Great Portland Estates plc · LSE:GPE

Great Portland Estates — FY2002 Earnings Presentation

35 slides from Great Portland Estates's earnings presentation, Jun 6, 2002

  1. Slide 1: Great Portland Estates Preliminary Results 2002

    GREAT PORTLAND ESTATES P.L.C. PRELIMINARY RESULTS 2002 1

  2. Slide 2: Agenda

    Agenda Toby Courtauld Introduction John Whiteley Business Highlights Financial Results Toby Courtauld Reshaped GPE Portfolio Analysis Asset Strategy Themes People and Process Outlook Toby Courtauld Good morning everyone and welcome to Great Portland’s Annual Results Presentation – and my first in th

  3. Slide 3: John Whiteley, Finance Director

    John Whiteley Finance Director John Whiteley Thank you Toby. Good morning everyone. What I would like to do over the next few minutes is to run through the major events of the year ended 31 March 2002 and then to look at the way in which they have affected the results for the year and the balance sh

  4. Slide 4: Business Highlights

    Business Highlights • Adjusted earnings up 7.6% to 12.7p per share (2001: 11.8p) • Dividend up 2.6% to 10.0p per share (2001: 9.75p) • Like-for-like rent up 6.5% to £71.4m (2001: £67.0m) • Adjusted diluted net assets down 11.9% to 349p (2001: 396p) • West End planning permissions • Repositioning of

  5. Slide 5: Repositioning of GPE: Three Year Activity

    Repositioning of GPE Three Year Activity Since 2000 2001 2002 31.3.02 Total Year to 31st March (£m) (£m) (£m) (£m) (£m) Disposals 99.3 402.7 360.4 - 862.4 Return of capital - 285.4 - - 285.4 Share buybacks 38.4 0.4 30.3 - 69.1 Retirement of - 57.9 129.2 197.0 384.1 expensive debt Since 1 April 1999

  6. Slide 6: Profit & Loss Account – Underlying Revenue

    Profit & Loss Account – Underlying Revenue Year ended 31st March 2002 2001 £m £m Rent receivable 85.3’ 106.8’ Ground rents (1.7) (1.9) Net rental income 83.6’ 104.9’ Property & admin (7.5) (8.0) Net interest (40.3) (52.8) Trading profits 0.4’ - Profits before tax 36.2’ 44.1’ Tax (9.8) (11.3) Profit

  7. Slide 7: Rent Receivable: Movement in the Year

    Rent Receivable Movement in the year £m Year ended 31st March 2001 106.8 Disposals (26.9) Expiries (0.9) Lettings & renewals 3.0 Rent reviews 3.3 Year ended 31st March 2002 85.3 Clearly, the main reason for the fall in rent receivable has been the disposal of properties both this year and last. Expi

  8. Slide 8: Rent Receivable: Rent Roll and Reversion

    Rent Receivable 5 year At 31st March 2002 Rent roll reversion Reversion £m £m % North of Oxford St Offices 18.1 5.2 29 Rest of West End Offices 14.0 1.8 13 West End Retail 11.5 1.7 15 West End 43.6 8.7 20 City & Holborn 17.5 4.2 24 Central London 61.1 12.9 21 South East Offices 8.8 0.2 2 Other 1.5 0

  9. Slide 9: Profit & Loss Account

    Profit & Loss Account Year ended Underlying Exceptional Capital Deferred 31st March 2002 £m revenue items loss tax Total Rent receivable 85.3 ’ 85.3 ’ Ground rents (1.7) (1.7) Net rental income 83.6 ’ 83.6 ’ Property & admin (7.5) (0.3) (7.8) Net interest (40.3) (30.3) (70.6) Trading profits 0.4’ 0.

