Foghorn Therapeutics Inc. · NASDAQ:FHTX

Foghorn Therapeutics — Investor Presentation (May 2024)

58 slides from Foghorn Therapeutics's investor presentation, May 23, 2024

  1. Slide 1: Unique biology, Precision therapeutics, Broad impact

    May 2024 Unique biology Precision therapeutics Broad impact Exhibit 99.1

  2. Slide 2: Forward Looking Statements

    | Forward Looking Statements 2 This presentation contains forward-looking statements that are based on management's beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to management. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this presentation are forward- looki

  3. Slide 3: Foghorn is the Pioneer in Chromatin Biology, an Untapped Area for Therapeutics

    | Foghorn is the Pioneer in Chromatin Biology, an Untapped Area for Therapeutics 3 What if … It were possible to develop a therapeutic approach to treat half of all cancers? Chromatin biology is implicated in up to 50% of tumors ~2.5 million cancer patients​ Potential for therapeutic area expansion

  4. Slide 4: Chromatin Regulatory System Orchestrates Gene Expression

    | Chromatin Regulatory System Orchestrates Gene Expression; Multiple Opportunities for Targets and Therapeutics 4 Chromatin – compacted form of DNA inside the nucleus of the cell Chromatin Remodeling Complex – specialized multiprotein machineries that allow access to DNA Transcription Factor – prote

  5. Slide 5: Foghorn has Progressed Multiple Programs Against Challenging Targets

    | Foghorn has Progressed Multiple Programs Against Challenging Targets 5 BRM: Potential in up to 5% of all solid tumors Challenge: Industry has failed to develop a selective inhibitor EP300: Role in both solid and heme malignancies Challenge: Toxicities with dual inhibition, difficulty engineering s

  6. Slide 6: Gene Traffic Control Platform Designed to Deliver Precision, First-in-Class Therapeutics

    | Foghorn’s Gene Traffic Control® Platform Designed to Deliver Precision, First-in-Class Therapeutics: Integrated, Scalable, Efficient, Repeatable 6 1. Chromatin Biology • Bioinformatics • Genomics • Epigenomics 2. Assays & Biochemistry Capabilities 3. Chemistry & Drugging • Selective, small molecul

  7. Slide 7: Unique Platform Capabilities Evolved from Drugging BAF

    | Foghorn's Unique Platform Capabilities Evolved from Drugging a Specific Chromatin Remodeling Complex (BAF)* 7 • Purification & recombinant production of large proteins and protein complexes • Biochemistry & biophysics of intrinsically disordered proteins • High throughput screening for binders and

  8. Slide 8: The Next Foghorn Chapter: Delivering Multiple Potential Blockbusters into the Clinic

    | The Next Foghorn Chapter: Delivering Multiple Potential Blockbusters into the Clinic 8 Pioneering BAF and Chromatin Biology (2016 – 2020)  Built platform and developed deep understanding of biology  Producing BAF and transcription factors at scale  Demonstrated druggability of chromatin regulat

  9. Slide 9: Advancing a Pipeline of First-in-Class Precision Therapeutics

    | Foghorn Is Advancing a Pipeline of First-in-Class Precision Therapeutics with Potential for Broad Application in Oncology … 9 Modality Program Phase 1 Enzyme Inhibitors Transcription Factor Disruptors Undisclosed Protein Degraders Commercial Rights FHD-286 (BRG1/BRM) FHD-909 (Selective BRM) 3 Disc

  10. Slide 10: Multiple Near-Term Value Inflection Points through 2026

    | … with Multiple Near-Term Value Inflection Points through 2026 10 H2 2024AML Combination Dose Escalation Data FHD-286 H2 2024Phase 1 InitiationFHD-909 (Selective BRM Inhibitor) ConfidentialIND Filing / Phase 1 InitiationSelective BRM Degrader Year End 2024Initiate IND-Enabling StudiesSelective CBP

  11. Slide 11: Potential Multi-Billion Dollar Opportunities in Oncology

    | Potential Multi-Billion Dollar Opportunities in Oncology 11 Foghorn Owned Selective CBP Degrader Selective EP300 Degrader Lilly Target #3 Selective ARID1B Degrader FHD-286 (R/R AML, Other) Potential for therapeutic area expansion (e.g., immunology and inflammation) Partnered w Lilly $500M to $2B M

  12. Slide 12: Clinical & Pre-Clinical Programs

    Clinical & Pre-Clinical Programs • FHD-286 – Dual BRM/BRG1 Inhibitor • FHD-909 (a.k.a. LY4050784) – Selective BRM Inhibitor • Selective CBP Degrader • Selective EP300 Degrader • Selective ARID1B Program

