Sampo Oyj · OMXHEX:SAMPO

Sampo Oyj — Investor Day (June 2014)

78 slides from Sampo Oyj's investor day presentation, Jun 2, 2014

  1. Slide 1: Sampo Group Capital Market Day 2014

    Sampo Group Capital Market Day 2014 Peter Johansson, Group CFO 2 June 2014

  2. Slide 2: Q1/2014 results

    Q1/2014 results Profit before taxes, EURm EPS and M-to-M EPS, EUR 500 EPS (reported) EPS (comp. result) 1-3/2013 1-3/2014 396 1.00 0.88 400 370 0.80 0.66 300 0.63 0.57 204 194 0.60 200 162 170 0.40 100 36 37 0.20 0 -30 -4 0.00 -100 1-3/2013 1-3/2014 If P&C Mandatum Nordea Holding Sampo Life Group Ne

  3. Slide 3: Sampo Group P&C, life and banking market shares by country

    Sampo Group P&C, life and banking ― Market shares by country, % P&C insurance Life insurance Nordea lending Finland/If 28 Finland/ML 19 35 Finland 30 Finland/ 13 41 Norway Norway/If 24 Nordea 11 Norway/ 14 8 Sweden Nordea 15 Sweden/If 18 24 Sweden/ Denmark 7 17 Nordea Denmark/If 6 22 Denmark/ Estoni

  4. Slide 4: Nordea Purchases 24.8.2005–20.5.2014

    Nordea Purchases 24.8.2005–20.5.2014 Number of Average Total dividends Total shares % of shares purchase price Unrealized profit* 2006-2014 return, % Sampo Plc 860 440 497 21,25 % 6,46 € 3 433 180 360 € 1 585 055 896 € 90,30 % 4 *Share price 10,45 €

  5. Slide 5: Nordea Q1/2014, EURm

    Nordea Q1/2014, EURm Nordea in Sampo Group’s B/S Nordea Q1/2014 Q1/2014 (21.25%) Income statement 1,106 Operating Profit Acquisition price 5,557.3 -266 Income tax expense 840 Net profit from Retained earnings 1,428.3 continuing operations Accumulated other changes in Nordea’s equity -79.5 -9 Net pro

  6. Slide 6: Topdanmark has been a great investment

    Topdanmark has been a great investment Sampo’s Topdanmark purchases 16.11.2007-20.5.2014 Topdanmark • Acquisition price in Sampo Group’s accounts EURm 330 (in If’s accounts EURm 310) • Book value in Sampo Group’s accounts EURm 369 • Market value EURm 703 (DKK 166.7/share, 21 May 2014) Sampo Group’s

  7. Slide 7: Suomi Mutual and group pension portfolio

    Suomi Mutual and group pension portfolio • Suomi Mutual operates as a run-off life insurance company, no new policies sold since 1.1.2005. Total technical provisions EUR 5.2 billion, number of policies 200,000. • Suomi Mutual expressed interest to transfer its group pension portfolio to Mandatum Lif

  8. Slide 8: Balance sheet of segregated fund after transfer

    Balance sheet of segregated fund after transfer Expense Reserve:  Expected future expenses 22 EURm Future Bonus Reserve  Distributed to p/h in normal circumstances (FBR): 133 EURm  Buffers shareholder losses in stress scenarios Longevity Reserve:  Supplementary reserve for longevity risk 85 EURm

  9. Slide 9: 10Y government bond yield; Group Pension insurance savings

    10Y government bond yield Group Pension insurance savings 3.5 3.5 12/2013, EUR 5,654m Mandatum Life U-L, 3.0 3.0 442, 8% Norway Other, 2.5 2.5 2074, 37% Mandatum % 2.0 Sweden 2.0 Life W-P, 2311, 41% Finland 1.5 1.5 Denmark Suomi Mutual, 1.0 1.0 826, 14% 2013 2014 Source: Reuters EcoWin 9

  10. Slide 10: Mandatum Life unit-linked and with-profit liabilities

    Mandatum Life Unit-linked and with-profit liabilities EURm 5,000 4,749 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,885 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 10 Unit-linked liabilities With-profit liabilities

