Cardiff Oncology, Inc. · NASDAQ:CRDF

Cardiff Oncology — Trovagene — Investor Presentation (August 2012)

52 slides from Cardiff Oncology's investor presentation, Aug 29, 2012

  1. Slide 1: Introduction to Trovagene, Inc.

    Introduction to Trovagene, Inc. Antonius Schuh, PhD Chief Executive Officer August 2012

  2. Slide 2: Forward-Looking Statements

    Forward-Looking Statements DISCLAIMER Statements in this presentation about the Company's expectations, applications of its technology, markets, launch of tests and other statements that are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act

  3. Slide 3: Company Overview

    Company Overview Molecular diagnostics company Clinical focus in oncology Collaboration opportunities in prenatal diagnostics, infectious diseases and transplant medicine IP protects detection of transrenal nucleic acids in urine (“DNA in urine”) Founded in 1999 $40M invested over a decade Headquart

  4. Slide 4: Experienced Core Management Team

    Experienced Core Management Team OUR TEAM Charlie Rodi, PhD Chief Technology Officer Vice President Research & Development/Collaborations, Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. (SRNE.OB) (2009 – 2011) Senior Fellow, ICx BioSystems, (2007 – 2009) Founder, CEO, Rodi Pharma, Inc. (2002 – 2006) Executive Vice Pre

  5. Slide 5: Board & Scientific Advisory Board

    Board & Scientific Advisory Board OUR TEAM Scientific Advisory Board Carlo M. Croce, MD John W. Wolfe Chair, Human Cancer Genetics, and Chairman, Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, and Director of the Human Cancer Genetics Program and the Genetics Institute at Ohio St

  6. Slide 6: Trovagene: Cell-free Nucleic Acids in Urine

    Trovagene: Cell-free Nucleic Acids in Urine Urine-based detection of systemic molecular markers Oncology Detection of oncogene mutations Infectious Disease Transplantation Prenatal Diagnostics INTRODUCTION Our Value Proposition

  7. Slide 7: Perfect Timing for Next Generation Urine-based Testing

    Perfect Timing for Next Generation Urine-based Testing MARKET TIMING Why Now?

  8. Slide 8: Clear Advantages Over Competing Technologies

    Clear Advantages Over Competing Technologies Ease of sample collection No physician required Self-sampling possible Virtually no sample volume and sampling frequency limitations Ideal for monitoring applications Enrichment of target for better chance to detect rare events Ideal to detect disease ons

  9. Slide 9: What are Transrenal Nucleic Acids (TrNAs)

    What are Transrenal Nucleic Acids (TrNAs) TECHNOLOGY & IP Billions of cells die naturally each day, releasing DNA/RNA Nucleic acids are broken into packets of genetic material which are carried away by the blood stream DNA/RNA fragments are filtered through the kidneys and appears in urine as Transr

  10. Slide 10: Origins of Detectable TrDNA/TrRNA in Urine

    Origins of Detectable TrDNA/TrRNA in Urine TECHNOLOGY & IP Urine Fetus Tumor Auto-Immunity Transplant Infections

  11. Slide 11: Broad Clinical Utility

    Transplant markers In recipient urine for acute allograft rejection Fetal DNA markers In maternal urine for aneuploidy screening Pathogens Viruses: HPV, HIV, EBV, JC Bacteria: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Helicobacter pylori, Bacillus anthracis Parasites: Leishmania, Plasmodium Tumor markers KRAS: Co

  12. Slide 12: Molecular Cancer Diagnostics

    Molecular Cancer Diagnostics Oncogene mutations, miRNAs

  13. Slide 13: >$40B Addressable US Oncology Market

    >$40B Addressable US Oncology Market Cancer Patient Monitoring: TAM US > $10B 18 million cancer patients & survivors by 2020 (US only)* 2 monitoring tests per case per year at $400 Early detection of cancer: TAM US > $27B 180 million people > 40 years old by 2020 Testing every other year Price trend

  14. Slide 14: KRAS Mutations in Cancer

    KRAS Mutations in Cancer 38%/45% (female/male) lifetime risk of cancer with a 20%/23% mortality risk* KRAS mutations present in 22% of all cancer tissue samples examined by the Sanger Center** Prevalence of KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer More sensitive detection methods suggest 100% contain KRA

