Realty Income Corporation · NYSE:O

Realty Income — Investor Presentation (February 2020)

58 slides from Realty Income's investor presentation, February 2020

  1. Slide 1: Fourth Quarter 2019 Institutional Investor Presentation

    FOURTH QUARTER 2019 INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR PRESENTATION

  2. Slide 2: Contents

    Contents Investment Thesis 4 Company Overview 5 Performance Track Record 6 Our Approach and 2019 Results 13 Superior Performance During Great Recession 14 Portfolio Diversification 19 Defensive Retail Portfolio 24 Asset Management & Real Estate Operations 29 Investment Strategy 33 Capital Structure

  3. Slide 3: Safe Harbor For Forward-Looking Statements

    Safe Harbor For Forward-Looking Statements Statements in this investor presentation that are not strictly historical are "forward-looking" statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, which may cause the company‘s actual future results to differ materially from expected re

  4. Slide 4: Investment Thesis

    Investment Thesis Business model offers attractive total return with minimal cash flow volatility PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF RETURNS 16.5% Compound Average Annual Total Return Since ‘94 NYSE Listing 0.4 Beta vs. S&P 500 PREDICTABLE CASH FLOW Years with Positive Earnings Per Share 23 of 24 Growth(1) 93.9

  5. Slide 5: Realty Income Company Overview

    Realty Income Company Overview Business model has generated above-market returns with below-market volatility since 1994 S&P 500 DIVERSIFIED, HIGH-QUALITY TRACK RECORD OF SAFETY REAL ESTATE COMPANY “NET LEASE” PORTFOLIO AND CONSISTENCY $32B A3 / A- 6,483 9.2 23 OF 24 enterprise value credit ratings

  6. Slide 6: Consistent Annual Earnings Growth Since NYSE Listing

    Consistent Annual Earnings Growth Since NYSE Listing Positive earnings growth(1) in 23 out of 24 years as a public company Historical Earnings Growth Rates (Median) 17.0% Realty Income (1): 5.1% Current REITs (2): 3.7% 9.4% 8.1% 6.8% 6.6% 6.6% 6.4% 6.3% 6.0% 6.0% 5.1% 5.4% 5.1% 5.1% 4.9% 4.4% 4.2% 4

  7. Slide 7: Low Earnings Volatility Supports Low Share Price Volatility

    Low Earnings Volatility Supports Low Share Price Volatility Since 1994 NYSE listing, “O” annual TSR downside volatility is one of the lowest in the S&P 500 Annual Total Shareholder Return Among S&P 500 Companies: 25% Downside Volatility Since 1994(1) 20% 15% Realty Income’s TSR Downside Volatility S

  8. Slide 8: Track Record of Favorable Returns to Shareholders

    Track Record of Favorable Returns to Shareholders Since 1994 NYSE listing, Realty Income shares have outperformed benchmark indices Compound Average Annual Total Shareholder Return Since 1994 16.5% 10.8% 10.7% 10.3% 10.1% O Equity REIT Index DJIA Nasdaq S&P 500 8

  9. Slide 9: Attractive Risk/Reward vs. S&P Companies

    Attractive Risk/Reward vs. S&P 500 Companies Higher returns and lower volatility than majority of S&P 500 companies since 1994 NYSE listing 35% Realty Income return Realtyper unitreturn Income of market per th 30% unit of market riskthe risk is in 98 in the percentile 98th percentile ofS&P of all al

  10. Slide 10: Attractive Risk/Reward vs. Blue Chip S&P Equities

    Attractive Risk/Reward vs. Blue Chip S&P 500 Equities Historically, more return per unit of risk vs. the 10 largest S&P 500 constituents and S&P 500 REITs 30% Average Annual Total Shareholder Return 25% AAPL 20% O MSFT UNH 15% JNJ JPM REITs WMT PG 10% S&P 500 T XOM 5% BAC Top 10 largest S&P 500 cons

