Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. · NYSE:AJG

Arthur J. Gallagher & — Investor Presentation (June 2015)

11 slides from Arthur J. Gallagher &'s investor presentation, June 2015

  1. Slide 1: United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell COMPLIANCE CONSULTING | JUNE 2015 Agenda • Background for King v. Burwell – the “individual mandate” and the “employer mandate” under PPACA, and how they interact with premium t

  2. Slide 2: Premium Tax Credits and the Marketplace

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 Premium Tax Credits and the Marketplace • Two Pillars of PPACA – Individual Mandate – Employer Mandate • Both mandates are made possible by premium tax credits – Individual Mandate • Low‐income individuals are eligible for premium ta

  3. Slide 3: Premium Tax Credits and the Marketplace

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 Premium Tax Credits and the Marketplace • King v. Burwell – Plaintiffs argued that the text of PPACA, as drafted by Congress, only authorizes premium tax credits in states that actually established their own Marketplaces • Only 16 st

  4. Slide 4: King v. Burwell

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 Premium Tax Credits and the Marketplace – Employers can no longer be penalized for failing to offer coverage to FT employees who reside in states with a federally‐facilitated Marketplace • If individuals do not get premium tax credit

  5. Slide 5: King v. Burwell

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 King v. Burwell • In upholding the availability of federal subsidies for individuals enrolled in coverage in either state‐run or federally‐facilitated Marketplaces, the court held that because Congress passed PPACA to improve health

  6. Slide 6: King v. Burwell

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 King v. Burwell • The Court noted that there are three requirements to obtain premium assistance: – 1. The individual must purchase coverage through a Marketplace – 2. The Marketplace must be established by a State – 3. The Marketpla

  7. Slide 7: King v. Burwell

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 King v. Burwell • Since the Court determine that PPACA was ambiguous, it was required to determine the meaning of the ambiguous subsidy provision by considering the “broader structure of the Act to determine whether one of the [subsi

  8. Slide 8: King v. Burwell: Death spirals

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 King v. Burwell • Death spirals – Prior healthcare reform focused on expanding access to coverage – Several states imposed a two‐pronged insurance market reform approach aimed at expanding coverage • “Guaranteed issue” – Barring heal

  9. Slide 9: King v. Burwell: Three-pronged approach

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 King v. Burwell • Massachusetts introduced a three‐pronged approach instead of a two‐pronged approach – Guaranteed issue and community rating – Individual mandate – Premium assistance for certain individuals • PPACA adopted a similar

  10. Slide 10: King v. Burwell: Bottom line result

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 King v. Burwell • Essentially, the Court thus found that when reading the subsidy provision within the context of the other provisions of PPACA, upholding federal subsidies only in states that run their own Marketplaces and not in st

  11. Slide 11: Thank you!

    United States Supreme Court Decision in King v. Burwell June, 2015 Resources: ajghealthcarereform.com © 2015 GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES, INC. ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. | BUSINESS WITHOUT BARRIERS™ 21 Thank you! The intent of this presentation is to provide you with general information regarding the

Arthur J. Gallagher & — Investor Presentation (June 2015) on 6ix