Kinder Morgan, Inc. · NYSE:KMI

Kinder Morgan — Kinder Morgan Energy Partners — Debt Investor Presentation (March 2009)

26 slides from Kinder Morgan's debt investor presentation, Mar 24, 2009

  1. Slide 1: Barclays 2009 Fixed Income Energy and Pipeline Conference

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Barclays 2009 Fixed Income Energy and Pipeline Conference March 24, 2009

  2. Slide 2: Forward Looking Statements

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward looking statements. These forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or current facts. In particular, statements, express or implied, concerning future acti

  3. Slide 3: Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures The non-generally accepted accounting principles ("non-GAAP") financial measures of distributable cash flow before certain items, segment distributable cash flow before certain items, and earnings before interest, taxes and DD&A ("EBITDA") bef

  4. Slide 4: Capital Structure

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Capital Structure Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Market Equity (a) $12.3B Debt (b) 8.4B Enterprise Value $20.7B 2009E EBITDA (c) $2.7B 2009E DCF (d) $2.1B Additional Cash Incentive Shares Distribution Distribution KMR KMP (LLC) (Partnership) 80 million i- i-units (a) 194 m

  5. Slide 5: The Kinder Morgan Strategy

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. The Kinder Morgan Strategy Same Strategy Since Inception  Focus on stable, fee-based assets which are core to the energy infrastructure of growing markets  Increase utilization of assets while controlling costs  Classic fixed cost businesses with little variable costs  Impr

  6. Slide 6: Unmatched Footprint

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Unmatched Trans Jet Mountain Fuel Footprint Pipeline 2 Cochin  Largest independent transporter of petroleum products in the U.S. Express Pacific  Transport nearly 2 million barrels per day (Bbl/d) 2  2nd largest transporter of natural Trailblazer gas in U.S. (a) REX 4 2 KMIG

  7. Slide 7: Well-diversified Asset Base

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Well-diversified Asset Base KMP CO2 2009 DCF Natural Gas Pipelines  32% CO2 transport and sales Profile (b)  58% Interstate (c)  68% oil production related  42% Texas Intrastate  Production hedged (a): 2009=73% ($49/Bbl) CO2 Natural Gas 2010=63% ($56) 27% Pipelines 2011=57

  8. Slide 8: Twelve Years of Consistent Growth

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Twelve Years of Consistent Growth Total Distributions (GP + LP) ($MM) Annual LP Distribution Per Unit (b) $2,250 $2,112 $4.50 $4.20 GP (a) $4.02 $2,000 $1,854 $4.00 = 16% LP 5% GR $3.48 $1,750 =4 $3.50 9C A $3.13 $3.26 GR $1,469 200 $2.87 $1,500 CA $1,265 $3.00 6- $2.63 $1,250

  9. Slide 9: Significant Historical Returns

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Significant Historical Returns (a) KMP: 25% CAGR (b) KMR: 9% CAGR (c) Dollars Dollars $2,000 $300 KMP = $1,522 $1,750 $270 $1,500 $240 $1,250 $210 KMR = $202 $1,000 $180 $750 $150 Alerian = $190 Alerian = $410 $500 $120 $250 $90 S&P 500 = $132 S&P 500 = $74 $0 $60 14-May-2001 D

  10. Slide 10: Promises Made, Promises Kept

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Promises Made, Promises Kept Promises Made Promises Kept Budgeted Actual Distribution per unit: Distribution per unit: 2000: $1.60 2000: $1.71 2001: $1.95 2001: $2.15 2002: $2.40 2002: $2.435 2003: $2.63 2003: $2.63 2004: $2.84 2004: $2.87 2005: $3.13 2005: $3.13 2006: $3.28 20

  11. Slide 11: 2009 Partnership Goals

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. 2009 Partnership Goals  2009 Distribution Target  $4.20 per unit (4.5% growth)  Excess coverage of ~$14 million  Maintain Solid Balance Sheet  Expansions / acquisitions financed 50% equity, 50% debt  Deliver Projects on Current Schedule and Cost Forecast 11

  12. Slide 12: Recent Trends

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Recent Trends Impact Offset / Response  Decline in product demand – Impacts volumes on product pipelines – Annual PPI adjustment – Ethanol  Lower oil prices – Impacts unhedged crude oil and NGL – Lower cost environment; e.g. drilling, volumes in CO2 segment equipment, capital

  13. Slide 13: Continued Growth Opportunities

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Continued Growth Opportunities Current Projects (2009-2011) Additional Opportunities  Shifting Natural Gas Supply Sources — Rockies – Rockies Express pipeline – Expansions, extensions and added service on current projects and — Shale Plays – Midcontinent Express pipeline exist