  15. Slide 15: Detection of KRAS Mutations in Urine

    Detection of KRAS Mutations in Urine KRAS mutation detection to Determine completeness of surgery Monitor therapy response Detect onset of disease recurrence Feasibility of urine test demonstrated* Comparable blood-based test requires minimum 50mL blood sample** * Serdyuk OI, Botezatu IV, Shelepov V

  16. Slide 16: KRAS: Comparison of Urine vs. Blood-based Detection

    KRAS: Comparison of Urine vs. Blood-based Detection ONCOLOGY: TUMOR MUTATION MONITORING Source: Su et al., Cancer Biomarkers 1 (2005), 177 - 182 More Sensitive Detection of KRAS Mutations in Urine vs. Plasma Tissue and KRAS Result Urine Sample Plasma Sample Colorectal Cancer, KRAS + 5/5 (100%) 2/5 (

  17. Slide 17: KRAS: Informing Pancreatic Cancer Care

    KRAS: Informing Pancreatic Cancer Care ONCOLOGY: TUMOR MUTATION MONITORING Track KRAS: Inform Medical Practice Determine progression No progression – operate Progression – do not operate Manage radiation, chemotherapy Achieve baseline: stop treatment Mutation levels cycle: continue treatment Mutatio

  18. Slide 18: Extending Mutation Tracking to All Cancers

    Extending Mutation Tracking to All Cancers ONCOLOGY: TUMOR MUTATION MONITORING Track Mutation(s): Inform Medical Practice Determine progression Monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) Manage treatment (radiation, chemotherapy) Monitor for recurrence Configure Mutation Assays Count individual wild typ

  19. Slide 19: Required Components

    Required Components ONCOLOGY: TUMOR MUTATION MONITORING Clinical samples: matched biopsy and urine samples Robust sample preparation of TrNAs Small footprint mutation assays CLIA laboratory

  20. Slide 20: Clinical Sample Sets

    Clinical Sample Sets ONCOLOGY: REQUIREMENTS: CLINICAL SAMPLES

  21. Slide 21: Trovagene Purification Outperforms Competitors

    Trovagene Purification Outperforms Competitors ONCOLOGY: REQUIREMENTS: SAMPLE PREPARATION For small target purification. Detection of 50 bp target spiked into identical 10 mL urine samples. First Elution First and Second Elutions Combined Total Number of Copies

  22. Slide 22: KRAS: Improved Assays

    KRAS: Improved Assays ONCOLOGY: REQUIREMENTS: MUTATION ASSAYS Effect of Amplicon Size on Digital Detection Sample # 80 bp Positives as % of 110 bp Positives 1 180% 2 217% 3 222% 4 185% 5 215% Average Improvement 204% Expected Percent of Molecules Detected Target size (bp) 146 Amplicon size (bp) 110

  23. Slide 23: Molecular Cancer Diagnostics Commercial Market Assessments

    Molecular Cancer Diagnostics Commercial Market Assessments June, 2012

  24. Slide 24: KRAS Mutations in Cancer

    KRAS Mutations in Cancer 38%/45% (female/male) lifetime risk of cancer with a 20%/23% mortality risk* KRAS mutations present in 22% of all cancer tissue samples examined by the Sanger Center** Prevalence of KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer More sensitive detection methods suggest 100% contain KRA

  25. Slide 25: KRAS Mutations – Potential US Market

    KRAS Mutations – Potential US Market COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY Therapies affected by KRAS mutations include Erbitux (cetuximab), Vectibix (panitumumab) and TKI inhibitors Based on http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09 based on November 2011 SEER data submission, multiplied by prevalence of mu

  26. Slide 26: BRAF Mutations – Potential US Market

    BRAF Mutations – Potential US Market COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY BRAF therapies include Zelboraf (vemurafenib), dabrafinib (GSK2118436)(pending approval), both for metastatic melanoma. Zelboraf (vemurafenib) is currently in a Phase II trial for thyroid cancer. Based on http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975

  27. Slide 27: PIK3CA Mutations – Potential US Market

    PIK3CA Mutations – Potential US Market COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY Treatments in development include perifosine (Ph III), MK-2206, CAL101, PX-866 (all Ph I-II). PIK3CA known to influence effectiveness of MTOR therapies - Toresil (temsirolimus), Afinitor (everolimus) Based on http://seer.cancer.gov/cs

