Axis NIFTY Bank ETF · NSE:BNKETFAXIS

Axis NIFTY Bank ETF — IEA EGRD 2017

28 slides from Axis NIFTY Bank ETF's conference presentation, 2017

  1. Slide 1: Mind our Business!

    v Mind our Business! Task 25: Business models for a more effective market uptake of DSM energy services for SMEs and communities IEA EGRD Ruth Mourik Kopenhagen 2017

  2. Slide 2: 3 Key levels/Questions

    3 Key levels/Questions… 1. Are user centered/service oriented business models more effective? 2. Do the (user centered) dynamic capabilities of entrepreneurs contribute to a more effective uptake of the product or service? 3. Is the way the business models fit or stretch context influencing their su

  3. Slide 3: What do our cases tell us?

    What do our cases tell us? 46 cases Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Austria, Switzerland and South Korea +ECI analysis Retrofitting, total solutions, lighting, heating, smart systems

  4. Slide 4: Who?

    Who? We tend to blame the Entrepreneurs For not understanding their users.. But…Their life is difficult! What do they need?

  5. Slide 5: For all the entrepreneurs in Energy Efficiency Services out there

    For all the entrepreneurs in Energy Efficiency Services out there…

  6. Slide 6: There are three essential ingredients to become successful

    There are three essential ingredients to become successful…

  7. Slide 7: And they are all about a transition

    And they are all about a transition

  8. Slide 8: From product dominant logic to service dominant logic

    From product dominant logic to service dominant logic

  9. Slide 9: Key success element 1

    Key success element 1:

  10. Slide 10: A service supporting business model is more successful

    When the offer is a service.. A service supporting businessmodel is more successful Building on business model canvas by Osterwalder and Pigneur (2010)

  11. Slide 11: Goods Services

    Goods Services • Output-orientation • Solutions • Offer stated in tech-specs • Value = outcomes for user • Efficiency: low costs, high margins • User role is key • Value in exchange/transaction • Value experienced in use • User role passive • Co-creation • Delivered within a system • Good/technology

  12. Slide 12: Key success element 2

    Key success element 2:

  13. Slide 13: Be skilled to serve the user

    Be skilled to serve the user… Sensing user needs, context, system Conceptualising Orchestration Scaling and stretching

  14. Slide 14: Key success element 3

    Key success element 3:

  15. Slide 15: Understand how to deal with context

    Understand how to deal with context

  16. Slide 16: Context and synchronicity

    Context and synchronicity… The unaware The smart matcher The aware stretcher The stealth stretcher

  17. Slide 17: 4 combinations business model-capabilities-context

    4 combinations business model-capabilities-context…

  18. Slide 18: Pushing harder

    Pushing harder Capabilties User Sensing Not ina structured way Conceptualizing Not in a structured way Orchestrating Not ina structured way. Focus on the supply chain side Scaling and stretching Outsourcing the sales skills C—° Businessmodel _~ 9 ‘Alexander Osterwald \ 1. Customer Segments Industria

  19. Slide 19: Reframing/referral

    Reframing/referral Capabilties User Sensing Weakly developed. Collecting user insights up to transaction. Strong focus ‘on specific details in transaction journey (like decision making, info needed or simplifiing process, trust building) Conceptualizing Shifting focus from delivery process towards t

  20. Slide 20: Pushing something else

    Pushing something else Capabilties User Sensing Well developed. Systematic. Active co-creation becomes key activity Conceptualizing Active conceptualizing, however technological barriers are inhibiting Moving towards multiple benefit innovation Orchestrating Problem solvers. Delivering complex corvi

  21. Slide 21: Servicing

    Servicing Capabilties User Sensing Core capability Conceptualizing Co-creating. Growth of client base is inhibiting the ambition to grow Orchestrating Aimed at serving the user during the use phase Scaling and stretching Aimed at continuious innovation C—° Businessmodel 8 9 ‘Alexander Osterwad \ na

  22. Slide 22: Business and research conclusions

    Business and research conclusions  Service oriented business models can be more successful  Energy efficiency experienced in use, multiple benefits matter  Requires specific capabilities  Combination model, capabilities context fit or stretch matters!  Service oriented business model canvas in

  23. Slide 23: It's not all up to the entrepreneurs

    it’s not all up to the entrepreneurs…. Most countries have many small EE firms Most service oriented firms that become bigger have a ‘patient mother’  Access to client base  Already existing good client relationship  Valuable customer data  Branding  Money of course but…  Time to experiment, s

  24. Slide 24: Policy conclusions

    Policy conclusions  Energy regime focused on products delivering EE  low hanging fruit business models  Focus on transaction not use phase  Weak user centered + orchestrating entrepreneurial capabilities = innovation system failure  Policy has important role to play as patient mother…  Laws an

  25. Slide 25: What did we do to support these different types of entrepreneurs?

    What did we do to support these different types of entrepreneurs?

  26. Slide 26: Most entrepreneurs are unaware

    Most entrepreneurs are unaware

  27. Slide 27: Climate change is trending business

    Climate change is trending busin gency for transition is felt by many > expect it to lead to new ~big- busi portunities. But When it comes to energy efficiency, we somehow are stil waiting for the b breakthrough. Energy Efficiency isn't an easy value to build a business on. After analysing 42 compan

  28. Slide 28: Thank you!

    Thank you! http://www.ieadsm.org/task/task-25-business-models-for-a- more-effective-uptake/ Email: Ruth.mourik@duneworks.nl Email: Renske@ideate.nl

Axis NIFTY Bank ETF — IEA EGRD 2017 on 6ix