  11. Slide 11: Consistency: Steady Portfolio, Solid Fundamentals

    Consistency: Steady Portfolio, Solid Fundamentals Focus on quality underwriting and real estate supports predictable cash flow generation Consistent Occupancy Levels, Never Below 96% Tenets of Consistency: ˃ Careful underwriting at acquisition ˃ Solid retail store performance ˃ Strong underlying rea

  12. Slide 12: Snapshot vs. S&P 500 REIT Peers

    Snapshot vs. S&P 500 REIT Peers Superior stability: Favorable occupancy, dividend growth, credit rating and total return metrics Portfolio Occupancy Dividend Growth(1) 98.4% 96.6% 8% 93.8% 91.2% 4.6% (2) 3.3% 0% Tenets of Consistency: Historical Median Lowest Year-End % of Years w/ Negative Dividend

  13. Slide 13: Our Approach and 2019 Results

    Our Approach and 2019 Results Acquire well-located commercial properties 1 ✓ ~$3.7 billion in acquisitions Remain disciplined in our acquisition underwriting 2 ✓ Acquired < 7% of sourced volume Execute long-term net lease agreements 3 ✓ Recaptured 102.6% of expiring rent Actively manage portfolio to

  14. Slide 14: Superior Performance During Great Recession

    SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE DURING GREAT RECESSION

  15. Slide 15: Superior Earnings Growth and TSR During Great Recession

    Superior Earnings Growth and TSR During Great Recession 1 of 2 S&P 500 REITs with positive earnings growth, dividend growth, and TSR during Great Recession 2007-2009 Earnings CAGR(1) 2007-2009 Dividend Growth 2007-2009 Total Return 2.1% 14.7% 9.0% -2.3% -20.6% (2) -28.3% Realty Income S&P 500 REITs

  16. Slide 16: NAV Premium Persisted Through Great Recession

    NAV Premium Persisted Through Great Recession Cost of capital advantage (measured by premium to NAV) remained stable during recession Historical Premium / (Discount) to NAV Realty Income’s median NAV premium was 10% during the downturn (1 of only 6 S&P 500 REITs trading at a premium to NAV during th

  17. Slide 17: Stable Leverage and Coverage Ratios During Downturn

    Stable Leverage and Coverage Ratios During Downturn Lower credit metric volatility during Great Recession relative to other blue-chip REITs Leverage(1) Ratio Range (2007-2009) Realty Income 5.2x 0.7x 5.9x Tighter metric S&P 500 REIT Median (2) 5.7x 3.1x 8.8x ranges reflect: Min Leverage Spread Max L

  18. Slide 18: Superior Relative Volatility Metrics vs. A-Rated REITs During Recession

    Superior Relative Volatility Metrics vs. A-Rated REITs During Recession 2007 – 2009 relative rankings Rank Less Volatile 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0.1x 0% 0.1% 1 0.7% 0.5% 0.6% 0.8% 0.3x 1.2% 0.2% 2 3.1% 1.1% 3.8% 1.3% 0.5x 1.5% 0.3% 3 3.7% 1.4% 4.3% 2.0% 1.5x 2.0% 0.3% 4 4.0% 1.7% 5.7% 2.2% 2.2x 2.2% 0.7

  19. Slide 19: Portfolio Diversification

    PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION

  20. Slide 20: Portfolio Diversification: Tenant

    Portfolio Diversification: Tenant Diverse tenant roster, investment grade concentration reduces overall portfolio risk 6.1% 2.1% TOP 20 TENANTS REPRESENT 4.8% 1.9% 4.4% 1.8% 4.0% 1.7% 53.3% 3.5% 1.7% Of annualized rental revenue 3.4% 1.6% 3.0% 1.6% 2.9% 2.6% 1.4% 1.3% 11 12 Different Investment grad

  21. Slide 21: Portfolio Diversification: Industry

    Portfolio Diversification: Industry Exposure to 50 industries enhances predictability of cash flow (See Appendix for Industry Theses) Exposure to defensive industries: 96% of total portfolio rent is protected against retail e-commerce threats and economic downturns Non-Discretionary ❶ Convenience St