  13. Slide 13: FHD-286: Dual BRM/BRG1 Inhibition Targeting BAF Dependency in Cancer

    FHD-286: Dual BRM/BRG1 Inhibition Targeting BAF Dependency in Cancer FHD-609 is a Selective, Potent, Protein Degrader of the BRD9 component of the BAF complex

  14. Slide 14: Exploring BAF Dependency in Cancer with FHD-286

    | Exploring BAF Dependency in Cancer with FHD-286 – Potent, Oral Dual Inhibitor of BRM and BRG1 14 Clinical and pre-clinical data demonstrated broad- based differentiation across AML and multiple solid tumors BAF ATPase: BRG1/BRM FHD-286: • Allosteric modulation inhibiting the activity of both BRM a

  15. Slide 15: Significant Opportunity for Novel Therapy in Patients with R/R AML

    | Significant Opportunity for Novel, Effective Therapy in Patients with R/R AML 15 • Greater than 50% patients relapse • Intensive chemo – still standard of care Most cases of AML are not curable 40% of AML cases have no actionable mutations • No meaningful developments for broad AML patient populat

  16. Slide 16: FHD-286 Induced Differentiation Across Broad Genetic Backgrounds in Phase 1

    | FHD-286 Induced Differentiation Across a Broad Range of Genetic Backgrounds in Phase 1 Study 16 Dose Level Mutations Cytogenetics Risk Starting CD11b% Max CD11b% CD11b+ Fold Change Starting CD34% Min CD34% CD34+ % Decrease 10mg N/A Adverse 7 62 9.2x 94 27 (71%) 7.5mg CBFB (locus at 16q22) 2 94 59.

  17. Slide 17: Dose Escalation Trial Design in Combination with Decitabine in AML

    | Dose Escalation Trial Design in Combination with Decitabine in AML 17 Target Indication: • R/R AML Treatment Plan & Dose Escalation: • 3+3 escalation design • Oral FHD-286, QD, 28-day cycles • Standard decitabine dose schedule Key Objectives Primary • Safety/Tolerability • Maximum Tolerated Dose (

  18. Slide 18: Pre-Clinical Data Demonstrated Combination Potential with Multiple Agents in AML

    | FHD-286 + decitabine (MLL-AFP + FLT3 TKD Luc/GFP PDX) Pre-Clinical Data Demonstrated Combination Potential with Multiple Agents in AML 18 FHD-286 + BET inhibitor (mtNPM1 + FLT3 ITD Luc/GFP AML PDX) FHD-286 + menin inhibitor (mtNPM1 + FLT3 ITD Luc/GFP AML PDX) FHD-286 + cytarabine (MV4, 11 FLT3 ITD

  19. Slide 19: FHD-286 Has Potential in Multiple High-Value Oncology Indications

    | FHD-286 Has Potential in Multiple High-Value Oncology Indications 19 R/R AML combinations (e.g., decitabine, menin inhibitors, others) Other Hematologic and Solid TumorsTKI Combination Front-Line AML Combination

  20. Slide 20: Selective BRM Modulators For BRG1 Mutated Cancers

    Selective BRM Modulators For BRG1 Mutated Cancers FHD-286 is a Potent, Selective, Allosteric, Small Molecule Inhibitor of the BRG1 and BRM subunits of the BAF complex

  21. Slide 21: BRM Selective Inhibitor FHD-909 IND Submitted Q2'24

    | BRM Selective Inhibitor FHD-909 IND Submitted Q2’24, BRM Selective Degrader Continues Late-Stage Pre-Clinical Development 21 BRM Selective Inhibitor (FHD-909) BRM Selective Degrader Biology Exploit the synthetic lethal relationship between BRM (SMARCA2) and mutated BRG1 (SMARCA4) Stage IND submitt

  22. Slide 22: BRM Selective Inhibition Exploits Synthetic Lethal Relationship

    | BRM Selective Inhibition is a Promising Strategy to Exploit the Synthetic Lethal Relationship Between BRM and Mutated BRG1 22 No BRG1 Mutations BRG1 Mutation BRG1 Mutation and BRMi Cell Survival Cell Death Healthy Cells Cancer Cells BRG1 BRM BAF Complex BRM BAF Complex Mutant BRG1 BAF Complex BRMi

