Slide 1: Appendix B Open House Presentations and Comment Forms
Summary of Consultation to Support the Côté Gold Project Closure Plan Côté Gold Project Appendix B Open House Presentations and Comment Forms TC180501 | October 2018
Slide 2: The Côté Gold Project – Project Update February 2018
The Côté Gold Project – Project Update February 2018
Slide 3: Côté Gold Project Update
Côté Gold Project Update Côté Gold Project Update Project Overview Environmental Assessment Approvals Project News Project Optimizations Environmental Effects Review Project Timeline Mine Closure Ongoing Communication and Consultation 2
Slide 4: The Côté Gold Project
The Côté Gold Project Typical haul truck and Open pit Project overview Located in Neville and Chester Townships 20 km southwest of Gogama; 130 km southwest of Timmins; 200 km northwest of Sudbury Open pit gold Project Operate for 17 years Rio Tinto, Palabora Open Pit Process 36,000 tonnes per day Em
Slide 5: Ore Processing Plant, Work Camp and Other Buildings
Ore Processing Plant, Work Camp and Other Buildings Accommodations Complex 1,200 workers during construction 500 full-time personnel during operation Ore Processing Plant Area where gold is recovered from mined rock (ore) Source for all images: Detour Gold 4
Slide 6: Environmental Assessment Approvals
Environmental Assessment Approvals Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency approval Approved April 13, 2016 Approximately 90 conditions / commitments Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change approval Approved December 22, 2016 Approximately 95 conditions / commitments 5
Slide 7: Successful Completion of the Côté Gold Project Environmental Assessment Process
Successful Completion of the Côté Gold Project Environmental Assessment Process 6
Slide 8: Côté Gold Project News
wares named in na wndtiicual or organise Financing, fOMO Matal Mining Pat aSCS 2 30% interest in 32 C86 Cola project in Aorheaster Ontario 5 won. The investment a SuBSoquent 70. 39 ait venture agreemere ees breakthrough {0 procesd toward Cevelopment of ama 0d project in ac 9 Financing environmmee Co
Slide 9: Project Optimizations
Project Optimizations Considered feedback received during environmental assessment Local communities First Nations and Métis Technical experts Government regulators Pre-feasibility study assessed different options to improve environmental performance 8
Slide 10: Overview of Key Optimizations and Responses to Concerns
Overview of Key Optimizations and Responses to Concerns Issues and Concerns Raised How the Optimized Project Layout during the EA Process Addresses Issues and Concerns • Increased access for hunting and use of Use of existing transmission line alignment new transmission line right-of-way and infrast
Slide 11: New Côté Gold Project Layout
New Côté Gold Project Layout 10
Slide 12: Côté Gold Project Layout – Comparison of Old and New Layouts
Côté Gold Project Layout – Comparison of Old and New Layouts Grey shaded areas represent show the Project layout assessed during the environmental assessment The pink shaded areas represent the optimized Project layout 11
Slide 13: Transmission Line Alignment
Transmission Line Alignment 12
Slide 14: Overview of Key Optimizations
Overview of Key Optimizations Component Previous Project Design (EA) Current (EER) Footprint 1,700 hectares (ha) 1,050 ha Life of Mine 15 years 17 years Purpose Open Pit Footprint 210 ha 145 ha Mining Rate 60,000 tonnes per day (tpd) 36,000 tpd Ore 261 million tonnes (Mt) 196 Mt Mine Rock Area Footp
Slide 15: Environmental Effects Review (EER)
Environmental Effects Review (EER) Purpose of the EER is to demonstrate: The optimized Project has similar or reduced potential for environmental effects The net impact significance conclusions from the environmental assessment are still valid The EER will compare the previous and new Project layout
Slide 16: Environmental Effects Review (EER) Report
Environmental Effects Review (EER) Report The EER Report will: Update description of Project effects Compare effects changes of the optimized Project Include changed or updated mitigation Include changed or updated environmental management Provide information about consultation Key issues raised by
Slide 17: Project Timeline
Project Timeline 2018 2019 2020 2021 EER Permitting Construction Operations 16
Slide 18: Côté Gold Project at End of Operations
Côté Gold Project at End of Operations 17
Slide 19: Côté Gold Project – Post Closure Phases 1 and 2
Côté Gold Project – Post Closure Phases 1 and 2 Phase 2 Phase 1 18
Slide 20: Ongoing Communication and Consultation
Ongoing Communication and Consultation IAMGOLD will: Hold open houses and community meetings Engage with the public, First Nations, Métis and government agencies regarding the proposed changes to the Project and our EER findings Engage with the public, First Nations, Métis and government agencies ab
