Regis Resources Limited · ASX:RRL

Regis Resources — Corporate Update (September 2026)

50 slides from Regis Resources's corporate update, Sep 21, 2026

  1. Slide 1: McPhillamys Community Consultative Committee

    ASX:RRL McPhillamys Community Consultative Committee Monday 21 September 2026

  2. Slide 2: Agenda: Monday 21 September 2026

    2 Agenda: Monday 21 September 2026 Item 1. Welcome, introduction and apologies DR 2. Declaration of interest All 3. Business arising from previous minutes All 4. Previous meeting DR 5. Correspondence All Questions from members 6. Project Update WT, DP, JI 7. Social Impact Assessment consultation Squ

  3. Slide 3: General Project Update

    General Project Update

  4. Slide 4: ATSIHP Act - Section 10 Declaration & Judicial Review

    ATSIHP Act - Section 10 Declaration & Judicial Review 4 Kings Plains s10 Declaration announced on 16 August 2024, impacting a critical area of the Project development site making the approved Project unviable. Since the Declaration was made, Regis: Commenced legal proceedings (Judicial Review) in re

  5. Slide 5: Environmental Monitoring

    Environmental Monitoring 5 Continuation of routine monitoring programs including surface water, dust deposition, HVAS, groundwater; as well as real-time monitoring for noise, air quality and meteorology. Baseline data collection remains ongoing across the MGP site and surrounds. The baseline data wi

  6. Slide 6: Exploration Update

    6 Exploration Update Drill rig mobilised from Last Chance prospect, 7 September 2026 Total of 6 holes completed at Last Chance since mobilisation on 10 June 2026 Additional drill hole planning underway for Last Chance and Jirri Jirri, pending interpretation of results Sustained drilling across multi

  7. Slide 7: Community

    7 Community Donations & Sponsorships Neville Public School – $1,600 Swimming lessons for the schools 16 students. Blayney High School – $500 Sponsorship for National Volleyball Championships in December 2026. Blayney High School (Lexi Henry project) - $2,250 Funding towards new goal posts for school

  8. Slide 8: Actions from Previous Meeting

    Actions from Previous Meeting

  9. Slide 9: Community Sentiment Survey - Methodology

    9 Community Sentiment Survey - Methodology Surveys were undertaken previously in 2021 and 2022, and again in 2026. The current 2026 study employed a similar quantitative research methodology to that for previous years to enhance comparability between data sets. Research was conducted in accordance w

  10. Slide 10: Community Sentiment Survey - Methodology

    10 Community Sentiment Survey - Methodology In the 2026 survey, the sample of 435 was drawn from Bathurst (n=151), Orange (n=121), Cabonne (n=99) and Blayney (n=64). All participants were permanent residents at their current address. Participants were sourced from a professional market research pane

  11. Slide 11: MGIP Approvals Update

    MGIP Approvals Update

  12. Slide 12: Approvals Update

    figure layout is indicative 12 Approvals Update Overview of McPhillamys McPhillamys Gold Infrastructure Project (MGIP) – Project Descriptions Integrated Waste Landform (IWL) Electricity Transmission Line (ETL) Water Supply Pipeline (WSP) Environmental Assessment Preliminary Visual Simulations MGIP S

  13. Slide 13: MGIP Project Descriptions IWL, ETL and WSP

    MGIP Project Descriptions IWL, ETL and WSP

  14. Slide 14: MGP and MGIP

    | MGP and MGIP McPhillamys Gold Project (MGP) (SSD 9505) McPhillamys Gold Infrastructure Project (MGIP) (SSI) Bbpro vec EEG EAC ponents, Integrated Waste Landform (IWL) ¢ Open Cut Pit -® Alternative tailings solution to replace the TSF and WRE if the * Processing Facility Section 10 Declaration rema

  15. Slide 15: MGIP – IWL

    figure layout is indicative 15 MGIP – IWL Key Features Integrated Waste Landform (IWL) Higher landform Processing Infrastructure Water Management and Supply Infrastructure Realigned Mine Access Road Soil Stockpile Areas

  16. Slide 16: MGIP – ETL

    figure layout is indicative 16 MGIP – ETL Key Features Two alignment options under consideration Northern Option (TransGrid) – longer but existing TransGrid ETL sufficient for power demand Southern Option (Essential Energy) – shorter, but requires broader network upgrades by Essential Energy to meet

  17. Slide 17: MGIP – WSP

    17 MGIP – WSP Key Features Water Supply Pipeline and corridor Approx. 90 km Pumping Station Facility Powerlines Temporary construction laydown areas Erosion and sediment control measures and structures Pressure reducing systems Landowners: Private landowners (multiple), Forestry NSW, TfNSW and Counc

  18. Slide 18: MGP and MGIP

    18 MGP and MGIP Peak Construction Workforce (FTE Roles): Component MGP MGP / MGIP Mine Development 590 700 WSP 120 150 ETL 50* 50 Average Operational Workforce (FTE Roles): Component MGP MGP / MGIP Mine Development 260 260 WSP ETL Negligible* Negligible Note: * = Subject to separate Part 5 Assessmen

  19. Slide 19: Environmental Assessment IWL, ETL and WSP

    Environmental Assessment IWL, ETL and WSP

  20. Slide 20: Environmental Assessment

    figure layout is indicative 20 Environmental Assessment Key assessments: Assessment IWL ETL WSP Combined Social Impact  Road Transport  Economics  Water Resources    Noise, Air Quality    and Visual Amenity Aboriginal Cultural    Heritage Historic Heritage   

  21. Slide 21: CCC EIS Key Areas of Interest

    CCC EIS Key Areas of Interest 21 At the CCC meeting held on 25 May 2026, a number of key studies were identified as being of interest to the CCC. These include: Noise Air quality/dust Human health Visual – this meeting. Social – this meeting. IWL technical summary Surface water Groundwater This slid

