Tennessee Valley Authority · NYSE:TVC

Tennessee Valley Authority — Technical Presentation (October 2009)

32 slides from Tennessee Valley Authority's technical presentation, Oct 22, 2009

  1. Slide 1: Supply Resource Options External Stakeholder Review

    Supply Resource Options External Stakeholder Review October 22, 2009

  2. Slide 2: Discussion Topics

    Discussion Topics ‹ Overview — Focus of Today’s Discussion — Supply Side Resources — Approach to Estimating Cost and Performance ‹ Technology Discussion — Supply Option Characteristics • Fossil • Nuclear • Renewable and Alternative • Storage — Comparison of Capital Costs — Screening Inputs ‹ Modelin

  3. Slide 3: IRP Summary Process

    Overview IRP Summary Process Focus for today Scenario (World) — A plausible future made up of Uncertainties and tomorrow one or more uncertainties GHG requirements: __% that may be written as a Total load: __,___ MW narrative hypothesis Change in load shape: __ MW Uncertainty— Issue or concern that

  4. Slide 4: Meeting Demand

    Overview Meeting Demand MW MW Projected Capacity Shortfall (Summer Peak) ‹ Capacity planning is typically about 60,000 60,000 seeking the least cost option to close the gap between projected Projected Firm Requirements firm requirements (load + reserves) 50,000 50,000 and existing firm supply consis

  5. Slide 5: Identifying the Least Cost Solution

    Overview Identifying the Least Cost Solution ‹ Capacity need filled with mix of resources that 35000 are least cost combination 30000 — Both capital and operating costs are 25000 considered (revenue requirements) — Capital cost modeled as cash flow 20000 — Operating costs based on unit 15000 charact

  6. Slide 6: Daily Load Shapes – Understanding Resource Needs

    Overview Daily Load Shapes – Understanding Resource Needs Total Available Capacity > Peak Load (reflects required reserve margin) Peaking Resources Represents surplus capacity (used for pumping or off- Intermediate Resources system sales) Base Load Resources Summer Day Load Shape 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1

  7. Slide 7: Supply-Side Resources (Cont’d)

    Overview Supply-Side Resources (Cont’d) There are many technologies to consider – cost, application, and maturity vary widely. Geography and proximity to supply source are also major factors. Mature Emerging Developmental / Conceptual Coal: IGCC with Coal: Pulverized Nuclear: BWR, Nuclear: AP1000 CC

  8. Slide 8: Approach to Estimating Cost and Performance

    Overview Approach to Estimating Cost and Performance Cost Estimates ‹ Determine required plant size and number of units ‹ Estimate capital costs — Ensure costs are for a complete plant — Base costs on 2009 dollars, assuming overnight costs. Overnight costs: • Include engineering, procurement, constr

  9. Slide 9: Approach to Estimating Cost and Performance (Cont’d)

    Overview Approach to Estimating Cost and Performance (Cont’d) Cost Estimates (Cont’d) ‹ Consider the following when comparing capital cost data — Level of the estimate (e.g., conceptual, final, based on bids) — Specific plant design (e.g., level of redundancy, amount spent to lower heat rate) — Year

  10. Slide 10: Approach to Estimating Cost and Performance (Cont’d)

    Overview Approach to Estimating Cost and Performance (Cont’d) Performance Estimates ‹ Estimate performance characteristics, in addition to capital costs — Heat rate and power output (include long-term degradation) — Fixed and variable operations and maintenance (O&M) costs — Emission rates (assume b

  11. Slide 11: Technology Discussion

    Technology Discussion

  12. Slide 12: Characteristics – Fossil

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Fossil Natural Gas – Combustion Turbine (CT) Plants ‹ Low initial capital cost ‹ Very low O&M cost ‹ Quick start and low start cost ‹ Easier to site ‹ Shorter construction schedule ‹ Very high operating cost (e.g., fuel, variable O&M, emission) Natural Gas – C

  13. Slide 13: Characteristics – Fossil (Cont’d)

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Fossil (Cont’d) All Base Load Coal Plants (coal-fired) Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion ‹ Low operating cost ‹ Flexibility on coal types ‹ Typically coal prices are low and not very volatile ‹ Smaller size than PC plants – higher cost per kW (regulatory ri

  14. Slide 14: Characteristics – Nuclear

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Nuclear ‹ Provider of baseload generation ‹ Low operating costs — Average fuel price volatility very low (long term fuel purchases) ‹ Does not create emissions of CO2, NOx, or SO2 ‹ Long lead time for licensing and construction ‹ High initial capital costs ‹ N

  15. Slide 15: Characteristics – Nuclear (Cont’d)

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Nuclear (Cont’d) MIT Study Update – Understanding the Estimates Different Estimates Largely Reflect Different Quotation Methods: Illustration 14

  16. Slide 16: Characteristics – Nuclear (Cont’d)

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Nuclear (Cont’d) MIT Study – Basis For $ per kW Construction Estimate Comparison of Five Nuclear Build Proposals in the U.S. 15

  17. Slide 17: Characteristics – Renewable and Alternative

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Renewable and Alternative Wind ‹ Mature technology, commercially available ‹ Does not require additional fuel source ‹ Offsets greenhouse gases ‹ Relatively simple design, short lead time for construction ‹ Intermittent generation – not dispatchable ‹ Best win

