Slide 1: 2027 Electric and Natural Gas Integrated Resource Plans
DRAFT 2027 Electric and Natural Gas Integrated Resource Plans Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 Agenda Friday, May 15, 2026 Virtual Meeting – 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm Pacific Time Topic State Audience • Introduction and Questions from TAC 8 • Natural Gas Availability & Resiliency Cost All Gas • I
Slide 2: Introductions 2027 Electric & Gas Integrated Resource Planning
DRAFT Introductions 2027 Electric & Gas Integrated Resource Planning TAC 9 – May 15, 2026 John Lyons, Ph.D. – Senior Resource Policy Analyst
Slide 3: TAC 9 Agenda
DRAFT TAC 9 Agenda • Introduction and Questions from TAC 8 • Natural Gas Availability & Resiliency Cost • IRP Generation Option Transmission Planning Studies WA/ID • Distribution System Planning within the IRP • Building Electrification Impact on T&D System • Gas Distribution Update 2
Slide 4: Meeting Guidelines
DRAFT Meeting Guidelines • IRP team is in office Monday – Wednesday; also available by email, phone and Teams for questions and comments • Stakeholder feedback responses shared with TAC at meetings, in Teams and in Appendix • Working IRP data posted to Teams • All TAC meetings will be virtual on Tea
Slide 5: Virtual TAC Meeting Reminders
DRAFT Virtual TAC Meeting Reminders • Please mute mics unless speaking or asking a question • Raise hand or use the chat box for questions or comments • Respect the pause • Please try not to speak over the presenter or a speaker • Please state your name before commenting for the note taker • This is
Slide 6: TAC 10 and TAC 11 Topics
DRAFT TAC 10 – Wednesday, May 27, 2025 (9:00 – 12:00 PDT) Topic State Audience CEIP Update WA Electric CETA Interim/Energy Compliance Report WA Electric Load Forecast Update All E&G TAC 11 Technical Modeling Workshop – Rescheduling, TBD Topic State Audience PRiSM Model Tour All E&G Aurora Resource A
Slide 7: TAC 12 and TAC 13 Topics
DRAFT TAC 12 Wednesday, July 15, 2026 (13:00 – 16:00 PDT) Topic State Audience Load & Resource Balance Methodology WA/ID Electric Loss of Load Probability WA/ID Electric Non-Energy Impacts All E&G Draft Preferred Resource Strategy Results All E&G TAC 13 – Monday, August 17, 2026 (13:00 – 16:00 PDT)
Slide 8: TAC 14 and T&D 5-Year Plan
DRAFT TAC 14 – Thursday, September 17, 2026 (13:00 – 16:00 PDT) Topic State Audience Portfolio Scenario Analysis All E&G Avoided Cost All Electric Resource Adequacy Results WA/ID Electric CBI Forecast and Results/Energy Burden WA/OR E&G Final Report Overview and Comment Plan All E&G Action Items All
Slide 9: Other Key 2027 IRP Dates
DRAFT Other Key 2027 IRP Dates • Oct 15, 2026 – Draft Electric IRP Released to TAC • Nov TBD 2026 – Virtual Public Meeting • Noon-1pm • 6-7pm • Jan 1, 2027 – Final Electric IRP Filed • Feb 15, 2027 – Draft Gas IRP Released to TAC • Apr 1, 2027 – Final Gas IRP Filed 8
Slide 10: Natural Gas Availability & Resiliency Cost
DRAFT Natural Gas Availability & Resiliency Cost TAC 9 – May 15, 2026 Michael Brutocao – Natural Gas Planning Manager
Slide 11: Comparing LNG and Propane Storage Technologies
DRAFT Comparing LNG and Propane Storage Technologies LNG Propane Cost: Much higher upfront capital cost Much lower upfront capital cost Staffing: Greater operational complexity, requiring Simpler operations, requiring fewer people more, higher skilled workers Sizing: Scalable at large increments Sca
Slide 12: Draft Storage Size, Operating Characteristics, and Costs
DRAFT Draft Storage Size, Operating Characteristics, and Costs LNG Propane Resource Life (Years): 50 20 Storage Capacity (dth/day): 1,037,000 30,000 Withdrawal Capacity (dth/day): 103,700 (10 days) 103,700 (~7 hours) Injection Capacity (dth/day): 7,007 (148 days) 203 (148 days) CapEx + Pipeline + $2
Slide 13: Draft LNG & Propane Storage Costs
DRAFT Draft LNG & Propane Storage Costs 4
Slide 14: Draft Resiliency Scenario