  11. Slide 11: Mandatum Life with-profit technical reserves

    Mandatum Life with-profit technical reserves EURm Reserve for decreased discount rate 4,300 4,229 4,200 2011 Q1/2014 108 4,100 Long term 79 75 4,000 Short term 29 83 3,867 Total 108 158 3,900 3,800 158 Δ +50 4,121 3,700 3,600 Δ -412 3,709 3,500 3,400 2011 Q1/2014 11

  12. Slide 12: Capitalization

    Capitalization 5044 EXPECTED RISK SAMPO GROUP EUR m REGULATORY BASED INTERNAL CAPITAL 10,000 FRAMEWORK ASSESSMENTS 9 697 Liability side adj. 346 9,000 Fair value reserve Vol a tile 8 794 pa rt 1026 Mandatum, EC 8,000 Equalization prov. 120 % * ∑ EC 401 1 121 7,000 6 241 ∑ EC If 6,000 5 555 Mandatum

  13. Slide 13: Sampo Group Capital Market Day 2014

    Sampo Group Capital Market Day 2014 Peter Johansson, Group CFO 2 June 2014

  14. Slide 14: If P&C

    If P&C Sampo Capital Market Day Torbjörn Magnusson, CEO 2 June, 2014

  15. Slide 15: If P&C at a glance

    If P&C at a glance • GWP of EUR 4,768m Nordic (excl. Baltics) #1 – If 18% #2 – Tryg 10% • Solvency ratio 87% / S&P A rating #3 – RSA Scandinavia 9% • 6,200 employees • If holds 28% of Topdanmark Finland #3 Norway #2 Market share: 26% • Long-term financial targets: Market share: 24% Sweden #2 • Combi

  16. Slide 16: Breakdown of GWP by country and business area

    Breakdown of GWP by country and business area Total GWP 2013: EUR 4,768m By country By business area 9% 2% 2% 13% 32% 21% 29% 56% 36% Sweden Norway Finland Private Commercial Denmark Baltics Industrial Baltics 3

  17. Slide 17: Underwriting excellence

    65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% Q2 04 100% Q3 04 Q4 04 Q1 05 Q2 05 Q3 05 Q4 05 Q1 06 Q2 06 Q3 06 Q4 06 Quarterly combined ratios Q1 07 Q2 07 Q3 07 Q4 07 Q1 08 Underwriting excellence Q2 08 Q3 08 Q4 08 Q1 09 Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09 Q1 10 Q2 10 Q3 10 Q4 10 Q1 11 Q2 11 Q3 11 Q4 11 Q1 12 Q2 12 Q3 12 Q4 12 Q1 13 Q

  18. Slide 18: Continuous efficiency improvement

    Continuous efficiency improvement Combined ratio development (%) 90.5 89.9 90.6 91.8 92.1 92.8 92.0 88.9 88.1 90.3 90.5 89.9 90.6 91.8 92.1 92.8 92.0 88.9 88.1 90.3 69.1 68.0 68.1 68.4 66.2 66.9 65.9 67.5 65.9 65.4 75.6 74.6 74.7 74.4 72.7 73.4 72.5 73.5 72.0 71.4 24.3 24.1 24.0 23.7 23.7 23.7 23.5

  19. Slide 19: Scale benefits

    Scale benefits Pan-Nordic product and underwriting system Commercial Industrial Commercial Industrial Commercial Industrial Commercial Industrial 6

  20. Slide 20: Shareholder perspective

    Shareholder perspective Return on equity (%) Dividend paid (EURm) 53.2% 1,031 39.8% 36.9% 27.5% 24.4% 25.7% 519 540 544 24.1% 488 485 494 22.0% 19.2% 406 12.4% 249 181 -0.8% 7

  21. Slide 21: Key figures Q1 2014

    Key figures Q1 2014 EURm Q1 Q1 Change 2014 2013 GWP 1,714 1,775 1.7%* Technical result 124 122 1.6% Investment result 88 102 -13.7% Operating result 194 204 -4.9% Result for the period 155 161 -3.7% Risk ratio 67.5% 67.6% -0.1-pp Cost ratio 22.8% 23.3% -0.5-pp Combined ratio 90.3% 90.9% -0.6-pp Retu

