Questor Technology Inc. · TSXV:QST

Questor Technology — Investor Presentation (April 2005)

47 slides from Questor Technology's investor presentation, April 2005

  1. Slide 1: Questor Technology Inc.

    QUESTOR TECHNOLOGY INC. Effective & Economic Waste Gas Incineration

  2. Slide 2: Who Is Questor Technology?

    WHO IS QUESTOR TECHNOLOGY? • Alberta based public company incorporated in 1995 • Listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (QST) • Specialize in the custom design and installation of high efficiency waste gas incineration systems • Technology applicable to any operation that requires the efficient combusti

  3. Slide 3: Our Clients

    OUR CLIENTS • Altagas • Edge • PetroCanada • Anadarko • EnCana • PetroReef • Atco Pipelines • Enerchem • Purcell Energy • BP Amoco • Enermark • Pogo • Bonavista • Exxon/Mobil • Quintana • Calpine • Gauntlet • Rider • Canadian Forest • Hunt Oil • Samson • Compton • Husky • Sherritt • Cougar/Starpoint

  4. Slide 4: Combustion of Hydrocarbons

    COMBUSTION OF HYDROCARBONS 99.99% combustion requires the right mix of air and fuel CH4 + 2 O2 = heat + CO2 + 2 H2 O Methane + Oxygen = heat + Carbon Dioxide + Water Inefficient combustion causes: 9Unburned hydrocarbons (Methane) 9Carbon monoxide 9Complex hydrocarbons can be created (benzene, styren

  5. Slide 5: What Is Incineration?

    WHAT IS INCINERATION? • Controlled Combustion of waste gases in an enclosed combustion chamber with: 9 pre-mixed air and fuel, 9 high temperature, 9 specific retention time, and 9 an ignition source. • Effective Dispersion of combustion products, based on: 9 exhaust gas velocity, 9 exhaust gas tempe

  6. Slide 6: How It Works

    HOW IT WORKS • Proprietary gas burner control creates a high velocity vortex • Air is naturally drawn in - No blowers • Air and fuel premixed • Refractory lined chamber – high temperatures • Optimal SO22 dispersion with velocity, temperature, and height

  7. Slide 7: Flaring vs Incineration

    FLARING INCINERATION • Difficult to measure efficiency 9 Measured independently at 99.99% and varies from site to site consistently • Heavily influenced by crosswinds 9 Combustion occurs in a closed allowing gases to escape chamber unaffected by winds unburned • Difficulty burning rich gases often 9

  8. Slide 8: Technology Assessment

    TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT Shell Canada test in January 2000 • Tested at 2 rates - 2.5 and 4.8 MMscf/d • Sour gas @ 11% H22S • Questor Q5000 incinerator - 40 ft tall unit Results: • 99.99% combustion efficiency - at both rates • Plume rise of 250 meters - SO22 dispersion comparable to a 110 ft stack – 5%

  9. Slide 9: Modeling assumptions and dispersion predictions

    * 100% Molar conversion efficiency H2S to SO2 * Heat radiation loss 5% * Actual incinerator height and not pseudo effective height * Actual incinerator exit diameter and not equivalent * Airflow within 7 km may be turbulent (non-laminar). Consequently, both simple & complex dispersion algorithms wer

  10. Slide 10: Looking Inside Questor Incinerators

    Looking Inside Questor Incinerators

  11. Slide 11: Each System is Custom-Engineered

    Each System is Custom-Engineered

  12. Slide 12: EnCana Countess Gas Storage Facility

    EnCana Countess Gas Storage Facility

  13. Slide 13: Spun Refractory Lining

    • High Quality, Spun Refractory Lining • No Thermal Shock • Low Weight

  14. Slide 14: Air Intake Flame Arrestor

    OF SA i Ba an ant a 7 Sum ‘e) =] 2) ® Sem Sem < ® = & LL ® =< 4} —_ = i <

  15. Slide 15: Flame Arrested Burner Box

    Flame Arrested Burner Box

  16. Slide 16: Simple & Reliable Burner Control

    Simple & Reliable Burner Control

  17. Slide 17: Purpose-Built Control Systems

    Purpose-Built Control Systems

  18. Slide 18: Live Pilot Assembly

    Live Pilot Assembly • Constant Spark Ignitor • Pilot Nozzle • Flame Fail Thermocouple

