Tangoe Inc

Tangoe — Investor Presentation (June 2007)

24 slides from Tangoe's investor presentation, June 2007

  1. Slide 1: Achieving Best-In-Class Mobile Telecom Contracts

    Achieving Best–In-Class Mobile Telecom Contracts Bill Marsh, Vice President Product Research Robert Whitmore, Sr. VP Contract Sourcing

  2. Slide 2: Potential Savings are Dramatic

    Potential Savings are Dramatic…. 2 Copyright © 2007 Tango, Inc.. - Confidential

  3. Slide 3: But Good Deals are Hard to Find!

    But Good deals are Hard to Find! Why shouldn’t you have a world class deal? 3 Copyright © 2007 Tango, Inc.. - Confidential

  4. Slide 4: What is Driving this Difference?

    What is Driving this Difference? ¾ Limited benchmarking data available ¾ Legacy contracts poorly managed ¾ Decentralized approach to wireless management ™ IT vs. procurement ™ Data vs. voice ¾ Companies too busy to “deal with wireless” ™ ILUs ™ Politics ¾ Chaotic provider landscape ¾ Custom deals ab

  5. Slide 5: Challenges to Getting a Good Deal

    Challenges to Getting a Good Deal ¾ Little to no visibility into enterprise pricing ¾ Limited time & resources to manage sourcing ¾ Internal politics and processes ¾ Constantly changing devices & business requirements ¾ Not realizing the risks with poor terms & conditions ¾ Incumbent perceives threa

  6. Slide 6: Savings Impact: Case Studies

    Savings Impact: Case Studies Current Savings Unit Project Annual 3 years Goal Liability Units Annual Cost Duration savings Spend (Projected) Reduce Cust. 27% cost Corp. 3,000 $90 $3.24M 3 mo. $2.62M A $874K Reduce cost Corp. 2,000 Cust. 45%* Central $130 $9.36M 4 mo. $12.6M B mgmt $4.21M Emp. 4,000

  7. Slide 7: Domestic Carrier Review

    x Tangoe Domestic Carrier Review Sv Fae

  8. Slide 8: Carrier Perspective - Total Subscribers

    Carrier Perspective - Total Subscribers Number of subscribers in millions 26, 13% 53.6, 26% 60.7, 30% 62.2, 31% T Mobile Verizon AT&T Mobile Sprint 8 Copyright © 2007 Tango, Inc.. - Confidential

  9. Slide 9: Verizon Wireless

    Verizon Wireless ¾ Strong belief “network” can command premium ™ Reality Æ Perception ™ Little flexibility until 10,000 lines or more ™ Most deals average 5 - 10 percent premium ¾ Leads in coverage - gap is closing ¾ EV-DO rollout successful ™ Suspending/terminating unlimited data subs deemed “abusi

  10. Slide 10: AT&T Mobility

    AT&T Mobility ¾ Competitive when needed ™ Wants existing VZ business ™ Flexible, willing to consider custom plans ™ Responds well to RFPs ™ Best flat rate pricing ¾ Coverage close to Verizon ¾ Patchwork of old systems creates service challenges ¾ UMTS/HSDPA network largely built-out ™ Not a competit

  11. Slide 11: Sprint Nextel

    Sprint Nextel ¾ Extremely competitive pricing ™ Responds aggressively to RFPs ™ Writes down business to retain customers ™ Very competitive over 1,000 lines ™ Good enterprise customer service ¾ Recovering from bumpy quarters ¾ EV-DO launched, more liberal usage terms than Verizon ¾ PowerSource and W

  12. Slide 12: T-Mobile

    T-Mobile ¾ Lowest cost provider in most cases ™ Standard plans often better vs. negotiated competitor deals ™ Most flexible subsidizing device costs ™ Consumer focused – inexperienced at enterprise level (RFPs, SLAs) ™ AT&T neutralized compelling international story ¾ Less coverage, but better than

  13. Slide 13: Tier IIs

    Tier IIs ¾ Profitable regional providers filling niche markets ¾ Tend to have smaller “anchor” enterprise customers ™ Results in fewer resources to support those customers 13 Copyright © 2007 Tango, Inc.. - Confidential

  14. Slide 14: Coverage Claims - Not Always What They Seem

    Coverage Claims - Not Always What the Seem 14 Copyright © 2007 Tango, Inc.. - Confidential

  15. Slide 15: Coverage Claims - Depend Upon Subscriber

    Coverage Claims - Depend Upon Subscriber 15 Copyright © 2007 Tango, Inc.. - Confidential

  16. Slide 16: Negotiation Strategies

    x Tangoe Negotiation Strategies Sv Fae

  17. Slide 17: Negotiate from a Position of Strength

    Negotiate from a Position of Strength ¾ Reach internal agreement on who owns wireless ™ Communicate it clearly to the carrier ¾ Build an inventory of what you have & what you spend ™ Key to RFP ™ Allows financial modeling through the process ¾ Meet with business leaders to determine current/future n

  18. Slide 18: Understand Carrier Position

    Understand Carrier Position ¾ Carrier priorities ™ Retain your business ™ Minimize the decrease in revenue through new pricing ™ Find a way to recover the revenue ™ Increase your commitment ¾ Incumbents know they’re in the pole position ™ Use an RFP to get competitive offers ™ Your threat to move bu

  19. Slide 19: Pricing Options and Dynamics

    Pricing Options and Dynamics ¾ Complex landscape ™ Contracts can include dozens of plans ™ Plethora of surcharges, monthly add-ons, special offers ™ Dozens of equipment options ™ One size doesn’t fit all ¾ Typical starting point ™ Standard individual and pooled plans ™ Data offer for Blackberrys and

  20. Slide 20: Rate Plans - Pooled

    Rate Plans – Pooled ¾ Advantages ™ More predictable than stand alone plans ™ Optimized across the organization ™ Lower CPM if optimized well ™ Not as sensitive to individual usage variances ¾ Disadvantages ™ Requires ongoing maintenance and optimization ™ Must overbuy to create predictability (“the

  21. Slide 21: Rate Plans - Flat

    Rate Plans – Flat ¾ Advantages ™ Pay only for what you use ™ The CPM is fixed ™ Minimal administration or management ™ Actual usage can be allocated at the user level ¾ Disadvantages ™ Generally more expensive than well-optimized pool ™ Can require substantial commitment (lines/revenue) ™ Minute flo

  22. Slide 22: Contract Terms - Key Areas

    Contract Terms - Key Areas ¾ Corporate liable vs. individual liable ¾ Commitments ¾ Restricting certain types of services ¾ Fees ¾ Credits ¾ Renewal terms ¾ Surcharges ¾ Service delivery ¾ SLAs 22 Copyright © 2007 Tango, Inc.. - Confidential

  23. Slide 23: Summary

    Summary ¾ Build a baseline ¾ Understand business requirements ¾ Use an RFP process to level the playing field ¾ Model both pooled and flat rate plans based on your usage ¾ Minimize commitment and risk through aggressive contract language ¾ Consider a 3rd party to maximize savings, minimize risk, and

  24. Slide 24: Questions?

    x Tangoe Questions? Sv Fae

Tangoe — Investor Presentation (June 2007) on 6ix