Inventiva SA · EURONEXT:IVA

Inventiva SA — Investor Presentation (September 2021)

66 slides from Inventiva SA's investor presentation, September 2021

  1. Slide 1: Developing innovative therapies in NASH and MPS

    Developing innovative therapies in NASH and MPS Corporate Presentation September 2021

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimer

    DISCLAIMER This presentation contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this presentation, including statements regarding our future financial condition, results of operations, business s

  3. Slide 3: Inventiva in a nutshell

    Inventiva in a nutshell Clinical stage biotech with focus on oral small molecules for the treatment of NASH, MPS, and other diseases with high unmet medical needs Two unencumbered late stage assets – Lanifibranor: only pan-PPAR agonist in clinical development for NASH; positive Phase IIb topline dat

  4. Slide 4: Management team with extensive global experience in drug development

    Management team with extensive global experience across all stages of drug development and commercialization Frédéric Cren, MA/MBA, CEO and Co-Founder  Wide expertise within the areas of R&D, marketing, strategy and commercial operations  Held senior positions at Abbott, Fournier, Solvay Pharma an

  5. Slide 5: Oral small molecule-focused discovery engine

    Oral small molecule-focused discovery engine targeting nuclear receptors, transcription factors and epigenetic modulation Expertise: nuclear receptors, transcription factors, epigenetic Library of ~240,000 Wholly-owned targets compounds of which 129,000 square 60% proprietary foot pharma-like R&D

  6. Slide 6: Deep pipeline

    Deep pipeline Candidate / IND Commercial Next Indication Discovery Phase I Phase II Phase III Program* Enabling Rights Milestone  Phase III First Patient Lanifibranor NASH pan-PPAR First Visit in Q3 2021  Strategy Odiparcil MPS VI GAG clearance update in 2021  Moderate to  Phase IIB Cedirogant

  7. Slide 7: Key financials and shareholder base

    Key financials and shareholder base Key financials Shareholder base(1) Founders 25% Free Float 31% ISIN code FR0013233012 / US46124U1079 Employees & Others 2% Market Euronext Paris / Nasdaq GM Sofinnova 38,659,361 (incl. 7,478,261 shares of Shares outstanding 8% the July 9 2020 Nasdaq IPO) BVF Marke

  8. Slide 8: Lanifibranor in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

    Lanifibranor in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

  9. Slide 9: Lanifibranor: the only pan-PPAR agonist in clinical development for NASH

    Lanifibranor: the only pan-PPAR agonist in clinical development for the treatment of NASH Moderate and balanced pan-PPAR agonist activity (PPAR, PPAR and PPAR) with differentiated chemical structure Once daily oral administration Effects observed on insulin-sensitivity, dyslipidemia, steatosis, b

  10. Slide 10: Lanifibranor is a differentiated pan-PPAR agonist with balanced activity

    Lanifibranor is a differentiated pan-PPAR agonist with moderate and well balanced activity on the three PPAR isoforms LANIFIBRANOR Differentiated oral small molecule … … that binds differently than glitazone to PPARγ  Small molecule that activates all three PPAR isoforms  Differentiated chemical R

  11. Slide 11: Lanifibranor's activation of three PPAR isoforms addresses key features of NASH

    Lanifibranor’s activation of the three PPAR isoforms addresses the key features of NASH LANIFIBRANOR Pan-PPAR activity expected to ensure improved efficacy INFLAMMATION AND METABOLISM STEATOSIS BALLOONING PPARα PPARδ PPARγ PPARγ PPARα PPARδ PPARγ Insulin sensitivity FA uptake NFkB-dependent PPARα ge

  12. Slide 12: Adverse events seen in other PPAR agonists are not observed in lanifibranor

    Adverse events and toxicity previously seen in other single and dual PPAR agonists are not observed in lanifibranor SAFETY Organ Isoforms activated Reported PPAR side effects lanifibranor effects  Fluid retention HEART PPARγ  Cardiac hypertrophy SKELETAL PPARα  Myofiber degeneration MUSCLE NOT 