  22. Slide 22: Combined ratio and premium growth by business area

    Combined ratio and premium growth by business area 110% Private 110% Commercial 32.0% 32.0% 100% 100% 90.6% 22.0% 92.0% 91.0% 22.0% 87.8% 89.5% 88.6% 90% 90% 12.0% 12.0% 80% 2.7% 5.0% 5.1% 80% 3.2% 2.6% 2.0% 2.0% 1.7% 70% -8.0% 70% -8.0% Q1-13 2013 Q1-14 Q1-13 2013 Q1-14 110% Industrial 110% Baltic

  23. Slide 23: Nordic P&C market size development

    Nordic P&C market size development GWP (EURbn) 24.9 22.4 4.1 Finland 3.4 6.4 5.5 Norway 6.5 6.8 Denmark* 7.0 7.7 Sweden 2010 2013 *Note: 2012 figure, 2013 figures available for Sweden, Norway and Finland 10

  24. Slide 24: Overview Nordic P&C market shares

    Overview Nordic P&C market shares Nordic P&C market: EUR 25bn Other 24% 25% 28% LähiTapiola 4% Pohjola 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% Folksam 6% 5% 5% 5% Topdanmark 8% 9% 9% 10% 9% Gjensidige 8% 10% 10% LF 9% 11% 11% 10% RSA Scandinavia Tryg 18% 18% 18% If 2008 2010 2013 11

  25. Slide 25: Our focus on online operations continues

    Our focus on online operations continues Website visits • Approx. 20% more Private visits to If website compared to last year Internet sales • Private internet sales increased by 27% in the first quarter 2014 Online claims reporting • 36% of Private claims are reported online 12

  26. Slide 26: Continued value creation through underwriting excellence

    Continued value creation through underwriting excellence • Stable returns through underwriting excellence and scale advantages • Financial discipline and best-in-risk • Management commitment to continuous improvement • Financial incentives focussed on underwriting result 13

  27. Slide 27: Relax, we'll help you.

    Relax, we'll help you.

  28. Slide 28: Appendix

    Appendix Relax, we'll help you. 15

  29. Slide 29: Combined ratio and premium growth by country

    Combined ratio and premium growth by country 110% Sweden 110% Norway 97.7% 32.0% 32.0% 100% 100% 92.5% 93.5% 22.0% 89.1% 89.5% 22.0% 90% 90% 12.0% 83.3% 12.0% 80% 2.6% 2.0% 80% 3.4% 2.3% 2.0% 1.5% -0.9% -1.5% 70% -8.0% 70% -8.0% Q1-13 2013 Q1-14 Q1-13 2013 Q1-14 110% Finland 110% Denmark 32.0% 32.0%

  30. Slide 30: Presentation of Topdanmark

    SAMPO CMD 2014 Presentation of Topdanmark by Christian Sagild, CEO 2 June, 2014 1 1

  31. Slide 31: Agenda

    Agenda • The Danish non-life market • Value creation within insurance • Topdanmark has a strong business model • Highlights in Q1 2014 • What’s the trigger on the Topdanmark share? 2 2 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  32. Slide 32: The Danish non-life market

    The Danish non-life market • All of the 6 largest players, representing a market share of 71%, are quoted on the stock exchange • Efficient players • Operating with an expense ratio of ~ 17% • Expense ratio for EU peers around 25-30% • Low interest rates increase focus on technical result • Provisio

  33. Slide 33: Trend in combined ratio in the Danish market

    Trend in combined ratio in the Danish market 100 Market 95 90 85 80 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 4 4 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  34. Slide 34: New players in personal lines

    New players in personal lines Danish players behind International players behind AIG Willis ETU og Gjensidige Nem forsikring Lloyds Himmerlandsforsikring AIG Semi-aggregators Aggregators 5 5 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  35. Slide 35: Effect of new aggregators

    Effect of new aggregators Aggregators will become more important • A cost-adding factor • Therefore development of low price, stripped-down products such as entry products for cross-selling The industry has established an insurance portal − Forsikringsguiden.dk − via the Danish Insurance Association

