Agnico Eagle Mines Limited · TSX:AEM

Agnico Eagle Mines — Merger or Acquisition (August 2005)

81 slides from Agnico Eagle Mines's merger presentation, Aug 24, 2005

  1. Slide 1: National Bank Financial

    . NATIONAL ae BANK ~~ 7 Ny FINANCIAL

  2. Slide 2: Forward Looking Statement

    Forward Looking Statement This presentation contains certain “orward-looking statements" (within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. There can ke no assurance that such statements will prove to be accura

  3. Slide 3: U.S. Shareholders

    U.S. Shareholders Agnico-Eagle has filed with the SEC a registration statement an Form F-4 containing an offer document regarding the offer. This presentatian does nat constitute an offer to purchase or sell or a solicitation of an offer to sell or purchase shares of Riddarhyttan or Agnico-Eagle to

  4. Slide 4: Technical Update

    — TECHNICAL UPDATE m OPERATIONS = LARONDE = GOLDEX m ADVANCED PROJECTS = LAPA = LARONDE I m ADVANCED EXPLORATION = RIDDARHYTTAN = PINOS ALTOS m EXPLORATION = BOUSQUET = NEVADA m SUMMARY

  5. Slide 5: Global Growth Exploration

    Expl Global Growth LaRond a Strong Fol @ Pro-mining environments with low political risk @ Projects well matched to our technical skills = Favourable geology with camp potential — growing gold resources @ Excellent infrastructure nearby = Large property positions & database — aggressive exploration

  6. Slide 6: Slide 6

  7. Slide 7: 2005 Production and Costs

    Gold (ounces) Silver (ounces in thousands) Zine (pounds in thousands) Copper (paunds in thousands) 117,081 2,302 85,488 7,694 Minesite costs perton (cs) $ 49 Total cash costs ($/oz) $ 84 Le otter

  8. Slide 8: Low Cost LaRonde Mine Helps Fund Growth

    Low Cost LaRonde Mine-Helps Fund Growth al H1, 2005 Financial Results a. Earnings (mil Earnings per share Cash flow provided by operating activities (mil $ 47.2 Cash & equivalents June 30, 2008 (mn

  9. Slide 9: Full Year 2005 Forecast

    Lo Full Year 2005 Forecast Assumptions (US$) | Breakdown 1 1 Gold ($/oz) $ 423 : Tons 2,910,000 | Tons per Day 7,975 Silver (S!oz) $ 7.03 | Payable Production: ; ‘Au (ounces) 250,000 to 260,000 Zine (ib) $ 0.57 | ‘Ag (ounces n thousands) 5,000 : Cu (pounds in thousands) 17,000 1 Copper ($b) $ 1.56 Z

  10. Slide 10: 2005 Operating Budget - June

    2005 Operating Budget - June Tons Produced Increase / Difference Decrease 2005 Budget June 2004 | June 2005 Tons milled | 1 442 926 1 466 715 + 23 789 2% 1 443 492 1495 115 1 406 423 + 1 443 489 oy Ore pass inventory = 12 000 tons

  11. Slide 11: Production Update

    Production Update Tons by Horizon +1900 000 + 400 000 1200000 @ ‘000000 § so0c00 | F 00000 400 000 200 000 {ii labuaea 168 104 215 Total la Forecast Horizon loReatzed Short Tons Horizon 155 194 26 Total [Budget 706,008 384,117 673,308 1443,400 Forecast 403,049 380,738 «882300 1,446,175 Realized agg7

  12. Slide 12: Production Update

    Production Update Dilution 194 215 2004 31% 15% 2005 Jan-May 40% 18% 2005 June 28% 8% Ore Recovery 194 Budget 215 Budget 2005 Jan-May 92% 94% 89% 99% 2005 June 92% 92% 86% 94%

  13. Slide 13: Dilution Control

    Dilution Control [Recovery HM) Dilution — — Ore limit iy ' |. 4.750 tons recovered