  13. Slide 13: Phase I and IIa trials: beneficial changes in key metabolic markers

    Phase I and Phase IIa clinical trials* in type 2 diabetes patients: beneficial changes in key metabolic markers PHASE I AND IIa Lanifibranor metabolic markers in type II diabetic patients Adiponectin (PPAR)** HDL Cholesterol (PPAR)^ Triglycerides (PPAR) ^^ baseline baseline baseline 300 p=0.0

  14. Slide 14: Improvements in metabolic parameters and liver histology in animal models

    Improvements in metabolic parameters and liver histology with anti- fibrotic activity have been demonstrated in animal models LANIFIBRANOR ANIMAL MODELS, BY MODEL TYPE METABOLIC NASH & NAFLD FIBROSIS CIRRHOSIS Diet induced obesity high Methionine Choline Carbon tetrachloride Thiocetamide (TAA) fat /

  15. Slide 15: NASH is a chronic progressive disease with no approved treatment

    NASH is a chronic progressive disease with no currently approved treatment options NASH OVERVIEW Chronic disease that may progress to cirrhosis Reversible Severe liver damage HEALTHY HEPATO- CIRRHOSIS* CARCINOMA DEATH** LIVER NAFLD NASH NASH with fibrosis LIVER c.25% of global c.25% of NAFLD TRANSPL

  16. Slide 16: The Phase IIb NATIVE trial studied lanifibranor across 247 patients

    The Phase IIb NATIVE trial studied 800 mg and 1200 mg once-daily lanifibranor across 247 patients PHASE IIb DESIGN OVERVIEW 24-week treatment + 4-week follow-up Screening Double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled End of treatment  Liver biopsy  Liver biopsy Placebo lanifibranor, 800 mg once dai

  17. Slide 17: 247 patients randomised across 71 sites worldwide

    247 patients were randomised across 71 sites worldwide, with the majority of patients based in Europe PHASE IIb DESIGN SITE SELECTION 4 sites in 49 sites in Canada Europe Patients Country randomized Europe 183 (74%) U.S. 36 (15%) Australia 13 (5%) 12 sites in the Canada 8 (3%) United States Mauritiu

  18. Slide 18: The majority of patients completed the 24-week treatment

    The majority of patients successfully completed the 24-week treatment PHASE IIb DESIGN TREATMENT ARMS 247 patients randomised and treated Placebo lanifibranor 800 mg/day lanifibranor 1200 mg/day N = 81 N = 83 N = 83 74 (91%) patients completed 77 (93%) patients completed 77 ( 93%) patients completed

  19. Slide 19: Patient population baseline characteristics

    Patient population included 58% of female and 42% of patients with T2DM at baseline PHASE IIb DESIGN BASELINE Placebo lanifibranor lanifibranor Overall Parameters (unit) - 800 mg/day 1200 mg/day - n (%) or mean ± SD N = 81 N = 83 N = 83 N = 247 Demographics Female 41 (51%) 54 (65%) 49 (59%) 144 (58%

  20. Slide 20: Liver enzyme, lipid and glucose parameters at baseline

    A number of liver enzyme, plasma lipid level and glucose metabolism parameters were recorded at baseline PHASE IIb DESIGN BASELINE Placebo lanifibranor lanifibranor Parameters (unit) - 800 mg/day 1200 mg/day mean ± SD N = 81 N = 83 N = 83 Liver enzymes Alanine aminotransferase, ALT (UI/L) 56.9 ± 31.

  21. Slide 21: First candidate to achieve significant results on both Phase III primary endpoints

    Lanifibranor is the first candidate to achieve statistically significant results on the two Phase III FDA and EMA primary endpoints PHASE IIb EFFICACY KEY ENDPOINTS xx Statistically significant xx Non-statistically significant Key Phase IIb results by endpoint N = 247 ITT population N = 197 PP popul

  22. Slide 22: Significance in F2-F3 patients on key secondary endpoints

    In F2-F3 patients, statistical significance was demonstrated for the main key histological secondary endpoints PHASE IIb EFFICACY F2-F3 POPULATION xx Statistically significant xx Non-statistically significant Key secondary endpoints in FAS F2 F3 patients (N=188) lanifibranor Placebo Placebo 800 mg 8

  23. Slide 23: Effect on histological endpoints in overall and F2-F3 populations

    Effect of lanifibranor therapy on histological endpoints, in the overall population and the subgroup of F2-F3 Reduction of 2 points of SAF Activity Score and Fibrosis improvement w/o worsening of NASH no worsening of fibrosis All F2‐F3 48% 49% 51% N=247 N=188 42% 41% 43% 30% 32% 28% 27% 24% 21% p=0.

