Boeing Company (the) · NYSE:BA

Boeing Company (the) — Technical Presentation (July 2019)

70 slides from Boeing Company (the)'s technical presentation, Jul 17, 2019

  1. Slide 1: Santa Susana Field Laboratory Public Meeting: Site-Wide Summary of Activities

    SANTA SUSANA FIELD LABORATORY PUBLIC MEETING SITE-WIDE SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES With support from July 17, 2019 SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel

  2. Slide 2: Meeting Orientation

    Meeting Orientation 2 Meeting Objectives • Provide opportunity for the Stormwater Expert Panel to provide an update on post-fire stormwater sampling results and management activities at SSFL, and respond to questions raised in a recent public survey • Provide interested members of the pubic an oppor

  3. Slide 3: Meeting Orientation: Proposed Ground Rules

    Meeting Orientation 3 Proposed Ground Rules • Please hold your questions until after the presentation • Take turns asking questions and focus your questions on topics addressed by the Stormwater Expert Panel • Please treat everyone present tonight with kindness and respect July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| S

  4. Slide 4: Santa Susana Field Laboratory

    Santa Susana Field Laboratory DTSC protects Californians and their environment from exposure to hazardous wastes by enforcing hazardous waste laws and regulations July 19, 2019 Calabasas, CA Department of Toxic Substances Control Cal/EPA

  5. Slide 5: DTSC's Regulating Authority at SSFL

    DTSC’s Regulating Authority at SSFL  The Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board regulates surface water leaving the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) site through an industrial discharge permit  All other media are regulated by DTSC under its Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RC

  6. Slide 6: DTSC Community Involvement for SSFL

    DTSC Community Involvement for SSFL • View DTSC’s SSFL website: https://dtsc.ca.gov/sitecleanup/santa_susana_field_lab/ • Subscribe to the SSFL E-list • Review the Monthly SSFL Progress Report via the SSFL E-list • Request for Notification of document uploading For questions regarding SSFL and Commu

  7. Slide 7: Outline

    Outline 7 • Stormwater Expert Panel introduction • Background • SSFL Stormwater Overview • HHRA Summary • Key Questions this Year • Conclusions MS July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  8. Slide 8: Background

    oe Background

  9. Slide 9: Stormwater Expert Panel Introduction

    Stormwater Expert Panel Introduction 9 • Dr. Bob Gearheart, PE, Humboldt State University • Jon Jones, PE, Wright Water Engineers • Dr. Michael Josselyn, WRA Consultants • Dr. Bob Pitt, PE, University of Alabama • Dr. Michael Stenstrom, PE, University of California, Los Angeles • Panel consultant: G

  10. Slide 10: Panel's Ongoing Role and Scope

    Panel’s Ongoing Role and Scope 10 • Independent panel formed in response to the 2007 Cease and Desist Order from the RWQCB o “…a panel to review site conditions, modeled flow, contaminants of concern, and evaluate the BMPs capable of providing the required treatment to meet the final effluent limits

  11. Slide 11: SSFL Overview

    SSFL Overview 11 • Former rocket testing and energy research facility • Industrial activities have ceased and facilities removal is underway o Nuclear energy research operations ceased in 1989 o Rocket engine testing operations ended in 2006 • Current activities include environmental monitoring/samp

  12. Slide 12: NPDES Permit Overview

    NPDES Permit Overview 12 • Stormwater discharges at SSFL are regulated by the LARWQCB through an individual NPDES permit, which requires: o Composite sampling at 12 stormwater outfalls; and o Compliance with approximately 50 Numeric Effluent Limits (NELs) – protective of both human health and aquati

  13. Slide 13: SSFL Stormwater Overview

    13 SSFL Stormwater Overview BP

  14. Slide 14: SSFL NPDES Outfalls

    SSFL NPDES Outfalls 14 Outfall Boundary BP July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  15. Slide 15: Simi Valley Calleguas Creek Tributaries Dayton Creek

    Simi Valley 15 Calleguas Creek Tributaries Dayton Creek West Hills neighborhood Bell Creek Tributaries BP July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  16. Slide 16: RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI)

    RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) 16 BP July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  17. Slide 17: Structural treatment controls target RFI Areas

    Structural treatment controls target RFI Areas 17 BP July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  18. Slide 18: Multi-Pronged Approach

    Multi-Pronged Approach 18 • Source Controls • Treatment Controls o ISRA soil removal o Advanced stormwater o Pavement and building treatment systems (011, 018) removal o Flow-through media filters • Erosion/Sediment Controls  Culvert modifications and Restoration  Media filters (B1, upper lot)  S