Slide 21: Côté Gold Project May / June 2018 Open House Presentation
May / June 2018 Open House Presentation Côté Gold Project
Slide 22: Côté Gold Project Update
Côté Gold Project Update Côté Gold Project Update Environmental Effects Review Transmission Line Environmental Assessment Management of Mine Waste Mine Closure Fish Habitat Plans Archaeological Studies and Findings Ongoing Communication and Consultation 2
Slide 23: The Côté Gold Project
The Côté Gold Project Typical haul truck and Open pit Project overview Located in Chester and Yeo Townships 20 km southwest of Gogama; 130 km southwest of Timmins; 200 km northwest of Sudbury Open pit gold Project Operate for 17 years Process 36,000 tonnes per day Rio Tinto, Palabora Open Pit Employ
Slide 24: Ore Processing Plant, Work Camp and Other Buildings
Ore Processing Plant, Work Camp and Other Buildings Ore Processing High Pressure Grinding Rolls (HPGR) Accommodations Complex 1,200 workers during construction 500 full-time personnel during operation Source for image: Detour Gold 4
Slide 25: Environmental Assessment Approvals
Environmental Assessment Approvals Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency approval Approved April 13, 2016 Approximately 90 conditions / commitments Follow-up program to verify accuracy of EA predictions and effectiveness of mitigation measures Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change approv
Slide 26: Côté Gold Project News
j s Cété Gold Project New amec S oster ‘neeler dy of the ibility Stu sibility Prefea yn the canada rt ol 01 Technical Repo ontario, 7 eof POAC: longese, ro ine Bresktent is given, toan ] on nenstrating eacerssar jement ang at Anancing for tne Sw ration ena ceveionmece si Neral resources p lainey 2°1
Slide 27: Project Optimizations
Project Optimizations Considered feedback received during environmental assessment First Nations Métis Local communities Technical experts Government regulators Pre-feasibility study assessed different options to improve environmental performance 7
Slide 28: Overview of Key Optimizations and Responses to Concerns
Overview of Key Optimizations and Responses to Concerns Issues and Concerns Raised How the Optimized Project Layout during the EA Process Addresses Issues and Concerns • Increased access for hunting and use of Use of existing transmission line alignment new transmission line right-of-way and infrast
Slide 29: Côté Gold Project Layout – Comparison of Old and New
Côté Gold Project Layout – Comparison of Old and New Project layout assessed during the environmental assessment Optimized Project layout 9
Slide 30: Environmental Effects Review (EER)
Environmental Effects Review (EER) The EER compares the previous and new Project layouts, considering Effects Significance Mitigation Monitoring Technical reviews to date demonstrate The optimized Project has the same or less potential for environmental effects The significance conclusions from the
Slide 31: Transmission Line Environmental Assessment
Transmission Line Environmental Assessment Required for new 115 kV transmission line Project site to Shining Tree Distribution Station (44 km) Will be owned and operated by IAMGOLD Process Requires a screening report Consultation opportunities Today’s open house 30 day review and comment period once
Slide 32: Management of Mine Waste
Management of Mine Waste Geography of the area Tailings location Mine rock location (stream and beaver pond) Decision making process to look at options for where to locate tailings and mine rock Review of options considered 4 aspects Environmental Technical Social Economic (cost to Project) IAMGOLD
Slide 33: Mine Closure
Mine Closure Closure is guided by the Mining Act and the Mine Rehabilitation Code of Ontario An approved Closure Plan and financial assurance is required before mine construction and operations can begin Primary objectives of closure activities are to achieve biological, chemical and physical stabil
Slide 34: Fish Habitat Plans
Fish Habitat Plans Optimized Project means less habitat loss 2 watercourse realignments and a new lake will support fish, plants and animals within the ecosystem Fisheries offsetting plan Detail proposed channel and lake designs Ways to support new fish habitat At closure Two new Open pit will flood
Slide 35: Archaeological Studies
Archaeological Studies 2018 2010 to 2013 2016 2017 2012 Proposed 2011 additional additional Stage 2 Stage 3 and Stage 3 and Stage 1 Stage 1 Stage 2 studies 4 studies possibly studies studies studies Stage 4 Presentation will highlight: Pre-contact settlement of the area Mining history on the propert
Slide 36: Want to work for the Côté Gold Project?