  24. Slide 24: Statistically significant decrease in liver enzymes

    A statistically significant decrease in liver enzymes was observed PHASE IIb EFFICACY OTHER Other secondary endpoints in ITT (N = 247) Absolute change from baseline in ALT Absolute change from baseline in AST 10 10 Mean absolute change (UI/L) Mean absolute change (UI/L) 0 0 ‐10 ‐10 ‐20 ** * ** ** *

  25. Slide 25: Effect of lanifibranor therapy on liver enzymes

    Effect of lanifibranor therapy on liver enzymes Percentage of patients with normal ALT values Percentage of patients with normal AST values 73% 76% 71% 69% 54% 50% 43% 46% 38% 33% End of Baseline treatment 25% 25% (Week 24) Placebo Lanifibranor 800mg Lanifibranor 1200mg Placebo Lanifibranor 800mg La

  26. Slide 26: Significant change in HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides

    A statistically significant change in HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides was seen, without a change in LDL-cholesterol PHASE IIb EFFICACY OTHER Other secondary endpoints in ITT (N = 247) * p<0.01 **p<0.001 Absolute change from baseline in HDL-C Absolute change from baseline in triglycerides SECONDARY

  27. Slide 27: Reductions of fasting glucose, insulin and HbA1c in NASH with T2DM

    In patients with NASH and T2DM, statistically significant reductions of fasting glucose and insulin, HbA1c were observed PHASE IIb EFFICACY OTHER Secondary endpoints in patients with NASH and T2DM (N = 103) Absolute change from baseline in HbA1c Absolute change from baseline in fasting glucose 0,5 M

  28. Slide 28: Decrease in circulating biomarkers after 24 weeks

    A significant decrease in circulating biomarkers was observed under lanifibranor treatment after 24-weeks PHASE IIb EFFICACY OTHER lanifibranor Median relative change (%) Placebo Pvalue (Two doses pooled) Pro-C3 (4.1%) (13.9%) p= 0.005* OTHER OUTCOME MEASURES Pro-C3 >14 at Fibrosis (12.8%) (20.5%) p

  29. Slide 29: Lanifibranor has continued to show a favourable safety profile

    Lanifibranor has continued to show a favourable safety profile PHASE IIb SAFETY OVERALL Placebo 800 mg 1200 mg N (%) patients reporting Adverse Event (AE) (N = 81) (N = 83) (N = 83)  Any Treatment-Emergent AE (TEAE) 50 (61.7%) 59 (71.1%) 62 (74.7%) Drug-related TEAE 19 (23.5%) 25 (30.1%) 23 (27.7%)

  30. Slide 30: A limited number of serious TEAEs occurred

    A limited number of serious TEAEs occurred PHASE IIb SAFETY SERIOUS TEAE Patients reporting treatment-emergent Placebo 800 mg 1200 mg Serious AE (SAE); N (%) (N = 81) (N = 83) (N = 83) Total 3 (3.7%) 3 (3.6%) 7 (8.4%) Treatment-Emergent Serious AE linked to biopsy procedure Post-procedural haematoma

  31. Slide 31: Modest weight increase with no impact on efficacy

    Phase II results have demonstrated modest weight increase with no impact on efficacy PHASE IIb SAFETY WEIGHT GAIN  CONSISTENT WITH KNOWN INSULIN-SENSITIZING PHARMACOLOGY, a mean weight increase from baseline of 2.4 kg (2.6%) at the 800 mg/day dose and 2.7 kg (3.1%) at the 1200 mg/day dose was obser