  18. Slide 18: Characteristics – Renewable and Alternative (Cont’d)

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Renewable and Alternative (Cont’d) Landfill Gas ‹ Mature technology, commercially available ‹ Practical for a large range of landfill sizes ‹ Converts a waste material into useable energy ‹ Capture and productive use of methane – a potent greenhouse gas ‹ Unce

  19. Slide 19: Characteristics – Renewable and Alternative (Cont’d)

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Renewable and Alternative (Cont’d) Concentrated Solar ‹ Parabolic trough technology mature, commercially available ‹ Other technology types emerging ‹ Direct, non-diffused solar resources limited to Southwest U.S. ‹ Intermittent generation ‹ High capital costs

  20. Slide 20: Characteristics – Renewable and Alternative (Cont’d)

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Renewable and Alternative (Cont’d) Hydrokinetic ‹ Emerging technology, first licensed project was August 2009 ‹ Varying capacity factors (e.g., ~29-65%) ‹ Siting and permitting issues ‹ Potential environmental and navigation impacts ‹ High cost ‹ Grid integrat

  21. Slide 21: Characteristics – Storage

    Technology Discussion Characteristics – Storage Pumped Storage ‹ Extraordinary operational flexibility ‹ Very low O&M costs ‹ Almost instant start and low start cost ‹ Very high initial capital cost, especially for a low capacity factor plant ‹ Siting challenges Compressed Air Energy Storage ‹ Excel

  22. Slide 22: Comparison of Capital Costs

    Technology Discussion Comparison of Capital Costs Capital Cost Estimates (Baseload) $8,000 IGCC w/CCS TVA PC w/CCS ‐ TVA $7,000 IGCC w/CCS Ind. PC w/CCS ‐ Ind. Nuclear ‐ Ind. New AP1000 BLN AP1000 Capital Costs ($ / kW) 2009 $ $6,000 Geother ‐ Ind. Biomass ‐ TVA USCPC ‐ TVA Biomass ‐ Ind. IGCC ‐ Ind

  23. Slide 23: Comparison of Capital Costs (Cont’d)

    Technology Discussion Comparison of Capital Costs (Cont’d) Capital Cost Estimates (Intermediate & Peaking) $8,000 $7,000 Capital Costs ($ / kW) 2009 $ $6,000 Pump Hydro ‐ Ind. N/A Solar PV ‐ TVA Pump Hydro ‐ TVA CAES ‐ Industry N/A CC w/ CCS ‐ TVA $5,000 Solar PV ‐ Ind. Wind ‐ TVA Hydrokinet ‐ TVA S

  24. Slide 24: Comparison of Capital Costs (Cont’d)

    Technology Discussion Comparison of Capital Costs (Cont’d) The following are additional industry sources used by TVA in development of capital costs: ‹ Recent TVA experience ‹ Energy Information Administration (EIA) www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/ ‹ Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) www.epa.gov ‹ EPRI

  25. Slide 25: Screening Inputs

    Technology Discussion Screening Inputs The following table provides detailed input used in supply option screening TVA RESTRICTED AND CONFIDENTIAL 24

  26. Slide 26: Screening Inputs

    Technology Discussion Screening Inputs After possible resource options are screened on policy and feasibility/maturity, remaining technologies are subjected to economic screening This screening step compares “busbar costs” for each technology by duty cycle to identify most economic options for base,

  27. Slide 27: Modeling Process for Resource Planning

    Modeling Process for Resource Planning

  28. Slide 28: Overview: The Inputs/Outputs of the Planning Process

    Modeling Process Overview: The Inputs/Outputs of the Planning Process Existing Supply Side DSM Commodity System Options Options Prices Data Environmental Parameters Constraints Reserve System Margin Capacity Planning Loads Targets Model Purchased Power Options Total Plan Cost Detailed Production Opt

  29. Slide 29: Overview: Identify the Resource Options

    Modeling Process Overview: Identify the Resource Options ‹ Supply side ‹ Purchased power agreements — Develop a list of candidate technology — Consider characteristics for conventional options using internal and external and renewable PPA characteristics sources — Capacity schedule (MW amount) — App

  30. Slide 30: Overview: Constraints and Reliability Requirements

    Modeling Process Overview: Constraints and Reliability Requirements Include modeling constraints (boundary Set the reserve margin to ensure an adequate conditions) level of reliability ‹ Set to ensure that possible capacity plans ‹ Capacity expansion modeling optimizes the reflect strategic and/or o

  31. Slide 31: Capacity Planning: “Optimized” Resource Additions

    Modeling Process Capacity Planning: “Optimized” Resource Additions ‹ Capacity planning is about finding the optimum combination of resources to meet projected demand/energy requirements over the study period ‹ The computer model is designed to optimize new resource schedule based on one key study pa

  32. Slide 32: Wrap-Up Discussion

    Wrap-Up Discussion ‹ Additional comments ‹ Recap of action items and follow-up questions ‹ Overall feedback on today’s discussion 31

Tennessee Valley Authority — Technical Presentation (October 2009) on 6ix