  22. Slide 22: IWL Visual Simulations Summerson Driveway

    IWL Visual Simulations Summerson Driveway

  23. Slide 23: Location on a Map

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR CONSULTATION ONLY 23 Location on a Map = IWL EIS Disturbance Areas

  24. Slide 24: Existing View

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR CONSULTATION ONLY 24 Existing View

  25. Slide 25: Simulation from 2020 Amendment Report

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR CONSULTATION ONLY 25 Simulation from 2020 Amendment Report Year 6 Year 8 Final Landform

  26. Slide 26: Draft IWL Simulations

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR CONSULTATION ONLY 26 Draft IWL Simulations Draft This area not complete. Hill and trees need to be removed due to Pit. Year 7 Draft This area not complete. Hill and trees need to be removed due to Pit. Year 12 Draft This area not complete. Hill and trees need to be removed du

  27. Slide 27: SUMMERSON DRIVEWAY – Existing View

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR SUMMERSON DRIVEWAY – Existing View CONSULTATION ONLY Interim Simulations

  28. Slide 28: SUMMERSON DRIVEWAY – Year 7

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR SUMMERSON DRIVEWAY – Year 7 CONSULTATION ONLY Interim Simulations This area not complete. Hill and trees need to be removed due to Pit.

  29. Slide 29: SUMMERSON DRIVEWAY – Year 12

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR SUMMERSON DRIVEWAY – Year 12 CONSULTATION ONLY Interim Simulations This area not complete. Hill and trees need to be removed due to Pit.

  30. Slide 30: SUMMERSON DRIVEWAY – Final Landform

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR SUMMERSON DRIVEWAY – Final Landform CONSULTATION ONLY Interim Simulations This area not complete. Hill and trees need to be removed due to Pit.

  31. Slide 31: IWL Visual Simulations Mid Western Highway West

    IWL Visual Simulations Mid Western Highway West

  32. Slide 32: Location on a Map

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR CONSULTATION ONLY 32 Location on a Map = IWL EIS Disturbance Areas

  33. Slide 33: Existing View

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR CONSULTATION ONLY 33 Existing View

  34. Slide 34: Simulation from 2020 Amendment Report

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR CONSULTATION ONLY 34 Simulation from 2020 Amendment Report Year 6 Year 8 Final Landform

  35. Slide 35: Draft IWL Simulations

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR CONSULTATION ONLY 35 Draft IWL Simulations Year 7 Year 12 Draft Draft Final Landform Draft

  36. Slide 36: HIGHWAY WEST – Existing View

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR HIGHWAY WEST – Existing View CONSULTATION ONLY Interim Simulations

  37. Slide 37: HIGHWAY WEST – Year 7

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR HIGHWAY WEST – Year 7 CONSULTATION ONLY Interim Simulations

  38. Slide 38: HIGHWAY WEST – Year 12

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR HIGHWAY WEST – Year 12 CONSULTATION ONLY Interim Simulations

  39. Slide 39: HIGHWAY WEST – Final Landform

    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – FOR HIGHWAY WEST – Final Landform CONSULTATION ONLY Interim Simulations

  40. Slide 40: Social Impact Assessment Square Peg Consulting

    Social Impact Assessment Square Peg Consulting

  41. Slide 41: Social Impact Assessment

    SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT For the McPhillamys Gold Infrastructure Project September 2026

  42. Slide 42: Purpose

    PURPOSE  Present the approach to Social Impact Assessment in NSW.  Discuss anticipated social impacts of the MGIP.

  43. Slide 43: Social impacts are the consequences people experience when a new project brings change

    SOCIAL IMPACTS ARE THE CONSEQUENCES PEOPLE EXPERIENCE WHEN A NEW PROJECT BRINGS CHANGE Source: Based on DPHI SIA Guideline PEOPLE’S EXPERIENCE OF CHANGE PEOPLE PROJECT SIA puts people and their experience of change at the centre of the assessment

  44. Slide 44: The SIA process is designed to answer three key questions

    THE SIA PROCESS IS DESIGNED TO ANSWER THREE KEY QUESTIONS What are the social impacts How might those impacts be What can be done to mitigate associated with a project? experienced, and by whom? negative and enhance positive impacts?

  45. Slide 45: Key data sources for the SIA

    KEY DATA SOURCES FOR THE SIA Analysis of secondary data about the existing community. Social Impact Assessments for the McPhillamys Gold Project. Project description and specialist technical studies. Assessments for the McPhillamys Gold Infrastructure Project. Consultation.

  46. Slide 46: Evaluating social impacts

    EVALUATING SOCIAL IMPACTS Each potential social impact will be assessed based on likelihood and magnitude definitions provided in the SIA Guideline. Magnitude Level 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Minimal Minor Moderate Major Transformational A. Almost Low Medium High Very High Very High certain Likelihood Level B.

  47. Slide 47: What is changing compared to the approved project?

    WHAT IS CHANGING COMPARED TO THE APPROVED PROJECT? Water supply pipeline Integrated waste landform Electricity transmission line Revised alignment New project, largely located within New project Fewer properties: 107, compared to 132. approved footprint. 15km (N) or 5km (S) Larger construction workf

  48. Slide 48: Questions…

    QUESTIONS… What would change for you / your Relating to which project Which of these changes are most community, compared to the component? important for you / your community? approved MGP?

  49. Slide 49: Thank you!

    THANK YOU!

  50. Slide 50: McPhillamys Gold Project Further information

    McPhillamys Gold Project Further information: Danielle Papich| HSEC Manager dpapich@regisresources.com 0402 692 588

Regis Resources — Corporate Update (September 2026) on 6ix