  28. Slide 28: Potential Revenue: 1st Three Mutation Markers

    Potential Revenue : 1st Three Mutation Markers COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY Assumes validation data available for use in monitoring treatment response and recurrence Assumes 2 tests / year per patient at $400 per test

  29. Slide 29: Launch KRAS Mutation Test

    Launch KRAS Mutation Test COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY Initial study in pancreatic cancer patients with MDACC Validate feasibility of urine as a sample Broadly promote results across pancreatic cancer centers Develop opinion leader support within cancer centers Promote data through publications and sc

  30. Slide 30: Building Advocacy – Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs)

    Building Advocacy – Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY Clinical Trials Clinical Experience KOLs Advisory Boards & Society Meetings Literature & Medical Affairs Outreach

  31. Slide 31: 2012 Key Milestones

    2012 Key Milestones COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY Q1 Establish KRAS assay using digital PCR platform Recruit clinical study sites for KRAS mutation monitoring in pancreatic cancer patients Q2 Analytical validation of KRAS wild type and mutant assays Q3 Establish concordance of tissue- and urine-based m

  32. Slide 32: Recent News & Events

    Recent News & Events INTRODUCTION Strengthened Patent Portfolio Received Notification of Issuance of U.S. Patent for NPM Mutants to Diagnose and Monitor Acute Myeloid Leukemia on July 18, 2012 Received Notification of Issuance of European Patent for Detection of Pathogenic Infections on May 10, 2012

  33. Slide 33: Commercialization Through CLIA Lab and Out-licensing

    Commercialization Through CLIA Lab and Out-licensing COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY

  34. Slide 34: Financials and Capitalization

    Financials and Capitalization Through June 30, 2012

  35. Slide 35: Balance Sheet

    Balance Sheet (In Thousands) June 30, 2012 December 31, 2011 Cash & Cash Equivalents 9,304 700 Other Assets 648 339 Total Liabilities 4,463 5,270 Total Shareholder’s Equity (Deficiency) 5,489 (4,231)

  36. Slide 36: Capitalization Table

    Capitalization Table June 30, 2012 (000’s) Common Stock Outstanding 14,175 Series A Convertible Preferred Stock 96 Outstanding Options Exercise price ($3.00 - $15.00) 3,062 Outstanding Warrants Exercise price ($3.00 - $10.80) 5,730 Total Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding 23,062

  37. Slide 37: Consolidated Profit and Loss

    Consolidated Profit and Loss Statement of Operations (in thousands, except per share data) 3 months ended June 30, 2011 3 months ended June 30, 2012 6 months ended June 30, 2011 6 months ended June 30, 2012 Total Revenue 41 80 75 168 Total Operating Expenses 1,287 727 2,452 1,536 Net Loss from Opera

  38. Slide 38: Appendix

    Appendix

  39. Slide 39: Broad Clinical Utility

    Transplant markers In recipient urine for acute allograft rejection Fetal DNA markers In maternal urine for aneuploidy screening Pathogens Viruses: HPV, HIV, EBV, JC Bacteria: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Helicobacter pylori, Bacillus anthracis Parasites: Leishmania, Plasmodium Tumor markers KRAS: Co

  40. Slide 40: Trovagene Non-invasive HPV Assay

    Trovagene Non-invasive HPV Assay Unique assay amplifying the E1 region Freedom-To-Operate (FTO) relative to patent landscape targeting L1, E6, and E7 regions is likely E1 region offers novel approach to high risk HPV amplification Simplicity of testing: only 1 PCR reaction identifies all high-risk H

  41. Slide 41: Initial Urine-HPV Test Results

    Initial Urine-HPV Test Results COLLABORATION OPPORTUNITY: NON-INVASIVE HPV TEST High Risk vs Low Risk HPV, # patients QIAGEN hc2 Results High Risk QIAGEN hc2 Results Low Risk Total Trovagene Urine-HPV Results – High Risk 102 38 140 Trovagene Urine-HPV Results – Low Risk 34 146 180 Total 136 184 320