  23. Slide 23: BRG1 is Mutated in Up to 10% of NSCLC; Up to 5% of Solid Tumors

    | BRG1 is Mutated in Up to 10% of NSCLC; Up to 5% of Solid Tumors 23 BRG1 mutated across a broad range of tumors Accounts for ~5% of solid tumors AACR GENIE via cBioPortal

  24. Slide 24: Patients with NSCLC Harboring BRG1 Mutations Have Worse Clinical Outcomes

    | BRG1 mutated in up to 10% of NSCLC tumors, minimal overlap with other mutations2Overall Survival for BRG1wt vs BRG1mut1* Patients with NSCLC Harboring BRG1 Mutations Have Significantly Worse Clinical Outcomes and Define a High Unmet Need Patient Population 24 BRG1 10% KRAS 29% EGFR 26% ALK 7% RET

  25. Slide 25: FHD-909 Demonstrated Approximately 33-fold Selectivity Across Cell Lines

    | BRG1 WT BRG1 MUT 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 A bs ol ut e IC 50 (μ M ) NCI-H2122 CALU6 NCI-H2172 NCI-H441 NCI-H2170 NCI-H460 NCI-H1703 NCI-H358 NCI-H2009 NCI-H1944 NCI-H1299 A549 RERFLCAI NCI-H1693 NCI-H1568 NCI-H2023 NCI-H838 BRG1 (WT) BRG1 (MUT) (BRM Only)(BRM and BRG1) FHD-909 Demonstrated Approxim

  26. Slide 26: FHD-909 Monotherapy Regression in H2126 BRG1 Mutant NSCLC Model

    | FHD-909 Monotherapy Demonstrated Regression In Vivo in H2126 BRG1 Mutant NSCLC Model and Was Well Tolerated 26 H2126 Reduction in Tumor Volume H2126 Body Weight Genetic Background: BRG1 W764R, TP53 E62*, STK11-/-, CDKN2A-/-, KEAP1 R272C NOTE: All doses w ere well tolerated. Dosing holidays w ere a

  27. Slide 27: FHD-909 Monotherapy 96% TGI in A549 and Tumor Stasis in RERF-LC-AI

    | RERF-LC-AI Model FHD-909 Monotherapy Demonstrated 96% TGI in A549 and Tumor Stasis in RERF-LC-AI Mutant NSCLC Models 27 A549 Model NOTE: All doses w ere well tolerated. Dosing holidays w ere applied at the high dose, as appropriate 0 7 14 21 28 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Days of Dosing (Dose Start

  28. Slide 28: FHD-909 Monotherapy Regression in H1793 BRG1 Mutant NSCLC Model

    | FHD-909 Monotherapy Demonstrated Regression in H1793 BRG1 Mutant NSCLC Model 28 H1793 Model • FHD 909 delivered across range of BRG1 mut xenograft models • Results ranging from impressive TGI to regression as monotherapy • All doses across all four models were well tolerated NOTE: All doses w ere

  29. Slide 29: BRM Selective Degrader Achieved Complete BRM Degradation In Vitro

    | BRM Selective Degrader Achieved Complete BRM Degradation and Cell Growth Inhibition In Vitro 29 Degraders Caused Time- and Dose-Dependent BRM Degradation Antiproliferative Effects in A549 Mutant NSCLC Model A549 Ten-Day Proliferation AssayBRM/BRG1 HIBIT Data BRM BRG1 % D eg ra da tio n Concentrati

  30. Slide 30: CBP and EP300 Proteins – A Decades Long Challenge in Selectivity

    | CBP and EP300 Proteins – A Decades Long Challenge in Selectivity 30 • CBP and EP300 are chromatin regulators and histone acetyltransferases • CBP and EP300 are virtually identical, thus achieving selectivity is a significant challenge • Dual targeting has revealed tolerability and safety issues Fo

  31. Slide 31: Selective CBP Protein Degrader For EP300 Mutated Cancers

    Selective CBP Protein Degrader For EP300 Mutated Cancers

  32. Slide 32: Summary: Selective CBP Protein Degrader for EP300 Mutated Cancers

    | Summary: Selective CBP Protein Degrader for EP300 Mutated Cancers 32* Per year incidence in the U.S., EU5, Japan . Source: Clarivate DRG Mature Markets Data. Target / Approach • CREB binding protein (CBP) • Targeted protein degrader Initial Indication • EP300 mutated cancers (e.g., subsets of blad

  33. Slide 33: Selective CBP Degradation Resulted in Significant Tumor Growth Inhibition

    | Selective CBP Degradation Resulted in Significant Tumor Growth Inhibition in Colorectal & Bladder and Regression in Gastric EP300 Null Models 33

