Swiss Re Ag · SIX:SREN

Swiss Re — Investor Presentation (October 2014)

44 slides from Swiss Re's investor presentation, Oct 15, 2014

  1. Slide 1: Health Risk – Air Pollution

    Health Risk – Air Pollution Health Risk Factors in Rapidly Changing Economies Swiss Re Centre for Global Dialogue October 15, 2014 Douglas W. Dockery Loeb Professor of Environmental Epidemiology Chair, Department of Environmental Health Harvard School of Public Health 1

  2. Slide 2: ‘Airpocalypse’ Hits Harbin, Closing Schools

    ‘Airpocalypse’ Hits Harbin, Closing Schools October 21, 2013 School was canceled, traffic was nearly paralyzed and the airport was shut down in the northeast Chinese city of Harbin on Monday as off-the-charts pollution dropped visibility to less than 10 meters in parts of the provincial capital. A d

  3. Slide 3: Choking smog returned to blanket Beijing and surrounding areas

    Choking smog returned to blanket Beijing and surrounding areas yesterday, four days after a dangerous smog alert was lifted. Meteorologists said pollution levels were likely to remain high until after the National Day "golden week" ends tomorrow - and the traffic crush as people returned from holida

  4. Slide 4: WHO Ambient air pollution in cities database 2014

    World Health Organization Public health, environmental and social determinants of health (PHE) Ambient (outdoor) air pollution in cities database 2014 The database contains results of ambient (outdoor) air pollution monitoring from almost 1600 cities in 91 countries. Air quality is represented by an

  5. Slide 5: Delhi pollution comparable to Beijing

    India's state air monitoring centre has admitted that pollution in Delhi is comparable to that of Beijing, but disputed a World Health Organisation (WHO) finding that the Indian capital had the dirtiest atmosphere in the world. A study of 1,600 cities across 91 countries released on Wednesday by the

  6. Slide 6: What is Fine Particulate Air Pollution (PM2.5)?

    What is Fine Particulate Air Pollution (PM2.5)?  Anything collected on a filter  Solid particles or liquid droplets  Not gases

  7. Slide 7: Global Satellite-Derived PM2.5: 2001–2006 Average

    Global Satellite-Derived PM2.5: 2001–2006 Average 7 Von Donkelaar et al Envir Hlth Pers 2010;118:847

  8. Slide 8: WHO Tabulation of PM2.5: 2012 Means by Country

    WHO Tabulation of PM2.5 2012 Means by Country India China Mexico Brazil Switzerland United Kingdom United States 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Annual Mean PM2.5 (mg/m3) http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/cities/en/

  9. Slide 9: WHO Tabulation of PM2.5: 2012 Means – Cities

    WHO Tabulation of PM2.5 2012 Means – Cities Delhi Beijing Rio de Janeiro Mexico City Zurich 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Annual Mean PM2.5 (mg/m3) http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/cities/en/

  10. Slide 10: Beijing still struggling to deal with traffic congestion

    Beijing still struggling to deal with traffic congestion. South China Morning Post Nov 10, 2013 10

  11. Slide 11: Coal and cars combine to increase pollution in North

    Coal and cars combine to increase pollution in North By Wang Qian 2010-12-08 11

  12. Slide 12: Household Air Pollution - a Major Avoidable Risk Factor for Cardiorespiratory Disease

    Household Air Pollution - a Major Avoidable Risk Factor for Cardiorespiratory Disease An Ethiopian An Indian woman woman trying to ignite dried preparing to dung in a brick stove cook over a three-stone fire in a wooden outbuilding A Peruvian mother holding A Malawian woman a young child cooking ove

  13. Slide 13: Cooking with Solid Fuels

    Cooking with Solid Fuels Biomass and Coal 13

  14. Slide 14: Comparative Risk Assessment

    Comparative Risk Assessment Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 14

  15. Slide 15: Burden of disease attributable to leading risk factors in 2010

    Burden of disease attributable to 20 leading risk factors in 2010 3.5 million deaths, 108 Million DALY 3.2 million deaths, 76 Million DALY 15 The Lancet, 2012; 380(9859): 2224 - 2260

