Medtronic Plc. · NYSE:MDT

Medtronic — Technical Presentation (March 2017)

40 slides from Medtronic's technical presentation, March 2017

  1. Slide 1: Syncope Therapy Awareness Presentation

    SYNCOPE THERAPY AWARENESS PRESENTATION

  2. Slide 2: The Syncope Challenge

    THE SYNCOPE CHALLENGE Syncope accounts for 740,000 ER visits per year, accounting for Magnitude 237,000 hospitalizations*1 Inpatient Approximately half of patients admitted to hospital leave without Challenge a diagnosis.2 Patient’s In reaching a diagnosis patients see 3 different specialists, under

  3. Slide 3: Unexplained Syncope + Cardiac Syncope Over 50% of Patients

    UNEXPLAINED SYNCOPE + CARDIAC SYNCOPE OVER 50% OF PATIENTS Syncope remains Neurally unexplained in Mediated approximately vasovagal, carotid sinus, situational 1/3 of cases 24% Unknown 34% Cardiac abnormal rhythms, structural damage 18% Orthostatic/ Neurologic Drug-induced Seizure, stroke, TIA etc A

  4. Slide 4: Syncope: The Cause Matters

    SYNCOPE THE CAUSE MATTERS Cardiac syncope: Overall Survival of Participants with  Carries a 6-month mortality Syncope According to Cause rate of greater than 10%  Doubles the risk of death Source: Soteriades ES, et al. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:878-885. 4 4 Syncope | Therapy Awareness Presentation |

  5. Slide 5: 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for Evaluation and Management of Syncope

    2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society Developed in Collaboration With the American College of Emergency P

  6. Slide 6: Evidence Level Definitions – New Descriptors

    EVIDENCE LEVEL DEFINITIONS – NEW DESCRIPTORS Note: types of clinical data qualify level of evidence •i.e. “randomized”/ ”non randomized” Source: Shen WK, et al.. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.003. 6 Syncope | Therapy Awareness Presentation | March 2017

  7. Slide 7: Syncope Initial Evaluation

    SYNCOPE INITIAL EVALUATION Source: Shen WK, et al.. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.003. 7 Syncope | Therapy Awareness Presentation | March 2017

  8. Slide 8: Characteristics Identifying Patients Most Likely Associated With a Cardiac Cause

    CHARACTERISTICS IDENTIYING PATIENTS MOST LIKELY TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH A CARDIAC CAUSE Class LOE Recommendation Evaluation of the cause and assessment for the short- and long-term I B-NR morbidity and mortality risk of Syncope are recommended Historical Characteristics Associated with Increased Proba

  9. Slide 9: Characterizing Risk Score of Syncopal Patients

    CHARACTERIZING RISK SCORE OF SYNCOPAL PATIENTS Class LOE Recommendation Evaluation of the cause and assessment for the short- and long-term I B-NR morbidity and mortality risk of syncope are recommended Short-term (<30 d) risk factors Long-term (>30d) risk factors  Older age (>60yr)  Older age (>6

  10. Slide 10: Syncope Evaluation Care Pathway

    SYNCOPE EVALUATION CARE PATHWAY  After initial evaluation and if cardiac cause is suspected, cardiac monitoring should be performed – Class I Recommendation  ICMs should be placed in all patients with infrequent symptoms Source: Shen WK, et al.. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03

  11. Slide 11: Cardiac Monitoring Recommendations

    CARDIAC MONITORING RECOMMENDATIONS Class LOE Recommendation The choice of a specific cardiac monitor should be determined on the I C-EO basis of the frequency and nature of syncope events. To evaluate selected ambulatory patients with syncope of suspected IIa B-R arrhythmic etiology, an ICM can be u