  34. Slide 34: Selective CBP Degradation Did Not Show Thrombocytopenia

    | Bone Marrow Staining (In Vivo)Platelet Counts Post Two Weeks of Dosing (In Vivo) Pre-Clinical Studies Indicate Selective CBP Degradation Did Not Show Thrombocytopenia and Spares Megakaryocytes In Vivo 34 PLT (x109cells/L) 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Study Day 14 Pl at el et s (X 10 3 c el ls /u

  35. Slide 35: Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of CBP Degrader Enable Dosing Every 2 Weeks

    | Pre-Clinical Studies Indicate Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of CBP Degrader Could Enable At Least Once Every 2 Weeks Dosing 35 dCBP-9 PK/PD (60mg/kg, sc) dCBP-9 PK/PD (150mg/kg, sc) dCBP-9 PK/PD (150mg/kg, im) 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 312 336 360 0 25 50 75 100 125 10 10

  36. Slide 36: Selective EP300 Protein Degrader For CBP Mutated and EP300 Dependent Cancers

    Selective EP300 Protein Degrader For CBP Mutated and EP300 Dependent Cancers

  37. Slide 37: Summary: Selective EP300 Protein Degrader

    | Summary: Selective EP300 Protein Degrader for CBP Mutant & EP300 Dependent Cancers 37 * Per year incidence in the U.S., EU5, Japan. Source: Clarivate DRG Mature Markets Data. Target / Approach • E1A binding protein p300 (EP300) • Targeted protein degrader Initial Indications • AR+ Prostate • DLBCL

  38. Slide 38: EP300 Degradation Results in Tumor Growth Inhibition in Prostate and DLBCL Models

    | EP300 Degradation Results in Significant Tumor Growth Inhibition in AR+ VCAP Prostate and KARPAS422 DLBCL Models 38 Prostate AR+ VCAP Model DLBCL KARPAS422 (CBP Null) Model 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Days After Tumor Inoculation Tu m or V ol um e (m m ³+ S EM ) Vehicle Co

  39. Slide 39: Selective EP300 Degradation Does Not Show Thrombocytopenia In Vivo

    | Selective EP300 Degradation Does Not Show Thrombocytopenia In Vivo 39 Platelet Counts Post Two Weeks of Dosing (In-Vivo) PLT (x109cells/L) 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Study Day 14 Pl at el et s (X 10 3 c el ls /u L) Vehicle FHT-EP300d, 50mg/kg, sc, BID Dual BD inhibitor, 30mg/kg, p.o, BID FHT-EP

  40. Slide 40: Selective ARID1B Protein Degrader For ARID1A Mutated Cancers

    Selective ARID1B Protein Degrader For ARID1A Mutated Cancers

  41. Slide 41: ARID1B is a Major Synthetic Lethal Target Implicated in Up To 5% of Solid Tumors

    | ARID1B is a Major Synthetic Lethal Target Implicated in Up To 5% of All Solid Tumors 41* Per year incidence in the U.S., EU5, Japan. Source: Clarivate DRG Mature Markets Data. Target / Approach • ARID1B • Targeted protein degrader Initial Indication • ARID1A mutated cancers Mutation / Aberration •

  42. Slide 42: Compound Screening and Structure-Based Optimization Yielded Selective ARID1B Binders

    | Compound Screening and Structure-Based Optimization Yielded Selective ARID1B Binders 42 • Mapped and purified several potential ligandable regions of ARID, which were then screened against various compound libraries • Characterized binding using multiple biochemical and biophysical techniques: e.g

  43. Slide 43: Structure-Based Optimization Improved ARID1B Binding Affinity

    | Structure-Based Optimization Drove Improved ARID1B Binding Affinity from 100 uM to less than 200 nM 43 1.4 Å co-xtal structure 2.0 Å soak structure 1.7 Å soak structure ARIDb-2 ARID1B Kd: 15 uM ARIDb-1 ARID1B Kd: 100 uM ARIDb-3 ARID1B Kd: 0.5 uM ARIDb-9 ARID1B Kd: 0.2 uM 1.9 Å co-xtal structure 1

  44. Slide 44: Multiple Near-Term Value Inflection Points through 2026

    | Multiple Near-Term Value Inflection Points through 2026 44 H2 2024AML Combination Dose Escalation Data FHD-286 H2 2024Phase 1 InitiationFHD-909 (Selective BRM Inhibitor) ConfidentialIND Filing / Phase 1 InitiationSelective BRM Degrader Year End 2024Initiate IND-Enabling StudiesSelective CBP Degrad