  10. Slide 10: Balance Sheet

    Balance Sheet As at 31st March 2002 2001 £m £m Property assets 1,076.1 1,502.6 Net debt (334.0) (597.5) Other liabilities (40.3) (57.7) Net assets 701.8 847.4 Deferred tax 14.9 17.7 Adjusted net assets 716.7 865.1 Adjusted net assets per share 353p 404p Adjusted diluted net assets per share 349p 396

  11. Slide 11: Movement in Adjusted Diluted NAV

    Movement in Adjusted Diluted NAV Pence per share NAV FRS 13 CGT At 31st March 2001 396’ (29) (23) Share buy-backs 6’ (2) (1) Revaluation (45) - 11’ Profit before 12’ - - exceptionals Exceptionals (10) 9’ - Dividend (9) - - Loss on disposals (1) - - At 31st March 2002 349’ (22) (13) Since 1st April 2

  12. Slide 12: The Valuation

    The Valuation Value Change Effect on NAV As at 31st March 2002 £m % pence North of Oxford St Offices 332.6 (11.0) (19) Rest of West End Offices 210.2 (8.0) (8) West End Retail 172.7 (7.4) (6) West End Total 715.5 (9.3) (33) City & Holborn 248.8 (2.5) (3) Central London 964.3 (7.6) (36) South East Of

  13. Slide 13: Reshaped GPE

    Reshaped GPE 31st March Pro 1999 Forma Weighted average cost of debt 8.3% 6.6% Interest cover 2.1x 2.3x FRS13 liability - net 31p 2p Balance sheet gearing 55% 60% As a consequence of the actions undertaken in the past twelve months, and following the purchase of our 10.75% Debenture 2021, we now hav

  14. Slide 14: Toby Courtauld, Chief Executive

    Toby Courtauld Chief Executive 14

  15. Slide 15: Agenda

    Agenda Toby Courtauld Introduction John Whiteley Business Highlights Financial Results Toby Courtauld Reshaped GPE Portfolio Analysis Asset Strategy Themes People and Process Outlook Toby Courtauld My first task during the eight weeks since I joined Great Portland has been to understand our business

  16. Slide 16: Reshaped GPE

    Reshaped GPE 31st March Pro 1999 Forma Weighted average cost of debt 8.3% 6.6% Interest cover 2.1x 2.3x FRS13 liability - net 31p 2p Balance sheet gearing 55% 60% Number of properties 157 70 Number of tenants 1,005 343 Average lot size £10.9m £15.4m % portfolio unsecured 53% 64% Looking at our busin

  17. Slide 17: Reshaped GPE: Portfolio by Value

    Reshaped GPE Portfolio by value % 90 80 70 60 50 London 40 Other 30 20 10 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 As you know, we are now a central London property company – 90% by value being in the Capital. The remaining 10% is made up of South East offices and our leisure development in Northampton. 17

  18. Slide 18: Portfolio Analysis: By Value

    Portfolio Analysis By Value 2% N. of Oxford St Offices 8% Rest of West End Offices 31% West End Retail 23% City & Holborn South East Offices Other 16% 20% Of the £964m in Central London, £715m is in the West End, with the remainder in the City and Holborn. We have a broad exposure across London, but

  19. Slide 19: Portfolio Analysis: Weighted Average Rental Values

    Portfolio Analysis Weighted Average Rental Values (£ psf) £ psf Average ERV 50 Average Rent 45 Previous year 40 ERV 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 North of Res t of West West End City & South East Other Oxford St End Of fices Retail Holborn Offices Offices We have a low average rent per sq ft. Looking at ave

  20. Slide 20: Portfolio Analysis: Rental Values and Outlook

    Portfolio Analysis Weighted Average Rental Values (£ psf) £ psf Average ERV 50 Average Rent 45 Previous year 40 ERV 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 North of Res t of West West End City & South East Other Oxford St End Of fices Retail Holborn Offices Offices What about the outlook for rents? 〈 We see West End

  21. Slide 21: Portfolio Analysis: ERV Analysis

    Portfolio Analysis ERV Analysis Rent passing £71.4m Current voids £1.0m Current refurbishments £1.5m Lease renewals £4.2m Rent reviews £9.0m £87.1m ERV rates relate to 5 year period So returning to our own portfolio, where does the rental uplift come from? As you can see, the majority is lease renew

  22. Slide 22: Portfolio Analysis: Expiry Profile

    Portfolio Analysis Expiry Profile (by rent) 15+ yrs 3.2% 10 - 15 yrs 0 - 5 yrs 26.8% 33.9% 5 - 10 yrs 36.1% Weighted average length of lease 7.6 years (2001: 8.9 years) I’ve already mentioned our weighted average lease length. This pie chart shows two important points. First, exactly 70% of our inco

  23. Slide 23: Portfolio Analysis: Occupier Profile

    Portfolio Analysis Occupier Profile Retailers Banking & Finance 21.1% 19.7% Government Media & Marketing 9.8% 15.8% Corporates 6.7% Professional IT & 19.4% Telecoms 7.5% Great Portland has a well diversified tenant base. I, for one, hadn’t appreciated the extent of our diversity before carrying out