  16. Slide 16: Burden of Disease: India, China, Brazil, and Mexico

    Burden of Disease: India, China, Brazil, and Mexico 16

  17. Slide 17: Courtesy of Mike Brauer

    PM2.5 (ug/m3) \ j ]o-1 5-10 RR 20-40 RM 20+ , ~ # ] 1-2 J) 10-15 I 40-60 Estimated (PM10)f9 : re curt § Mike B " PA $ *’ Courtesy of Mike Brauer 2-5 | 15-20 J co-80 @ Measured ¥ - ¥ y

  18. Slide 18: Burden of disease attributable to risk factors: China

    Burden of disease attributable to 15 leading risk factors in 2010, expressed as a percentage of China DALYs China http://www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/country-profiles 18

  19. Slide 19: Courtesy of Mike Brauer

    & PM2.5 al ’ o-1 5-10 JM 20-40 j 20+ : y 1-2 [)) 10-15 I 40-60 Estimated (PM10) ne = Courtesy of Mike Brauer 2-5 [I] 15-20 NM) 60-20 @ Measured mers :

  20. Slide 20: Burden of disease attributable to risk factors: India

    Burden of disease attributable to 15 leading risk factors in 2010, expressed as a percentage of India DALYs India http://www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/country-profiles 20

  21. Slide 21: Courtesy of Mike Brauer

    21 Courtesy of Mike Brauer

  22. Slide 22: Burden of disease attributable to risk factors: Mexico

    Burden of disease attributable to 15 leading risk factors in 2010, expressed as a percentage of Mexico DALYs Mexico http://www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/country-profiles 22

  23. Slide 23: Courtesy of Mike Brauer

    Courtesy of Mike Brauer 2-8 [I 15-20 MM coco @ Measured

  24. Slide 24: Burden of disease attributable to risk factors: Brazil

    Burden of disease attributable to 15 leading risk factors in 2010, expressed as a percentage of Brazil DALYs Brazil http://www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/country-profiles 24

  25. Slide 25: How do they estimate these numbers?

    How do they estimate these numbers? Dose – Response Exposure Population statistics 25

  26. Slide 26: Six Cities Adult Mortality Study

    Six Cities Adult Mortality Study  8111 adults in 6 cities  Dirty: Steubenville & St. Louis  Moderate: Watertown & Kinston/Harriman  Clean: Topeka & Portage  Enrolled starting in 1974  14-16 years of mortality follow-up Dockery et al, NEJM 1993;329:1753

  27. Slide 27: Follow-up

    Follow-up HARVARD LUNG STUDY IS THE LABEL BELOW CORRECT? CYES BNO ‘IF NO, PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS. Home phone # Has the person named below died? wo a Yosp Date of Death es ieee <a 7 §- . i Lake Hitis FR - L = This card was completed by: a named above O Spouse Ci Other Relative orFriend ©) Other Hand

  28. Slide 28: Follow-up

    Follow-up Rue secs + a IF NO, PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS. ~ HARVARDLUNGSTUDY RES !5 IS THELABEL BELOW GORRECT? [YES [NO ——— —— sai wate TART ge it yes, specify Has the person named below died? [JNo 3Yes Date of Death > City/State of Death [ - 9042-5 Or a ” STEUBENVILLE® CH 43952 This card was completec

  29. Slide 29: Mortality Risk Ratio

    Delhi (153 ug/m3) Six Cities Adult Mortality Beijing (56 ug/m3) 1.4 EPA NAAQS 1.3 Steubenville Kingston Mortality Risk Ratio 1.2 Zurich St. Louis (14 ug/m3) 1.1 Topeka Watertown 1.0 Portage 0.9 0.8 0.7 0 10 20 30 40 PM 2.5 (mg/m3)