  45. Slide 45: Developing First-In-Class Precision Medicines Targeting Major Unmet Needs in Cancer

    | Developing First-In-Class Precision Medicines Targeting Major Unmet Needs in Cancer 45 Large Market Potential Chromatin biology is implicated in up to 50% of tumors, potentially impacting ~2.5 million patients Foghorn’s current pipeline potentially addresses more than 500,000 of these patients Bro

  46. Slide 46: Unique biology, Precision therapeutics, Broad impact

    May 2024 Unique biology Precision therapeutics Broad impact

  47. Slide 47: Appendix

    Appendix

  48. Slide 48: Loxo@Lilly Collaboration Validates Foghorn Approach

    | Loxo@Lilly Collaboration Validates Foghorn Approach: Significant Upfront and Deal Economics 48 $380 Million Up-front $300 million cash $80 million in Foghorn common stock at a price of $20 per share Three Undisclosed Discovery Programs Option to participate in a percentage of the U.S. economics Ti

  49. Slide 49: FHD-286: Dual BRM/BRG1 Inhibition Additional Information

    FHD-286: Dual BRM/BRG1 Inhibition Targeting BAF Dependency in Cancer Additional Information FHD-609 is a Selective, Potent, Protein Degrader of the BRD9 component of the BAF complex

  50. Slide 50: Potential First-in-Class Broad-Based Differentiation Agent in AML

    | Potential First-in-Class Broad-Based Differentiation Agent With Significant Combination Potential in AML 50 Completed Phase I Monotherapy Safety and Efficacy Results Ongoing Phase I Combination Study Efficacy • Differentiation observed in heavily pre-treated patients, regardless of mutational stat

  51. Slide 51: Blast Count Reduction Led to ANC Recovery in a Subset of Patients

    | Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Blast Count Reduction Led to ANC Recovery in a Subset of Patients 51* MDS Patient Diagnosis Dose Level Mutations Cytogenetic Risk Cycles on Study ANC Recovery Peripheral Starting Blast % Peripheral Min Blast % Peripheral Blast % Change BMA Starting Blast % BMA Min

  52. Slide 52: Blast Count Reduction Leading to ANC Recovery in a Subset of Patients

    | Peripheral Blood and Bone Marrow Blast Count Reduction Leading to ANC Recovery in a Subset of Patients 52* MDS Patient Diagnosis Dose Level Mutations Cytogenetic Risk Cycles on Study ANC Recovery Peripheral Starting Blast % Peripheral Min Blast % Peripheral Blast % Change BMA Starting Blast % BMA

  53. Slide 53: Bone Marrow Aspirate: Clear Evidence of Differentiation

    | Bone Marrow Aspirate: Clear Evidence of Differentiation Bone Marrow Blast Reduction from 40% to 6% Signs of Differentiation in Heavily Pre-Treated, Secondary AML Patient with Abnormal Karyotype in Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study 53 Patient Background: • 47-year-old male, secondary AML • Abnormal kar

  54. Slide 54: Clinical Benefit in Heavily Pre-Treated Patient in Phase 1

    | Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Peripheral Blast Count Clinical Benefit in Heavily Pre-Treated Patient in Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study 54 100% 0% 50% 10 5 10/13/21 10/24/21 11/4/21 11/14/21 11/25/21 12/6/21 0 Initiation of FHD 286 1st SCT 2nd SCT Patient Background: • 25-year-old male, treatment-

  55. Slide 55: Transcription Factors A Novel Approach

    Transcription Factors A Novel Approach FHD-609 is a Selective, Potent, Protein Degrader of the BRD9 component of the BAF complex

  56. Slide 56: Novel Approach to Drugging Transcription Factors

    | Foghorn’s Novel Approach to Drugging Transcription Factors Enabled by Its Protein Production and Discovery Capabilities 56 • Highly involved in gene expression • Implicated in range of cancers and other diseases • Featureless surface: no druggable binding pocket • Tight interactions with DNA: undr

  57. Slide 57: Transcription Factors Bind to BAF Directly with Specificity

    | Transcription Factors Bind to BAF Directly with Specificity; Unique Insights into Where and How Transcription Factors Bind 57 Mass spec. foot-printing Pull-down assays Foghorn’s collection of BAF sub-complexes and domains Biophysical Biochemical Structural AUC / SPR / ITC TR-FRET / FP Crystal / NM

  58. Slide 58: Unique biology, Precision therapeutics, Broad impact

    May 2024 Unique biology Precision therapeutics Broad impact

Foghorn Therapeutics — Investor Presentation (May 2024) on 6ix