  14. Slide 14: Shifting Natural Gas Supply Sources

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Shifting Natural Gas Supply Sources Natural Gas Supply (a) % Production Volumes (Bcf/d) 2008E 2013 Change Change Rockies 8.9 10.9 2.0 22% Barnett Shale 3.9 5.5 1.6 41% Fayetteville Shale 0.7 2.9 2.2 314% Rockies Haynesville Shale 0.1 3.7 3.6 n/m production Gulf Coast LNG Import

  15. Slide 15: Newbuild Natural Gas Pipelines

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Newbuild Natural Gas Pipelines Wyoming Nebraska Illinois Indiana Ohio Colorado Kansas Missouri ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE Oklahoma IN-SERVICE ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE Arkansas Mississippi FAYETTEVILLE EXPRESS PIPELINE Alabama Texas MIDCONTINENT EXPRESS PIPELINE Louisiana KM LOUIS

  16. Slide 16: Increased Use of Renewable Fuels

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Increased Use of Renewable Fuels EPA guidelines require significant Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) (a) ethanol/biodiesel blending in 2009 40 Incremental Impact R 36.0 and beyond 35 of EISA - 2007 % CAG 10.4 22 30 EPACT - 2005 8-20 Leverage Existing Assets to be Most Efficient,

  17. Slide 17: Increased Production and Use of Heavy Crude

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Increased Production and Use of Heavy Crude North American Petcoke Production (a) Despite drop in crude price, oil slate still getting heavier – 1.4MMbbl/d of incremental heavy ‘1 GR 75 69 refining capacity forecast to be added by 2015 (c) 8- A Rest of N. America ‘0 C 5 7% U.S.

  18. Slide 18: Current Major Projects

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Current Major Projects $6 Billion In Current Projects 2009-2011 (a) Estimated Est. Remaining Project Cost Project Cost KM-Share KM-Share Expected Project ($MM) ($MM) (b) Completion Rockies Express East $1,825 (a,c) $845 (a,c) 2009 (d) Midcontinent Express 1,114 (a,e) 695 (a,e)

  19. Slide 19: ~$17 Billion in Capital Invested To Date

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. ~$17 Billion in Capital Invested To Date (a,b) (billions) Total Invested by Type (a,b) Total Invested by Year (a) $9 $0.5 $3.0 $2.9 $2.8 $6 JV Contributions $2.7 $8.4 Expansion $7.7 Acquisition $3 $2.5 $0 $2.0 $1.9 Expansions Acquisitions $1.6 $1.5 $1.3 Total Invested by Segmen

  20. Slide 20: Returns on Capital

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Returns on Capital 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Segment ROI (a): Products Pipelines 11.9% 11.8% 12.8% 12.9% 12.4% 11.6% 11.8% 13.2% 12.5% Natural Gas Pipelines 13.3 15.5 12.9 13.5 14.0 15.5 16.7 17.6 16.9 CO2 27.5 24.6 22.0 21.9 23.8 25.7 23.1 21.8 25.9 Terminal

  21. Slide 21: Balance Sheet Has Remained Solid

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Balance Sheet Has Remained Solid (millions) Credit Summary Budgeted Current (a) Yr-end 2009 L-T Debt Rating Baa2/BBB (b) Credit Metrics Debt / EBITDA (c,d) 3.4x 3.6x EBITDA / Interest (d) 6.1x 5.9x Revolver Liquidity (a,e) a,e) Long-term Debt Maturities (a,g) a,g) Total Bank Cr

  22. Slide 22: Will We Distribute $4.20 in 2009?

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Will We Distribute $4.20 in 2009?  Vast majority of $2.1 billion 2009 budgeted DCF is very secure  Impact of oil price at $50/Bbl (vs. $68 in budget) = ~$100 million  4.7% of total DCF  Sensitivity is ~$6 million per $1/Bbl change in crude price  Potential offsetting facto

  23. Slide 23: Do Not Require Access to Capital Markets in 2009

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Do Not Require Access to Capital Markets in 2009 (millions) Uses – Budget Sources Sources – Alternative Growth Expenditures: Sources: Already Secured: Expansion Capex $1,188 Dec‘08 Debt Issue $500 Cash on Hand @ 12/31/08 $63 Contributions to JVs 1,472 (a) Dec‘08/Jan‘09 Swap Unw

  24. Slide 24: Risks

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Risks  Regulatory  Pacific Products Pipeline FERC/CPUC case  Periodic rate reviews  Unexpected policy changes  Crude Oil Production Volumes  Crude Oil Prices  Budget assumes $68/Bbl realized price on unhedged barrels  2009 Sensitivity is ~$6 million DCF per $1/Bbl chang

  25. Slide 25: Summary

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Summary KMP’s model works  Stable Cash Flow  Own assets core to energy infrastructure  Fixed Cost Business  Drop growth to bottom line  Available Internal/External Growth Opportunities  Critical mass KMP/KMR:  Well-located assets/favorable demographics 8-9% Yield  At at

  26. Slide 26: Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. KINDER/MORGAN

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners — Debt Investor Presentation (March 2009) on 6ix