  36. Slide 36: Agenda

    Agenda • The Danish non-life market • Value creation within insurance • Topdanmark has a strong business model • Highlights in Q1 2014 • What’s the trigger on the Topdanmark share? 7 7 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  37. Slide 37: Value creation in insurance depends not only on distribution costs

    Value creation in insurance depends not only on distribution costs Distribution power Customer satisfaction Pricing Efficiency 8 8

  38. Slide 38: Distribution power

    Distribution power Distribution power Customer satisfaction Internet-based companies are influenced by Pricing Efficiency • Insurance is a low interest product • Customers want advisory services • The Danish market is already a direct market • Dependent on attracting potential customers • Expensive

  39. Slide 39: Distribution power

    Distribution power Distribution power Customer satisfaction The Topdanmark way in the personal market Pricing Efficiency • Own sales channels • Use of risk-based prices • Strict acceptance criteria • Exact knowledge of those customer segments where we are competitive • Extensive outbound telephone s

  40. Slide 40: Pricing

    Pricing Distribution power Customer satisfaction • Risk-based pricing − micro rating Pricing Efficiency • An ongoing process • Positive risk selection Risk premium Basis for pricing 0 0 A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H Company without price differentiation Company with price differentiation 11 11

  41. Slide 41: Efficiency

    Efficiency Distribution power Customer satisfaction • Process automatisation Pricing Efficiency • Online self-servicing • Digitalisation • Lean • Using procurement power • Supplier agreements • Scalepoint • Time and material 12 12 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  42. Slide 42: Customer satisfaction

    Customer satisfaction Distribution power Customer satisfaction Improved customer satisfaction Pricing Efficiency 10% 45% 43% 44% Improved customer loyalty 9% 8.1% 40% 8% 39% 7.7% 37% Lower churn 7% 6.8% 35% 34% 6.3% 6.0% 6% 5% 30% Higher top-line growth 2010 2011 2012 2013 1. 1maj May2014 2014 Unsat

  43. Slide 43: Customer satisfaction

    Customer satisfaction Trend in retention percentage in personal segment Index 102 101.1 100 100.7 100 99.7 98 2010 2011 2012 2013 14 14 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  44. Slide 44: Earnings depend only to a limited extent on distribution costs

    Earnings depend only to a limited extent on distribution costs Distribution power Customer satisfaction Pricing Efficiency Possible that online players may reduce expense ratio But Loss ratio could deteriorate more than the effect of any cost advantage 15 15 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  45. Slide 45: Agenda

    Agenda • The Danish non-life market • Value creation within insurance • Topdanmark has a strong business model • Highlights in Q1 2014 • What’s the trigger on the Topdanmark share? 16 16 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  46. Slide 46: Share profile

    Share profile Focused strategy • Danish player • Stable insurance risks • Low expense ratio • Limited financial risk • Synergy between life and non-life The Topdanmark • Efficient capital management share is a value case – not a growth case • Limited top line growth • Profitable growth - in that ord

  47. Slide 47: Trend in technical result (2001-Q1 2014)

    Trend in technical result (2001-Q1 2014) 660 560 460 360 260 160 60 (40) Q1 2010 Q4 2013 Q1 2001 Q1 2003 Q1 2005 Q1 2007 Q1 2011 Snow loading 3rd and 4th claims largest storms in Denmark 18 18

  48. Slide 48: Trend in CR incl. and excl. run-off

    Trend in CR incl. and excl. run-off (white) 95.7 95,0 93.6 92.0 90.3 90-91 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 19 19

  49. Slide 49: Maintained high quality of insurance portfolio

    Maintained high quality of insurance portfolio • Focus on personal, agricultural and lower SME markets • Non-professional buyers • High frequency− low average claim • Risk-based pricing • Micro rating Low volatility in earnings • Improving claims trend for non-profitable customers / segments • Distr

  50. Slide 50: Reinsurance cover

    Reinsurance cover Topdanmark has a comprehensive reinsurance programme • Proportional fire contracts • XL protection against cats Is it disadvantageous that Topdanmark is only represented in Denmark? Not significantly • As reinsurers’ diversification benefit is returned to the customers via competit

