of scrutiny did not evolve commensurate with increasing complexity of CIO activities  CIO Risk Management was ineffective in dealing with Synthetic Credit Portfolio  Risk limits for CIO we

  11. Slide 11: CIO judgment, execution and escalation in 1Q12 were poor

    CIO judgment, execution and escalation in 1Q12 were poor Observations  Trading approach was poorly designed, vetted and executed  Poor trading judgment in 1Q12  CIO Management did not set clear objectives, properly vet the trading strategy or sufficiently examine underlying positions and correlat

  12. Slide 12: Level of scrutiny did not evolve with CIO complexity

    Level of scrutiny did not evolve commensurate with increasing complexity of CIO activities Observations  CIO’s mandate and historical performance may have contributed to less rigorous scrutiny of CIO  Perception that CIO risks were primarily related to managing Firm’s investment portfolio  Track

  13. Slide 13: CIO Risk Management was ineffective

    CIO Risk Management was ineffective in dealing with Synthetic Credit Portfolio Observations  CIO Risk Management group faced challenges  Transitions in key roles and lack of adequate resources  Lack of robust Risk Committee structure  Nonetheless, CIO Risk Management failed to meet expectations

  14. Slide 14: Risk limits in CIO were not sufficiently granular

    Risk limits in CIO were not sufficiently granular Observations  No specific risk limits for Synthetic Credit Portfolio  Portfolio was subsumed within more aggregated CIO limits  No limits by size, asset type or risk factor for Synthetic Credit Portfolio  Credit derivatives desk in IB operated un

  15. Slide 15: Approval and implementation of Synthetic Credit VaR model were inadequate

    Approval and implementation of Synthetic Credit VaR model were inadequate Facts and observations  Between August and November 2011, CIO developed a new Synthetic Credit VaR model to prepare for implementation of Basel 2.5  Independent Model Review Group (MRG) review between November 2011 and Janua

  16. Slide 16: Observations leading to remedial actions

    Observations leading to remedial actions  CIO leadership, governance, mandate and processes revamped Observations Remedial Actions  CIO judgment, execution, and escalation in 1Q12 were poor 2  Risk Management findings addressed  CIO Risk Management strengthened  Risk committees enhanced  Ensur

  17. Slide 17: CIO leadership, governance, mandate and processes revamped

    CIO leadership, governance, mandate and processes revamped Remediation Team  New CIO management team appointed on May 14, 2012  Established stronger linkages across regional CIOs  Enhancing talent and resourcing of key support functions Governance  Instituted robust committees to improve governa

  18. Slide 18: Risk Management observations addressed

    Risk Management observations addressed Remediation Risk governance  Launched Joint Treasury-CIO-Corporate Risk Committee  Detailed portfolio reviews conducted for sub-portfolios in CIO  Enhanced firmwide oversight Risk limits  Introduced granular limits across CIO  Reaffirmed market risk limits

  19. Slide 19: Enhancements to model approval and monitoring

    Enhancements to model approval and monitoring Remediation  MRG to approve models based on an evaluation of:  The integrity of the analytical framework  Independent analysis of results  Soundness of operational environment  Enhanced MRG oversight of implemented models  Formed new team to review

  20. Slide 20: We believe the losses in CIO are an isolated failure

    We believe the losses in CIO are an isolated failure Circumstances in CIO were unique  CIO’s mandate is to offset firmwide balance sheet risk  Preponderance of activity was managing the Firm’s investment portfolio Management focus on risks taken in client-facing business has been, and continues to

  21. Slide 21: Q & A

    Q & A  CIO valuation matters  Compensation 20 C I O T A S K F O R C E U P D A T E

  22. Slide 22: CIO valuation matters

    CIO valuation matters  CIO valuation processes related to quarter-end  CIO traders marked their positions at end of Q1  CIO’s Valuation Control Group (VCG), which is part of Finance, verified that trader marks were within pre-established thresholds that considered market bid/offer spreads; marks

  23. Slide 23: Employment-related actions for responsible CIO managers

     To date, all CIO managers based in London with responsibility for Synthetic Credit Portfolio have been separated from the Firm  No severance  No 2012 incentive compensation  Decision to claw back compensation from each individual  Maximum permitted clawbacks invoked  Represents approximately

  24. Slide 24: Board statement on other compensation determinations

     For all other individuals, 2012 performance-year compensation and clawbacks, if appropriate, will be determined in the ordinary course considering, among other things, the following factors:  Company, unit and individual performance both on absolute and relative basis  Achievement of non-financi

Jpmorgan Chase & — Corporate Update (July 2012) on 6ix