  12. Slide 12: Monitoring Selection Criteria: The Right Device for the Right Patient

    MONITORING SELECTION CRITERIA THE RIGHT DEVICE FOR THE RIGHT PATIENT Holter Extended External Loop Mobile Cardiac Insertable Monitors Holters Recorders Telemetry Cardiac Monitors Duration 24 – 48 hrs 2-14 days Up to 1 month ≤3 years Patient Daily Weekly Monthly Monthly Recurrent, Selection symptoms

  13. Slide 13: ESC Syncope Guidelines: Recommendations for Use of ICM Monitoring

    ESC SYNCOPE GUIDELINES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE USE OF ICM MONITORING Class I  Indicated in early phase of evaluation in patients with recurrent ICM syncope of uncertain origin, absence of high risk criteria, and a high Guidelines likelihood of recurrence within battery longevity of the device  Ind

  14. Slide 14: NICE Clinical Syncope Guideline: Diagnostic Testing by Frequency of Symptoms

    NICE CLINICAL SYNCOPE GUIDELINE DIAGNOSTIC TESTING ACCORDING TO FREQUENCY OF SYMPTOMS Frequency of Syncope Suggested ECG Monitoring Technique Several times a week 24-48h Holter monitoring Every 1-2 weeks External loop recorder Less than once per month Implantable loop recorder Source: NICE Clinical

  15. Slide 15: Syncope Guidelines: Are They Followed?

    SYNCOPE GUIDELINES: ARE THEY FOLLOWED? SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF HCPs STATE THEY WOULD USE MONITORING INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES Type of monitor recommended based on the frequency of syncope episodes Event ICM Holter 100% 13% 11% 12% 14% 3% 9% 13% 35% 9% 20% 53% 62% ICM / ILR 63% 65% 44% MCOT % of

  16. Slide 16: Reveal LINQ System Advantages: ICMs Are Underutilized

    REVEAL LINQ SYSTEM ADVANTAGES POWERFUL CARDIAC MONITORING ICMs are underutilized ICMs are recommended by clinical guidelines1,2 ─ yet significantly underutilized Up to 3 in 4 Patients who met appropriate criteria for ICM implantation did not receive one3 1 Moya A, et al. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2631-26

  17. Slide 17: Patients & Healthcare Providers Struggle to Find the Answer

    PATIENTS & HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS STRUGGLE TO FIND THE ANSWER Patients endure ongoing diagnostic testing and still come away with no answers 3 13 1 in 4 specialists Inconclusive Undergo visited tests more than on average 20 tests Source: Edvardsson N, et al. Europace. 2011;13:262-269. 17 Syncope | The

  18. Slide 18: Patient Experience

    PATIENT EXPERIENCE  70% of patients had been hospitalized at least once for syncope.  36% of patients had experienced significant trauma in association with a syncopal episode.  Overall, patients had seen an average of 3 different specialists for their syncope. Source: Edvardsson N, et al. Europa

  19. Slide 19: PICTURE Study: Diagnostic Tests Performed Before Reveal ICM

    DIAGNOSTIC TESTS PERFORMED BEFORE REVEAL™ ICM PICTURE STUDY Total recruitment 570 (100%) The median number of tests Standard ECG 556 (98%) performed per patient was 13 Echocardiography 490 (86%) (inter-quartile range 9 - 20) Basic laboratory tests 488 (86%) Ambulatory ECG monitoring 382 (67%) In-hos

  20. Slide 20: Syncope Diagnosis Testing Options & Yield

    SYNCOPE DIAGNOSIS TESTING OPTIONS & YIELD Test / Procedure Yield* ECG 2-11%1 Holter Monitoring 2%2 External Loop Recorder 20%3 Tilt Table 11%+4,5 EP Study without structural heart disease 11%6 Neurological (CT scan, carotid doppler) 0-4%5 Reveal ICM 78%7 *Based on mean diagnosis time of 5.1 mos.2 1