  22. Slide 22: Portfolio Diversification: Property Type

    Portfolio Diversification: Property Type Core exposure in retail and industrial single-tenant freestanding net lease properties RETAIL (83.0%) INDUSTRIAL (11.5%) Number of Properties: 6,305 Number of Properties: 120 Average Leasable Square Feet: 11,800 Average Leasable Square Feet: 238,000 Percentag

  23. Slide 23: Portfolio Diversification: Geography

    Portfolio Diversification: Geography Balanced presence in 49 states, Puerto Rico and the United Kingdom <1 <1 <1 1.0 <1 <1 1.1 2.9 <1 4.3 <1 2.1 <1 <1 2.2 1.0 <1 3.0 1.7 1.2 4.7 <1 <1 <1 5.9 2.6 <1 1.7 <1 1.7 2.8 8.7 1.6 2.5 1.3 2.9 3.1 Top 6 States 2.2 2.1 <1 <1 2.5 % of Rental Revenue 1.5 1.8 3.9

  24. Slide 24: Defensive Retail Portfolio

    REALTY “INCOME The Monthly Dividend Company®

  25. Slide 25: Top Tenants Highly Insulated from Changing Consumer Behavior

    Top 20 Tenants Highly Insulated from Changing Consumer Behavior All top 20 tenants fall into at least one category (Service, Non-Discretionary, Low Price Point Retail or Non-Retail) Service / Experiential Non-Discretionary Non-Retail Low Price Point Walmart represented by Neighborhood Markets and Sa

  26. Slide 26: Top Tenant Exposure: 2009 vs. Today

    Top Tenant Exposure: 2009 vs. Today Less cyclicality and superior credit and diversification vs. prior downturn Bold tenants represent investment-grade rated credit TOP 15 TENANTS AS OF YE 2009 TOP 15 TENANTS AS OF YE 2019 Tenant Industry % of Rent Tenant Industry % of Rent Hometown Buffet Casual Di

  27. Slide 27: Differentiated Business Model from Traditional Retail REITs

    Differentiated Business Model from “Traditional” Retail REITs Lease structure and growth drivers support predictable revenue stream relative to other forms of retail real estate Unique “net lease” structure drives lower cash flow volatility Shopping Centers and Malls Initial Length of Lease 15+ Year

  28. Slide 28: Realty Income Not Materially Impacted by Recent Retailer Bankruptcies

    Realty Income Not Materially Impacted by Recent Retailer Bankruptcies 60 of 79 U.S. retailer bankruptcies since 2017 associated with companies lacking a non-discretionary, low price point, and / or service-oriented component to their business # of Realty Retail Industry Retailer Bankruptcy Income BK

  29. Slide 29: Asset Management & Real Estate Operations

    ASSET MANAGEMENT & REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS

  30. Slide 30: Active Real Estate Management: Re-leasing Experience

    Active Real Estate Management: Re-leasing Experience Since 1996, Realty Income has achieved 100.5% recapture of prior rent on re-leasing activity Recapture vs. Prior Rent: (All Re-Leasing Activity) 1996 - 2005 95.9% 2006 - 2012 95.6% 2013 - Present 102.3% 3,179 Lease Expirations since 1996 2,729 450

  31. Slide 31: Actively-Managed Real Estate Portfolio

    Actively-Managed Real Estate Portfolio Proven track record of value creation, cash flow preservation and risk mitigation Asset Management & Healthy Leasing Results Real Estate Operations Blended rent recapture ✓ Largest department in the company 93.0% rate of 102.6% on expired leases ✓ Distinct mana

  32. Slide 32: Realty Incurs Immaterial Recurring CapEx Obligations

    Realty Incurs Immaterial Recurring CapEx Obligations Capital-light portfolio maintenance is a differentiating factor versus other CRE sectors 2012 – 2019 “Hidden” Cost of Supporting Portfolio Revenue: Recurring Capital Expenditures as % of NOI: Rarely captured in NAREIT-defined FFO multiples…. Realt

  33. Slide 33: Investment Strategy

    INVESTMENT STRATEGY ?