  19. Slide 19: Northern outfalls and OF018 treated with advanced treatment system

    Northern outfalls and OF018 treated with advanced treatment system Northern outfalls pumped to Silvernale pond, overflows treated by 19 Silvernale media filters Treated stormwater drains to OF002 MS July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  20. Slide 20: Outfall 018 Stormwater Treatment System

    Outfall 018 Stormwater Treatment System 20 Silvernale pond on 3/26/18 MS July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  21. Slide 21: Stormwater not treated by Silvernale flows through media filters

    Stormwater not treated by Silvernale treatment system flows through media filters before leaving northern outfalls 21 Outfall 003 Media Filter Outfall 006 Media Filter MS July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  22. Slide 22: BMP Strategy for 008/009 Watersheds

    BMP Strategy for 008/009 Watersheds 22 Unlike other outfalls, “end of pipe” stormwater treatment was not possible here without constructing environmentally-intrusive dams. So instead a distributed, watershed-based approach was implemented. Emphases were: • 008: Source removal, erosion control, and r

  23. Slide 23: 008/009 Distributed Approach

    008/009 Distributed Approach 23 BP July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  24. Slide 24: Example 009 BMPs

    Example 009 BMPs 24 12 Culvert Sedimentation Basin Modifications and Biofilter Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) Treatment BMP BP July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  25. Slide 25: BMP Performance: Lead

    BMP Performance: Lead 25 Lead concentrations are significantly reduced for most BMP types 100 10 1 0.1 (2009-present) (2013-present) (2013-present) (2015-present) BP July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  26. Slide 26: BMP Performance: Dioxin

    BMP Performance: Dioxin 26 Dioxin concentrations are significantly reduced for all BMP types 0.001 0.0001 >Q3+1.5*IQR Q3+1.5*IQR 75th percentile (Q3) 0.00001 Interquartile Range 0.000001 (IQR) Median 0.0000001 25th percentile (Q1) 0.00000001 Q1-1.5*IQR 0.000000001 (2009-present) (2013-present) (2013

  27. Slide 27: HHRA Summary

    27 HHRA Summary

  28. Slide 28: HHRA Scope

    HHRA Scope 28 • Regional Board issued Order to Boeing to conduct stormwater HHRA in response to public comment • Quantitative assessment of potential risks and hazards associated with human contact with stormwater and treated groundwater discharges from the SSFL o Other media (e.g., soil, sediment,

  29. Slide 29: HHRA Analyzed NPDES Outfalls

    HHRA Analyzed NPDES Outfalls 29 Outfall Sage Boundary 9 NASA Ranch 10 4 3 14 Boeing/DOE 12 6 7 13 5 Boeing Boeing NASA 8 18 11 2 19 1 BS July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  30. Slide 30: HHRA Approach

    HHRA Approach 30 • Recreators (child/adult) were evaluated • Exposure was assumed to occur at each outfall separately • Exposure frequency – days per year of exposure connected to the flow days (1-2 days per week) • Exposure pathways o Incidental ingestion and dermal contact evaluated as primary pat

  31. Slide 31: HHRA Findings

    HHRA Findings 31 • Potential recreational exposure via incidental ingestion and dermal contact in surface water runoff exiting the SSFL via Outfalls 001, 002, 008, 009, 011, 018, and 019 are below levels of concern as established by CalEPA and USEPA (see chart on next slide). • Volatilization/inhala

  32. Slide 32: Incremental Cancer Risk

    Comparison of Lower and Upperbound Cumulative Incremental Cancer Risk Estimates by Outfall 32 1:1,000,000 8:10,000,000 Incremental Cancer Risk 6:10,000,000 4:10,000,000 2:10,000,000 1:10,000,000 * *Outfall 019 is not planned to be used for surface water discharge BS July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Sto

  33. Slide 33: Comparison of SSFL Stormwater with Urban Residential Stormwater

    Comparison of SSFL Stormwater with 33 Urban Residential Stormwater California Mixed Urban (n=180) California Mixed Urban (n=180) BS July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  34. Slide 34: Key Questions This Year

    34 Key Questions This Year How did the Woolsey Wildfire impact the site and how has Boeing responded?

  35. Slide 35: Woolsey Wildfire Extent

    Woolsey Wildfire Extent 35 • 79% of site burned MS • Outfall watersheds most impacted: o Outfall 011/001 Area IV (Boeing/DOE) o Outfall 018/002 o Outfall 008 • Last wildfire was 18 8 in 2005 (Topanga) 11 2 1 JJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  36. Slide 36: Woolsey Wildfire Extent

    Woolsey Wildfire Extent MS 36 Wildfire perimeter JJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  37. Slide 37: Effects of Wildfire

    Effects of Wildfire JJ 37 o Lost vegetative cover o Lost plant litter o Increased soil hydrophobicity Burned sampling station at Outfall 018 (water repellent) o Burned material including plastic sampler housing, metal platforms, batteries, HDPE pipelines, PVC fixtures, utility poles, etc. o Temporar