  21. Slide 21: PICTURE Study: ICM Success in Diagnosing Patients With Syncope

    ICM SUCCESS IN DIAGNOSING PATIENTS WITH SYNCOPE PICTURE STUDY 570 Patients Study Design  Investigated the effectiveness of Reveal™ ICM in the diagnosis of unexplained recurrent syncope in everyday clinical practice  Helped inform current guidelines Conclusion A Reveal ICM should be implanted rathe

  22. Slide 22: Syncope Algorithm

    SYNCOPE ALGORITHM SHD = Structural Heart Disease CSM = Carotid Sinus Massage EPS = Electrophysiologic Study *Provides up to 36 months of continuous monitoring. This is a general protocol to assist with the management of patients. This is not designed to replace clinical judgment or individual patien

  23. Slide 23: ICMs Are a Cost-Effective Diagnostic Tool

    ICMs ARE A COST-EFFECTIVE DIAGNOSTIC TOOL REDUCE COST WITH EARLIER UTILIZATION Multiple studies show ICM monitoring resulted in cost savings in syncope patients compared to conventional testing through fewer tests and hospital admissions.1-4 6 1 Krahn AD, J Am Coll Cardiol.August 6, 2003;42(3):495-5

  24. Slide 24: Economic Value: Reveal LINQ ICM and the Care Continuum

    ECONOMIC VALUE REVEAL LINQ ICM AND THE CARE CONTINUUM Long-term benefits of Reveal LINQ™ ICM Accurate diagnosis and defined care continuum PATIENT CARE CONTINUUM NO ICM IMPLANTED ICM IMPLANTED ✕ Care continuum is variable or unknown  Accurate diagnosis of cardiac ✕ Further diagnostic testing, with

  25. Slide 25: Experience the Reveal LINQ Advantage

    EXPERIENCE THE REVEAL LINQ™ ADVANTAGE REVEAL LINQ™ INSERTABLE CARDIAC MONITOR AN OVERVIEW

  26. Slide 26: Reveal LINQ System Advantages: Indications for Use

    REVEAL LINQ SYSTEM ADVANTAGES POWERFUL CARDIAC MONITORING Indications for use The Reveal LINQ™ insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) is an implantable patient-activated and automatically-activated monitoring system that records subcutaneous ECG and is indicated in the following cases:  Patients with cli

  27. Slide 27: Reveal LINQ System Advantages: An Advanced Monitoring Solution

    REVEAL LINQ™ SYSTEM ADVANTAGES AN ADVANCED MONITORING SOLUTION Reveal LINQ ICM Wireless MyCareLink™ Cellular CareLink™ Network Patient Monitor & Reports Solution Enablers Insertion Tools Patient Assistant NEW App-based Reveal NEW Monitoring LINQ Mobile Manager Service Solutions 27 Syncope | Therapy

  28. Slide 28: Revolutionizing Cardiac Monitoring

    REVEAL LINQ™ SYSTEM ADVANTAGES REVOLUTIONIZING CARDIAC MONITORING The smallest, most powerful insertable cardiac monitor One-third the size of a AAA battery (1.2 cc) Up to a 3-year longevity for long-term monitoring1 MR Conditional at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla Minimally invasive, simplified insertion proced

  29. Slide 29: Simple Insertion Procedure

    REVEAL LINQ™ SYSTEM ADVANTAGES SIMPLE INSERTION PROCEDURE Best location: 45 degrees to sternum over 4th intercostal space, 2 cm from left edge of sternum 97% Of physicians found the insertion tool simple and intuitive.1 1 Reveal LINQ Usability Study. Medtronic data on file. 2013. 29 Syncope | Therap

  30. Slide 30: Transforming Cardiac Monitoring

    REVEAL LINQ™ SYSTEM ADVANTAGES TRANSFORMING CARDIAC MONITORING Transforming your ability to diagnose and treat even the most difficult-to-detect arrhythmias PROVEN ACCURACY Evidence superiority.1-5 Real-world impact.1,6,7 CLINICAL RIGOR Proven arrhythmia detection.1,8,9 Informed clinical decisions.