Want to work for the Côté Gold Project? Mid-2018 Mid-2019 to 2021 2018 Recruit key Recruit mix of Hire a General management roles* permanent employees Manager and contractors Qualifications will be specific to positions Visit IAMGOLD Careers webpage: www.iamgold.com/careers Register on the website t
Slide 37: Ongoing Communication and Consultation
Ongoing Communication and Consultation We invite you to come and learn about the Project, provide your feedback, ask questions and get involved! For more information please contact us: cotegold@iamgold.com Dave Brown Manager of Environment and Community Relations, Côté Gold Project david_brown@iamgo
Slide 38: Project Optimization
Poster Boards presented at May and June 2018 Open Houses Project Optimization Environmental Assessment (EA) approvals received in 2016 Since then, IAMGOLD Considered feedback received during the EA process from First Nations and Métis, local communities, technical experts, government regulators Cond
Slide 39: New Côté Gold Project Layout
New Coté Gold Project Layout # IAMGOLD CORPORATION Mine Wate Pond Area Polishing. nid Low-grade Ora y ‘Stockpile \ + Realignment connects Clam Lake and Chester Lake Seepage Collection Pond S) Three Duck Collection Pond
Slide 40: Côté Gold Project Layout – Comparison of Old and New
Côté Gold Project Layout – Comparison of Old and New Project layout assessed during the environmental assessment Optimized Project layout
Slide 41: Côté Gold Project – Site Access
Côté Gold Project – Site Access
Slide 42: Overview of Key Optimizations
Overview of Key Optimizations Component Previous Project Design (EA) Current (EER) Footprint 1,700 hectares (ha) 1,050 ha Life of Mine 15 years 17 years Open Pit Footprint 210 ha 145 ha Mining Rate 60,000 tonnes per day (tpd) 36,000 tpd Ore 261 million tonnes (Mt) 196 Mt Mine Rock Area Footprint 400
Slide 43: Overview of Key Optimizations and Responses to Concerns
Overview of Key Optimizations and Responses to Concerns Issues and Concerns Raised during How the Optimized Project Layout the EA Process Addresses Issues and Concerns • Increased access for hunting and use of Use of existing transmission line alignment U new transmission line right-of-way and infra
Slide 44: Environmental Effects Review (EER)
Environmental Effects Review (EER) Comparison of the previous and optimized Project layouts Updates to Project effects on the environment Updates to mitigation measures Updates to environmental management and/or monitoring programs The EER will be submitted to the federal and provincial governments
Slide 45: EER Results – Air, Noise and Vibration
EER Results – Air, Noise and Vibration Reduced effects on air quality Reduced emissions (smaller mine fleet, condensed Project layout) ~28% reduction in GHG predictions (less equipment required) Reduced noise emissions Mitigation proposed in EA for nighttime operations no longer required Continued c
Slide 46: EER Results – Groundwater and Surface water
EER Results – Groundwater and Surface water Reduced groundwater and surface water effects Fewer watercourse realignments (from 7 to 2) Operations no longer impacting Bagsverd Creek Shortened pit flooding during Closure & Post-closure Quicker return of groundwater levels to pre-mining conditions Wate
Slide 47: EER Results – Terrestrial and Aquatic Biology
EER Results – Terrestrial and Aquatic Biology Reduced effects on aquatic and terrestrial habitat Smaller Project footprint Less clearing for the new transmission line route Fewer water realignment channels Creation of a new lake Relocation and smaller TMF avoids Painted Turtle habitat and other sens
Slide 48: EER Results – Archaeology and Built Heritage
EER Results – Archaeology and Built Heritage No archaeological or built heritage resources will be affected by Project (no changes from EA) Based on feedback during the EA Additional field work planned in 2018 Discussions about protocols for curation and storage Licensed archaeologist will monitor d