  24. Slide 24: Portfolio Analysis: Yield Profile

    Portfolio Analysis Yield Profile Basis point Initial Yield Equivalent movement since % Yield % 31.03.01 North of Oxford St Offices 5.3 7.3 +58 Rest of West End Offices 6.3 7.2 +32 West End Retail 5.9 6.6 +56 West End 5.7 7.2 +52 City & Holborn 6.8 7.4 -19 Central London 6.0 7.2 +36 South East Office

  25. Slide 25: Portfolio Observations

    Portfolio Observations • 36% weighting North of Oxford Street • Low average rents ... … but limited reversionary upside • Consistently low void rates … … despite short average lease lengths • Well diversified tenant base So, some observations at this statistical look at our portfolio, 〈 We are 36% w

  26. Slide 26: Critical Mass

    Critical Mass GREAT PORTLAND ST TITCHMOR BISHOPSGATE BARNARDS INN KNIGHTON HOUSE MARKET PLACE I’d like now to move on from the statistical make up of our portfolio and look at some of the specific asset characteristics within our portfolio. I use the expression “Critical Mass” to define an important

  27. Slide 27: Great Portland Street Estate

    Great Portland Street Estate • 32 properties • 700,000 sq. ft. • 131 tenants • Offers a range of type, size & quality of space Stretching to 32 properties with 131 tenants over 700,000 sq ft of space, this estate is, in many ways, analogous to a shopping centre – we gain a degree of commercial power

  28. Slide 28: 190 Great Portland Street

    190 Great Portland Street 190 G REAT PORTLAND ST • 87,000 sq. ft. • Adjoins redeveloped 160 Great Portland St • Planning permission granted (118,000 sq. ft.) For example, 190 Great Portland Street – 83,000 sq ft of existing space represented by the dark blue area on this slide, adjoining our develop

  29. Slide 29: Titchmor Block

    Titchmor B lock • 143,000 sq. ft. • Rolling refurbishment at successful Elsley House • From modern offices to ‘studio’ space • Medium term significant development • Planning permission granted (193,000 sq. ft.) Similarly, at the junction of Mortimer Street, Great Titchfield and Wells Street, we gain

  30. Slide 30: Bishopsgate Block

    Bishopsgate Block • 160,000 sq. ft. • Prime city location • Medium term, significant development opportunity • Full development review initiated Moving to the City, our properties in Bishopsgate represent another such holding with critical mass. Here we have 160,000 sq ft in a prime City location pr

  31. Slide 31: Tower Cluster

    “Tower Cluster” 1. Stock Exchange BISHOPSGATE BLOCK. Tower 2. Tower 42 3. 99 Bishopsgate 4. 6-8 & 22-24 5 Bishopsgate 3 5. Heron Tower 6. Swiss Re 2 7. CGNU Tower 9 8. 122 Leadenhall 1 6 7 9. St Botolophs 4 8 Source: Knight Frank Research & Consultancy As you can see we sit bang in the centre of the

  32. Slide 32: Portfolio Observations

    Portfolio Observations • 36% weighting North of Oxford Street • Low average rents ... … but limited reversionary upside • Consistently low void rates … … despite short average lease lengths • Well diversified tenant base • Quality blocks and clusters with critical mass - 50% of portfolio by value •

  33. Slide 33: Asset Strategy Themes

    Asset Strategy Themes • Central London • Critical mass • More developments and major refurbishments • Higher churn rates, beginning with sale of prospective non-performers • Asset management a priority • Growing income profile I hope from my look at our portfolio - and from some of my comments - tha

  34. Slide 34: People & Process

    People & Process • Skills audit – Asset management – Development – Corporate finance / tax • Property business planning and management information review • Development reviews • Decision making / monitoring As I hope is apparent, we are going to have a pretty full agenda ahead of us at GPE. To get i

  35. Slide 35: Outlook

    Outlook • Strong, flexible balance sheet • Core markets: strong presence, looking to expand • Building teams • Changing culture We face some significant challenges, both within GPE and in our markets. And its for exactly these reasons that I took the job – And, as a result of the action already take

Great Portland Estates — FY2002 Earnings Presentation on 6ix