  32. Slide 32: Peripheral edemas not flagged as a concern by investigators

    Peripheral edemas were not flagged as a concern by study investigators PHASE IIb SAFETY PERIPHERAL OEDEMA Treatment Verbatim of AE Action taken or Corrective Relationship # Intensity group edema peripheral treatment to treatment 1 edema in the lower leg and knees Moderate IMP interrupted + Meloxicam

  33. Slide 33: Physicians perceive weight gain as manageable

    Physicians perceive weight gain due to lanifibranor as manageable, with the risk profile viewed positively SAFETY  Physician express differing views on the importance of weight gain – the majority of physicians believed that given lanifibranor's efficacy profile the RISK- BENEFIT RATIO WAS ACCEPTAB

  34. Slide 34: Tolerability profile versus other oral NASH drug candidates

    Lanifibranor tolerability profile characteristics and other oral NASH drug candidates SAFETY NATIVE FLINT Phase REGENERATE ARREST BALANCED Phase IIb Phase IIb Phase IIb IIb Ph. III Phase IIb Phase IIa DEATHS None 2 3 None None None 1 9% placebo 7% placebo 11% placebo 12.5% placebo 4.8% placebo TRIAL

  35. Slide 35: Differentiated potential to address all features of NASH

    Lanifibranor has a differentiated potential to address all features of NASH in a safe and efficacious manner EFFICACY AND SAFETY Targeting all features of NASH… … ensures favourable comparison against competitors NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis METABOLISM STEATOSIS VASCULAR Fibrosis im

  36. Slide 36: Lanifibranor NATIVE results and other oral NASH drug candidates

    Lanifibranor NATIVE results and other oral NASH drug candidates DIFFERENTIATION NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis <0.001 xx Statistically significant in accordance to the statistical analysis plan (SAP) Placebo Active xx Non- statistically significant 0.03 0.045 0.0659 45% 0.051 0.1268 1

  37. Slide 37: F2-F3 Phase III consists of two parts

    The F2-F3 Phase III consists of two parts, with inclusion criteria and patient profile in line with the NATIVE Phase IIb trial PHASE III F2 F3 Patients A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, Phase III study evaluating long-term efficacy and safety of lanifibranor in adult patie

  38. Slide 38: Primary endpoint will help differentiate from key competitors

    The primary endpoint combining NASH resolution and fibrosis improvement will help differentiate from key competitors PHASE III EFFICACY  The primary endpoint “resolution of NASH and improvement of fibrosis” addresses the major pathways of the disease: achieving both of these histological outcomes r

  39. Slide 39: Phase III patients randomised across approximately 300 sites

    The Phase III patients will be randomised across approximately 300 sites worldwide PHASE III DESIGN SITE SELECTION Nativ3 countries 25 countries worldwide for close to 300 sites expected to participate Corporate Presentation | 2021 Non-confidential – Property of Inventiva │ 39

  40. Slide 40: Key milestones of the Phase III study in NASH (Part 1)

    Key milestones of the Phase III study in NASH (Part 1) PHASE III MILESTONES 2021 2022 2023 2024 F2-F3 Phase III Q3 2021 H2 2022 H1 2024 First Patient Part 1: Last Patient Part 1: Last First Visit First Visit Patient Last Visit (c.900 patients) (c.900 patients) H2 2024 Part 1: Headline results Corpor

  41. Slide 41: Ongoing Phase II trial in patients with NAFLD and T2DM

    The ongoing Phase II trial in patients with NAFLD and T2DM could provide additional supporting clinical data for lanifibranor in NASH PHASE II NAFLD T2DM TRIAL Trial design Principal investigator Primary endpoint  Prof. Kenneth Cusi (University of Florida)  Change from baseline to week 24 in IHTG

  42. Slide 42: Odiparcil – MPS

    Odiparcil – MPS

  43. Slide 43: MPS are devastating diseases with high unmet medical needs

    Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are devastating diseases with high unmet medical needs MPS is a group of inherited lysosomal storage disorders  Lysosomes function as the primary digestive units within cells: enzymes within lysosomes break down or digest particular nutrients, such as certain carbohydrat