Slide 49: EER Results – Land Use and Socio-Economics
EER Results – Land Use and Socio-Economics Improved economic benefits from extended operation timeframe (from 15 to 17 years) Extended duration for employment opportunities Positive impact to local businesses and professional services Increased Government revenue from taxation to support local commu
Slide 50: EER Results – Traditional Land Use
EER Results – Traditional Land Use Effects on traditional land uses are predicted to be less than or equal to EA predictions More compact Project footprint Decreased habitat loss Shorter Transmission Line using existing corridor Responds to concerns about increased vegetation loss and potential incr
Slide 51: EER Results – Visual Aesthetics
EER Results – Visual Aesthetics Mine Rock Area (MRA) Less visible compared to EA design (smaller footprint, portions that are further from shoreline, more cover from the natural topography) Tailings Management Facility (TMF) Relocated and smaller footprint, increased dam height New TMF will be visib
Slide 52: Côté Gold Project – Closure
Côté Gold Project – Closure Progressive rehabilitation Completed throughout the Operations phase with the objectives of Informing design and planning for Closure and rehabilitation Testing rehabilitation methods (where possible) Stabilizing Project components as they reach completion to meet end lan
Slide 53: Côté Gold Project Post-closure – Stage 1
Côté Gold Project Post-closure – Stage 1
Slide 54: Côté Gold Project Post-closure – Stage 2
Côté Gold Project Post-closure – Stage 2
Slide 55: Transmission Line from Project Site to Shining Tree DS
Transmission Line from Project Site to Shining Tree DS 2017 Biological Inventory Study Areas
Slide 56: Transmission Line from Project Site to Shining Tree DS
Transmission Line from Project Site to Shining Tree DS Existing Corridor between Project Site and Shining Tree DS
Slide 57: Transmission Line Alignment Côté Gold Project to Shining Tree Distribution Station
Transmission Line Alignment Côté Gold Project to Shining Tree Distribution Station Proposed 44 km, 115 kV transmission line Located almost entirely along an existing right-of-way Minor vegetation clearing will use mechanical means IAMGOLD to consult with local trappers and land users Additional base
Slide 58: Current Conditions
Current Conditions Shallow lakes connected by small streams Stream habitat dominated by slow meandering watercourses with heavily vegetated banks and a silty bottom Fish Populations Most abundant: northern pike and yellow perch Common: walleye, smallmouth bass, lake whitefish and white sucker No end
Slide 59: Construction Phase – Fish Habitat Changes
Construction Phase – Fish Habitat Changes Lake and stream habitat (dark brown) changes include Côté Lake, small ponds and the West Arm of Upper Three Duck Lake Mollie River and Clam Creek realigned to accommodate the open pit Tailings Management Facility will overprint West Beaver Pond, a number of
Slide 60: Operations Phase – Active Flow Through Realignments
Operations Phase – Active Flow Through Realignments Clam Lake water will flow south to Chester Lake in realignment channel Chester Lake water will flow to the Mollie River and flow north east into a newly constructed lake New Lake will flow into a watercourse realignment to Upper Three Duck Lake
Slide 61: Strategies to Support New Habitat
Strategies to Support New Habitat Incorporate features typically found in rivers (spawning habitat, rock clusters) Move plants to support new vegetation growth Relocate fish
Slide 62: New Lake and Outlet Channel
New Lake and Outlet Channel sIIAMGOLD |
Slide 63: Clam Lake to Chester Lake Channel
Clam Lake to Chester Lake Channel
Slide 64: Construction Noise Levels
Construction Noise Levels Day Night Common Indoor and Outdoor Noise Levels* LEGEND LEGEND * Image extracted from Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT, Sept. 2008); NOTE: Sound is perceived differently by every individual.
