Udr, Inc. · NYSE:UDR

Udr — NAREIT Presentation June 2014

36 slides from Udr's conference presentation, Jun 3, 2014

  1. Slide 1: NAREIT Presentation June 2014

    UDR, Inc. (NYSE: UDR), has a demonstrated history of successfully managing, buying, selling, developing and redeveloping attractive real estate properties in primary U.S. markets • S&P 400 Company • $13 Billion Enterprise • 2014 Annualized Dividend of $1.04, ~3.8% Yield CFO: Tom Herzog 720.283.6139

  2. Slide 2: Table of Contents

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Cirque – Dallas, TX UDR/MetLife II Joint Venture UDR, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE About UDR, Inc. 3 Recent Highlights 4 3-Year Outlook / Strategic Priorities 5 Capital Allocation 6 Development Pipeline 7 Development Value Creation 8 Development Progress 9 Future Development /Fundin

  3. Slide 3: About UDR, Inc.

    ABOUT UDR, INC. 3 (1) As of March 31, 2014. Source: Company and peer documents. UDR STATS(1) • 22 Markets • 182 Communities • 52,567 Homes • Same-Store Revenue per Occupied Home: $1,520 • Total Portfolio Revenue per Occupied Home: $1,687 • Average Age of Communities: 16 years • Approximately 50% / 5

  4. Slide 4: Recent Highlights

    RECENT HIGHLIGHTS 4 GENERATED STRONG 1Q14 SAME-STORE RESULTS • SS Revenue Growth: 4.5% versus 4.0% multifamily peer REIT average • SS NOI Growth: 5.6% versus 3.6% multifamily peer REIT average 1 2 3 5 717 Olympic – Los Angeles, CA Pier 4 – Boston, MA Development – Scheduled Completion: 2Q 2015 (1) A

  5. Slide 5: 3-Year Outlook / Strategic Priorities

    Will Drive Value Creation and Total Shareholder Return (TSR) 1 2 4 3-YEAR OUTLOOK / STRATEGIC PRIORITIES WE REMAIN HIGHLY FOCUSED ON THE CONTINUED EXECUTION OF THE STRATEGIC PRIORITIES IN OUR 3-YEAR PLAN ALLOCATE CAPITAL TO ACCRETIVE GROWTH PROSPECTS THAT STRENGTHEN OUR MARKET MIX, PORTFOLIO QUALITY

  6. Slide 6: Capital Allocation

    CAPITAL ALLOCATION  ALLOCATE CAPITAL TO ACCRETIVE GROWTH PROSPECTS THAT STRENGTHEN OUR MARKET MIX, PORTFOLIO QUALITY AND GROWTH RATE  DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY OFFERS THE BEST OPPORTUNITY 6 Columbus Square – NYC, NY UDR/MetLife II Joint Venture

  7. Slide 7: Development Pipeline

    (1) As of March 31, 2014. (2) UDR has the option to purchase the property upon completion of construction and receives 50% of the upside upon acquisition of the asset or sale to a third party. (3) A portion of the Dallas land parcel is wholly-owned and a portion is held in the UDR/MetLife Vitruvian

  8. Slide 8: Development Value Creation

    8 DEVELOPMENT VALUE CREATION DEVELOPMENT IS EXPECTED TO GENERATE STRONG CASH FLOW AND NAV GROWTH OVER TIME TAKEAWAYS • The estimated cash flow generated by development projects from 2014-2016 is expected to offset the associated drag • Cumulative NAV/sh accretion is estimated at $2.10 from 2014-2016

  9. Slide 9: Development Progress

    Development Projects(1) Performance versus Project Plans Below In-Line Above Below Above In-Line Fiori, $49M Domain College Park, $63M Los Alisos, $87M Channel, $145M 13th and Market, $73M Bella Terra, $150M Wtd. Avg. DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS 9 PROGRESS OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS • Some of our development