  14. Slide 14: Forecast Level

    Forecast Level 215 to 197

  15. Slide 15: Increase gold production

    Increase gold production Development Focus on high priority faces Cable bolting use Cmac and extra manpower Production drilling increase # of one shot blasts Use Machine Roger in difficult stopes Mucking 6 Yd Scoops used in stopes Purchase aSth 8 Yd Scoop Increase zone7 prod Priority management Unde

  16. Slide 16: New Results

    New Results ‘engine ieoing Hor © ew Resute S. Previows Resuts Ia Proven & Probable Reserves a Infered Rescue TI Indicated Resource sunt

  17. Slide 17: LaRonde II

    LaRonde Il | om toon =~. ou ® = > 7) @ o c ° = £ 2 a x lu 2 G =

  18. Slide 18: Slide 18

  19. Slide 19: New Gold Mine Under Construction: Goldex

    New Gold Mine Under Construction Goldex

  20. Slide 20: Goldex Base Case $400 Gold

    20 Base case $400 gold, 1.30 CS$/US$ Base case IRR 15% after tax Capital cost $135 million Minesite operating costs C$17/ton Starting H2, 2008 Estimated average annual production of 170,000 oz. Estimated average total cash costs 0: $200/0z Probable reserve of 22.1 million tons at 0.07 oz/ton, or 1.6

  21. Slide 21: Goldex Key Attributes

    New Gold Mine under Construction Goldex KEY ATTRIBUTES Most Advanced Project in Agnico-Eagle’s Pipeline Short Pre-production Period - 3 Years Simple Orebody Geometry — Utilizing Existing Infrastructure Economies of Scale Metallurgically Simple Synergies with nearby LaRonde — Operating Staff Explorat

  22. Slide 22: Goldex Possible Risks

    New Gold Mine under Construction Goldex POSSIBLE RISKS m Low Grade m= Ground Stability m= Capex Estimate = Tailings Pond Location

  23. Slide 23: Goldex Feasibility 2005

    a a New Gold Mine under Construction Goldex, 4* FEASIBILITY 2005

  24. Slide 24: Raising Program

    [5 lewel(-11005f & Raising Prog olde 4 tovel (1250 ° ° 24-302 Flot Hole raise 200) ° u See 24-300 lot Hole reise 60) Se 0.067 opt / 582.6 Ft 500 el emo 3 2,017 ft of raises 24-300 it Hole raise 90) 2 0.054 opt? 535.4 fi 19,489 ft of DDH ° 0 ° 0 °° ° of? 6.000 e1 2.06! ° 0 °) ° c ° ° er fe) o 9 4 lev

  25. Slide 25: NQ Pilot Hole Core

    NQ Pilot Hole Core

  26. Slide 26: Raise Chipping

    Building feEBBtrenatt Raise Chipping 4

  27. Slide 27: Stockpiles Oct. 27th, 2004

    Stockpiles Oct. 27th, 2004 2,025 muck samples: 12 to 18 kg each FE=

  28. Slide 28: Sampling Results - Bulk Sample 2004

    Sampling Results - Bulk Sample 2004. Goldex Pilot DDH Wall Chips Muck Tons Total u-g 0.065 opt 0.085 opt 0.065opt 18,389 Mill (final results) 0.0810pt 18,210 t DDH and muck sampling under estimate the grade

  29. Slide 29: Ore Reserves

    ORE RESERVES PROBABLE RESERVES = 22.1 million tons at 0.07 oz/ton or 1.6 million ounces Goldex extensively sampled, based on: m 329 Diamond Drill Holes m= 40,401 Core Samples = 2,600 Chip Samples = 145,000 Tons of Bulk Sampling

  30. Slide 30: General Arrangement

    3 iar <) Building 5 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT

  31. Slide 31: General Arrangement

    GENERAL ARRANGEMENT 2 3

  32. Slide 32: Mining Method

    MINING METHO (Longitudinal view)

  33. Slide 33: Mining Method

    MINING METHOD (Longitudinal view)