Slide 65: Operations Noise Levels
Operations Noise Levels Day Night g Common Indoor and Outdoor Noise Levels* LEGEND LEGEND Notes: NPC-300 daytime criteria of 45 dBA at receptor locations NPC-300 nighttime criteria of 40 dBA at receptor locations * Image extracted from Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT, Sept. 2008); NOTE: S
Slide 66: Assessment of Alternatives – Mine Rock Area
Assessment of Alternatives – Mine Rock Area 12 potential Mine Rock Area locations identified based on Land ownership and mineral rights Watershed considerations Social and cultural impact Environmental impact Location capacity Proximity to mine infrastructure 5 locations were suitable for additional
Slide 67: Assessment of Alternatives – Mine Rock Area
Assessment of Alternatives – Mine Rock Area Assessment considered 4 aspects Environmental Social Technical Cost Indicators were developed for each aspect Alternatives were rated based on performance of indicators Mine Rock Area ‘A’ is the preferred alternative *Process to meet Mining Metal Effluent
Slide 68: Assessment of Alternatives – Tailings Management Facility
Assessment of Alternatives – Tailings Management Facility 17 potential Tailings Management Facility locations identified Alternatives looked at different locations and methods of tailings management 3 potential technologies were considered Conventional slurry Thickened tailings Filtered (dry) stack
Slide 69: Assessment of Alternatives – Tailings Management Facility
Assessment of Alternatives – Tailings Management Facility 4 locations were suitable for additional analysis Assessment considered 4 aspects Environmental Social Technical Cost Indicators were developed for each aspect Tailings Management Facility ‘C’ is the preferred alternative *Process to meet Min
Slide 70: The Côté Gold Project – Archaeological Involvement and Update for 2018
The Côté Gold Project – Archaeological Involvement and Update for 2018
Slide 71: Agenda
Agenda Archaeological Assessment Processes Why we are here and what we do What you need to know History of Work on the Côté Gold Project Property Sites Which Have Been Avoided and their Locations Sites Without Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI) Mitigated Sites Passive Protection Measures Sit
Slide 72: Archaeological Assessment Processes
Archaeological Assessment Processes Under the Ontario Heritage Act, (R.S.O. 1990) anyone wishing to carry out archaeological fieldwork in Ontario must meet the following criteria: Have a licence from the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. File a report with the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and
Slide 73: Archaeological Assessment Processes
Archaeological Assessment Processes Archaeological resource assessment studies are classified as Stage 1 through Stage 4, as follows: Stage 1: Stage 1 archaeological assessments define areas of archaeological potential within the subject property and evaluate whether additional archaeological work i
Slide 74: History of Work on the Property
History of Work on the Property 5
Slide 75: History of Work on the Property
History of Work on the Property 6
Slide 76: Sites without Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI)
Sites without Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI) Rocky Narrows 1 Weeduck Cabin Site Bagsverd Creek 2 Makwa Point Clam Lake Gold Mining Company 1, 2 & 3 Large Pit Mine Site Chester 4 & 6 7
Slide 77: Sites Which Have Been Mitigated
Sites Which Have Been Mitigated Côté Lake 1 & 2 Two Pike Point Flat Rock Site Rocky Narrows 2 Shannon Cabin Chester 1, 2, 3, & 5 8
Slide 78: Sites Protected Through Passive Protection Measures
Sites Which Have Continued CHVI and are Protected Through Passive Protection Measures Bagsverd Creek 1, 3 & 4 Table Point Site Rocky Island Campsite Cryderman Camp 1 and 2 Headframe Point Sheppard Prospect Cabins Gosselin Camp 9
Slide 79: Sites Requiring More Work
Sites Requiring More Work Upper Duck Pine Point 10
Slide 80: Sites Requiring More Work
Sites Requiring More Work Mollie River 1 11
Slide 81: Sites Requiring More Work
Sites Requiring More Work Weeduck Lake 1 12
Slide 82: Sites Requiring More Work
Sites Requiring More Work Upper Three Duck Lake 1, 2 & 3 13
Slide 83: What We Learned about the Mining History of the Property
What We Learned about the Mining History of the Property Structures and complexes (camps). Evidence of exploration - shafts, pits, middens and trenches. Post-contact artifacts, tools and features. 14
Slide 84: What We Learned about Pre-contact Settlement of the Area
What We Learned about Pre-contact Settlement of the Area Stone tools including: various bifacial and unifacial tools (projectile points, knives, chisels, or drills), scrapers, projectile points, cores, ground stone tools, chert, debitage, etc. Bone, kaolin pipe fragments and native pottery fragments
Slide 85: Questions?
Questions? CORPORATION
Slide 86: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
# IAMGOLD CORPORATION COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Cété Gold Project . Which Open House did you attend? Q Timmins QO Gogama ly“Guabury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) . What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project?
Slide 87: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? M hn 4 be Ocal owned tou pis p FI Sees une Shy GOAbe 3 {22 Lc Awe fall No chr bs ters er l/ los Clin Du a Ly ms And. (¢ot Ss nel fH aa fe rll not (> ¢ Loo obec, aed. AS ty {24.04 ocd yD Orse) Osis t fF Coe y
Slide 88: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
= IAMGOLD Beare eee COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Cété Gold Project 1. Which Open House did you attend? Q Timmins Q Gogama rf Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) 2. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project?
