Norfolk Southern Corporation · NYSE:NSC

Norfolk Southern — Proxy Contest (February 2024)

58 slides from Norfolk Southern's proxy contest presentation, Feb 20, 2024

  1. Slide 1: The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern

    February 2024 The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern​

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimer

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Disclaimer Ancora Alternatives LLC (“Ancora Alternatives”) and its affiliates (collectively, “Ancora”) exclaim that the information contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offering

  3. Slide 3: Situation Overview

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Once stronger leadership establishes a safety-first, worker-focused culture, Norfolk Southern can implement the network of the future to regain trust, reestablish reliability and unlock enhanced value for shareholders, employees,

  4. Slide 4: Table of Contents

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Table of Contents 4 Executive Summary (Page 5) The Problem: Ineffective Management, Failed Strategy, Lax Oversight and Absent Accountability (Page 20) The Evidence: Underperformance, Shrinking Margins and Tone-Deaf Crisis Respons

  5. Slide 5: Executive Summary

    ee ih Executive Summary

  6. Slide 6: About Norfolk Southern

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern About Norfolk Southern 6 1 Company filings. 2 Source: Bloomberg. Performance runs from 2022 Investor Day on December 6, 2022 through January 31, 2024, the first public disclosure of investor group activity in The Wall Street Jour

  7. Slide 7: About Norfolk Southern (Cont.)

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern About Norfolk Southern (Cont.) Source: Surface Transportation Board, Company filings. Class I Average includes CSX, UNP, CP and CNI. 7 Weak Revenue / EBIT / EPS Industry-Worst Operating Ratio Declining Volumes Lagging Ratio of Ca

  8. Slide 8: Why We're Seeking to Elect a Majority Slate and Install a New CEO

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Why We’re Seeking to Elect a Majority Slate and Install a New CEO 8 UNQUALIFIED CEO • Mr. Shaw does not possess the strategic operating and financial experience needed to effectively oversee Norfolk Southern during this critical

  9. Slide 9: The Financial Community Has Lost Confidence in Existing Leadership

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 9 $230 $235 $240 $245 $250 $255 $260 1/25/24 1/26/24 1/29/24 1/30/24 1/31/24 2/1/24 Norfolk Southern misses consensus for 2023 Norfolk Southern is reportedly targeted by active investors (1.9%) 9.1% “Norfolk Southern was the wors

  10. Slide 10: The General Public Has Lost Confidence in Existing Leadership

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern The Company’s insufficient response to the 2023 derailment in East Palestine, Ohio is a microcosm of Norfolk Southern’s failed strategy, insufficient accountability and lack of oversight of poor leadership. 10 The General Public

  11. Slide 11: Elected Officials Have Lost Confidence in Existing Leadership

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 11 President Joseph Biden’s Post; Senator Sherrod Brown's Post; Senator John Fetterman’s Post; Senator Bob Casey, Jr.’s Post. Elected Officials Have Lost Confidence in Existing Leadership

  12. Slide 12: New Lapses in 2024 Validate Concerns About Existing Leadership

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 12 “Nine train cars derailed at the Lamberts Point terminal in Norfolk on Wednesday morning, officials with Norfolk Southern confirmed to 13News Now.” -Feb. 7, 2024 “The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating a Nor

  13. Slide 13: Our Nominees Possess Relevant Operating and Governance Backgrounds

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Our nominees possess relevant operating backgrounds, railroad industry expertise, corporate governance knowhow, financial analysis skills, strategy, legislative and regulatory affairs expertise, and public company board experienc

  14. Slide 14: Jim Barber, Jr. as CEO

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Mr. Barber has a track record of growth and significant experience in operations, supply chain, strategic planning, employee relations and risk management from his 35-year career as a leader in the shipping and logistics industry

  15. Slide 15: Jamie Boychuk as COO

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 15 • A lifelong railroader with the safety record and scheduled railroading acumen needed to help turn around Norfolk Southern. • Previously served as the Executive Vice President of Operations at CSX, where he led a variety of o