  34. Slide 34: Mining Method

    MINING METHOD Typical 20-25t Scoop Goldex

  35. Slide 35: Metallurgical

    METALLURGICAL Shaking Tables Induction Furnas

  36. Slide 36: Slide 36

  37. Slide 37: Capital Costs

    Capital Costs Mine Surface Plant 13$ | 136 | 38 29§ Shaft 2s | 1s | 2¢ 206 Mine Development us | 13s | es | 3¢ 35 $ Mine Constr. & Closure 18 7$ 4s | 18 3s | 17s Mobile Equipments 6s EY 3¢ 178 Concentrator tes | 31s | 58 52§ Tailings & Closure 18 7$ 1s | 2¢ 128 Working Capital & 7$ as |] 15 as | 78

  38. Slide 38: Operating Costs

    Operating Costs Waste Dev. 0.26 Sit 0.07 Sit Ore Dev. 0.77 $it 0.66 Sit Stoping 4.46 Sit 3.04 Sit UIG Services 3.00 $it 4.78 Sit ho Milling 5.53 Sit 5.88 Sit | 35% ADM & Tech. Serv. 1.75 Sit 2.54 Sit | 15% a 15.77 Sit 16.97 Sit +8%

  39. Slide 39: Financial Evaluation

    Financial Evaluatio Gold = 400 Us $/oz Exchange rate = 1.3 Gold = 520 C$/oz Capex 265 C$/oz IRR 12% 15 % Net Cashflow 189 M C$ 202 M C$

  40. Slide 40: 2005 Goldex Study

    2005 Goldex Study SS l200 000 1180 000 1160 000 !140 000 1420 000 i100 000 80 000 60 000 40.000 20.000 0 Goldex 2005 --- Ounces Produced

  41. Slide 41: Ore Value & Operating Cost

    Ore Value & Operating Cost (c$/T) re Value @ 360 US $/oz (510 C$) Average = 16.97 C$A Operating Cost

  42. Slide 42: Operating Cost US $/oz

    Operating Cost US $/oz Average = 201 US $/oz PRHHFRHOR HOHE OE Years

  43. Slide 43: Capital Cost Sensitivities

    CAPITAL COST SENSITIVITIES $300 | $325 | $350 | $375 | $400 | $425 | $450 | $475 | $500 10% | 3.4% | 6.7% | 11.2% | 14.6% | 17.6% | 20.6% | 23.5% | 26.0% | 27.8% S% | 25% | 6.4% | 10.0% | 13.3% | 16.3% | 19.2% | 22.0% | 24.4% | 26.2% Base case | 1.6% | 5.4% | 8.9% | 12.2% | 15.0% | 17.9% | 20.6% | 2

  44. Slide 44: Grade Sensitivities

    GRADE SENSITIVITIES $300 | $325 | $350 | $375 | $400 | $425 | $450 | $475 | $500 +10% | 6.1% | 9.8% | 13.4% | 16.6% | 19.5% | 22.4% | 25.1% | 27.1% | 28.8% 45% =| 3.9% | 7.7% | 11.2% | 14.5% | 17.3% | 20.2% | 22.9% | 25.1% | 26.8% Base case | 1.6% | 5.4% | 8.9% | 12.2% | 15.0% | 17.9% | 20.6% | 23.0

  45. Slide 45: Operating Cost Sensitivities

    $300 | $325 | $350 | $375 | $400 | $425 | $450 | $475 | $500 10% AT% | 8.3% | 11.7% | 14.8% | 17.5% | 20.3% | 22.9% | 25.0% | 26.6% 5% 3.2% | 6.9% | 10.3% | 13.5% | 16.3% | 19.1% | 21.8% | 24.0% | 25.7% Base case operating costs | 1.6% | 5.4% | 8.9% | 12.2% | 15.0% | 17.9% | 20.6% | 23.0% | 24.7% +5

  46. Slide 46: Experienced Project Team

    EXPERIENCED PROJECT TEAM Project Manager — Rosaire Emond, P.Eng. Mine Superintendent — Christian Provencher, P.Eng. Construction Manager — Pierre Bureau, P.Eng. Project Metallurgist - Paul Cousin, P.Eng. Mill Superintendent — Julie Fournier, P.Eng. Planning Engineer — Hughes Destenay, P.Eng. Senior

