Xcel Energy Inc. · NASDAQ:XEL

Xcel Energy — Technical Presentation (2010)

26 slides from Xcel Energy's technical presentation, 2010

  1. Slide 1: Life after R-22: Refrigerant Selection Considerations

    Life after R-22 Refrigerant Selection Considerations Daniel Dettmers (djdettme@wisc.edu) (djdettme@wisc edu) HVAC&R Center/Industrial Refrigeration Consortium University of Wisconsin www.irc.wisc.edu (866) 635-4721 What is a Refrigerant? Refrigerant - the vital working fluid in refrigeration, refrig

  2. Slide 2: Evolution of Modern Refrigerants

    Evolution of Modern Refrigerants  Domestic refrigerators used toxic or flammable fluids (i.e. Ammonia, CO2, and SO2)  Frigidaire asked GM to develop new refrigerants that were non-toxic, non-flammable, and inexpensive.  Work began in 1928, with Tom Midgley, Jr. developing R-21 in just three days

  3. Slide 3: Ozone Depletion from Chlorine; ODP and GWP

    Ozone Depletion from Chlorine O3 Cl Cl C F F Cl O2 Dettmers2010 Dettmers 2/8/07 ODP and GWP Same as 1.0 CFC-11 ODP or CO2 Ozone Depletion Potential  Damage substance does to the ozone layer, relative to CFC-11 GWP Gl b l Warming Global W i Potential P t ti l  Contribution of substance to the atmos

  4. Slide 4: Refrigerant Selection Criteria

    Refrigerant Selection Criteria  Safety, risk & regulation  Environmental impacts  Likelihood of future availability  Refrigerant properties  Toxicity & flammability  Thermodynamic & transport  Other  Economics  Operating efficiency  Capital costs (refrigerant & equipment)  Staff capabilit

  5. Slide 5: Phaseout Schedule

    Phaseout Schedule HCFCs CFCs Ban on new Stop Stop equipment Production Ban in new Stop Production HCFC-22 HCFC-22 equipment Production CFCs All other All other HCFCs HCFCs 1996 2010 2020 2030 Dettmers2010 Dettmers 2/8/07 HCFC Phaseout Schedule % Reduction in National Consumption 100% HCFC-22 HCFC-22

  6. Slide 6: HCFC Phaseout Schedule -2007

    HCFC Phaseout Schedule -2007 % Reduction in National Consumption of HCFC’s 100 Cap at 1989 ODP- weighted HCFC + 2.8% CFC consumption. 35% 80 reduction of cap 60 75% reduction of cap (formerly 40 65%) 99.5% reduction of cap, cap but b t 0% 90% allocation to R- 20 reduction of 22 cap 0% 0 Dettmers2010

  7. Slide 7: ASHRAE Standard 34-2004 Refrigerant Classification

    ASHRAE Standard 34-2004 Refrigerant Classification  Coming Soon: Flammability classification “2L” 2L  Refrigerant is still mildly flammable (2) but will have Lower Flammability  Lower propagation rate  Similar to ISO 817 category g y 2L  Proposed change for ASHRAE Standard 34  Targeted at refr

  8. Slide 8: ASHRAE Numbering System

    ASHRAE Numbering System From ASHRAE Standard 34  Single Component Fluorocarbons  000 Series - Methane Based Molecules  100 Series - Ethane Based  200 Series - Propane Based Fluids  300 Series - Butane Based  Mixtures  400 Series - Zeotropic Blends (or “Non-Azeotropic”)  500 Series - Azeotrop

  9. Slide 9: Refrigerant Mixtures

    Refrigerant Mixtures  Zeotropes (Blends or Simple Mixtures)  R-400 series  Tend to average properties  Segregate (Easy to separate)  Offer greatest flexibility  Azeotropes  R-500 series  Behave like pure fluid  Higher or lower B.P. than components  Non segregating (Difficult to separate) S

  10. Slide 10: R-22 Outlook

    R-22 Outlook  Will there be shortages of: R R-22? 22?  Replacement parts?  EPA has a DRAFT report on HCFC’s to see if cap reductions are possible  It is a preliminary draft report, not to be cited Dettmers2010 Dettmers 2/8/07 Prediction of R-22 Use Estimated Number of R- R-22 Units Installed En

  11. Slide 11: Where Do We Get the R-22

    Where Do We Get the R-22  Virgin supply  The HCFC cap does not prohibit R R-22 22 from manufacture until 2020  The cap is for all HCFC’s, so the EPA decides what to allocate to R-22 and to other HCFC’s  Recovery/Recycling/Reclaim  Recycled R l d refrigerant fi t iin owner’s ’ system t only l 

  12. Slide 12: HCFC Phaseout Schedule -2007

    Total Projected R-22 Servicing Demand Source: The U.S. Phaseout of HCFC, U.S. EPA Dettmers2010 Dettmers 2/8/07 HCFC Phaseout Schedule -2007 % Reduction in National Consumption of HCFC’s 100 Cap at 1989 ODP- weighted HCFC + 2.8% CFC consumption. 35% 80 reduction of cap 60 75% reduction of cap (former