  19. Slide 19: CSA - B.149.3 Compliant Fuel Train

    CSA - B.149.3 Compliant Fuel Train

  20. Slide 20: Why Incinerate? Environmental Advantages

    WHY INCINERATE ? ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGES 9 Measured combustion efficiency in excess of 99.99% 9 Improved air quality and reduced greenhouse gases 9 No odour, soot, smoke or visible flame 9 No emission of products of incomplete combustion 9 Smaller lease/footprint and lower impact 9 Low radiant heat

  21. Slide 21: Why Incinerate? Economic Advantages

    WHY INCINERATE ? ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES 9 Lower operating costs and reduced fuel gas usage 9 Single incinerator processes variable pressure waste gas streams concurrently 9 Reduced site capital costs by minimizing equipment 9 Closer spacing minimizes lease size and piping costs 9 Community well-being p

  22. Slide 22: Applications

    APPLICATIONS • Technology applicable to many industries: 9 Oil and Gas 9 Petrochemical 9 Landfills 9 Agriculture 9 Any industry with hazardous waste gas • Heat generated by incineration can be captured for process heat and/or surplus electricity generation

  23. Slide 23: Typical Incinerator Applications

    QUESTOR TECHNOLOGY INC. TYPICAL INCINERATOR APPLICATIONS INCINERATOR UNIT SALES GAS PIPELINE 1 TREATER > PIPELINE DE-PRESSURE OPERATIONS @T! STILL COLUMN VAPOURS v SOLUTION GAS TANK > VAPOURS. INCINERAT STORAGE TANK R

  24. Slide 24: Trailer Mounted Q3000 Rental Unit

    Trailer Mounted Q3000 Rental Unit

  25. Slide 25: Well Testing

    WELL TESTING • Testing in sensitive areas 9 Near Near communities communities and and wildlife wildlife 9 Perma-frost Perma-frost 9 High High fire fire hazard hazard areas areas 9 National National parks, parks, reserves reserves and and protected protected areas areas • Extended long term tests i.e

  26. Slide 26: Case Study – DECL Violet Grove

    CASE STUDY – DECL Violet Grove Sour Solution Gas Welltest Problem: Well testing using a flare stack • Tight hole and sensitive area • Sour gas test – potentially 52% H22S • Complex terrain Solution: Used 3MMscf/d QTI incinerator for the test • EUB comfortable with Questor Technology modeling • Fuel

  27. Slide 27: Coal Bed Methane Testing

    COAL BED METHANE TESTING • Incineration is a effective technology to address flaring and visibility concerns with testing • Tests are typically 6-8 months in duration to ensure an understanding of the reserve potential • Projects include : 9BP testing at Ojay in B.C. 9EnCana at Strathmore

  28. Slide 28: Case Study: Vaquero 7-34

    CASE STUDY: Vaquero 7-34 Sour Solution Gas Welltest • Background monitoring indicated 1-3 ppb H22S • Waste gas contained 18.95% H22S • BTEX (C7+) was also present in the waste gas 9410 ppm prior to combustion • The Questor incinerator combusted to 99.9% sulphur conversion efficiency and did not add

  29. Slide 29: Case Study – DECL Round Hill

    CASE STUDY – DECL Round Hill Sweet Gas Welltest Problem: Testing with a flare stack • DECL (Viking) had been testing with flare • Created landowner complaints • EUB called out at 2 AM • Well is 300 yards from church and close to town Solution: Used 3MMscf/d QTI incinerator for the test • No objectio

  30. Slide 30: Slide 30

  31. Slide 31: Portable Well Test Incinerator

    Questor Technology Inc. Portable Well Test Incinerator 3,000,000 scfiday Working on 34% H2S Well Near Calgary Phone: (403) 571-1530

  32. Slide 32: Case Study: Cabre Kessler Battery

    CASE STUDY: Cabre Kessler Battery • Incineration of sour produced gas and vapours from production tanks 9 Sour rich solution gas - 60 MJ/m33 9 Smoky flare and odour at site 9 Flow rates fluctuated between 50 - 950 mscf/d from the treater and tanks 9 Solution: single incinerator processing multiple v