  31. Slide 31: Clinical Rigor: Evidence Superiority, Real-World Impact

    CLINICAL RIGOR EVIDENCE SUPERIORITY. REAL-WORLD IMPACT. Most With Withananevidence portfolio evidence of 500+ portfolio published of 500+ clinical published articlesarticles clinical and Studied 1 ICM abstracts and abstracts 1 Most Clinically AcrossCryptogenic Across Cryptogenic Stroke, Stroke, Sync

  32. Slide 32: TruRhythm Detection Inside: Accuracy Evolution

    TRURHYTHM™ DETECTION INSIDE ACCURACY EVOLUTION TruRhythm™ Detection Reveal LINQ™ Reveal™ XT With FullView ™ Software Reveal™ XT Streamlined episode review for clinic efficiency1,2 NEW Pause algorithm NEW simplified insertion and NEW algorithms with PAUSE with diminishing tight pocket for better sign

  33. Slide 33: TruRhythm Intelligent Detection: New Algorithms

    TRURHYTHM™ INTELLIGENT DETECTION NEW ALGORITHMS SMART FILTERING SELF-LEARNING NEW second sensing filter Exclusive fifth-generation analyzes rhythms for possible atrial fibrillation algorithm undersensing in Brady and learns and adapts to Pause patient’s rhythm over time BRADY PAUSE & AF 33 Syncope |

  34. Slide 34: Advanced Monitoring: Innovative Solutions, Simplified Experience

    ADVANCED MONITORING INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS. SIMPLIFIED EXPERIENCE. STREAMLINED INSERTION ACTIONABLE REPORTS SIMPLIFIED PATIENT WORK FLOW MANAGEMENT  Supported by an enhanced Medtronic Resources to support clinic CareLink™ network efficiency and data review  Industry’s highest diagnostic yields, with

  35. Slide 35: Economic Value: Syncope

    ECONOMIC VALUE SYNCOPE Clinical impact of Reveal™ ICM in syncope patients Accurately Diagnose Effectively Treat 13 78% 75% 25% Median number of Patients that receive a of Reveal-guided Reveal ICM patients inconclusive tests diagnosis following a diagnoses were found that receive device before ICM wa

  36. Slide 36: Syncope Patient Impact: William's Story

    ADVANCED MONITORING SYNCOPE PATIENT IMPACT William’s story Reveal LINQ™ ICM used to discover non-sustained SVT event William remembered his fainting spells seemed to come out of nowhere. The first time it happened was just after he stood up to get a second cup of coffee. He was unconscious for 30 se

  37. Slide 37: Syncope Patient Impact: Kymberli's Story

    ADVANCED MONITORING SYNCOPE PATIENT IMPACT Kymberli’s story Reveal LINQ™ ICM used to discover malignant vasovagal syncope On a February morning in 2015, Kymberli, the busy mother of four young children prepared for her triplets’ first birthday party. Suddenly, she felt queasy, confused and clammy. S

  38. Slide 38: Syncope Patient Impact: Debbie's Story

    ADVANCED MONITORING SYNCOPE PATIENT IMPACT Debbie’s story Reveal™ ICM used to discover a rare form of AT After Debbie fainted the first time, she didn't think much about it. As a cardiac nurse, she knew there were many reasons people faint. But the fainting continued, and within a couple of months s

  39. Slide 39: Indications, Safety, and Warnings

    INDICATIONS, SAFETY, AND WARNINGS If you are located in the United States, please refer to the brief statement below to review applicable indications, safety, and warning information. See the device manual for detailed information regarding the implant procedure, indications, contraindications, warn

  40. Slide 40: Indications, Safety, and Warnings

    INDICATIONS, SAFETY, AND WARNINGS Patient Assistant Operation of the Patient Assistant near sources of electromagnetic interference, such as cellular phones, computer monitors, etc., may adversely affect the performance of this device. Potential Complications Potential complications include, but are

Medtronic — Technical Presentation (March 2017) on 6ix