Slide 89: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Cété Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) i No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cété Gold Project? Q
Slide 90: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
# L[AMGOLD CORPORATION COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Cété Gold Project . Which Open House did you attend? Q Timmins Q Gogama tf Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) . What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Coté Gold Project?
Slide 91: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? LG 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested e Cété Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Coté Gold Project? Q) Ope
Slide 92: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
wn $ [AMGOLD fo eto peor COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Cété Gold Project . Which Open House did you attend? QO Timmins Q Gogama YA Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project
Slide 93: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Cété Gold Project? Q Yes (who?__DuwAs ) Q No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cété Gold Proj
Slide 94: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
{a iLAMGOLD CORPORATION COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Cété Gold Project Which Open House did you attend? Q Timmins W-Gogama Q Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Coté Gold Project? \f
Slide 95: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Coté Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) Q No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cété Gold Project? O
Slide 96: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
& IAMGOLD CORPORATION COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Coté Gold Project 1. Which Open House did you attend? Q Timmins @ Gogama Q) Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) 2. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project
Slide 97: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? WD 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Cété Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) 4% No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cété Gold Project
Slide 98: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
& IAMGOLD CORPORATION COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Cété Gold Project 1. Which Open House did you atend? 4 Q Timmins WU’ Gogama Q Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) 2. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Coté Gold Proje
Slide 99: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Coté Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) Q No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cdté Gold Project? Op
Slide 100: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
IAMGOLD CORPORATION COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Cété Gold Project . Which Open House did you ec Q Timmins Gogama Q Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) . What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project? QL me Qeev
Slide 101: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? a 4 / LZ 4. e . WN ay thhzig S obblr 7 tite ene rb Ctpealecn 7, / J y ; i). 4 Z {__ C2 4 (GA. (ce lZn - & ¢ Z [ZS vl atten Gl AWEY B29 yeete ¢ £ : A GA f / Z re 4 { he AAMLG et/ CLL Z tl Ze < é / GS 8. Are t
Slide 102: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
AMGOLD CORPORATION ) COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Cété Gold Project . Which Qpen House did you attend? Timmins Q Gogama Q Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) . What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project? Phev
Slide 103: Comment Form (continued)
7, Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? A ” Me Ke Sere fry G vache S gael 4 ww leg ? NOgp tit moautte. — ; ji a Aayt 20 Lor bur Cartvol ‘ 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Cété Gold Project? Q Ye
Slide 104: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
IAMGOLD CORPORATION COMMENT FORM Environmental Effects Review (EER) Coté Gold Project 1. Which Open House did you attend? Sf Timmins OQ Gogama Q Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) 2. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project?
Slide 105: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? Cx Gx St brew J C2 €—) re wy La 5 os 5 tt 5 oy sek Série <€ Con fr-<m eS Sih A 7 pay ta G Pe oA 9S Se /é,) A) rw Kal -peb Cok Ce Loire Le beer Canndla - Vpelor Plone baled (07 — POS Sfew ke 8. Are there othe
Slide 106: Comment Form – Environmental Effects Review
= for) COMMENT FORM : Environmental Effects Review (EER) Cété Gold Project ; wmielfOpen House did you attend? Timmins Q Gogama Q Sudbury (February 13, 2018) (February 14, 2018) (February 15, 2018) . What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project? What are your co
Slide 107: Comment Form (continued)
7. Do you have any information that might be relevant for the proposed Project/Project area? 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Cété Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) Q No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cété Gold Project? Q