  13. Slide 13: Further Reductions in R-22

    Further Reductions in R-22  40 CFR Part 82: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Prod ction Import, Import and E Export port  December 7, 2009  Projected to result in 27.5 million lb/year shortfall of virgin refrigerant (numbers f

  14. Slide 14: What About Equipment?

    What About Equipment?  January 14th a Fact Sheet was issued to clarify the EPA EPA’ss position  http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/phaseout/rule soverview.html  Items allowed:  Sale and distribution would be allowed for self-contained, lf t i d ffactory-charged t h d appliances li such as pre-charg

  15. Slide 15: What About Equipment? What Are The Alternatives?

    What About Equipment?  Items allowed, continued:  Servicing of existing (pre-2010) appliances containing R-22 or R- 142b would be allowed. allowed  A pre-charged component manufactured before Jan. 1 could be used to service an existing appliance. The EPA gave an example: “The regulatory text for

  16. Slide 16: Conversion

    Conversion  Is there a magic Silver Bullet fluid to allow for an easy conversion?  Of course not  “Drop-ins” are typically defined as fluids:  That have similar properties to R-22 (or original fluid)  Can use same lubricants  Are not class I or II and not subject to a phase out  Can be “dropp

  17. Slide 17: Problems with “Drop-Ins”

    Problems with “Drop-Ins”  They must have EPA SNAP approval for refrigeration & A/C  Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program evaluates and regulates substitutes for the ozone- depleting chemicals  Other problems:  No true “drop-ins”  None are as efficient  None are as miscible with M

  18. Slide 18: Why Are Hydrocarbons Used

    Why Are Hydrocarbons Used  Many of the retrofit blends use hydrocarbons:  R-290 (Propane)  R-600 R 600 (n-Butane), ( B t ) R-600a R 600 (I (Iso-butane) b t )  R-601a (Iso-pentane)  They provide miscibility of the MO/AB with the HFC refrigerant, but not as well as R-22  Problems may occur:  Oi

  19. Slide 19: Comparison of R-22 Replacements

    Comparison of R-22 Replacements  Data developed by Honeywell for refrigeration retrofit Source: EPA, GreenChill Best Practices Guideline Commercial Refrigeration Retrofits Dettmers2010 Dettmers 2/8/07 epa.gov/ozone/partnerships/greenchill/downloads/RetrofitGuidelines.pdf GWP of Popular R-22 Retrofi

  20. Slide 20: Long Term HCFC-22 Alternatives

    Long Term HCFC-22 Alternatives Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Components 134a 32 / 125 32 / 125 / 134a Percentage 100% 50% / 50% 23% / 25% / 52% ASHRAE # R-134a R-410A R-407C Trade names several AZ-20/PuronAC9000/KLEA66 Manufacturers several Allied-Signal DuPont/ICI Glide none 0.2°F 8-10°F Pressure * 20

  21. Slide 21: Alternatives to R-13/R-503

    Alternatives to R-13/R-503  CFC 13 & R-503 (40.1/59.9 of R-23/R-13)  Traditional refrigerants g for extremely y low temperature refrigeration (below -40°F) applications  HFC 23 & R-508B (46/54 of R-23/R-116)  GWP of 12,240 and 12,000 respectively  Both have no ODP  NH3-CO2 Cascade  Finding fa

  22. Slide 22: Any New Refrigerants?

    Any New Refrigerants?  HFO-1234yf  A hydrofluoro-olefin y refrigerant g  Similar capacity and efficiency to R-134a  Targeted at European automotive market as alternative to using R-744 (CO2) in cars  No ODP and low GWP  (GWP = 4 vs vs. 1340 for R-134a) R 134a)  Joint project of Honeywell and

  23. Slide 23: German/European Perspective

    German/European Perspective  Any ODP unacceptable  Any GWP unacceptable  Moving to CO2, NH3 and propane  CO2 can be used be used directly or with a secondary refrigerant  NH3 use w/ secondary  Propane used in small stand alone unit Dettmers2010 Dettmers 2/8/07 What About The U.S.?  EPA’s Gree

  24. Slide 24: What About The U.S.?

    What About The U.S.?  Analysis of HFC Production and Consumption Controls  Released October 2009  Preliminary analysis of potential benefits for controlling consumption of HFCs  No legislation pending  Would count on HFO’s, natural and low GWP blends to fill the gap Dettmers2010 Dettmers 2/8/07

  25. Slide 25: Unacceptable Substitute Refrigerants

    Unacceptable Substitute Refrigerants Substitute (Name Used in the Federal ODS Being Replaced End-uses Reason Register) All flammable refrigerants, including OZ- Lack of adequate assessment that 12® (Hydrocarbon Blend A), HC-12a® Motor vehicle air conditioning, retrofit and CFC-12 characterizes incre

  26. Slide 26: What’s the Danger of HC’s?

    Pure Hydrocarbon as Refrigerants  Be certain the have SNAP approval  Beware of another HC “drop-in” drop in marketed for R-22 systems  No SNAP approval  Sometimes called a HC or Alkane refrigerant “Drop-in” Propane Hazardous ingredient Alkane Propane is Alkane Lower Flammability Limit (LEL) 2.15

Xcel Energy — Technical Presentation (2010) on 6ix