  16. Slide 16: Scheduled Railroading Has Worked

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern • Scheduled railroading has had a profound impact on the operating model of the railroad industry and is credited with significant improvements at Illinois Central Railroad (“Illinois Central”), Canadian National, Canadian Pacifi

  17. Slide 17: Network of the Future Principles

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern • Safety-First Culture – The well-being of our people, business partners and community • Human Capital – People are your #1 asset, ensure you provide recognition and development • Service – Customer-focused, based on reliable ser

  18. Slide 18: The Value Creation Opportunity at Norfolk Southern

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern The Value Creation Opportunity at Norfolk Southern We believe that our slate can provide new leadership and direction for Norfolk Southern. 18 • As demonstrated below, there are at least five areas where we have modeled potential

  19. Slide 19: Safety-First Culture

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 19 ✓ Instill a safety-based, accountable, disciplined workforce culture that enables employees to take ownership of their work and responsibilities. ✓ An operations-experienced CEO like Mr. Barber can credibly establish a culture

  20. Slide 20: The Problem: Ineffective Management, Failed Strategy, Lax Oversight and Absent Accountability

    The Problem: Ineffective Management, Failed Strategy, Lax Oversight and Absent Accountability

  21. Slide 21: Mr. Shaw's Unneeded and Expensive Growth Strategy

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Mr. Shaw has put in place an unneeded, untried and wildly expensive growth strategy based on driving increased low margin intermodal business with an operational design that has proven detrimental to earnings and ROIC. 21 1 Norfo

  22. Slide 22: Mr. Shaw's Response to the East Palestine Tragedy Was Abysmal

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 22 NBC News article; The Hill article; CNN article; Associated Press article; CNN Business article; NBC News article; The Independent article; The Hill article; The Ohio Star article. Mr. Shaw’s Response to the East Palestine Tra

  23. Slide 23: TOP|SPG Reverses TOP-21

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 23 • The TOP-21 operating strategy was released at an Investor Day in February 2019, at which time Norfolk Southern laid out an OR target of 60% by 2021. • TOP-21 was based on responsible PSR principles with demonstrable results

  24. Slide 24: Norfolk Southern's Strategic Shift

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 24 • Norfolk Southern has the same fundamental strategic objectives as every rail: • Reliable, on-time service. • Highest growth possible. • Deliver service in both weak and strong markets. • No shortage of trained people or equi

  25. Slide 25: Operational Shortcomings Despite Excess Resources

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 25 • Despite such excess resources, Norfolk Southern’s operation is unable to handle current trough volumes as measured by inferior trip plan compliance metrics, the large number of cars online, the mediocre 72% on-time arrival r

  26. Slide 26: Board Has Sat Idle on Accident Rate and Abandoned Targets

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 26 • Rather than benchmarking Norfolk Southern’s performance against other Class I railroads, the Board is looking forward to contrasting 2024’s results with 2023’s underwhelming achievements. • The Board has not held management

  27. Slide 27: Strong Boards Demand Accountability Following Major Failures

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 27 The New York Times article; The Wall Street Journal article; NPR article Strong Boards Demand Accountability Following Major Failures

  28. Slide 28: The Evidence: Underperformance, Shrinking Margins and Tone-Deaf Crisis Response

    The Evidence: Underperformance, Shrinking Margins and Tone-Deaf Crisis Response

  29. Slide 29: Norfolk Southern Has Been a Long-Term Underperformer

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Norfolk Southern’s shares have underperformed the Company’s Class I railroad peers over every relevant period. 29 Source: FactSet, total shareholder returns as of 1/31/2024. Class I Average includes CSX, UNP, CP and CNI. 2022 Inv

  30. Slide 30: Norfolk Southern's Operating Ratio Has Consistently Lagged Peers

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 30 Source: Company filings, FactSet. Class I Average includes CSX, UNP, CP and CNI. CSX figures exclude Quality Carriers contribution to OR. 64.4% 64.4% 60.6% 61.4% 67.4% 58.4% 58.8% 57.4% 57.5% 59.6% 60.2% 59.1% 58.4% 59.6% 61.1

  31. Slide 31: EBIT Margins Have Worsened Versus Closest Competitor

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern In 2023, the delta in EBIT dollars between Norfolk Southern and CSX was more than $1.6 billion. 31 Source: Bloomberg. $208 $410 $1,041 $944 $876 $880 $976 $1,601 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 2016 2017