  44. Slide 44: Despite ERT success, many unmet medical needs remain

    Despite enzyme replacement therapies (ERT) being commercially successful, many unmet medical needs remain Enzyme replacement therapies are standard of care in MPS  Recombinant human enzymes, requiring a once a week intravenous infusion over 4 hours  Limited penetration into protected or poorly vas

  45. Slide 45: Odiparcil: an oral small molecule GAG reduction therapy

    Odiparcil: an orally available small molecule GAG reduction therapy designed to treat several forms of MPS Acts to decrease lysosomal accumulation of GAGs by promoting formation of soluble DS / CS which can be excreted in the urine Oral administration and distribution in tissues that are poorly pene

  46. Slide 46: Differentiated mechanism of action potentially synergistic with ERT

    Differentiated mechanism of action potentially synergistic with ERT Odiparcil acts to divert endogenous protein-bound GAG synthesis to soluble odiparcil- bound chondroitin sulfate (CS) and dermatan sulfate (DS) synthesis Galactosyl transferase I (GTI) Galactosyl transferase I (GTI) Synthesis of prot

  47. Slide 47: Mechanism relevant to MPS subtypes with excess DS and CS

    Odiparcil mechanism of action potentially relevant to MPS subtypes with excess DS and CS MPS Type Frequency DS CS HS(1) KS(2) MPS I-H   MPS I-S 1/100,000  MPS I-H/S   MPS II Types A & B 1/100,000   1/40,000 to MPS IV Type A 1/200,000   1/240,000 to MPS VI 1/400,000   MPS VII Very rare  

  48. Slide 48: Odiparcil GAG clearance mechanism observed in MPS VI mice

    Odiparcil GAG clearance mechanism of action observed in MPS VI mice Odiparcil and GAG accumulation in livers tissues 40 GAG in liver [Area * Index] p<0.001 p<0.001 Soluble GAGs produced from 30 odiparcil are excreted in urine 20 Sulfated GAG (µg/mg of creatinine) 6000 p<0.0001 10 0 4000 WT MPS VI MP

  49. Slide 49: Odiparcil penetrates tissues where ERT has limited efficacy

    Odiparcil penetrates tissues where ERT has limited efficacy Odiparcil observed to be well distributed in tissues and organs poorly penetrated by recombinant enzymes Heart Bone Cornea Cartilage Odiparcil(1) rhASB(2) Not tested Not detected Not detected Meaningful concentrations of odiparcil observed

  50. Slide 50: Odiparcil reverses corneal impairment in MPS VI mice

    Odiparcil reverses corneal impairment in MPS VI mice Odiparcil administration observed to affect corneal structure and corneal GAG storage epithelium stroma WT MPSVI MPS VI + Odi Odiparcil effect on corneal Odiparcil effect on number Odiparcil effect on GAG storage in corneal stroma epithelium thick

  51. Slide 51: iMProveS Phase IIa trial of odiparcil in MPS VI

    iMProveS Phase IIa trial of odiparcil in MPS VI Phase IIa Population ► Safety and efficacy trial with evidence for dose selection and PK / PD response characterization ≥ 16yo ► Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03370653 15 patients double blind + 5 patients open label 6 weeks 4 weeks 26 week treatme

  52. Slide 52: Safety data

    Safety data  The clinical trial met its safety primary endpoint with a favourable tolerability profile consistent with that observed in previous Phase I and Phase II clinical trials  The majority of adverse events were mild or moderate  One death occurred in the placebo group  Three serious adve

  53. Slide 53: Odiparcil pharmacodynamics: urinary GAG levels and PK/PD correlation

    Odiparcil pharmacodynamics: total GAG levels in urine and PK/PD correlation A dose-dependent urinary GAGs clearance, used as an activity biomarker, was observed in the odiparcil treated patient population 3000 Total urinary GAG µg/mg creatinine 2000 1000 0 Bsl V4 Bsl V4 Bsl V4 Bsl V4 V2 V7 V2 V7 V2