  34. Slide 34: Investment Strategy: Key Considerations

    Investment Strategy: Key Considerations Cost of capital advantage, size, track record represent competitive advantage COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES VS. NET LEASE PEERS LOWEST COST OF CAPITAL SIZE AND TRACK RECORD 1 Supports investment selectivity 1 Ability to buy “wholesale” (at a discount) without creatin

  35. Slide 35: Investment Strategy: Aim to Exceed Long-Term WACC

    Investment Strategy: Aim to Exceed Long-Term WACC WACC viewpoint balances near-term earnings per share growth with long-term value accretion Long-term Weighted Average Cost of Capital “Nominal” 1st-Year Weighted Average Cost of Capital • Drives investment decision- • Long-term WACC is the • Used to

  36. Slide 36: Investment Strategy: Benefits of Low Cost of Capital

    Investment Strategy: Benefits of Low Cost of Capital Low cost of capital is the most important competitive advantage in the net lease industry 6% Higher Lower Reduces need to pursue lower- stock cost of quality, higher-yielding investments 5.2% Annualized AFFO/sh Growth price capital to generate gro

  37. Slide 37: Acquisition Cap Rate to Achieve 150 bps Spreads

    Investment Strategy: Utilizing Low Cost of Capital Advantage Low cost of capital allows Realty Income to acquire the highest quality assets in the net lease industry 8.0% “High Yield” Investment Characteristics (higher cap rates): Higher cost of capital forces companies to invest in riskier Acquisit

  38. Slide 38: Investment Strategy: The Importance of Market Rents

    Investment Strategy: The Importance of Market Rents Realty Income avoids lease structures with above-market rents, which can inflate initial cap rates Illustrative Sale-Leaseback Example Assumptions Annual EBITDAR (000s) $8,500 Replacement cost (psf) $200 Total square footage (000s) 175 Market rent

  39. Slide 39: Investment Strategy: Disciplined Execution

    Investment Strategy: Disciplined Execution Consistent, selective underwriting philosophy on strong sourced volume Key Metrics Since 2010 (Excluding $3.2 billion ARCT transaction): $16.0 billion $7.2 billion in non-investment grade 53% of volume leased to 86% in property-level acquisition volume of v

  40. Slide 40: Capital Structure & Scalability

    CAPITAL STRUCTURE & SCALABILITY

  41. Slide 41: Conservative Capital Structure

    Conservative Capital Structure Modest leverage, low cost of capital, ample liquidity provides financial flexibility Total Enterprise Value: $32.5 billion Common Stock, Unsecured Notes: $6.3 billion 76% Revolving Credit Facility: $704 million Net Debt, 19% Equity Market Cap: 24% Unsecured Term Loans:

  42. Slide 42: Well-Laddered Debt Maturity Schedule

    Well-Laddered Debt Maturity Schedule Limited re-financing and variable interest rate risk throughout debt maturity schedule 7.2 Years 3.76% Debt Profile Weighted Average Years Weighted Average Unsecured Until Maturity Interest Rate(1) 95% Unsecured Secured $1,475 $1,225 $1,062 £(3) Fixed Rate 91% Fi

  43. Slide 43: Scalability as a Competitive Advantage

    Scalability as a Competitive Advantage Leaders in the net lease industry in efficiency and ability to buy in bulk Larger Size Drives Superior Overhead Efficiency Larger Size Provides Growth Optionality G&A as % of Rental Revenue(1) in millions Transaction Size & Impact(2) to Rent Concentration Curre

  44. Slide 44: Dependable Dividends

    DEPENDABLE DIVIDENDS ?

