Inspiremd Inc. · NASDAQ:NSPR

Inspiremd — Technical Presentation (September 2014)

24 slides from Inspiremd's technical presentation, Sep 16, 2014

  1. Slide 1: Evaluation of PET Mesh Covered Stent in Patients with Carotid Artery Disease: CARENET Trial

    Joachim Schofer (PI) Piotr Musialek (Co - PI) On behalf of the CARENET Investigators Evaluation of PET Mesh Covered Stent in Patients with Carotid Artery Disease T he CARENET - Trial ( CAR otid E mbolic protection using micro NET ) Joachim Schofer, MD,PhD , Hamburg University CardiovascularCenter ,

  2. Slide 2: Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest

    Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest • Grant/Research Support • InspireMD Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company

  3. Slide 3: Conventional Carotid Stent: plaque protrusion may lead to embolization

    Conventional Carotid Stent Plaque protrusion may lead to early and late distal embolization

  4. Slide 4: Mean total lesion area DW-MRI post CAS

    Schofer J et al, JACC Cardiovasc interv 2008 0 10 20 30 40 50 3,5 h 18 h mm 2 Mean total lesion area DW - MRI post CAS

  5. Slide 5: CGuard Carotid Embolic Prevention System Specifications

    CGuard TM Carotid Embolic Prevention System Specifications Device Features Stent type Nitinol Self - Expanding MicroNet Aperture Size 150 - 180µ Guidewire 0.014” Foreshortening <10% Sizes Diameter( 6mm - 10mm) x Length (20mm – 60mm) Delivery System (OD) 6F (2.1mm) CE marked. Not approved for sale in

  6. Slide 6: CGuard CARENET Trial Design

    CGuard TM CARENET ( CAR otid E mbolic protection using micro NET ) Trial Design ■; Study Design: • Prospective, multi - center, multi - specialty, international, open label, single arm, non - randomized clinical trial in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis ■; Objective

  7. Slide 7: CARENET Trial Design: Population and Endpoints

    ■; Study Population: • Symptomatic pts (w/ history of a transient ischemic attack, stroke, or amaurosis fugax within the last 6 mos on the ipsilateral side) w/carotid stenosis ≥ 50% • Asymptomatic pts w/ carotid stenosis ≥ 80% both as diagnosed by angiography using NASCET methodology ■; Primary Endp

  8. Slide 8: Baseline Characteristics (n=30)

    Baseline Characteristics (n=30) Age 71.6 ± 7.6 Male 63.4% Symptomatic 33.3% (10) BMI (kg/m 2 ) 26.4 ± 3.9 Hypertension 83.3% (25) Dyslipidemia 90% (27) Diabetics 23.3% (7) Smoker: Current Former 13.4% (4) 36.6% (11) Prior MI 26.7% (8) Prior TIA 13.3% (4)

  9. Slide 9: Procedure Results

    Procedure Results Femoral access 100% (30) Target vessel Left ICA Right ICA 33.3% (10) 66.6% (20) Protection used Distal protection Proximal protection 100% 96.6% (29) 3.4% (1) Pre dilatation 70.9% (22) Post dilatation 77.4% (24) Post dilatation Pressure (ATM) 13.6 ± 4.5 Device success 100% (30) Ste

  10. Slide 10: Pre & Post Procedure Carotid Angiogram in Patient with right ICA Stenosis

    Pre & Post Procedure Carotid Angiogram in Patient with right ICA Stenosis

  11. Slide 11: Clinical Outcomes

    Clinical Outcomes Post Procedure Discharge 30 days Device success 100% NA NA MACE 0% 0% 0% Death 0% 0% 0% MI 0% 0% 0% Stroke 0% 0% 0%

  12. Slide 12: Angiographic Assessment

    Angiographic Assessment Baseline Final Lesion location (internal) 100% NA Lesion length (mm) 16.94 ± 4.7 NA RVD (mm) 6.18 5.89 MLD (mm) 1.25 4.82 Diameter stenosis (%) 79.9 % ± 5.0% 16.9% ± 6.5% (in stent) ECA stenosis (%) 18.0% 22.1% TIMI flow in ECA Normal 100.0% 100.0%