  47. Slide 47: Independent Review

    Independent Review Roscoe Postle Associates In: CONCLUSION “In RPA’s opinion, the GOLDEX Feasibility Study is a reasonable representation of the proposed project. The proposed mine will be one of the lowest grade mines in the industry and, therefore will be more sensitive to the kind of risks that a

  48. Slide 48: Independent Review - Recommendations

    Independent Review — Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. RECOMMENDATIONS m Reserves — Compare to Standard Kriged Block Model = Verify whether Dilution Used is too Low = Validate Recovery of 93.6 % = Capital Costs —- Contingency too Low

  49. Slide 49: Independent Review - Agnico-Eagle Response

    INDEPENDENT REVIEW — Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. AGNICO-EAGLE RESPONSE m Reserves = Standard block model run = Estimated grade higher (0.075 opt vs. 0.074 opt) = Resource classification confirmed = Dilution (20% vs. 10%) = Overall grade would decrease from 0.070 opt to 0.067 opt = Negative impact

  50. Slide 50: Summary & Conclusions

    UMMARY & CONCLUSIONS “Agnico-Eagle’s Board Recommends Placing Goldex Into Production” m Robust Economics = Experienced Mine Building Team = Pro — Mining Region = Qualified Labour Available @ Straightforward Metallurgy & Mine Plan = Short Lead Time = Financed Internally

  51. Slide 51: Slide 51

  52. Slide 52: Regional Geology

    Regional Geology

  53. Slide 53: Lapa: Potentially the Second New Mine

    Potentially the Second New Mine Probable reserve of 4.5 million tons at 0.26 oz/ton, or 1.2 million oz ™ Indicated resource of 0.8 million tons at 0.16 oz/ton, or 0.13 million OZ ™@ Inferred resource of 1.9 million tons at 0.22 oz/ton, or 0.41 million oz ™ $80 million shaft sinking program in progre

  54. Slide 54: Ounce Distribution

    Ounce Distribution 300m => 33% of total ounces 240m ¢ 31% of total ounces 240m = = (— 36% of total ounces

  55. Slide 55: Ounces Produced

    Ounces Produced Lapa Ounces Payable (Reserves) 160,000 T cut +208 140,000 Cut 10%] 120,000 i 400,000 Cut Grade 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017| Years

  56. Slide 56: Longitudinal Section

    Longitudinal Section “eo Present Depth = fi Phase 1 (piace ern) °° ee towtsza Fate SE Longitudinal Section Looking West + Sinking advance — 10 ft per day + Potentially 24 new mine + Feasibility complete in H2 2006

  57. Slide 57: Slide 57

  58. Slide 58: Large gold reserve

    = Large gold reserve — continuing resource conversion = Higher NSR values at depth in polymetallic envelope = Pre-feasibility expected in third quarter 2005 — internal winze vs. new shaft = Detailed engineering of preferred option by year Polymetalic end, 2005 ~— zone 20n Potential Higher Grade Enve

  59. Slide 59: LaRonde II

    LaRonde Il @ Winze is the preferred option @ Will extend Laronde’s mine life rather than augment LaRonde | production m ADVANTAGES @ Technically simpler @ Lower Capex — use existing infrastructure @ Shorter lead time @ Lower risk

  60. Slide 60: LaRonde II

    LaRonde Il @ STUDIES COMPLETED @ Rock Mechanics ™ Access Options @ Ventilation = Mine Development & Infrastructure @ Mining Rate & Sequence m TO COMPLETE ™ Access — Winze Option @ Feasibility December 2005

  61. Slide 61: Winze Options

    Winze Options

  62. Slide 62: Slide 62

  63. Slide 63: Bid proceeding as planned

    = Bid proceeding as planned © Gold Deposit Prospective Regions. Major city @ If bid successful, expected to be completed in 2005 @ = Suurikuusikko resource continues to grow @ 6 drills in operation = Adjacent to major infrastructure

