Reward Minerals Ltd · ASX:RWD

Reward Minerals — Investor Presentation (September 2012)

22 slides from Reward Minerals's investor presentation, September 2012

  1. Slide 1: Reward Minerals Limited Company Update

    Reward Minerals Limited Company Update September 2012

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimer

    Disclaimer This Presentation is provided on the basis that neither the Company nor its respective officers, shareholders, related bodies corporate, partners, affiliates, employees, representatives and advisers, make any representation or warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability,

  3. Slide 3: Snapshot

    Snapshot Capital Structure 14 Sep 2012 ASX:RWD Board Mr Colin McCavana Non Executive Director, Chairman Ordinary Shares on Issue 73.8m  31+ years experience in the mining and earthmoving industries Options on Issue1 11.65m  FAICD and member of Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Share

  4. Slide 4: Investment Highlights

    Investment Highlights Single focus small cap company with significant Potash resources in surface/lake  brine deposits in Australia Resources of 24.4 Mt of SOP in Lake Disappointment, WA + 20.5 Mt SOP in Lake  Mackay, WA – high sulfate brine sources  Numerous buried evaporite Potash targets held

  5. Slide 5: Project Locations

    Project Locations oO 500 kms \ SCALE G \dham, \ Lake Mackay \ NT Project \ ile & ZZ _| Adavale |Lake Disappointment ¢ Project Project . X \ a Karinga Project Eromanga Sub- Basin basin — Officer Basin Project RM REWARD MINERALS LTD {he/as" 4

  6. Slide 6: Lake Disappointment – Highlights

    Lake Disappointment – Highlights  JORC compliant resource of 24.4 Mt of SOP (From 0-4m depth)  Chemistry similar to Great Salt Lake – high sulphate brine  Mining and Indigenous Land Use Agreement signed December 2011  Further feasibility studies to commence early 2012  Proven production techniq

  7. Slide 7: Lake Disappointment - Project Location

    Lake Disappointment - Project Location The Lake Disappointment Project is 340km from Newman. Potash recovery operations are expected to be located on the northern perimeter of the Lake. 6

  8. Slide 8: Lake Disappointment – Resource

    Lake Disappointment – Resource  JORC compliant Indicated Resource of 7,705 Bt at 3.17kg/t K2SO4 for 24.4 Mt contained K2SO4  Based on 30 holes drilled on a 5km x 5km grid  Brine samples drawn from drill holes returned SOP values up to 20.0g/L (ave 12.6g/L)  Heavy brine flow encountered in all ho

  9. Slide 9: Lake Disappointment – Brine Parameters

    Lake Disappointment – Brine Parameters Total dissolved solids 293 g/L Specific gravity 1.19 g/L NaCl 238 g/L K2SO4 12.19 g/L MgSO4 22.65 g/L MgCl2 5.51 g/L NaCl/K2SO4 19.5:1 Lakebed solids % brine 30.5% Lakebed solids specific gravity 1.95 tonne/m3 Brine composition 12.19 kg SOP/m3 Lakebed solids 3.

  10. Slide 10: Laboratory Evaporation Trial

    Laboratory Evaporation Trial April 2012 – Results Summary  Feed Brine Composition – Elemental Percentages K 0.52 | Na 7.27 | Mg 0.63 | Cl 12.43 | SO4 2.47 – Total Dissolved Solids 276 grams per litre – K2SO4 Content 11.6 grams per litre  Trial Duration 49 days  Brine Mass – Day 1 23.37kg – Day 49

  11. Slide 11: Lake Disappointment – Process Parameters

    Lake Disappointment – Process Parameters Assumptions A. Initial K2SO4 output – refined product = 200,000 TPA B. Harvest Grade 8.0% K = 17.85% K2SO4 C. Plant Recovery from harvest = 80% D. Harvest K recovery from feed brine = 70% E. Evaporation rate 5.5mm per day (average) Process Parameter Calculati

  12. Slide 12: Typical SOP Production Process

    Typical SOP Production Process Typically, harvested SOP salt is put through a milling, flotation, filtration and crystallisation process before it is ready to be distributed. START Harvested SOP salts Schoenite solids Milling / SOP water conversion crystallisation pulp SOP pulp NaCl tailings Bittern

  13. Slide 13: Typical SOP Production Process

    Typical SOP Production Process Saline water is drawn into shallow solar evaporation ponds where the water is naturally evaporated by the sun and wind before the SOP salts are harvested. Note: Not all photographs are of Lake Disappointment. 12

  14. Slide 14: Development Plan

    Development Plan Activity Timing 1. Appoint Lake Disappointment Project Director Done 2. Finalise native title clearance survey with WDLAC/Martu and register Done ILUA 3. Register Mining and Indigenous Land Use Agreement September 2012 4. Lodge Applications for project Mining Lease and Miscellaneous

  15. Slide 15: Potash Overview

    Potash Overview  Potash is a generic term for various potassium (K) salts  Used primarily as a fertiliser – One of three primary agricultural nutrients – Increases yields, water retention and disease resistance  Global consumption of approx. 50 mtpa Potash  Two main forms – Muriate of Potash (MO

  16. Slide 16: Potash Pricing

    Potash Pricing SOP generally trades at a premium to MOP, it is a niche product which is better suited to certain agricultural production. 1,400 Declining food prices during global financial crisis led 1,200 farmers to reassess the economics of fertilizer use Accelerated demand resulting in excess ca

  17. Slide 17: SOP Production Methods

    SOP Production Methods Production of SOP from salt lakes is proven technology and is generally a lower cost method of production.  SOP global market size of approx. 4mtpa (<10% of total Potash market)  Preferred over MOP for chloride sensitive crops (fruits, vegetables, tobacco and potatoes)  Pro

  18. Slide 18: Mineral Production from Salt Lakes

    Mineral Production from Salt Lakes Various other mineral products are also produced from salt lakes globally, using similar production concepts planned by Reward. Xinjiang Luobupo Potash Compass Minerals Lop Nur Qinghai Guoan Great Salt Lake, Big Quill Lake Dead Sea Works  Potash (SOP, MOP) Dongtai

  19. Slide 19: Potash Demand

    Potash Demand Strong growth in demand is expected in key markets of China, India and Brazil. Demand and growth by Region Demand by region, 2011 10,000 8.00% Demand (LHS) 2011 - 2015 CAGR (RHS) East Europe Central Africa Compound annual growth rate 2011-2015 (%) 9,000 Oceania 7.00% and Central Europe

  20. Slide 20: Potash Market – Regional Issues

    Potash Market – Regional Issues Europe  Declining reserves CIS  Political uncertainty  High operating costs  Higher inflation forecast  Distance to target market North America  Isolated reserves  Strength of incumbents Asia  High capex  Operating difficulties  Distance to target markets 

  21. Slide 21: Proximity to Key Markets

    Proximity to Key Markets Reward’s geographic location places it in close proximity to key Asian markets, which collectively accounted for over 50% of global Potash demand in 2011 East Asia 28.9% of West Asia Global Demand 11.6% of 2011 South Asia Global Demand 12.3% of 2011 Global Demand 2011 Reward

  22. Slide 22: Competent Person Statement

    Competent Person Statement Reward Minerals Ltd advise in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.6 that resource parameters provided in this presentation are based on information compiled by Mr Nigel Cranley who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a Member of the Australasian Ins

Reward Minerals — Investor Presentation (September 2012) on 6ix