Portland General Electric Co · NYSE:POR

Portland General Electric — Technical Presentation (November 2010)

17 slides from Portland General Electric's technical presentation, November 2010

  1. Slide 1: Portland General Electric Company

    Portland General Electric Company

  2. Slide 2: Project Description, Expected FERC Process, PAD Review, Study Planning

    Š Project Description Š Expected FERC Process Š Preliminary Application Document Review Š Study Planning

  3. Slide 3: Investor owned electric utility in NW Oregon

    Š Investor owned electric utility in NW Oregon Š Approx. 700,000 customers (servicing 1.5 million people) Š Three existing FERC licensed hydroelectric projects ƒ Total Combined MW – 555 ƒ Includes Pelton Round Butte Project; Deschutes River, 80 miles downstream of Bowman Dam

  4. Slide 4: Install 6 MW Hydroelectric Project at Bowman Dam, Prineville

    •Install 6 MW Hydroelectric Project •Bowman Dam, Prineville Oregon •No Proposed Change in Flow or Existing Operations

  5. Slide 5: Upper Crooked River Wild & Scenic designation

    Š Upper Crooked River – designated Wild & Scenic Š Designation precludes FERC licensing authority Š PGE actively seeking congressional action moving boundary ¼ mile below dam

  6. Slide 6: Power development at Bowman Dam not reserved to federal government

    Š Power development at Bowman Dam not reserved to federal government Š FERC –Bureau of Reclamation (BuRec) 1992 MOU ƒ Allows FERC to issue License & act as lead NEPA Agency Š PGE committed to collaborative licensing process

  7. Slide 7: New Penstock, Powerhouse, Generation

    1. New Penstock à Independent of existing outlet works 2. Powerhouse à Designed with aesthetic considerations adjacent to existing spillway 3. Generation à 2 turbines - 6 MW estimated installed capacity 4. Transmission Facilities à Routed along spillway to existing transmission

  8. Slide 8: Symbiotics, LLC and PGE licensing history

    Š Symbiotics, LLC ƒ Final License application (July 2004) ƒ FERC dismissal of application (March 2005) Š PGE ƒ Preliminary Permit application (June 2009) ƒ FERC rejection (Aug 2009) ƒ Ongoing efforts regarding Wild & Scenic Re-designation ƒ Intent to pursue development/FERC licensing (2010- 2013)

  9. Slide 9: Traditional Licensing Process (TLP)

    Š Traditional Licensing Process (TLP) Š PreliminaryApplication Document (PAD) (Fall 2010) ƒ Agency consultation ƒ Development & implementation of study plans Š Conduct studies and draft License application (date?) ƒ Incorporate study results or initial findings ƒ Ongoing stakeholder consultation Š F

  10. Slide 10: Benefits of Traditional Licensing Process

    Š Minimizes initial demands on agency staff Š More flexible process for small hydro/new development Š Allows extensive & open licensing process Š Allows ongoing consultation & study modifications Š PGE’s successful experience with TLP

  11. Slide 11: PGE will convene a stakeholder group

    Š PGE will convene a stakeholder group to address issues raised by project development ƒ Irrigators ƒ BuRec ƒ Resource agencies ƒ City of Prineville ƒ NGOs Š Work toward agreement in principle on aquatic resources, water use, W&SR issues and other licensing issues

  12. Slide 12: Preliminary Application Document

    Preliminary Appli

  13. Slide 13: Contents and purpose of the PAD

    Š Contains “existing, relevant, & reasonably available information” Š Provides baseline resource descriptions Š Identifies preliminary issues, information needs, & mitigation measures Š Sets framework for discussion of additional information requirements Š Begins dialog on necessary studies and foll

  14. Slide 14: Water Quality, Aquatic, Terrestrial/Wetland studies

    Š Water Quality (temporal & diel) ƒ Baseline data collection ƒ Hydraulic modeling Š Aquatic/Fish resources ƒ Desktop entrainment ƒ Hydraulic modeling Š Terrestrial/Wetland Resources ƒ Wetland delineation ƒ Noxious weed/invasive species survey ƒ Amphibian survey

  15. Slide 15: Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, Engineering Feasibility & Design

    Š Aesthetics ƒ Visual resource survey Š Cultural Resources ƒ Phase I archaeological survey Š Engineering Feasibility & Design

  16. Slide 16: Questions

    Questions

  17. Slide 17: Next Steps

Portland General Electric Company — Technical Presentation (November 2010) on 6ix