  13. Slide 13: CARENET with Distal Protection DW-MRI

    CARENET with Distal Protection DW - MRI @ 24 - 48 hrs CARENET CGuard with only Distal EPD (N=26 * ) Incidence of New Lesions 46% Lesions ( per patient) 1.62 ± 2.68 Volume (per patient) 0.061 ± 0.11 cm 3 • *3 pts unable to undergo MRI (1 = pacemaker; 2 = claustrophobia) • 1 pt with proximal protectio

  14. Slide 14: CARENET Comparison DW-MRI

    CARENET Comparison DW - MRI @ 24 - 48 hrs CARENET (Filter group) N=26 PROFI 1 (Filter group) N=31 ICSS 2 (Filter group) N=37 Incidencs of New Lesions 48% 87% 73% Avg Lesion Volume 0.06 cm 3 0.59 cm 3 NA 1 JACC, April 2012 2 Lancet, March 2010

  15. Slide 15: Conclusions

    Conclusions • CARENET trial demonstrated the safety of the CGuard TM Technology with zero MACCE at 30 days • The procedural success was 100% • Compared to published DW - MRI data of non - mesh covered carotid stents, the incidence of new ischemic lesions was reduced by almost 50% and the average les

  16. Slide 16: Back up slides

    ¢ Back up slides otct20i4

  17. Slide 17: Histopathology in Pig Carotid Artery

    Histopathology in Pig Carotid Artery 16

  18. Slide 18: Ischemic Lesions (Pre, 48hr Post, 30 day Post)

    Preprocedure MRI 48 - Hr MRI 30 - Day MRI Subjects with Lesions 2 (8.0%) 11 (46.0%) 2 (8.32%) Number of new lesions 12 42 2 Avg. Lesions (per patient) 0.5 + 1.72 1.71 + 4.77 0.08 + 0.28 Total Lesion Volume (cm 3 ) 0.33 + 1.4 0.16 + 0.31 0.13 + 0.54 Ischemic Lesions (Pre, 48hr Post, 30 day Post)

  19. Slide 19: History - MGuard Prime EPS Designed for Embolic Protection

    » Co - Cr Bare metal stent wrapped with an expandable MicroNet TM » Single strand Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) fiber » Attached only to proximal and distal crowns of the stent » Deploys exactly like a typical balloon expandable stent » Thousand’s of MGuard TM coronary embolic protection systems

  20. Slide 20: History - MGuard Prime EPS Designed for Embolic Protection

    » Co - Cr Bare metal stent wrapped with an expandable MicroNet TM » Single strand Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) fiber » Attached only to proximal and distal crowns of the stent » Deploys exactly like a typical balloon expandable stent » Thousand’s of MGuard TM coronary embolic protection systems

  21. Slide 21: Aperture Size CGuard vs Other Mesh Covered Stents

    Aperture Size 20 CGuard TM 150 - 180 microns Other Mesh covered carotid stent technology 375 - 500 microns Pore Size CGuard TM 150 - 180µ

  22. Slide 22: Patients with Ischemic Lesions DW-MRI post CAS

    Schofer J et al, JACC Cardiovasc interv 2008 0 10 20 30 40 3,5 h 18 h % Patients with ischemic lesions 0 10 20 30 40 50 3,5 h 18 h mm 2 Mean total lesion area DW - MRI post CAS

  23. Slide 23: CARENET with Distal Protection DW-MRI

    CARENET with Distal Protection DW - MRI @ 24 - 48 hrs CARENET CGuard with only Distal EPD (N=26 * ) Incidence of New Lesions 46% Lesions ( per patient) 1.62 ± 2.68 Number of new lesion 42 Volume (per patient) 0.061 ± 0.11 cm 3 • *3 pts unable to undergo MRI (1 = pacemaker; 2 = claustrophobia) • 1 pt

  24. Slide 24: Conclusions

    Conclusions • CARENET trial met primary endpoint of zero MACE (no death, stroke, and MI) at 30 days • The procedural success was 100% • Compared to published historical control groups of non - mesh covered carotid stents, in the CARENET trial the incidence of new ischemic lesions as assessed by DW -

InspireMD — Technical Presentation (September 2014) on 6ix