  42. Slide 42: HPV Discordant Samples Resolved by DNA Sequencing

    HPV Discordant Samples Resolved by DNA Sequencing COLLABORATION OPPORTUNITY: NON-INVASIVE HPV TEST Discordants Previous Results High Risk HPV by Sequencing High Risk Low Risk 38 Urine+ / hc2 - 31 7 34 Urine- / hc2+ 10 24 Trovagene True Positives 31 hc2 True Positives 10 Trovagene True Negatives 24 h

  43. Slide 43: Trovagene Test Feasibility – Final Results

    Trovagene Test Feasibility – Final Results COLLABORATION OPPORTUNITY: NON-INVASIVE HPV TEST Urine HPV Test Final Results* Number of Patients Total High Risk Low Risk High Risk 102 + 31 = 133 7 140 Low Risk 10 146 + 24 = 170 180 Total 143* 177* 320 Trovagene QIAGEN Sensitivity: 93.0% 78.3% Specificit

  44. Slide 44: Broad Clinical Utility

    Transplant markers In recipient urine for acute allograft rejection Fetal DNA markers In maternal urine for aneuploidy screening Pathogens Viruses: HPV, HIV, EBV, JC Bacteria: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Helicobacter pylori, Bacillus anthracis Parasites: Leishmania, Plasmodium TECHNOLOGY & IP Broad

  45. Slide 45: Truly Non-invasive Screening of Pre-natal Disorders

    Truly Non-invasive Screening of Pre-natal Disorders COLLABORATION OPPORTUNITY: NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS The plurality of Y chromosomal sequences clearly demonstrates the presence of transrenal fetal nucleic acids in maternal urine The combination of next gen sequencing with our transrenal nuc

  46. Slide 46: Genome Representation in Urine of Pregnant Women

    Genome Representation in Urine of Pregnant Women COLLABORATION OPPORTUNITY: NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS Mapping Statistics Input reads processed: 34,850,754 Total reads mapped: 32,476,497 (93.19%) Reads uniquely mapped: 28,272,898 (81.13%) Reads that failed to map: 2,374,257 (6.81%) Tens of thou

  47. Slide 47: Broad Clinical Utility

    Transplant markers In recipient urine for acute allograft rejection Fetal DNA markers In maternal urine for aneuploidy screening Pathogens Viruses: HPV, HIV, EBV, JC Bacteria: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Helicobacter pylori, Bacillus anthracis Parasites: Leishmania, Plasmodium TECHNOLOGY & IP Broad

  48. Slide 48: Transplantation Diagnostics

    Transplantation Diagnostics ONCOLOGY: EARLY DETECTION OF DISEASE From “Noninvasive diagnosis of acute rejection of renal allografts.” Hartono C, Muthukumar T, Suthanthiran M. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2010 Feb;15(1):35-41. Review. Test Platform Examples of Potential Biomarkers Gene Transcripts Sin

  49. Slide 49: TrNAs in Transplantation Diagnostics

    TrNAs in Transplantation Diagnostics EARLY DETECTION OF DISEASE, PATIENT STATUS Urinary miR-210 as a mediator of acute T-cell mediated rejection in renal allograft recipients Lorenzen JM, Volkmann I, Fiedler J, Schmidt M, Scheffner I, Haller H, Gwinner W, Thum T. Am J Transplant. 2011 Oct;11(10):222

  50. Slide 50: HPV-HR in Urine: Broad Market Applicability

    HPV-HR in Urine: Broad Market Applicability COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY Estimated 25M HPV tests run annually (US) 1 Represents only about 35-40% market penetration 8.7 – 14.2% of cases come back as positive2 Repeat HPV testing often performed at 6 and 12 months No convenient test for male partner to

  51. Slide 51: HPV in Urine: Value Proposition

    HPV in Urine: Value Proposition COMMERCIALIZATION STRATEGY TrovaCheckSM HPV-PLUS assay: Convenient, urine-based carrier screening for women and potentially men Screens for all known high risk HPV types Specific testing and typing for low-risk types 6 and 11 (which cause 90% of genital warts) Specifi

  52. Slide 52: For further information contact

    For further information contact: Antonius Schuh, CEO aschuh@trovagene.com Stephen Zaniboni, CFO szaniboni@trovagene.com

Trovagene — Investor Presentation (August 2012) on 6ix