  38. Slide 38: Hydrologic and Water Quality Response

    Hydrologic and Water Quality Response 38 ◦ Increased runoff (frequency and volume) ◦ New pollutant sources (burned materials) ◦ Increased soil exposure and associated constituent mobilization With time these effects are diminished with vegetative regrowth and as soil infiltration characteristics ret

  39. Slide 39: Example SSFL Response, Repairs, and Controls

    Example SSFL Response, Repairs, and Controls JJ 39 • Hydromulch applied and fiber rolls installed • Burned HDPE pipelines replaced to direct runoff to storm water treatment system (SWTS) • Debris removed and ash vacuumed from burned areas • Repair and maintenance of stormwater BMPs, including SWTS,

  40. Slide 40: Example Sediment Capture: CM-4

    Example Sediment Capture: CM-4 JJ 40 Post-Wildfire sediment accumulation looking downstream toward weir boards. Today JJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  41. Slide 41: Key Questions This Year

    41 Key Questions This Year Did lead from the shooting range impact water quality at Outfall 009?

  42. Slide 42: Outfall 009 Shooting Range Soil Lead Hot Spots

    Outfall 009 Shooting Range Soil Lead 42 Hot Spots JJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  43. Slide 43: Outfall 009 Shooting Range BMPs

    Outfall 009 Shooting Range BMPs 43 BMPs implemented to capture sediment and particulate- bound lead from Culvert the shooting Silt Fence Modifications Fiber Rolls range Sandbag Berms Riprap Vegetation JJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  44. Slide 44: No Lead Exceedances at Outfall 009

    No Lead Exceedances at Outfall 009 This year the lead is being contained on the site 44 6 5 4 Total Lead (ug/L) 3 2 1 0 12/1/18 1/10/19 2/19/19 Outfall 009 Lead Concentrations NPDES Permit Limit JJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  45. Slide 45: Key Questions This Year

    45 Key Questions This Year What was the water quality of stormwater discharged this year and how does it compare to drinking water and human health-based standards?

  46. Slide 46: Cumulative Annual Rainfall

    2018-19 was a wetter than average year 46 • Eleven qualifying rain events (>0.10 inch in 24-hrs) o Three 7-day samples • Total annual rainfall 26.05 inch (vs. 16.8 inch average) 2018-2019 2015-16 (most near-average recent year) 30 Cumulative Annual Rainfall (in) 25 Woolsey Wildfire  20 = no samplea

  47. Slide 47: 57 Total Exceedances Coincide with Burned Areas

    57 Total Exceedances: Numbers Coincide with Burned Areas (Except 018 Treatment System) 47 0 OF 004 2 0 OF 006 11 1 10 27 6 The numbers show Permit limit or Benchmark exceedances at each Outfall. No number for a particular outfall implies no stormwater discharged in the 2018/19 season. Red = watershe

  48. Slide 48: Constituents that Exceeded Human Health Based Thresholds

    Constituents that Exceeded Human 48 Health Based Thresholds • 57 NPDES Exceedances • Drinking water standard o Iron (12) exceedances o Lead (9) o Gross Alpha (3) Manganese (8) o Arsenic (2) o Dioxin (6) o Nickel (1) o o Copper (5) o Zinc (3) • Fish consumption o Gross Alpha (3) standard exceedances

  49. Slide 49: Historical Overview – NPDES Sampling All SSFL Outfalls

    Historical Overview – NPDES Sampling All SSFL Outfalls Average annual rainfall (16.8 in) 2005-06 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 BG July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  50. Slide 50: Historical Overview – NPDES Sampling All SSFL Outfalls

    Historical Overview – NPDES Sampling All SSFL Outfalls Similar post-wildfire rain years, but substantially fewer discharges and exceedances in 2018-19 2005-06 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 BG July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeti

  51. Slide 51: Historical Overview – NPDES Sampling All SSFL Outfalls

    Historical Overview – NPDES Sampling All SSFL Outfalls Similar rain years, but substantially fewer discharges and exceedances in 2017-18 2005-06 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 BG July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  52. Slide 52: Historical Overview – NPDES Sampling All SSFL Outfalls

    Historical Overview – NPDES Sampling All SSFL Outfalls Similar rain years, but substantially fewer discharges and exceedances in 2016-17 2005-06 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 BG July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  53. Slide 53: Key Questions This Year

    53 Key Questions This Year What were the sources of this year’s NPDES permit limit/benchmark exceedances?

  54. Slide 54: Post-Wildfire Source Evaluation

    Post-Wildfire Source Evaluation 54 • Potential Sources Evaluated o Soils from former operational and contaminated areas o Ash and burnt material Lines of Evidence o Hydromulch o Pavement solids Congeners o Treated wood and adjacent soils Particulate (dioxins) or o Atmospheric deposition strength rat