  45. Slide 45: Dependable Dividends That Grow Over Time

    Dependable Dividends That Grow Over Time Steady dividend track record supported by inherently stable business model, disciplined execution Strong Dividend Track Record 89 consecutive quarterly increases $2.79 $2.73 $2.65 105 total increases since 1994 NYSE listing $2.53 79% AFFO payout (based on mid

  46. Slide 46: Corporate Responsibility

    REALTY JJINCOME The Monthly Dividend Company®

  47. Slide 47: Corporate Responsibility

    Corporate Responsibility Realty Income strives to lead the net lease industry in Environmental, Social, and Governance initiatives Overview Focus • We remain committed to sustainable • HQ energy efficiency, waste business practices in our day-to-day diversion, and water efficiency activities by enco

  48. Slide 48: Summary

    Summary ˃ Long term-focused business strategy ˃ Diversified and actively managed portfolio ˃ Proven and disciplined relationship-driven acquisition strategy ˃ Conservative capital structure able to withstand economic volatility ˃ Precedent of outperforming S&P 500 and REITs since 1994 listing ˃ Attr

  49. Slide 49: Appendix

    APPENDIX ? 49

  50. Slide 50: Top Industries Overview

    TOP INDUSTRIES OVERVIEW ? si ENO PARKING

  51. Slide 51: Convenience Stores (11.6% of Rent)

    Convenience Stores (11.6% of Rent) Quality real estate locations with strong store-level performance Industry Considerations (1) Strong performance independent of gas sales: ~70% of inside sales are generated by customers not buying gas(1) (2) Larger-format stores provide stability: Larger format st

  52. Slide 52: Drug Stores (8.6% of Rent)

    Drug Stores (8.6% of Rent) Industry tailwinds, high barriers to entry, key real estate presence Δ in 30-day Prescriptions by Pharmacy Format (2012 – 2017)(1) 21% 21% 12% 3% (33%) Chain Mass Supermarkets Independent Mail Drugstores Merchants Pharmacies Pharmacies Industry Considerations Walgreens: 26

  53. Slide 53: Dollar Stores (7.3% of Rent)

    Dollar Stores (7.3% of Rent) Counter-cyclical protection due to a trade down effect and E-commerce resiliency Wages for Low Paying Jobs Growing Faster than for 5% High Paying Jobs(1) 4.4% 4% 3% 3.0% 2% 1% Highest Paying Industries, YoY % ∆ Lowest Paying Industries, YoY % ∆ 0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 201

  54. Slide 54: Grocery (7.3% of Rent)

    Grocery (7.3% of Rent) Exposure to top operators in a largely e-commerce resistant industry U.S. Grocery E-Commerce Market Share Remains Modest(2) 64% 35% 24% 20% 9% 3% Media Consumer Sporting Apparel Home Grocery Electronics Goods Goods Industry Considerations U.S. Grocery Market Share(2) (1) Stabl

  55. Slide 55: Grocery: Overview of the U.K. Grocery Industry

    Grocery: Overview of the U.K. Grocery Industry Traditional grocery retailers remain the core distribution channel and dominate online sales 2018 U.K. Grocery Sales by Channel(1) Traditional grocery retail formats 100 £89 (supermarkets & hypermarkets) account for ~55% of sales and an 80 estimated 80%

  56. Slide 56: Health & Fitness (7.3% of Rent)

    Health & Fitness (7.3% of Rent) E-commerce resilient supported by favorable demographic trends Industry Considerations (1) Favorable consumer trends and demographic tailwinds: Growing market as consumers increasingly value health / Baby Boomer age group has the highest attendance frequency (2) E-com

  57. Slide 57: Theaters (6.7% of Rent)

    Theaters (6.7% of Rent) Stability throughout economic cycles / Experiential component supports e-commerce resiliency Industry Considerations (1) Historical U.S. box office receipts illustrate stability: 3.6% CAGR since 1981 / no year worse than -7.0% (2) High variable cost structure limits rent cove

  58. Slide 58: Quick-Service Restaurants (6.2% of Rent)

    Quick-Service Restaurants (6.2% of Rent) High-quality real estate, reliable sales growth Industry Considerations (1) Consistent demand: Approximately 75 million Americans eat fast food every day(1) / positive trend of same-store sales growth supported by value-seeking consumers (2) Fungibility of re

Realty Income — Investor Presentation (February 2020) on 6ix