  10. Slide 10: Future Development / Funding Development

    FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 10 WE HAVE $375 MILLION LEFT TO FUND ON OUR CURRENT $1.1 BILLION PIPELINE Source: Company documents. $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 Remaining to Fund: $375M; 35% of Pipeline FUNDING DEVELOPMENT • Sales from our $1.4 billion portfolio of non-core and capital warehouse pr

  11. Slide 11: Where We Develop and Why

    37% 34% 34% 31% 31% 23% 22% 16% 14% 12% 48.6% 42.8% 47.6% 42.0% 48.6% 37.9% 35.3% 32.1% 32.7% 38.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Orange County San Fran. Bay Area New York San Diego L.A. Seattle Boston Metro DC National Dallas Home Affordability and Propensity to Rent Avg. Mortgage Payment to Income Pr

  12. Slide 12: Joint Ventures

    6.2% 7.9% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% ROIC ROE 1Q 2014 Joint Venture ROIC and ROE (1) As of March 31, 2014 except for MetLife relationship which reflects transactions completed as of April 29, 2014. (2) Measured at gross book value. Source: Company documents. Columbus Square – New York, NY UNCONS

  13. Slide 13: Operations

    OPERATIONS  DRIVE ORGANIC GROWTH AND IMPROVE RESIDENT / ASSOCIATE SATISFACTION THROUGH OUR BEST-IN- CLASS OPERATING PLATFORM 13 Garrison Square – Boston, MA Wholly-Owned

  14. Slide 14: Operational Excellence

    OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE (1) Excludes historical AEC, BRE and CLP results. Source: Company documents and forecasts and peer documents. 3.5% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% UDR Mulitfamily Peer Median 2014 Same-Store Revenue Growth Guidance …AND EXPECTATIONS ARE FOR CONTINUED STRENGTH IN 2014 42% 30% 20% 30% 40% 5

  15. Slide 15: Cash Flow, Dividend and NAV Growth

    CASH FLOW, DIVIDEND AND NAV GROWTH  GENERATE HIGH-QUALITY CASH FLOW GROWTH TO DRIVE DIVIDEND AND NAV PER SHARE GROWTH 15 Capitol View on 14th – Washington, DC Wholly-Owned

  16. Slide 16: Creating Value Over Time

    CREATING VALUE OVER TIME (1) Consensus estimates per BMO Capital Market’s Morning Brew Report. (2) Assuming a flat cap rate environment. Source: Company documents and forecasts and peer documents and BMO Capital Markets. 16 DEVELOPMENT EARN-IN AND SOLID OPERATING RESULTS WILL DRIVE OUR CASH FLOW AND

  17. Slide 17: Balance Sheet

    BALANCE SHEET  MAINTAIN A STRONG AND FLEXIBLE BALANCE SHEET WHILE SEEKING TO FURTHER IMPROVE OUR METRICS OVER TIME 17 Edgewater – San Francisco, CA Wholly-Owned

  18. Slide 18: Balance Sheet Management

    METRIC YE 2009A YE 2013A YE 2014E YE 2016E YE 2016E – NO NEW EQUITY Debt-to-assets 53% 39% 38% to 40% 35% to 38% 38% to 40% Net debt-to-EBITDA 10.0x 7.0x 6.3x to 6.7x 5.6x to 6.2x 6.0x to 6.6x Fixed Charge Coverage 2.0x 3.1x 3.4x to 3.6x 3.6x to 3.8x 3.3x to 3.5x BALANCE SHEET MANAGEMENT 18 1 2 FOCU

  19. Slide 19: Appendix

    UDR, Inc. Appendix PAGE 2014 Guidance 20 Operating Trends Update 21 2014 Market Growth Expectations 22 Apartment Fundamentals 23 Definitions and Reconciliations 27 19 Elements Too – Seattle, WA Wholly-Owned

  20. Slide 20: 2014 Guidance

    2014 GUIDANCE 20 FFO and AFFO per Share Guidance 2Q 2014E Full-Year 2014E FFO per common share $0.36 to $0.38 $1.47 to $1.53 FFO as Adjusted per common share $0.36 to $0.38 $1.47 to $1.53 Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”) $0.31 to $0.33 $1.30 to $1.36 Weighted average diluted shares/units (M)