  32. Slide 32: Three-Year Outlook Indicates Margin Gap to Peers Will Not Close

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Mr. Shaw’s Three-Year Outlook Explicitly Indicates the Margin Gap to Peers Will Not Close 32 Source: Bloomberg. Outlook slide from NSC’s 4Q23 Earnings Presentation We aren’t going to give you a specific margin target, but it shou

  33. Slide 33: Analysts Have No Confidence in Closing the Margin Gap

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Analysts have no confidence in current Company leadership’s ability to close the margin gap to peers. 33 Source: Company filings and FactSet. Class I Average includes CSX, UNP, CP, and CNI. CP excluded for historical data due to

  34. Slide 34: Underperformed Peers Across All Relevant Financial Metrics (Cont.)

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 34 Source: Company filings and FactSet. Class I Peer Average excludes Canadian Pacific in FY 2021 to 2023 due to accounting anomaly from Kansas City Southern acquisition. 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 2019 2020 2021 2022

  35. Slide 35: Operating Expense Breakdown vs. CSX

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 35 Source: Company filings. CSX figures based on rail revenue and excludes estimated expense contribution from Quality Carriers. Norfolk Southern vs. CSX Operating Expense Breakdown Expense Line Items % of Rail Revenue % differen

  36. Slide 36: Purchased Services, Materials, Rents and Other Expenses

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 36 Source: Company filings. Measures purchased services, rents, materials and other expenses per gross ton mile. CSX figures exclude contribution from Quality Carriers. Estimated impact from Quality Carriers is $140M/quarter begi

  37. Slide 37: Too Many Rail Cars on Its Network

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 37 Source: Company filings. • Since 2019, Norfolk Southern’s ratio of carloads to cars online is ~15% worse than CSX’s on average. • This trend has only worsened under Mr. Shaw’s tenure as CEO with the current difference -20%. •

  38. Slide 38: Lower Train Speeds and Volume Declines

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 38 Source: Surface Transportation Board and company filings. Train speed is the average for the year. • Norfolk Southern’s deteriorating service levels have resulted in volume declines worse than CSX and other Class I rail peers.

  39. Slide 39: Rail Cars Are Waiting For Longer

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 39 Source: Surface Transportation Board and company filings. 1Terminal dwell is the average for the year. • Norfolk Southern’s 2023 terminal dwell, or the time a rail car spends in a terminal awaiting movement toward its destinat

  40. Slide 40: Norfolk Southern's Operations Have Not Improved

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 40 Source: Company filings. Dwell for NSC and CSX is system-wide. Train Speeds, Terminal Dwell and Volume: Percentage Change of Norfolk Southern vs. CSX From 2019 to 2023 Merchandise CSX -18% 5% -3% -20% 0% 20% 40% Speeds Dwell V

  41. Slide 41: Switches Rail Cars Too Often

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 41 Source: Company filings (R1 Annual Report). • Norfolk Southern switched manifest cars more than 2x as often as CSX in 2022, extending a gap evident in prior years. • Increased railcar switching requires a vast number of on-sit

  42. Slide 42: Trains Holding for Power and Unplanned Recrews

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 42 Source: Surface Transportation Board and company filings. Data from May 13, 2022 through the week of December 22, 2023. • In 2023, Norfolk Southern had an average of 11.5 trains per week held/delayed due to lack of necessary l

  43. Slide 43: Manifest Trip Plan Compliance Has Lagged

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% May-22 Jun-22 Jul-22 Aug-22 Sep-22 Oct-22 Nov-22 Dec-22 Jan-23 Feb-23 Mar-23 Apr-23 May-23 Jun-23 Jul-23 Aug-23 Sep-23 Oct-23 Nov-23 Dec-23 NSC CSX 43 Source: Surface Transportation Board. Data from M

  44. Slide 44: East Palestine Derailment Timeline and $1.1 Billion in Charges

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern The Board and management’s flawed response is costly: Norfolk Southern has reserved $1.1 billion in charges so far as a result of the 2023 derailment in East Palestine.1 44 1 Company Form 10-K for fiscal year 2023. Feb. 6, 2023 A