Slide 108: Comment Form – Mattagami First Nation Open House
COMMENT FORM CORPORATION Cété Gold Project Open House Mattagami First Nation —- May 28, 2018 . What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project? . Do you have any comments or questions about the Project’s proposed use of the Shining Tree Transmission alignment? . D
Slide 109: Comment Form (continued)
6. Do you have any recommendations for how to properly house artifacts found at the archaeological sites? House arhuckc, Marta adm (Fy. , Cota lcaue, Oulselay - Wer te be displonse ch onlin Resebct: Wi 7. Would you like to be provided with any other information about the Cété Gold Project? Yer! 8. A
Slide 110: Comment Form – Côté Gold Project Open House
# [AMGOLD COMMENT FORM CORPORATION COTE GOLD PROJECT OPEN HOUSE OQ Gogama x Timmins Q Sudbury (June 13, 2018) (June14, 2018) (June 15, 2018) 1. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the C6té Gold Project? ZA PLEASE) Cet mur New Pru conpme) Tro Ren OALGIAAC CA. You pave A Gaer
Slide 111: Comment Form (continued)
7. Would you like to be provided with any other information about the Cété Gold Project? Since DAW 4 TanGors HAS Been SeEcoun TO nons ry COMMUANTCAT IONS WITH Ue, Conmacr HAS BEEN ertercy LY ALL Ire Uriah ae TO YouR Wwe @srre, PLEASE cree WPETH THe Ghar wWeec, 8. Are there other people or stakeholde
Slide 112: Comment Form – Côté Gold Project Open House
= [IAMGOLD COMMENT FORM CORPORATION COTE GOLD PROJECT OPEN HOUSE Q Gogama Timmins Q Sudbury (June 13, 2018) (June14, 2018) (June 15, 2018) 1. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the C6té Gold Project? _ 5 led 4s C2 Q its sh ff OH acs = pest of Ick & muck prove OCR . 2. Do y
Slide 113: Comment Form (continued)
7. Wouid you like to be provided with any other information about the Cété Gold Project? ia date/ 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Cété Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) KM No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cété Gold Proje
Slide 114: Comment Form – Côté Gold Project Open House
= [AMGOLD COMMENT FORM CORPORATION COTE GOLD PROJECT OPEN HOUSE OQ Gogama W Timmins Q Sudbury (June 13, 2018) (June14, 2018) (June 15, 2018) 1. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project? 2. Do you have any comments or questions about the Project’s proposed u
Slide 115: Comment Form (continued)
7. Would you like to be provided with any other information about the Cété Gold Project? Alice A dedlo x uy JA. pert « U [aw Cay | 7 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Cété Gold Project? Q) Yes (who? ) Q No 9. How would you like to receive future in
Slide 116: Comment Form – Côté Gold Project Open House
& IAMGOLD COMMENT FORM CORPORATION COTE GOLD PROJECT OPEN HOUSE Q Gogama Timmins Q Sudbury (June 13, 2018) (June14, 2018) (June 15, 2018) 1. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project? Vo 2. Do you have any comments or questions about the Project's proposed u
Slide 117: Comment Form (continued)
7. Would you like to be provided with any other information about the Cété Gold Project? Vo 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Cdté Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) ANo 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cété Gold Project? UO O
Slide 118: Comment Form – Côté Gold Project Open House
# [AMGOLD COMMENT FORM COTE GOLD PROJECT OPEN HOUSE Q Gogama Q Timmins Uo Sudbury (June 13, 2018) (June14, 2018) (June 15, 2018) 1. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Cété Gold Project? 2. Do you have any comments or questions about the Project’s proposed use of the Sh
Slide 119: Comment Form (continued)
7. Would you like to be provided with any other information about the Cété Gold Project? 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Coté Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) OQ) No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cété Gold Project? Q1 O
Slide 120: Comment Form – Côté Gold Project Open House
COMMENT FORM #| LAMGOLD CORPORATION COTE GOLD PROJECT OPEN HOUSE if susbury Q Timmins (June 15, 2018) Q Gogama (June14, 2018) (June 13, 2018) What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the C6té Gold Project? Taw pot. thetlid with new acer? Road. Fron 420 Bd. ADDS dis hawce dt ow?
Slide 121: Comment Form (continued)
7. Would you like to be provided with any other information about the Coté Gold Project? Any werol All Wis tat wens [wv Fo ww le CnamAsen ched — Sinner we Mut yA oped, fod) o| C $4 Bb. cul (4 ‘Ly kaw poe hs rE,’ tlw Lead Gill earn Pain Aro we Woe toro ptt 8. Are there other people or stakeholders th
Slide 122: Comment Form – Côté Gold Project Open House
3] [AMGOLD COMMENT FORM COTE GOLD PROJECT OPEN HOUSE Q) Gogama Q Timmins AL Sudbury (June 13, 2018) (June14, 2018) (June 15, 2018) 1. What are your questions or comments related to the updates to the Coté Gold Project? 2. Do you have any comments or questions about the Project's proposed use of the
Slide 123: Comment Form (continued)
7. Would you fike to be provided with any other information about the Coté Gold Project? BereteMdety 8. Are there other people or stakeholders that you believe would be interested in the Cété Gold Project? Q Yes (who? ) Q No 9. How would you like to receive future information about the Cété Gold Pro