Veolia Environnement Sa · EURONEXT:VIE

Veolia Environnement Sa — Conference on methane (Veolia Institut) (November 2015)

30 slides from Veolia Environnement Sa's conference presentation, Nov 9, 2015

  1. Slide 1: Addressing Methane Emissions from Livestock

    ‹#› ADDRESSING METHANE EMISSIONS FROM LIVESTOCK CAROLYN OPIO LIVESTOCK POLICY OFFICER, FAO Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  2. Slide 2: Outline

    ‹#› OUTLINE • Methane emissions from livestock • Why livestock is important for the methane discourse • Addressing enteric methane from livestock • From science to action • Key messages Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  3. Slide 3: Methane Emissions from Agriculture

    ‹#› METHANE EMISSIONS FROM AGRICULTURE Agriculture accounts for 50% of global methane emissions Within agriculture, 78% of methane emissions are from livestock Meeting/Workshop title • place and date FAOSTAT, 2014

  4. Slide 4: GHG Emissions from Global Livestock Supply Chains

    ‹#› GHG EMISSIONS FROM GLOBAL LIVESTOCK SUPPLY CHAINS Meeting/Workshop title • place and date GLEAM, 2013

  5. Slide 5: Regional Share of Global Methane Emissions from Livestock

    ‹#› REGIONAL SHARE OF GLOBAL METHANE EMISSIONS FROM LIVESTOCK Meeting/Workshop title • place and date GLEAM, 2013

  6. Slide 6: Enteric Methane Emission Intensity

    ENTERIC METHANE EMISSION INTENSITY ‹#› Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  7. Slide 7: 9.6 Million Tonnes of CH4 from Manure Management

    9.6 MILLION TONNES OF CH4 FROM MANURE MANAGEMENT ‹#› (~240 MILLION TONNES CO2-e) Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  8. Slide 8: Why Focus on Enteric Methane from Livestock?

    ‹#› WHY FOCUS ON ENTERIC METHANE FROM LIVESTOCK? Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  9. Slide 9: The Rumen and the Essential Role of Microbes

    THE RUMEN AND THE ESSENTIAL ROLE OF MICROBES ‹#› • takes place in the rumen Enteric CH4 •“fermentation vat” containing a by-product of rumination billions of microbes • efficient in digestion of cellulose rich diets Rumen •converting human inedible Enteric fermentation Methanogens H2 products to hig

  10. Slide 10: Role of Ruminants in Food Security and Livelihoods

    ROLE OF RUMINANTS IN FOOD SECURITY AND LIVELIHOODS ‹#› many of people who depend on livestock are among the most vulnerable populations • 730 million poor live in rural and marginal areas • 430 million are poor livestock keepers • direct food - high value protein • traction and nutrients for arable

  11. Slide 11: Significant Contribution to Global Warming

    ‹#› SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO GLOBAL WARMING Gt CO2 eq. GWP100 Global anthropogenic GHG emissions 49 Global methane emissions 6,9 Global enteric CH4 emissions 2,7 ENTERIC CH4 AS A SHARE OF … % Global human-induced emissions 6 Global CH4 emissions 30 CH4 from Agriculture 70 GHG emission from livest

  12. Slide 12: Potential for Immediate Gains for Global Climate

    POTENTIAL FOR IMMEDIATE GAINS FOR GLOBAL ‹#› CLIMATE GLOBAL EMISSIONS FROM RUMINANTS WEIGHTED FOR TWO DIFFERENT GWPS (expressed in CO2-e) 9,00 8,00 7,00 Gigatonnes CO2 eq. 6,00 CO2 CH4 5,00 +18% N2O 4,00 3,00 2,00 +6% 1,00 0,00 GWP 100 GWP20 • 100-year horizon: traps 28 times more heat than CO2 • 20

  13. Slide 13: Large Technical Mitigation Potential

    LARGE TECHNICAL MITIGATION POTENTIAL ‹#› Production units aligned to average emission intensity of 10th percentile Addressing the emission intensity gap Production units aligned to average emission intensity of 25th percentile enteric CH4 emissions can be reduced by approximately between 22% and 33%

  14. Slide 14: Mitigation Potential

    MITIGATION POTENTIAL ‹#› Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  15. Slide 15: Enteric Methane Emissions Are Energy Losses

    ENTERIC METHANE EMISSIONS ARE ENERGY LOSSES: 2-12% OF ‹#› FEED ENERGY IS LOST There is a strong link between GHG emission intensity and resource use efficiency Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  16. Slide 16: Partitioning of Feed Energy