  21. Slide 21: Operating Trends Update

    (1) As of May 29, 2014. Source: Company documents. OPERATING TRENDS UPDATE(1) 21 % Total NOI % SS NOI Effective YOY SS New Lease Rate Growth Effective YOY SS Renewal Lease Rate Growth Annualized SS Turnover as of May 29 Same-Store (SS) Market 1Q 2014 1Q 2014 Apr/May 2014(1) 1Q 2014 Apr/May 2014(1) 1

  22. Slide 22: 2014 Market Growth Expectations

    (1) Revenue growth based on UDR’s current 2014 forecast. Source: Company documents. Core Markets: Seattle, San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, Denver, Austin, Dallas, Boston, New York, Baltimore/Washington DC area and Philadelphia. Capital Warehouse Markets: Portland, Inla

  23. Slide 23: Apartment Fundamentals

    13th and Market – San Diego, CA Development Lease-up 23 APARTMENT FUNDAMENTALS

  24. Slide 24: Apartment Fundamentals (Demand)

    (100%) (50%) 0.% 50.% 100.% 150.% 200.% 20 25 30 35 40 45 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015E Renter Households (M, left-axis) Renter Capture Rate (%, right-axis) APARTMENT FUNDAMENTALS (DEMAND) -6.0% -4.0% -2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014E 2016E U.S.

  25. Slide 25: Apartment Fundamentals (MF Supply)

    However, when comparing expected job growth to new supply in our major markets from 2014 through 2016, Our portfolio is well positioned APARTMENT FUNDAMENTALS (MF SUPPLY) 25 Washington, DC New York Orange County San Francisco Seattle Boston Dallas Baltimore Los Angeles Austin Other S. CA National 2%

  26. Slide 26: Apartment Fundamentals (SF Housing)

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Axiometrics, National Association of Realtors and Freddie Mac. Demand for single-family homes continues to slowly improve although recent data points call into question the vitality of the recovery. At the same time, increasing home prices and rising mortgage rates have c

  27. Slide 27: Definitions and Reconciliations

    DEFINITIONS AND RECONCILIATIONS Acquired Communities: The Company defines Acquired Communities as those communities acquired by the Company, other than development and redevelopment activity, that did not achieve stabilization as of the most recent quarter. Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO"): T

  28. Slide 28: Definitions and Reconciliations

    DEFINITIONS AND RECONCILIATIONS Activities of our taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS), RE3, include development and land entitlement. From time to time, we develop and subsequently sell a TRS property which results in a short- term use of funds that produces a profit that differs from the traditional long

  29. Slide 29: Definitions and Reconciliations

    DEFINITIONS AND RECONCILIATIONS QTD Same-Store ("SS") Communities: The Company defines QTD SS Communities as those communities stabilized for five consecutive quarters. These communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no

  30. Slide 30: Definitions and Reconciliations: Net Debt to EBITDA

    Net Debt to EBITDA: The Company defines net debt to EBITDA as total debt net of cash and cash equivalents divided by EBITDA. EBITDA is defined as net income, excluding the impact of interest expense, real estate depreciation and amortization of wholly owned and other joint venture communities, other

  31. Slide 31: Definitions and Reconciliations

    (1) 2014 adjustment relates to estimated damages at our Rosebeach community in California as a result of the earthquake in March 2014. 2013 adjustment primarily represents the portion of Hurricane Sandy insurance recoveries in 2013 that relate to the $9.3 million in charges added back to FFO as Adju

  32. Slide 32: Forward Looking Statements

    Forward Looking Statements Certain statements made in this presentation may constitute “forward-looking statements.” Words such as “expects,” “intends,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “likely,” “will,” “seeks,” “estimates” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to ide

  33. Slide 33: Notes

    NOTES 33

  34. Slide 34: Notes

    NOTES 34

  35. Slide 35: Notes

    NOTES 35

  36. Slide 36: Investor Relations Contact

    Investor Relations Contact: Chris Van Ens cvanens@udr.com 720.348.7762

UDR — NAREIT Presentation June 2014 on 6ix