  33. Slide 33: Case Study: DECL Cache Facility

    CASE STUDY: DECL Cache Facility • Oil battery on the Alaska Highway • Incinerator installed 9 air inlet flame arrested allowing closer spacing to equipment • Eliminated the need for 2 flare stacks and 2 knockout tanks • Minimized lease size and footprint • Lower piping costs • Site capital costs red

  34. Slide 34: Dominion 10-5 Cache Battery Site

    Dominion 10-5 Cache Battery Site

  35. Slide 35: Dehydrator and Amine Towers

    DEHYDRATOR AND AMINE TOWERS

  36. Slide 36: Case Study: Acid Gas Combustion

    CASE STUDY: Acid Gas Combustion • 20% H22S / 60% CO22 • Alberta Environment requirements: • 53800 C stack temperature and 20 MJ/m33 heating value • continuous SO22 monitoring • Actual stack temp - 110000 C • Reduced fuel usage from 1410 m33/d to 290 m33/d (50 to 10 mcf/d) • Payout in 200 days Compto

  37. Slide 37: Tank Vapour Recovery

    TANK VAPOUR RECOVERY • Passive continuous vapour recovery with incineration • Low capital cost ~ 50% of traditional VRU • Low operating cost • Reliable simple system; no moving parts • Ability to incorporate other waste streams 9Treater gas, dehydrator or amine vapours

  38. Slide 38: Pipeline and Plant Blowdowns

    PIPELINE AND PLANT BLOWDOWNS • Pipelines are drawn down to atmospheric pressure • Units able to process variable rates and pressures • Reliable simple system 9Flanged connections to minimize setup time 9Solar/battery ignition control for remote operations • 99.99% combustion of hydrocarbon stream re

  39. Slide 39: Dominion Exploration Canada Acid Gas Pipeline Blowdown

    Dominion Exploration Canada Acid Gas Pipeline Blowdown • 2.1 km, 3” pipeline with 75% H22S gas and 25% CO22 • Transporting 1.5 MMscf/d at 1200 psig • Blowdown to a Q5000 incinerator in < 15 minutes • Meets dispersion and company safety requirements • Monitored air emissions up to 8 km away with no d

  40. Slide 40: Dominion Exploration - West Stoddart Pipeline Blowdown Facility

    Dominion Exploration-West Stoddart Pipeline Blowdown Facility

  41. Slide 41: Community Well-Being

    COMMUNITY WELL-BEING

  42. Slide 42: Compton Petroleum Corporation Landowner Letter

    Compton Petroleum Corporation Suite 3100, 150-6 Avenue SW I live one kilometer downwind of a natural gas plant owned by Compton Petroleum. When this company wanted to expand their operations and applied for a permit to incinerate sour gas I was concerned about air quality and bad smells that may res

  43. Slide 43: Incineration contributes to clean air strategy

    Incineration contributes to clean air strategy The petroleum industry has come a long way in its handling of waste gas. Evor cinco commoaorcial auantitioc of natural aac ware diccovorod in Turnor As Compton Petroleum Corporation learned in the Peace River county incineration can also be an excellent

  44. Slide 44: Greenhouse Gas Emissions

    GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS • The Global Warming Potential (GWP) of methane is 21 times higher than that of CO22 and therefore inefficient combustion increases the greenhouse gases emitted • For example: 19 mscf/d of waste methane gas generates these daily CO22 emissions : T/d T/d T/yr T/yr • Vented Ve

  45. Slide 45: TransCanada pilot tests of portable incinerator

    In both pilot tests Questor technology's portable incinerator was used. In each case approximately 75 per cent of the remaining gas was incinerated. Questor incinerators use a vortex combustion system to achieve 99 per cent combustion efficiency. - “ Methane Incineration for both GHG Emission Compar

  46. Slide 46: Conclusions

    CONCLUSIONS • Incineration offers an efficient,environmental and economical manner to significantly improve air quality • Benefits accrue by addressing community concerns, generating goodwill and potentially avoiding costly hearings • Reliable with low operating costs and reduced fuel gas needs • Mi

  47. Slide 47: Providing Solutions to your Burning Questions

    Providing Solutions to your Burning Questions Calgary, Alberta (403) 571-1530 www.questortech.com

Questor Technology — Investor Presentation (April 2005) on 6ix