DRAFT Draft Resiliency Scenario • Pipeline capacity contracts determine how much gas Avista can move from one location to another along interstate pipelines and play an integral role in Avista’s ability to reliably serve customers. • Sometimes, however, pipelines are unable to provide these contract
Slide 15: IRP Transmission Planning Studies
DRAFT Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Transmission Planning Studies Dean Spratt, Transmission Planning Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 15, 2026
Slide 16: FERC Standards of Conduct
DRAFT FERC Standards of Conduct • Non-public transmission information can not be shared with Avista Merchant Function employees • There are Avista Merchant Function employees attending today • We will not be sharing any non-public transmission information. Avista’s OASIS is where this information is
Slide 17: Agenda
DRAFT Agenda • Introduction to Avista System Planning • Useful information about Transmission Planning • Overview of recent and planned Avista projects • Generation Interconnection Study Process • Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) requests • Large Generation Interconnection Queue • Third year into the
Slide 18: Introduction to Avista System Planning
DRAFT Introduction to Avista System Planning Avista’s System Planning Group includes: • Distribution and Gas Planning • Transmission Planning • Focus on reliable electric service - Federal, regional, state, and local compliance - Regional system coordination • Provide transmission service and system
Slide 19: Information About Transmission Planning
DRAFT Information About Transmission Planning • Our focus is the Bulk Electric System (BES) • Avista’s 115kV and 230kV facilities (>100kV) • Identify issues where Avista’s BES won’t reliably deliver power to our customers • Then we develop plans to fix it • “Corrective Action Plans” • Mandated and d
Slide 20: NERC Standard TPL-001-5.1
DRAFT NERC Standard TPL-001-5.1 • Describes system scenarios and outage conditions that must be studied • P0: everything online and available • P1: single facility outages, like a transformer • P2, P4, P5 & P7: multiple facility outages • P3 & P6: overlapping combination of two facilities 6
Slide 21: TPL-001-5.1, cont.
DRAFT TPL-001-5.1, cont. • A couple of NERC directives for the above faults • “The System shall remain stable” - Cascading and uncontrolled islanding shall not occur • “Applicable Facility Ratings shall not be exceeded” - Equipment ratings, voltage, fault duty, etc. • “An objective of the planning p
Slide 22: Two Approaches to Reliability Issues
DRAFT Two Approaches to Reliability Issues • Transmission Operations (TO) are guided by significantly different standards than Transmission Planning (TP) • TO standards provide flexibility that TP standards do not allow • Operators can push system limits to SAVE the interconnected system - Shed load
Slide 23: Standards are a Roadmap
DRAFT Standards are a Roadmap • Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC) • Ensure that disturbances in one system do not spread to other systems. - Operating agreement with 40 electric power systems established in 1967 • Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) • Responsible for coordinati
Slide 24: Transmission System Reinforcements
DRAFT Transmission System Reinforcements Planned (2027-2037) Completed Reinforcements Planned Renewables 10
Slide 25: Non-Wire Alternatives are Considered
DRAFT Non-Wire Alternatives are Considered • We are documenting this with more clarity • Non-wire options require robust wires to perform • Avista is working on the transmission fundamentals 11
Slide 26: Evaluated Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) for T-1-1
DRAFT Evaluated Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) for T-1-1 • TPL-001-5 ~ Verify T-1-1 for Long-lead Equipment • Concurrent transformer outages - Shawnee 230/115 kV outage followed by a concurrent outage of Moscow 230/115 kV transformer, results in load shedding under heavy load conditions • Coul
Slide 27: Generation Interconnection Study Process