  64. Slide 64: If The Bid Is Successful

    If The Bid Is Successful: + Complete acquisition and merger + Accelerate drill program + Convert resources to reserves

  65. Slide 65: Results of the Extensive Exploration Programme

    Results of the Extensive Exploration Programme 2004-2005 a 2008-08 — The xdioazoue™ of Grade * thickness on" 2006-08 5 The a ; Expenditures for the extensive exploration programme: USD 7.0 The Eastern Zone SF

  66. Slide 66: Slide 66

  67. Slide 67: Pinos Altos Location Map

    XK Location Map High Grade Precious Metal: Indicated gold resource* of 4.4 million tons at 0.18 oziton, or 0.8 million oz Inferred gold resource of 2.5 million tons at 0.18 oziton, or 0.4 million oz Chihuahua @ Indicated silver resource* of 4.4 million tons at 3.8 oz/ton, or 17 million oz Inferred s

  68. Slide 68: Drill Hole Location

    Drill Hole Location Plan View [aromas congome — 9 sano uo ance [ant grime > Prone snaenty wetorts gnimete « Pinos Altos, co ‘winzone sync Lins Longin va ton

  69. Slide 69: Composite Longitudinal Section Pinos Altos

    Composite Longitudinal Section pings Altes

  70. Slide 70: $2.8 Million Work Plan 2005 Pinos Altos

    $2.8 Million Work Plan 2005 Pinos Altés MONTHS [> |= | sem | ot | ter | ati pen pit exploration and resource corversion (24,c00 feet ceiling) Underground reserve confirmation and resource conversion (15,400 feet driling] Deep exploration (1800 fest eilling) Underground rehabilitation, enginaering an

  71. Slide 71: Longitudinal Section

    Longitudinal Section Santo Nifio Zone « Pinos Altos PASS ies I PA05.05 0.13 036 113.5 PA05.08 PA05.08 (028833 %0.0 | orf S88 7e5.9 PA.O5-28 In Progress V.G. PA05.04 0.00 0.54 33.5 PA05.06 (o2d 387 ii8.0 0-05-10. Jor'Bs (108.3) -—paae2t PAO5-15 NS.R. PA.05-17 0.14 ap. 40.0 PA05.02 0.94537 / 148 PA05-

  72. Slide 72: Slide 72

  73. Slide 73: Exploration update Bousquet-Ellison

    Exploration update Bousquet-Ellison |= Ra ee Few TE June Expl. Results Division Bousquet . jad SEE SEL, Ben

  74. Slide 74: Slide 74

  75. Slide 75: Cortez Trend Area

    Cortez Trend Area Lander and Eureka Counties, Nevada Current Projects m@ NSR North and South ™ Norma Sass (Norma Sass, Lander Ranch and Blue Nugget Claims) @ Trend Project

  76. Slide 76: Cortez Trend Area

    Cortez Trend Area Lander and Eureka Counties, Nevada a View looking southwest across the Pipeline structural corridor

  77. Slide 77: Cortez Trend Area

    Cortez Trend Area ‘iew looking northwest along the Cortez structural corridor

  78. Slide 78: Norma Sass property

    Norma Sass property + early-stage exploration project + located immediately south of the Gold Acres open pit mine and west of the Pipeline Mine *represents one of Nevada’s best remaining exploration targets +previous drilling at Norma Sass encountered ore-grade gold values hosted by favorable lower-

  79. Slide 79: wn a) o is} = = ° z

    wn a) o 0 is} = = ° z

  80. Slide 80: Looking NNE

    Looking NNE*

  81. Slide 81: Searchable text section of graphics

    Searchable text section of graphics shown above [ GRAPHIC] [LOGO] TECHNICAL UPDATE August 23 rd , 2005 [LOGO] [GR APHIC] Forward Looking Statement Building from Strength [LOGO] This presentation contains certain “forward-looking statements” (within the meaning of the United States Private Securities

Agnico-Eagle Mines — Merger or Acquisition (August 2005) on 6ix