    ‹#› PARTITIONING OF FEED ENERGY Ruminant animals with low levels of production efficiency have relatively high methane emissions per unit of product because these animals use a large fraction of their feed intake solely for maintenance. Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  17. Slide 17: Reduction Improves Productivity

    REDUCTION IMPROVES PRODUCTIVITY ‹#› RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MILK YIELD AND ENTERIC CH4 PER KG MILK Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  18. Slide 18: Addressing Enteric Methane from Livestock

    ‹#› ADDRESSING ENTERIC METHANE FROM LIVESTOCK Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  19. Slide 19: A Wide Range of Technical Interventions

    A WIDE RANGE OF TECHNICAL INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE ‹#› NATURAL RESOURCE USE EFFICIENCY & PRODUCTIVITY AND REDUCE EMISSIONS Enteric CH4 : at animal AND herd level • Improved feeding practices and feed processing (improving forage quality, feed processing, concentrate use) • Supplementary feeding - in

  20. Slide 20: Mitigation Options: Feeding, Supplements, Herd Management

    ‹#› Feeding practices Supplements & additives Herd mgt. A wide range of mitigation options for reducing methane from enteric fermentation Many have some mitigation uncertainty, are not cost effective, have poorly understood interactive effects with other emission sources, or other associated risk.

  21. Slide 21: Benefits from Enteric CH4 Reduction

    BENEFITS FROM ENTERIC CH4 REDUCTION Specialized beef ‹#› Mixed dairy production production in in South Asia South America Notes Global impacts - Million tonnes CO2 eq. 213 201 Enteric Methane Baseline - Percentage of enteric methane in (62%) (50%) total GHG mitigation - Million tonnes CO2 eq. -54 -9

  22. Slide 22: Summary: Why Focus on Enteric CH4?

    ‹#› SUMMARY: WHY FOCUS ON ENTERIC CH4 ? • Opportunity for high impact. 78% of agricultural and 30% of global methane emissions; expected to grow • Low cost and wide range of co-benefits (climate, productivity, profitability, food security, nutritional benefits, human health benefits, adaptation (gre

  23. Slide 23: From Science to Action: Issues to Consider

    ‹#› FROM SCIENCE TO ACTION: ISSUES TO CONSIDER • Importance of the sector: food security, livelihoods, income, economic development, exposure to CC • Complexity added by the diversity and heterogeneity of livestock systems • Barriers:limited awareness of emissions levels, reduction opportunities and

  24. Slide 24: What Is Required for Action?

    ‹#› WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR ACTION? • Building of an evidence-base and tools for decision-making regarding the actions to address enteric methane and technologies and practices • Engaging with appropriate stakeholders and other relevant organizations to share knowledge, experiences, outcomes, and key r

  25. Slide 25: Global Action to Address Enteric CH4 Emissions

    ‹#› GLOBAL ACTION TO ADDRESS ENTERIC CH4 EMISSIONS Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

  26. Slide 26: Objectives

    OBJECTIVES ‹#› • building knowledge and innovation through generation and dissemination of information and tools to support the identification and prioritization of high potential areas for intervention. • enhancing policy capabilities and as well as building political will and action to address ent

  27. Slide 27: Global Action to Address Enteric CH4: Phase 1

    GLOBAL ACTION TO ADDRESS ENTERIC CH4:PHASE 1 ‹#› Engagement and Analysis  Defining the ruminant production systems  Identifying the existing and available technologies and interventions  Understanding the constraints and barriers to intervention  Identifying the key stakeholders Identification o

  28. Slide 28: Tools: Linking Productivity Gains to Emissions Reduction

    TOOLS: LINKING PRODUCTIVITY GAINS TO EMISSIONS REDUCTION ‹#› Bridging the milk yield gap Methane emissions = 64% • xi= Yield gaps due to “animal husbandry practices” • yi= Gap in productivity due to “genotype” • A protocol and accounting tool, validated by third party, to certify emission reduction

  29. Slide 29: Key Messages

    KEY MESSAGES ‹#› Agricultural emissions are highly variable and reflect the diversity of production environments. Implementation needs to adapt to local conditions and technological solutions differ from place to place; blanket solutions are bound to fail. In developing countries, any mitigation str

  30. Slide 30: Thank you

    ‹#› Thank you Carolyn.Opio@fao.org Meeting/Workshop title • place and date

Veolia Environnement — Conference on methane (Veolia Institut) (November 2015) on 6ix