DRAFT Generation Interconnection Study Process • Process for Generation Requests • External developers - Enter via the Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) process • Internal IRP requests - Feasibility Study… then continue through the OATT process - AVA Merchant MUST follow the OATT just like exte
Slide 28: Transition to Cluster Study Process
DRAFT Transition to Cluster Study Process • Challenges with Serial Interconnections • Large serial queues become difficult to process efficiently - Slow "first-come, first-served" study process • Interdependency of projects becomes complicated - Studying single projects is inefficient compared to st
Slide 29: Serial Process was Complex and Slow
DRAFT Serial Process was Complex and Slow Two-Phase Cluster Study Process 15
Slide 30: Current Interconnection Queue
DRAFT Current Interconnection Queue • Project in bold is currently under construction • Thirteen new projects (2,460MW) in the 2026 Cluster Study cycle 16
Slide 31: Generation Integration Cost Estimates
DRAFT Generation Integration Cost Estimates • Potential Integration at new locations on Avista’s Transmission System 17 Preliminary estimates are given as -25% to +75%
Slide 32: Generation Integration Cost Estimates, con't
DRAFT Generation Integration Cost Estimates, con’t • Potential Integration at existing locations on Avista’s Transmission System 18 Preliminary estimates are given as -25% to +75%
Slide 33: Kootenai County: 350/450/600MW
DRAFT Kootenai County: 350/450/600MW • Multiple Generation Integration alternatives were evaluated • Avista and the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) have a robust transmission corridor through this area 19
Slide 34: Lewiston-Clarkston: 100/200/300MW
DRAFT Lewiston-Clarkston: 100/200/300MW • Multiple Generation Integration alternatives were evaluated 20
Slide 35: Transmission System Expansion Projects (TSEP)
DRAFT Transmission System Expansion Projects (TSEP) • Avista is evaluating and advancing several major projects to increase capacity and interconnectivity: • Idaho Crossing Capacity Increase (ID-NW Path 14) - Conceptual projects to reinforce system ties, plus increase capacity and reliability on the
Slide 36: Wrap-up and Questions
DRAFT Wrap-up and Questions • Refer to Avista’s Open Access Same-time Information System (OASIS) link for further information regarding System Planning and the Interconnection Process at: • https://www.oasis.oati.com/avat/ 22
Slide 37: Distribution Planning
DRAFT Distribution Planning TAC 9 – May 15, 2026 Erik Lee – Distribution System Planning Engineer
Slide 38: Agenda
DRAFT Agenda • Distribution Planning Overview • Distribution System Overview • Distribution System Assessment • 2025 Distribution System Assessment Results • Current Projects, Small Generators & Large Loads • Nonwires Solution Screening Process Draft • Process Enhancement Focus Areas 2
Slide 39: Distribution Planning Overview
DRAFT Distribution Planning Overview • 3 Planning Engineers & 1 Modeling & Tools We Interface With… Engineer • System Assessment & Project Substation Distribution Design & Project System Development Design Standards Management Protection • Generation Interconnection Studies Transmission Distribution
Slide 40: Distribution System Overview
DRAFT Distribution System Overview • 4 Regions, 13 Operational Areas • 132 Distribution Substations (WA, ID, MT) • 394 ‘Avista’ Feeders • 32 ‘Foreign’ Feeders (Fed From Avista Substations & Transformers) • ~433,000 Service Points • ~53 MW Installed Rooftop Solar (Rated) 4
Slide 41: Distribution System Assessment
DRAFT Distribution System Assessment • Large Bi-Annual, Whole-Team Analytical Effort • Analyze Planning Model Using our Planning Criteria to Identify ‘System Needs’ • Formal System Assessment Report • Posted on OASIS Facility Model Load Model • Transmission & Distribution System Assessment/Planning
Slide 42: Distribution System Assessment – Process