  30. Slide 30: Comprehensive Dose-Response

    Comprehensive Dose-Response 30 Pope et al, Circulation. 2009;120:941-948

  31. Slide 31: Comprehensive Dose-Response

    Comprehensive Dose-Response 31 Pope et al, Circulation. 2009;120:941-948

  32. Slide 32: Comprehensive Dose-Response

    Comprehensive Dose-Response 32 Pope et al, Circulation. 2009;120:941-948

  33. Slide 33: What does this mean for the individual?

    What does this mean for the individual? What is effect of life expectancy? 33

  34. Slide 34: Survival curves 18-100 years and estimated life expectancy

    Survival curves 18-100 years and estimated life expectancy (LE) for alternative excess risk assumptions Survival Life Curve Expectancy Never Smoker Never-Smoker 80.6 LE years 80.6 years Moderate Smoker LE yr 7.8 72.8 yearsLE reduced Living Polluted City LEyr 3.1 77.5 years reduced LE 34

  35. Slide 35: Years Reduced Life Expectancy

    Estimated Years reduced life expectancy - exposures to cigarette smoke and fine particle air pollution 14 Personal Smoking Second Hand Fine Particle Years Reduced Life Expectancy 12 Smoking Air Pollution 10 8 6 4 2 0 35

  36. Slide 36: WHO Tabulation of PM2.5: 2012 Means – Cities

    WHO Tabulation of PM2.5 2012 Means – Cities Delhi Beijing Rio de Janeiro Mexico City Zurich 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Annual Mean PM2.5 (mg/m3) http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/cities/en/

  37. Slide 37: Years Reduced Life Expectancy - Lifetime Exposure

    Years Reduced Life Expectancy - Lifetime Exposure 9 Cigarette Smoking Fine Particle Air Pollution* 8 Years Reduced Life 7 Expectancy 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 * Compared to Zurich 37

  38. Slide 38: Incremental Risk

    Incremental Risk  Estimate of effect of each year of exposure  Effect of potential changes in exposures or behaviors.  Comparative risk for a worker or student who temporarily moves to such an environment.  Consider 50-year old non-smoker who spends one year in mild, moderate, and high PM2.5 air

  39. Slide 39: Estimated days of reduced life expectancy per year of exposure

    Estimated days of reduced life expectancy 1 year exposures to cigarette smoke and fine particle air pollution 50 years of age 80 Cigarette Smoking Fine Particle Air Pollution* 70 Days Reduced Life 60 Expectancy 50 40 30 20 10 0 * Compared to 15 ug/m3 39

  40. Slide 40: Estimated days of reduced life expectancy per year of exposure

    Estimated days of reduced life expectancy 1 year exposures to cigarette smoke and fine particle air pollution 50 years of age 80 70 Cigarette Smoking Fine Particle Air Pollution* Days Reduced Life 60 Expectancy 50 40 30 20 10 0 * Compared to Zurich 40

  41. Slide 41: Effect of Age of living in Delhi?

    Effect of Age of living in Delhi?  Baseline risk goes up with age  Impact of each year of exposure to high pollution increases with age  35 yrs – 29 days reduced LE  50 yrs – 67 days reduced LE  65 yrs – 116 days reduced LE 41

  42. Slide 42: What does this mean for the individual?

    What does this mean for the individual?  Not suggesting that their life is measurably shortened.  Rather these estimates reflect the increase probability of death in each year.  How would they die?  Acute events such as myocardial infarction, stroke, asthma attack, or traffic accident.  Assume

  43. Slide 43: Summary

    Summary  Each year of living in highly polluted city (e.g. Delhi) reduces expected average life expectancy by 30 to 120 days compared to living in cleaner city (e.g. Zurich)  Comparable to effects of being moderate smoker  Over a lifetime, this amounts to up about 7 years lost life expectancy 43

  44. Slide 44: Basic Copyright Notice & Disclaimer

    Basic Copyright Notice & Disclaimer ©2014 This presentation is copyright protected. All rights reserved. You may download or print out a hard copy for your private or internal use. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivatives of this presentation without the prior written permiss

Swiss Re — Investor Presentation (October 2014) on 6ix