Canalaska Uranium Ltd · TSXV:CVV

Canalaska Uranium — Technical Presentation (January 2011)

29 slides from Canalaska Uranium's technical presentation, Jan 18, 2011

  1. Slide 1: 2010 Technical Report for the Hodgson Project, Saskatchewan

    2010 TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE HODGSON PROJECT, SASKATCHEWAN FOR CANALASKA URANIUM LTD . Prepared by: Peter Daubeny, M.Sc., P.Geo September 2010 i SUMMARY The Hodgson project is located in the east central part of the Athabasca basin and is comprised of six mineral claims totalling 249.4 km 2 . The c

  2. Slide 2: Hodgson Project road access and area mineral deposits

    1. Hodgson Project road access and area mineral deposits ACCESS, CLIMATE, TOPOGRAPHY AND INFRASTRUCTURE The Hodgson property is located approximately 700 km northeast of Saskatoon and 70 km south south-east of Points North Landing. Points North Landing is accessed by Saskatchewan Highway 905 from La

  3. Slide 3: Hodgson Project claim block physiography

    2. Hodgson Project claim block physiography HISTORY The geologic trend of the sub-Athabasca Group rocks of the project area lies directly northwest but is otherwise parallel to the of the strike of the trend defined by the McArthur, Millennium and Key Lake deposits and ground that is now covered by

  4. Slide 4: Hodgson Project air and ground EM conductors and historic drill holes

    3. Hodgson Project air and ground EM conductors and historic drill holes

  5. Slide 5: Hodgson Project regional TMI and area mineral occurrences

    4. Hodgson Project regional TMI and area mineral occurrences GEOLOGICAL SETTING 5.1 Regional Geology Setting The area of the Hodgson project is underlain by the Athabasca Basin, which consists of essentially flat lying un-metamorphosed sandstone, conglomerate, and siltstone of Paleo Proterozoic age

  6. Slide 6: Geology of the Athabasca Basin

    5. Geology of the Athabasca Basin 5.2 Property Geology Geologic Atlas of Saskatchewan interpreted geology indicates that Dunlop Member (MFd) sandstone of the Manitou Falls Formation underlies the Hodgson project property. The Manitou Falls Formation has been subdivided into four members by Ramaekers

  7. Slide 7: Unconformity-associated uranium deposit models

    6. Unconformity-associated uranium deposit models Basement hosted deposits typically have narrow, inverted alteration halos along the sides of the basement structure. Halos can grade from illite ± sudoite directly adjacent to mineralization through sudoite ± illite, to Fe-Mg chlorite ± sudoite on th

  8. Slide 8: Hodgson Property uranium in lake sediments

    7. Hodgson Property uranium in lake sediments

  9. Slide 9: Hodgson Property boulder hosted illite

    8. Hodgson Property boulder hosted illite

  10. Slide 10: Hodgson Property boulder hosted boron

    9. Hodgson Property boulder hosted boron

  11. Slide 11: Hodgson Property boulder hosted dravite

    10. Hodgson Property boulder hosted dravite

  12. Slide 12: Hodgson Property boulder hosted uranium

    11. Hodgson Property boulder hosted uranium 8.1.3 Geochemical sampling summary and conclusions Lake sediment sampling in the Hodgson Project area has returned an anomalously high number of samples showing greater than 1 ppm uranium and clusters of drainages hosting anomalous samples occur in at leas

  13. Slide 13: Sandstone, unconformity and basement hosted conductors

    12. Sandstone, unconformity and basement hosted conductors. Irving (2006) examined the “processing outcomes” from the VTEM survey and selected three target zones that now lie in or near the current Hodgson claim block. All of these target zones broadly correlate with magnetic lows indicating that Ap

  14. Slide 14: 2006 survey VTEM target areas on channel (micro-levelled)

    13. 2006 survey VTEM target areas on channel 810 (micro-levelled)

  15. Slide 15: VTEM Target Zone A, Line 6090

    (=) s ok Line L6090 <<< VTEM Ch 3-29 a st & © ww f=) [=] 3 CN 2 a 2 am S a p= 470000 470500 471000 i=) Line L6090 <<< LEI CDS _ e-L 600 F300 isp) oot am t © ; w Claim boundary sec 2000 bi é 3 i=) o 1000 S| o “i ra + o m0 ma 20 470000 TMI Example Line 6090 VTEM target zone A, as delineated on line 60

  16. Slide 16: VTEM Target Zone B, Line 5850

    Line L5850 <<< VTEM Ch 3-29 pv/Am*4 1 1 1 1 475500 476000 476500 477000 Line L5850 >>> LEI CDS A Claim boundary 3000 2000 Elevm 475500 476000 476500 477000 TMI Example Line 5850 VTEM target zone B, as delineated on line 5850 >) CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. Hodgson Project VTEM Target Zone B Line 5850 ‘Con

  17. Slide 17: VTEM Target Zone C

    AMAT AdTau AAA ATO pines T™ be RERE, Example Line 5780 VTEM target zonec, as delineated on line 5790 CanAlaska Uranium Ltd, Hodgson Project VTEM Target Zone C Line 9790 rae"

  18. Slide 18: Hodgson Project TMI on GSC regional total field magnetic fabric

    17. Hodgson Project TMI on GSC regional total field magnetic fabric.

  19. Slide 19: Hodgson Project residual magnetic field (micro levelled)

    18. Hodgson Project residual magnetic field (micro levelled). 8.2.3 Audio Magneto Telluric survey During the summer of 2007, CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. contracted Geosystem Canada Inc. of Ottawa Ontario to carry out a reconnaissance scale Audio Magneto Telluric survey over parts of the property (Geosyst

  20. Slide 20: 2007 AMT survey line and station locations

    19. 2007 AMT survey line and station locations.

  21. Slide 21: Magnetic induction arrows and basement conductors

    20. Magnetic induction arrows and basement conductors.

  22. Slide 22: 2D inversion model profile 32H

    21. 2D inversion model profile 32H.

  23. Slide 23: 2D inversion model profile 24H

    22. 2D inversion model profile 24H.

  24. Slide 24: 2D inversion model profile 14H

    23. 2D inversion model profile 14H.

  25. Slide 25: 2D inversion model profile 6H

    24. 2D inversion model profile 6H. Figure 25, Figure 26 and Figure 27 show resistivity depth slices at -100, -200 and -400 metres above sea level (a.s.l.) from a resistivity-depth model created using 3D inversion of the Hodgson AMT data. Slices at these depths best exemplify anomalies that maybe spa

  26. Slide 26: Interpreted resistivity at -100 metres a.s.l.

    25. Interpreted resistivity at -100 metres a.s.l.

  27. Slide 27: Interpreted resistivity at -200 metres a.s.l.

    26. Interpreted resistivity at -200 metres a.s.l.

  28. Slide 28: Interpreted resistivity at -400 metres a.s.l.

    27. Interpreted resistivity at -400 metres a.s.l. SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH Samples collected from Athabasca Group sandstone boulders consisted of a chip taken from each of the 10 most angular sandstone boulders located in a 10 metre radius of each station. Efforts were made to avoid sampling con

  29. Slide 29: Certificate of Author

    19 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR I, Peter Daubeny, P.Geo., a self-employed geological consultant residing at suite 402- 1245 Nicola Street, V6G 2E7 do hereby certify that: 10. 1. 1 graduated with a M.Sc. in mineral exploration from Queens University in Kingston, Ontario (2002) and with a B.Sc. in geology fr

Canalaska Uranium — Technical Presentation (January 2011) on 6ix