DRAFT Distribution System Assessment – Process System Performance Criteria Loadflow-Based Analysis Facility Model (Multiyear) Model & System Need System Need Simulate Pick Optimal Base576 Load Models System System Need Viable Solution Needs Solutions Discrete Load Scenario Identification Every Syste
Slide 43: Distribution System Assessment – Process
DRAFT Distribution System Assessment – Process System Performance Criteria Loadflow-Based Analysis Facility Model (Multiyear) (And/ Or) Model & System Need System Need Simulate Pick Optimal Base576 Load Models System System Need Viable Solution Needs Solutions Discrete Load Scenario Identification E
Slide 44: Distribution System Performance Criteria
DRAFT Distribution System Performance Criteria 8
Slide 45: Facility Model
DRAFT Facility Model • ~500k Nodes • Snapshot in time from Weekly- Built As-Operated Model • Manual Rigorous QA Process • Connectivity • Powerflow convergence • Visual Verification • Hand-Model Approved Solutions in the Year We Expect Them to Become Operational Synergi Electric – Pullman WA 9
Slide 46: Load Modeling: Load Response to Temperature
DRAFT Load Modeling: Load Response to Temperature 10
Slide 47: Load Modeling & Forecasting
DRAFT Load Modeling & Forecasting • Develop 576 1-in-10 Weather Year- Aligned Feeder Load Models • 576 = 24 hr x 12-month x2 (weekday & weekend) Summer • Identify Summer & Winter Peaks (By Percent Loading) • Point-In-Time Powerflow Analysis • Perform Multiple Regression-Based Load Forecasting per Fe
Slide 48: 1-in-10 Temperature Curve – July, Lewiston/Clarkston
DRAFT 1-in-10 Temperature Curve – July, Lewiston/Clarkston 12
Slide 49: 1-in-10 Temperature Curve – Jan, Lewiston/Clarkston
DRAFT 1-in-10 Temperature Curve – Jan, Lewiston/Clarkston 13
Slide 50: 2025 Assessment: D0 (Normal State) Capacity Constraints
DRAFT 2025 Assessment: D0 (Normal State) Capacity Constraints 14
Slide 51: Lewiston-Clarkston 2035 Pre-Project (Summer)
DRAFT Lewiston-Clarkston 2035 Pre-Project (Summer) Red: > 100% Pink > 90% Orange: > 80% Green: < 80% 15
Slide 52: Lewiston-Clarkston 2035 Post-Project (Summer)
DRAFT Lewiston-Clarkston 2035 Post-Project (Summer) Red: > 100% Pink > 90% Orange: > 80% Green: < 80% 16
Slide 53: Current Projects w/Scope & Cost Estimate (2025 System Assessment)
DRAFT Current Projects w/Scope & Cost Estimate (2025 System Assessment) Name Scope Cost Estimate Lewiston Capacity Mitigation New station, existing station $13M upgrades, and feeder reconductors. Bryden Canyon / South Lewiston Transmission Reinforcement & $18M Station with Distribution Critchfield M
Slide 54: Small Generator Queue (Distribution)
DRAFT Small Generator Queue (Distribution) • 100 kW – 20 MW Name Area Size CS24-02 Spokane 0.5 MW Microgrid FT #15 Pullman 0.2 MW Rooftop PV CS26-03 Spokane 2 MW PV + BESS CS26-06 Stevens Co./ Little Falls 1.1 MW Microgrid 18
Slide 55: Large Loads
DRAFT Large Loads • Distribution & Transmission Impact Studies (June 1st 2025) • 1.6MW – 25MW Distribution • 20MW+ Transmission • Identify System Constraints and Propose Solutions • No Constraints • Distribution, Transmission, or Substation Construction Required • Present Findings in a Report to Cus
Slide 56: Nonwires Screening Procedure
DRAFT Is there an simple, economical traditional solution such as phase Nonwires Screening Procedure balancing, facility rating re-evaluation, start equipment upgrade, or load transfer? [In Development] No Yes Is the deferral potential above the Use Traditional minimum threshold? No Solution • Provi
Slide 57: Future Enhancement Focus: End-Use Customer Load Model Work
DRAFT Future Enhancement Focus: End-Use Customer Load Model Work • Build on the DER Potential Study • Enabler For Scenario Analysis • Impacts From Electrification, Cooling, etc. – any predicted change in adoption, shape, magnitude of end-use loads • Emphasis on EV & Electrification • Constraint Char
Slide 58: Questions & Discussion
DRAFT Questions & Discussion
Slide 59: T&D Costs of Electrification
DRAFT T&D Costs of Electrification TAC 9 – May 15, 2026 Robert Hughes Resource Planning Analyst
Slide 60: What makes up this cost?