  51. Slide 51: Investment policy matches profitability of insurance business

    Investment policy matches profitability of insurance business Very low probability of loss on primary business Investment risk aligned with expected profitability of primary business E (CR) ~ 90 Some investment risk E (CR) ~ 95 Significantly lower investment risk New 2008 Low, but positive bottom li

  52. Slide 52: Agenda

    Agenda • The Danish non-life market • Value creation within insurance • Topdanmark has a strong business model • Highlights in Q1 2014 • What’s the trigger on the Topdanmark share? 23 23 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  53. Slide 53: Highlights – Q1 2014

    Highlights – Q1 2014 • Q1 2014: Profit of DKK 418m (Q1 2013: 505m) • Underlying improvement in results as Q1 2013 benefitted from a DKK 136m transfer from shadow account • EPS: DKK 3.8 (Q1 2013: DKK 4.1) • CR improved marginally from 89.6 in Q1 2013 to 89.5 in Q1 2014 • Excl. run-off CR improved fro

  54. Slide 54: Buy-back of DKK 1.9bn in 2014

    Buy-back of DKK 1.9bn in 2014 • Increased from DKK 1.7bn to DKK 1.9bn • Buy-back yield of 10.9% • To date in 2014 shares of DKK 593m bought back • Leaving a balance of DKK 1,307m of buy-back for 2014 • Since 1998 Topdanmark has cancelled 72.1% of outstanding shares • From 2000 to 2013 average buy-ba

  55. Slide 55: Average yield of 9.5% (2000-2013)

    Average yield of 9.5% (2000-2013) 20 19 18 16 Yield 14 14 13 12 11.1 10.9 10 10 10 10 9 Average 9 9.5 8 8 7 7 6 4 3 2 2 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 E 26 26

  56. Slide 56: Agenda

    Agenda • The Danish non-life market • Value creation within insurance • Topdanmark has a strong business model • Highlights in Q1 2014 • What’s the trigger on the Topdanmark share? 27 27 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  57. Slide 57: What's the trigger on the Topdanmark share? None!

    What’s the trigger on the Topdanmark share? None! Index-linked share price movements in Topdanmark (Basis: Year-end 2000 = 100) 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 28 28 Sampo CMD 2 June 2014

  58. Slide 58: Any questions?

    &*' Any questions? a — Topdanmark P24 ow

  59. Slide 59: Disclaimer

    Disclaimer This presentation includes statements relating to the future. Such statements are uncertain and involve both general and specific risks. Many factors may cause a significant deviation from the forecasts and assumptions set out in the presentation. Such factors could be, for example, cycli

  60. Slide 60: Strengthening the foundation

    Strengthening the foundation Sampo Capital Markets Day 2 June 2014 Torsten Hagen Jørgensen, Group CFO

  61. Slide 61: Disclaimer

    Disclaimer This presentation contains forward-looking statements that reflect management’s current views with respect to certain future events and potential financial performance. Although Nordea believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance

  62. Slide 62: Nordic ideas

    Nordic ideas Nordea was created with the vision Today, Nordea is the that the Nordic region was one market largest financial services group and to establish a pan-Nordic platform in the Nordic and Baltic Sea region 11 million customers in 8 home markets Distribution power through 800 locations and

  63. Slide 63: The relationship bank business model has delivered

    The relationship bank business model has delivered 14

  64. Slide 64: Nordea has a unique position in the Nordics

    Nordea has a unique position in the Nordics… Global capabilities on par with Superior customer franchise international peers1 Retail Customers Corporates & Institutions Relationships Market Relationships Market (m) position (‘000s) position Sweden 4.1 #2-3 238 #1-2 Asset Capital Markets Management N

  65. Slide 65: A resilient relationship bank business model

    …with a resiliant relationship bank business model Nordea is the most …with low-volatility …and low funding costs diversified Nordic bank… earnings growth… Largest market contribution Earnings volatility1 Funding cost2 Nordea Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer 5 Nordea Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer

  66. Slide 66: Q1 2014 financial results highlights

    Q1 2014 financial results highlights 14

  67. Slide 67: Q1 2014 financial result – an overview

    Q1 2014 financial result – an overview Stable income and improving cost efficiency • Stable but low lending demand, strong underlying income growth • Strong activity in the savings area • Cost trend follows ambitious agenda, cost/income ratio improving to 49% • Continued decrease of loan losses • Op

  68. Slide 68: Improved return

    Improved return RETURN DEVELOPMENT, GROUP AND BUSINESS AREAS GROUP RETAIL BANKING WHOLESALE BANKING WEALTH MANAGEMENT RaRoCaR RaRoCaR RaRoCaR RaRoCaR 15% 14% 15% 29% 14% 13% 13% 24% Q1/13 Q1/14 Q1/13 Q1/14 Q1/13 Q1/14 Q1/13 Q1/14 INCOME 0% INCOME -2% INCOME 4% INCOME 8% COSTS -2% COSTS -4% COSTS -7%

  69. Slide 69: 2015 plan update

    2015 plan update 14

  70. Slide 70: The 2015 plan – an overview

    The 2015 plan – an overview Nordea market commitments Key initiatives and levers Strong capital generation and Capital initiative to improve the CET1 ratio increased payout ratio in 2014 and 2015 while maintaining a strong capital base Initiatives for income generation To reach a ROE of 13% at the r

  71. Slide 71: Progress on 2015 plan in Q1/14

    Progress on 2015 plan in Q1/14 PROGRESS ON NORDEA FINANCIAL PLAN 2015 IN Q1/14 CET1 capital ratio • Fully loaded Basel III CET1 capital ratio up 70 bps to 14.6% P • Risk Exposure Amount Total efficiencies of EUR 18bn of which 10bn in the quarter P Income growth • Income holding up (P) Costs • Improv

  72. Slide 72: Capital models are being continuously refined

    Capital models are being continuously refined CAPITAL RATIO REQUIREMENTS, % 18.7-24.5 4.2-5.0* 18.7 18.4 4.2 3.8 Additional local capital requirements 4.0-9.0* Local CET 1 requirements 8 8 2.5 Capital conservation buffer 2 14.5 14.6 T1/T2 4 4 1.5 2 2 CET 1 4.5 2 2 Basel I Basel II Basel III Nordea N

  73. Slide 73: Capital considerations

    Capital considerations >18-20 >0.5 3.5 >14-16 Combined buffer requirement >1.0 0.7 2.0 0-2.5 2.5 Pillar 2 buffers 4.5 3.0 Management SRB Swedish Min req SRB CCoB CCyB Other Tot Min req P2 Tot buffer (P2) mortgages P2 risks CET1 (P1) req subdebt buffers req (25% RW) CET 1 capital 14 •

  74. Slide 74: The accelerated cost efficiency programme on track

    The accelerated cost efficiency programme on track Total deliveries amounting to EUR 255m* of which EUR 45m in Q1/14 Reducing activity-related Adjusting the distribution to expenses meet changed customer P P (e.g. travelling and consultants) behaviour Increasing efficiency within IT, Reducing intern

  75. Slide 75: Longer-term strategic opportunities

    Longer-term strategic opportunities 14

  76. Slide 76: Longer-term strategic opportunities

    Longer-term strategic opportunities Structurally • From physical to digital relationships 1. improving cost • Reworking all tools and frameworks and capital • Instilling a cost conscious mind-set efficiency Expanding • Driving product capabilities 2. on core • Developing new means of financing stren

  77. Slide 77: Simplification ongoing to increase agility and responsiveness

    Simplification ongoing to increase agility and responsiveness Complexity Simplification examples • Reduce low value adding products Products • Reduce number of variations of existing products • Reduce number of processes Processes • CentralizeEliminateSimplifyAutomateMove • Re-use of processes a

  78. Slide 78: Strengthening the foundation

    Strengthening the foundation Sampo Capital Markets Day 2 June 2014 Torsten Hagen Jørgensen, Group CFO

Sampo Group — Investor Day (June 2014) on 6ix