  45. Slide 45: Our Slate's Solution: New Board and Management With a New, Safety-First Strategic Vision

    Our Slate’s Solution: New Board and Management With a New, Safety-First Strategic Vision

  46. Slide 46: Nominee Profiles: Atkins and Barber

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 46 Betsy Atkins • Capital Allocation: CEO and Founder of Baja Corp., a venture capital firm that has focused on software and technology since 1993. • Governance: Director of SL Green Realty Corp. (NYSE: SLG), SolarEdge Technologi

  47. Slide 47: Nominee Profiles: Fahmy, Kasich and Others

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 47 Former railroad and transportation industry executive with safety, supply management, engineering and mechanical experience. Former Ohio governor and congressman with significant regulatory, legislative and executive policy ex

  48. Slide 48: The Winning Ticket: Jim Barber as CEO and Jamie Boychuk as COO

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 48 BARBER BOYCHUK ’24 The Agenda The Winning Ticket: Jim Barber as CEO and Jamie Boychuk as COO

  49. Slide 49: Our CEO Candidate Has the Investment Community's Respect

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 49 Jim Barber, Jr. “Barber in our view was a likely successor to [former UPS] Chairman and CEO David Abney.” “Barber is highly regarded as a logistics operator who helped turnaround U.S. peak season problems at UPS during his ten

  50. Slide 50: Jim Barber, Jr. vs. Alan Shaw

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 50 Jim Barber, Jr. Alan Shaw × Non-operating background in marketing and sales, industrial development, real estate and customer relations. Was in coal, chemicals and financial staff roles during his first 20 years at Norfolk Sou

  51. Slide 51: Our Slate Has Proven Railroad Industry and Well-Rounded Experience

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 51 ATKINS BARBER, JR. CLYBURN, JR. CONNORS FAHMY KASICH LAMPHERE LANDRY RAILROAD OR TRANSPORTATION EXPERTISE LOGISTICS & SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT & COMPENSATION EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE FINA

  52. Slide 52: Safety Metrics Improved Once Scheduled Railroading Was Implemented

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern Illinois Central (1993-1997) Canadian National (2003-2007) Canadian Pacific (2011-2015) CSX (2017-2021) Railroads Have Seen Safety Metrics Improve Once Scheduled Railroading Principles Were Implemented Source: Company filings, FR

  53. Slide 53: The Value Creation Opportunity at Norfolk Southern

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern The Value Creation Opportunity at Norfolk Southern We believe that our slate can provide new leadership and direction for Norfolk Southern. 53 • As demonstrated below, there are at least five areas where we have modeled potential

  54. Slide 54: Appendix

    Appendix

  55. Slide 55: Why Mr. Shaw's TOP|SPG Strategy Is Flawed

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 55 • Carrying high overhead to gain market share. • This strategy is untested, hypothetical analytically unsubstantiated and depends on competitive responses and market conditions including truck pricing. There is no basis for su

  56. Slide 56: Why Mr. Shaw's TOP|SPG Strategy Is Flawed (Cont.)

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 56 • Altering operation to clear congestion for intermodal through trains. • Reversing the strategy of blocking merchandise consists at point of origination or enroute and forcing them instead into yards has resulted in the numbe

  57. Slide 57: Why Mr. Shaw's TOP|SPG Strategy Is Flawed (Cont.)

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 57 • A pricing and operation design strategy enabling intermodal to grow at an accelerated rate will lead to even further congestion. • On average it takes three to four intermodal cars to equal the EBIT of one merchandise car. •

  58. Slide 58: Why Mr. Shaw's TOP|SPG Strategy Is Flawed (Cont.)

    The Case for Leadership, Safety & Strategy Changes at Norfolk Southern 58 Why Mr. Shaw’s TOP|SPG Strategy Is Flawed (Cont.) • Use of “accretive to the OR” and “incremental margins.” • A short-term strategy that accelerates rapid onboarding of lower margin intermodal. • Is misleading accounting – all

Norfolk Southern — Proxy Contest (February 2024) on 6ix