DRAFT What makes up this cost? Incremental increases in demand due to electrification will require additional investments in the transmission and distribution system beyond traditional load growth. Estimated to be $304 per kW (compared to $316 in the 2025 IRP). Costs (2025$) include: • Feeders: 10MW
Slide 61: Gas Distribution System Planning
DRAFT Gas Distribution System Planning Terrence Browne PE, Principal Gas Planning Engineer Natural Gas Technical Advisory Committee May 15, 2026
Slide 62: Mission
DRAFT Mission • Using technology to plan and design a safe, reliable, and economical distribution system
Slide 63: Service Territory and Customer Overview
DRAFT Service Territory and Customer Overview • Serves electric and natural gas customers in eastern Washington and northern Idaho, and natural gas customers in southern and eastern Oregon – Population of service area 1.7 million 418,784 electric customers 380,857 natural gas customers
Slide 64: Our Planning Models
DRAFT Our Planning Models • 8,000 miles of distribution main • 120 cities • ~8 load study models
Slide 65: Variables for Any Given Pipe
DRAFT 5 Variables for Any Given Pipe Pup Pdown __ Q __D | L |
Slide 66: Scope of Gas Distribution Planning
DRAFT Scope of Gas Distribution Planning Supplier Pipeline Gate Sta. High Pressure Main Reg. Reg. Reg. Distribution Main and Services
Slide 67: Scope of Gas Distrib. Planning cont.
DRAFT Scope of Gas Distrib. Planning cont. Gate Gate Sta. Sta. Reg. Reg. Reg. Gate Sta. Reg. Reg.
Slide 68: SynerGi (SynerGEE, Stoner) Load Study
DRAFT SynerGi (SynerGEE, Stoner) Load Study • Simulate distribution behavior • Identify low pressure areas • Test reinforcements • Measure reliability
Slide 69: Creating a Pipeline Model
DRAFT Creating a Pipeline Model • Elements – Pipes, regulators, valves – Attributes: Length, internal diameter, roughness • Nodes – Sources, usage points, pipe ends – Attributes: Flow, pressure
Slide 70: Estimating Customer Usage
DRAFT Estimating Customer Usage • Gathering Data – Days of service – Degree Days – Usage – Name, Address, Revenue Class, Rate Schedule…
Slide 71: Estimating Customer Usage cont.
DRAFT Estimating Customer Usage cont. Avg. Daily Heating Cooling Temperature Degree Days Degree Days ('Fahrenheit) (HDD) (CDD) • Degree Days 85 80 20 15 – Heating (HDD) 75 70 10 5 – Cooling (CDD) 65 60 0 5 0 55 10 • Temperature - Usage Relationship 50 15 45 20 – Load vs. HDD’s 40 25 35 30 – Base Loa
Slide 72: Heat Base Load vs. Temperature
DRAFT Load vs. Temperature 0.80 5 y = 0.0129x + 0.1175 0.70 0.60 0.50 Mcfh 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 7 T r T r oO t=) 10 15 20 25 Heating Degree Days \ Summary / 109735 / 103678 / 114268 / 114279 },Charti_“ 133049 / 156920 / 161549 f 208478 ,|< 45
Slide 73: Coeur D'Alene Area
Coeur D’Alene Area DRAFT Current System Spirit Lake Athol Rathdrum Hayden Lake Fernan Lake Post Falls Coeur d’Alene Lake
Slide 74: Coeur D'Alene Area – 50 HDD
Coeur D’Alene Area DRAFT Current System 50 HDD
Slide 75: Coeur D'Alene Area – 55 HDD
Coeur D’Alene Area DRAFT Current System 55 HDD
Slide 76: Coeur D'Alene Area – 60 HDD
Coeur D’Alene Area DRAFT Current System 60 HDD
Slide 77: Monitoring Our System
DRAFT Monitoring Our System • Electronic Pressure Recorders • Daily Feedback • Real time if necessary • Validates our Load Studies
Slide 78: Validating Model
DRAFT Validating Model • Simulate recorded condition • Electronic Pressure Recorders – Do calculated results match field data? • Gate Station Telemetry – Do calculated results match source data? • Possible Errors – Missing pipe – Source pressure changed – Industrial loads
Slide 79: Planning Criteria – 2026
