Tenax Therapeutics, Inc. · NASDAQ:TENX

Tenax Therapeutics — Investor Presentation (October 2026)

39 slides from Tenax Therapeutics's investor presentation, Oct 8, 2026

  1. Slide 1: Corporate Presentation October 2026

    Corporate Presentation October 2026 Exhibit 99.1

  2. Slide 2: Forward-Looking Statements Disclaimers

    Forward-Looking Statements Disclaimers Except for historical information, all of the statements, expectations and assumptions contained in this presentation are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our expectations about t

  3. Slide 3: Evidence-Driven Phase 3 Program

    Evidence-Driven Phase 3 Program LEVEL DATA ENHANCES HELP TRIAL PROOF OF CONCEPT TO DE-RISK ONGOING PHASE 3; WELL-ESTABLISHED SAFETY PROFILE PH-HFpEF: pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; MOA: mechanism of action. TNX-103, or Oral Levosimendan, is a potential firs

  4. Slide 4: Pulmonary Hypertension in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PH-HFpEF)

    Pulmonary Hypertension in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PH-HFpEF)

  5. Slide 5: Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension (Left Heart Disease)

    Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension (Left Heart Disease) PH: pulmonary hypertension; PH-HFpEF: pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; WHO: World Health Organization. Strange G, et al. Heart (British Cardiac Society) vol. 98,24 (2012): 1805-11. PH-HFpEF is the most commo

  6. Slide 6: The Fundamental Role of the Splanchnic Reservoir

    The Fundamental Role of the Splanchnic Reservoir Gelman S and Mushlin PS. Anesthesiology vol. 100,2 (2004): 434-9. 35% of circulating blood is in the systemic veins 35% of circulating blood is in the systemic arteries 30% of circulating blood is in the splanchnic vascular reservoir

  7. Slide 7: Blood Volume Distribution in Healthy vs PH-HFpEF

    LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; PH-HFpEF, pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Gelman S, et al. J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 2004;100(2):434-439.; Fudim M, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23:1076-1084.; Yaku H, et al. J Cardiol.

  8. Slide 8: Oral Levosimendan (TNX-103)

    Oral Levosimendan (TNX-103)

  9. Slide 9: Levosimendan's MOA is Uniquely Suited to Treat PH-HFpEF

    Levosimendan’s MOA is Uniquely Suited to Treat PH-HFpEF NOVEL, POTENTIAL FIRST-IN-CLASS K-ATP CHANNEL ACTIVATOR AND CALCIUM SENSITIZER MOA: mechanism of action; K-ATP: potassium adenosine triphosphate-sensitive. Pataricza J, et al. The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology vol. 52,2 (2000): 213-7. Do

  10. Slide 10: Phase 3 LEVEL Trial Design

    Phase 3 LEVEL Trial Design PHASE 3 REGISTRATIONAL TRIAL IN U.S. AND CANADA BID: twice a day; TID: three times a day; 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; RHC: right heart catheterization; PCWP: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; mPAP: mean pulmonary artery pressure; RAP: right atrial pressure. 1 mg oral c

  11. Slide 11: We Believe LEVEL Confirms the Biological Thesis

    PH-HFpEF: pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; LV: left ventricle; RV: right ventricle; 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; AE: adverse events. We Believe LEVEL Confirms th

  12. Slide 12: Patient Demographics

    Patient Demographics BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS WERE BROADLY BALANCED ACROSS TREATMENT ARMS BMI: body mass index; 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; NYHA: New York Heart Association. Characteristic TNX-103 (N=120) Placebo (N=121) Overall (N=241) Age, years, mean

  13. Slide 13: Safety

    Safety TOLERABILITY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ARMS; SERIOUS EVENTS AND CLINICAL WORSENING BALANCED CWE: clinical worsening event; AE: adverse event; CV: cardiovascular; IV: intravenous. Adverse event summary TNX-103 (N=120) Placebo (N=121) Any adverse event, n (%) 104 (86.7) 87 (71.9) Treatment-related adv

  14. Slide 14: Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Treatment Emergent Adverse Events BALANCED BETWEEN TNX-103 AND PLACEBO IN THE ≥ AND < MEDIAN BASELINE 6MWD SUBGROUPS TNX-103 Placebo System Organ Class (SOC) Preferred Term (PT), n (%) Overall (N=120) BL 6MWD < Median (N=62)* BL 6MWD ≥ Median (N=58)* Overall (N=121) BL 6MWD < Median (N=57)* BL 6MWD

  15. Slide 15: Primary and Key Secondary Endpoints

    Primary and Key Secondary Endpoints *N=120 and N=121 for TNX-103 and placebo arms, respectively. 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; LS: least squares; SE: standard error; SD: standard deviation; KCCQ-TSS: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Total Symptom Score; NYHA: New York Heart Association; NS:

  16. Slide 16: Mean Change in 6MWD by Baseline 6MWD Quartile

    Mean Change in 6MWD by Baseline 6MWD Quartile INVERSE LINEAR RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BASELINE 6MWD AND TREATMENT EFFECT Q1 ≤264 M (N=61) Q2 >264-333 M (N=61) Q3 >333-384 M (N=59) Q4 >384 M (N=60) *Post-hoc analysis 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; LS: least squares. Levosimendan produced a large and clini

  17. Slide 17: Drug Response Correlates with Baseline 6MWD

    Drug Response Correlates with Baseline 6MWD *Prespecified analysis 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; LS: least squares; CI: confidence interval. LS Mean Difference in Δ6MWD (95% CI) Levosimendan N / LS Mean (95% CI) Placebo N / LS Mean (95% CI) LS Mean Difference (95% CI) Baseline 6MWD Below Median (<33