  55. Slide 55: Previous studies of water quality following wildfires

    Previous studies of water quality following wildfires in mostly undeveloped areas show an increase in many constituents 55 Multiplicative Increase Constituent References Pre- to Post-Fire Conc. Arsenic* 7 Burton et al., 2016 [2006 Station Fire, CA] Burton et al., 2016 [2006 Station Fire, CA]; Stein

  56. Slide 56: Potential Dioxin Sources

    Potential Dioxin Sources BP July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  57. Slide 57: Summary of Exceedance Sources

    Summary of Exceedance Sources 57 Exceedance Potential Source Most metals Natural background soils, pavement solids Dioxins Pavement solids, soils near treated wood, soils from former operational areas, and burned treated wood and pipes Gross Alpha Only naturally occurring radionuclides detected Nitr

  58. Slide 58: Key Questions This Year

    58 Key Questions This Year Are there any lasting effects from the wildfire and what about the future?

  59. Slide 59: Measured Exceedances Decreasing with Time

    Number of Permit Limit and Benchmark Exceedances are Decreasing with Time 10 0 Daily Rainfall Measured Exceedances by 9 2 Daily rainfall 8 4 Area14 7 6 6 8 Outfall Outfall 5 10 001 Woolsey Wildfire 4 12 Outfall 3 14 002 2 16 1 18 Outfall 0 20 004 Outfall 006 Outfall 008 59 MJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2018

  60. Slide 60: Stormwater Concentrations Returning to Typical Levels

    Stormwater Concentrations Returning to Typical Levels 60 Outfall 008 Post-Topanga Post-Woolsey MJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  61. Slide 61: Stormwater Exceedances Expected to Decrease

    Stormwater Exceedances Expected to 61 Decrease • Based on observed trend post-wildfires (Topanga and Woolsey), concentrations expected to decrease • Future storm discharge water quality will be closely monitored to determine if the trend of decreasing concentrations continues MJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2

  62. Slide 62: Future Wildfires

    Future Wildfires 62 • Boeing and the SWEP are developing recommendations to prepare for future wildfires • These recommendations may reduce the response time for BMP deployment and operation MJ July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  63. Slide 63: Key Questions This Year

    63 Key Questions This Year What BMP and monitoring recommendations are being considered for this year’s Annual Report?

  64. Slide 64: Preliminary BMP and Monitoring Recommendations

    Preliminary BMP and Monitoring 64 Recommendations • BMP Recommendations o Stockpiling erosion controls for emergency response o Install BMPs around more treated wood poles o Repair OF011 treatment system and ready for operation o Assess feasibility of increasing pond storage and/or reconstructing OF

  65. Slide 65: Conclusion

    Conclusion 65 • The Woolsey wildfire occurred in early November, prior to much of the wet season • There was higher than usual rainfall recorded this year; this, combined with the wildfire’s affects on soils and vegetation, caused higher than usual number of stormwater runoff events at SSFL • There

  66. Slide 66: Conclusion

    Conclusion 66 • Existing stormwater treatment controls have been implemented (and repaired) to capture stormwater from contaminated areas at the site • These controls have been effective at reducing site stormwater concentrations for the constituents of concern during normal operations • NPDES permi

  67. Slide 67: Conclusion

    Conclusion 67 • Most of the exceedances occurred downstream of “buffer areas” with minimal or no historic operations (i.e., 001 and 002) or areas with a previously completed Interim Source Removal Action that addressed impacted surface soils (i.e., 008 and 009), limiting the area where the wildfire

  68. Slide 68: Conclusion

    Conclusion 68 • Most measured concentrations decreased throughout the year showing that the water quality effects of the wildfire are diminishing within a relatively short timeframe consistent with trends seen after the 2005 Topanga Wildfire • The Panel is making new BMP and monitoring recommendatio

  69. Slide 69: Questions – Thank You

    Questions 69 THANK YOU Additional Information (e.g., Annual Report, Panel Presentations, NPDES Permit, and Technical Reports): www.boeing.com/principles/environment/santa-susana MS July 17, 25, 2019| 2018| SSFL Stormwater Expert Panel Public Meeting

  70. Slide 70: HHRA Documents Available Online

    HHRA Documents Available Online 70 Revised HHRA Work Plan www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/principles/environ ment/pdf/Revised_Human_Health_Assessment_Work_Plan_SSF L.pdf Final HHRA Submitted to RWQCB www.waterboards.ca.gov/losangeles/public_notices/Boeing/20 17/16.FinalHHRAforSurfaceWaterRunof

Boeing Company — Technical Presentation (July 2019) on 6ix