DRAFT Planning Criteria – 2026 • Reliability during design HDD – Spokane 81 HDD (avg. daily temp. -16’ F) – Medford 60 HDD (avg. daily temp. 5’ F) – Klamath Falls 72 HDD (avg. daily temp. -7’ F) – La Grande 75 HDD (avg. daily temp. -10’ F) – Roseburg 54 HDD (avg. daily temp. 11’ F) • Maintain minimu
Slide 80: Coeur D'Alene Area – 60 HDD
Coeur D’Alene Area DRAFT Current System 60 HDD
Slide 81: Coeur D'Alene Area – 65 HDD
Coeur D’Alene Area DRAFT Current System 65 HDD
Slide 82: Coeur D'Alene Area – 70 HDD
Coeur D’Alene Area DRAFT Current System 70 HDD
Slide 83: Coeur D'Alene Area – 75 HDD
Coeur D’Alene Area DRAFT Current System 75 HDD
Slide 84: Coeur D'Alene Area
DRAFT Coeur D’Alene Area Current System 75 HDD Hayden Lake
Slide 85: Coeur D'Alene Area
Facilities Color By: Internal Diameter (inches) DRAFT Coeur D’Alene Area < 1.900 Current System 1.900 – 2.800 2.800 – 3.670 3.670 – 5.400 5.400 – 7.900 7.900 – 10.000 10.000 – 12.000 12.000 – 13.000 > 13.000 Hayden Lake
Slide 86: Fixes and Reinforcements
DRAFT Fixes and Reinforcements • Identify Low Pressure Areas – Number of feeds – Proximity to source • Looking for Most Economical Solution – Length (minimize) – Construction obstacles (minimize) • Lead Times: – Design and engineering; 12 months – Real estate, permits, and environmental; 6-24 months
Slide 87: Proposed 2" PE Tie-ins (Proposal 1)
DRAFT Proposed 2” PE Tie-ins (Proposal 1) Facilities Color By: Internal Diameter (inches) < 1.900 1.900 – 2.800 2.800 – 3.670 3.670 – 5.400 5.400 – 7.900 7.900 – 10.000 10.000 – 12.000 12.000 – 13.000 > 13.000
Slide 88: Proposed 6" PE 1,080' (Proposal 2)
DRAFT Proposed 6” PE 1,080’ (Proposal 2) Facilities Color By: Internal Diameter (inches) < 1.900 1.900 – 2.800 2.800 – 3.670 3.670 – 5.400 5.400 – 7.900 7.900 – 10.000 10.000 – 12.000 12.000 – 13.000 > 13.000
Slide 89: Proposed 4" PE 2,000' (Proposal 3)
Proposed 4” PE 2,000’ DRAFT Facilities Color By: Internal Diameter (inches) (Proposal 3) < 1.900 1.900 – 2.800 2.800 – 3.670 3.670 – 5.400 5.400 – 7.900 7.900 – 10.000 10.000 – 12.000 12.000 – 13.000 > 13.000 Hayden Lake
Slide 90: Coeur D'Alene Area
DRAFT Coeur D’Alene Area Current System 75 HDD Hayden Lake
Slide 91: Coeur D'Alene Area With Proposals 1,2
DRAFT Coeur D’Alene Area With Proposals 1,2 75 HDD
Slide 92: Coeur D'Alene Area With Proposals 1,2,3
DRAFT Coeur D’Alene Area With Proposals 1,2,3 75 HDD
Slide 93: Non-Pipe Alternatives (NPAs) Studies
DRAFT Non-Pipe Alternatives (NPAs) Studies • Grants Pass • Roseburg
Slide 94: Grants Pass, OR
DRAFT Grants Pass, OR 57 HDD (60 HDD design) pressure criteria failure (white) reinforcement required future reinforcement watch (red & dark orange)
Slide 95: Roseburg, OR
DRAFT pressure criteria failure (white) reinforcement required Roseburg, OR 47 HDD (54 HDD design) future reinforcement watch (dark orange)
Slide 96: Areas Currently Monitoring for Low Pressure and Proposed Solutions
DRAFT Areas Currently Monitoring for Low Pressure and Proposed Solutions* • Grants Pass, OR • Roseburg, OR • Airway Heights, WA • North Spokane, WA • Liberty Lake, WA • Schweitzer Resort, ID • Hayden, ID • Moscow, ID *Notes: – List not comprehensive – projects are subject to change and will be revie
Slide 97: City Gate Stations Currently Monitoring and Proposed Solutions
DRAFT City Gate Stations Currently Monitoring and Proposed Solutions* • Observation and Monitoring: • Rebuild and Enhancement: – Sutherlin, OR – Malin, OR: 2026 – Medford, OR – Spokane West, WA: 2027+ – Medical Lake, WA – Mead, WA: 2028 + – Mica, WA – Pullman, WA *Notes: – CDA E, ID – List not compr
Slide 98: Questions and Discussion
DRAFT Questions and Discussion Mission Using technology to plan and design a safe, reliable, and economical distribution system