  54. Slide 54: Efficacy endpoints

    Efficacy endpoints Not addressed by ERT (hard-to-reach Partially addressed by ERT tissues) Endurance and mobility Cardiac and vascular system  6-minute walk test (6MWT)  ECG, Echocardiogram  9 hole peg test (9HPT)  Carotid intima media thickness (CIMT)  Range of motion of left and right shoulde

  55. Slide 55: Efficacy data: trends of improvement on 6MWT and FVC

    Efficacy data: trends of improvement on 6MWT and FVC 6MWT FVC ERT-PLB ERT-PLB ERT-250 BID ERT-250 BID ERT-500 BID ERT-500 BID non-ERT-500 BID non-ERT-500 BID -150 -100 -50 0 50 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 worsening improvement worsening improvement change from reference (m) change from reference (mL) Tre

  56. Slide 56: Patients treated by ERT and odiparcil show improvements

    Efficacy data: several patients treated by ERT and odiparcil show improvements in one or several parameters Treatment Respiratory Ophthalmology Cardiology (N=10) (FVC) (COM left eye, right eye) 1 1 (slightly improved) (slightly improved) Placebo + ERT 0 Patient A(1): +4, +11 - (N=4) - Patient B: ↓ 3

  57. Slide 57: Signals of activity in patients treated only with odiparcil

    Efficacy data: signals of activity were also detected in patients only treated with odiparcil Odiparcil Respiratory 500mg Bid Ophthalmology Cardiology Range of Motion Other (FVC) (N=3) Improved range of Improved FVC motion on both Patient H NA Stable Pain improved by +18% shoulders (+17.8%/+21.0%) I

  58. Slide 58: Odiparcil: anticipated clinical development path in MPS VI

    Odiparcil: anticipated clinical development path for approval in MPS VI Phase IIa (6-m treatment) MPS VI adults (16y+)  Safety - Add on to ERT, n=15  PK, PD (uGAG) and BM (leukoGAG, skinGAG) - Not receiving ERT, n=5  Exploratory assessment of efficacy Open-label (iMProveS Extension) extension Com

  59. Slide 59: Cedirogant

    Cedirogant

  60. Slide 60: Cedirogant: a clinical stage RORγ inverse agonist (I)

    Cedirogant: a clinical stage ROR inverse agonist co-discovered by Inventiva with potential in several auto-immune diseases (I) ROR is believed to be a master regulator of Th17 differentiation and IL-17 expression, an approach validated by several successful biologics  Pharmacological inhibition o

  61. Slide 61: Cedirogant: a clinical stage RORγ inverse agonist (II)

    Cedirogant: a clinical stage ROR inverse agonist co-discovered by Inventiva with potential in several auto-immune diseases (II) Cedirogant (ABBV-157) is targeting indications where competitors have reached block-buster status Brand Company Target Posology 2020 sales(1)  Cedirogant Target Product P

  62. Slide 62: YAP-TEAD and TGF-β programs

    YAP-TEAD and TGF- programs

  63. Slide 63: YAP-TEAD and TGF-β programs

    YAP-TEAD and TGF- programs YAP-TEAD program  Hippo signalling pathway is potentially implicated in the process of cell differentiation and proliferation, tissue growth and organ size  Inventiva compounds observed to disrupt interaction between YAP and TEAD along the pathway  Potentially relevant

  64. Slide 64: Recent and upcoming catalysts

    Recent and upcoming catalysts

  65. Slide 65: Recent and anticipated key milestones

    Recent and anticipated key milestones Lanifibranor  Positive topline results of NATIVE Phase IIb trial in NASH  Breakthrough Therapy Designation granted by FDA  NATIVE Phase IIb meeting with FDA and EMA Scientific Advice  First Patient First Visit of phase III trial in NASH – H2 2021  Results o

  66. Slide 66: Contacts

    Contacts Inventiva Brunswick Westwicke, an ICR Company Frédéric Cren Yannick Tetzlaff / Tristan Roquet Montégon Patricia L. Bank / Aude Lepreux CEO Investor relations Media relations info@inventivapharma.com inventiva@brunswickgroup.com patti.bank@westwicke.com +33 (0)3 80 44 75 00 + 33 1 53 96 83 8

Inventiva — Investor Presentation (September 2021) on 6ix