Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. · NASDAQ:INBX
Inhibrx Biosciences — Technical Presentation (October 2026)
16 slides from Inhibrx Biosciences's technical presentation, Oct 25, 2026
Slide 1: HexAgon-HN: Phase 2 Primary Analysis of Ordastobart plus Pembrolizumab in HNSCC
HEXAGON-HN: A PHASE 2/3 STUDY OF THE HEXAVALENT OX40 AGONIST ORDASTOBART (INBRX-106) IN COMBINATION WITH PEMBROLIZUMAB AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF PD-L1–HIGH RECURRENT/METASTATIC HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA—PHASE 2 PRIMARY ANALYSIS Jong Chul Park,1 Lisa Licitra,2 Eun Joo Kang,3 Dan P. Zandb
Slide 2: Declaration of Interests
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS JC Park reports research funding to his institution from A2 Biotherapeutics, ALX Oncology, Ankyra Therapeutics, AVEO, BioNTech, DualityBio, GSK, Hanmi, Inhibrx, and Pyxis Oncology; and consult honoraria from Coherus, Hanmi, and ABL Bio. Presenter: Jong Chul Park, MD Content
Slide 3: Background: INBRX-106, engineered hexavalent OX40 agonist
BACKGROUND INBRX-106: engineered hexavalent OX40 agonist • OX40 is a TNF-receptor family costimulatory receptor on 6x single-domain antibodies activated T cells that enhances anti-tumor T-cell responses simultaneously engage multiple OX40 molecules to drive hyperclustering • INBRX-106 (ordastobart)
Slide 4: HexAgon-HN Study Design
HEXAGON-HN STUDY DESIGN Phase 2/3 randomized study of INBRX-106 + pembro vs pembro as 1L tx for patients with R/M HNSCC, PD-L1 CPS ≥201,2 • CPS ≥20 selection: strongest established activity of pembro monotherapy provides clearest benchmark to test combination, and subpopulation was initially hypothe
Slide 5: Baseline Characteristics
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS INBRX-106 + pembro Pembro INBRX-106 + pembro Pembro Demographics Disease characteristics n=33 n=35 n=33 n=35 Age, median (range), y 62.0 (35-80) 66.0 (44-89) Disease status,a n (%) Sex, n (%) Locoregional recurrent 15 (45.5) 14 (40.0) Male / female 30 (90.9) / 3 (9.1) 28 (80
Slide 6: Patient Disposition
PATIENT DISPOSITION INBRX-106 + pembro Pembro Total randomized Patient disposition n=33 n=35 N=68 Ongoing treatment, n (%) 11 (33.3) 8 (22.9) 19 (27.9) Discontinued treatment, n (%) 22 (66.7) 27 (77.1) 49 (72.1) Post-treatment follow-up 12 (36.4) 17 (48.6) 29 (42.6) tumor assessment / OS, n (%) Disc
Slide 7: Primary Efficacy Endpoint: cORR
PRIMARY EFFICACY ENDPOINT: cORR INBRX-106 + pembro (n=29) Pembro (n=34) 80 cORR, 48.3% (14/29) 80 cORR, 26.5% (9/34) TL SOD best change from BL, % (95% CI, 12.9-44.4) TL SOD best change from BL, % 60 (95% CI, 29.4-67.5) 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 -20 -20 -40 -40 -60 -60 -80 -80 -100 CR PR SD PD -100 PR SD P
Slide 8: Secondary Efficacy Endpoints: PFS6mo and CBR
SECONDARY EFFICACY ENDPOINTS: PFS6mo and CBR INBRX-106 + pembro (n=29) Pembro (n=34) ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ PFS6mo, 72.4% ★ PFS6mo, 42.8% ★ (95% CI, 52.3-85.1) ★ (95% CI, 25.2-59.2) ★ ★ ★ ★ CBR, 72.4% ★ CBR, 58.8% ★ ★ CR PR SD PD PR SD PD ★ Ongoing, progression free ★ Ongoing, progression free 0
Slide 9: Subgroup Analysis by Stratification Factors
SUBGROUP ANALYSIS BY STRATIFICATION FACTORS Disease status HPV status ECOG PS INBRX-106 + INBRX-106 + INBRX-106 + Pembro Pembro Pembro pembro pembro pembro Locoreg rec, n 14 14 HPV-positive, n 10 9 ECOG PS 0, n 15 16 cORR, % 42.9 14.3 cORR, % 80.0 33.3 cORR, % 46.7 31.3 ΔORR, % 28.6 ΔORR, % 46.7 ΔOR
Slide 10: Efficacy in HPV-Positive Disease: ORR
EFFICACY IN HPV-POSITIVE DISEASE: ORR INBRX-106 + pembro (n=10) Pembro (n=9) 40 cORR, 80.0% 40 cORR, 33.3% (95% CI, 44.4-97.5) (95% CI, 7.5-70.1) 20 20 TL SOD best change from BL, % TL SOD best change from BL, % 0 0 -20 -20 -40 -40 -60 -60 -80 -80 -100 CR PR SD PD -100 PR SD PD • Greater treatment e
Slide 11: Efficacy in HPV-Positive Disease: PFS6mo
EFFICACY IN HPV-POSITIVE DISEASE: PFS6mo INBRX-106 + pembro (n=10) Pembro (n=9) ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ PFS6mo, 90% PFS6mo, 33% ★ ★ ★ ★ CR PR SD PD PR SD PD ★ Ongoing, progression free ★ Ongoing, progression free 0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 Time on study, mo Time on study, mo • Greater and durable treatment effect in
Slide 12: Pharmacodynamics
PHARMACODYNAMICS Proliferation Activation Max fold change from baseline, % of proliferating memory cells Max fold change from baseline, % of activated memory cells • Translational findings in peripheral blood in CD4+ T cells HexAgon-HN support validation of INBRX-106 as a potent T-cell co-activator
Slide 13: Safety
SAFETY INBRX-106 + Most frequent TRAEs (≥10% of patients) pembro Pembro Rash maculopapular 32.3 9.7 0.0 Patients with ≥1 TEAE, n(%) n=31 n=34 Rash 32.3 3.2 11.8 TEAE 31 (100) 29 (85.3) Fatigue 29.0 3.2 2.9 11.8 Diarrhea 29.0 9.7 5.9 Tx-related 27 (87.1) 20 (58.8) ALT increased 6.5 2.9 8.8 25.8 SAE 1
Slide 14: Conclusions
CONCLUSIONS • Addition of INBRX-106 to pembro as 1L treatment for patients with R/M HNSCC with PD-L1 CPS ≥20 improved cORR (48.3% vs 26.5%), supported by PFS6mo (72.4% vs 42.8%) • In the prespecified subgroup of patients with HPV-positive disease, a more pronounced benefit (cORR, 80.0% vs 33.3%; PFS
Slide 15: Acknowledgments
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS • We thank our patients and participating clinical sites and teams Copies of this presentation obtained through QR, AR and/or text key codes are for personal use only and may not be reproduced without written permission of the authors Presenter: Jong Chul Park, MD Content of this pre
Slide 16: Thank you!
Copies of this presentation obtained through QR, AR and/or text key codes are for personal use only and may not be reproduced without written Thank you! permission of the authors European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Via Ginevra 4, CH-6900 Lugano T. +41 (0)91 973 19 00 esmo@esmo.org esmo.org
Inhibrx Biosciences — Technical Presentation (October 2026) on 6ix