  18. Slide 18: Patients with Greater Exercise Limitation Demonstrated Large Treatment Effect

    Patients with Greater Exercise Limitation Demonstrated Large Treatment Effect +26.3 M LS Mean Difference *Prespecified analysis. #For patients with a baseline 6MWD >333 M, the change in 6MWD was -17.6 M (95% CI -36.9, 1.7; nominal p-value 0.0744) 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; LS: least squares; SE:

  19. Slide 19: LEVEL Patients with Baseline 6MWD <Median: Improvement Similar to HELP

    LEVEL Patients with Baseline 6MWD <Median: Improvement Similar to HELP +26.3 M LS Mean Difference +29.3 M LS Mean Difference p = 0.0329 *Prespecified subgroup 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; LS: least squares; SE: standard error; CI: confidence interval. Difference in change from baseline LS Mean Diff

  20. Slide 20: 6MWD Treatment Effect: Comparison of LEVEL and HELP

    6MWD Treatment Effect: Comparison of LEVEL (12 Weeks) & HELP (6 Weeks)

  21. Slide 21: Lower 6MWD, Greatest Benefit

    Lower 6MWD, Greatest Benefit Data presented by Dr. Sanjiv Shah at ESC Congress 2026 on August 29, 2026. 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance. 333 M CADENCE: HELP: Shaded area represents 95% CI Inverse linear relationship between baseline 6MWD and treatment effect In LEVEL, levosimendan-treated patients whos

  22. Slide 22: RVSP Reduction Greatest in Patients with Baseline 6MWD <Median

    RVSP Reduction Greatest in Patients with Baseline 6MWD <Median (<333 M) LEVOSIMENDAN EFFECTIVELY LOWERS RVSP ACROSS THIS PULMONARY HYPERTENSION POPULATION *Prespecified subgroup 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; CI: confidence interval. Physiologic improvement in RVSP aligns with 6MWD improvement in thi

  23. Slide 23: Echocardiographic Measures Point to RV & LV Functional Enhancement

    Echocardiographic Measures Point to RV & LV Functional Enhancement ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY CONDUCTED AT BASELINE AND WEEK 12 Echocardiographic summary provided by Northwestern University core lab

  24. Slide 24: TNX-103 Benefited Patients on State-of-the-Art Therapy

    TNX-103 Benefited Patients on State-of-the-Art Therapy PATIENTS WITH BASELINE 6MWD <MEDIAN (333 M) AND ON GLP-1s & GUIDELINE-DIRECTED MEDICAL THERAPY BENEFIT MOST Difference in change from baseline LS Mean Difference (SE) 35.9 (12.17) 95% CI for LS Mean Difference 12.1, 59.8 Difference in change fro

  25. Slide 25: LEVEL Study 6MWD Change by Baseline NT-proBNP

    LEVEL Study 6MWD Change by Baseline NT-proBNP *Post-hoc analysis 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; LS: least squares; SE: standard error; CI: confidence interval. Difference in change from baseline LS Mean Difference (SE) 16.7 (9.72) 95% CI for LS Me

  26. Slide 26: Change in 6MWD by Type of Qualifying RHC Hemodynamic Assessment

    ∆6MWD by Type of Qualifying RHC Hemodynamic Assessment BY SUBGROUP WITH BASELINE 6MWD < MEDIAN (<333 M) Difference in change from baseline LS Mean Difference (SE) 29.9 (14.12) 95% CI for LS Mean Difference 2.2, 57.6 Difference in change from baseline LS Mean Difference (SE) 21.4 (15.15) 95% CI for L

  27. Slide 27: PAH Studies with Best Results in Lowest 6MWD Cohort

    PAH Studies with Best Results in Lowest 6MWD Cohort SERAPHIN Trial (1) (macitentan) <300 M baseline cohort SUPER-1 Trial (2) (sildenafil) <325 M baseline cohort PHIRST Trial (3) (tadalafil) <325 M baseline cohort TRIUMPH-1 trial (4) ( treprostinil) <350 M baseline cohort PH/HFPEF Studies Reporting P

  28. Slide 28: Baseline 6MWD Below Median (<333 M) Subgroup

    Baseline 6MWD Below Median (<333 M) Subgroup 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; KCCQ-TSS: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Total Symptom Score; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; CI: confidence interval +21.1 -5.2 n=62 -20 0 20 40 TNX-

  29. Slide 29: We Believe Learnings from LEVEL will De-risk LEVEL-2

    We Believe Learnings from LEVEL will De-risk LEVEL-2 Strong treatment effect in patients with baseline 6MWD below the median (<333 M) is real: Prespecified subgroup finding supported by multivariable analysis No evidence that regression to the mean explains the finding RVSP reduction aligns with the

  30. Slide 30: Confirming Biological Activity Using NT-proBNP

    Confirming Biological Activity Using NT-proBNP NT-proBNP FELL IN OVERALL POPULATION WITH SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION OBSERVED IN FIRST VISIT AFTER RANDOMIZATION *nominal p-value. NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; LS: least squares; CI: confidence interval. NT-proBNP vs. placebo at Week

  31. Slide 31: LEVEL: Largest Reduction in NT-proBNP To Date in HFpEF

    LEVEL: Largest Reduction in NT-proBNP To Date in HFpEF Data presented by Dr. Sanjiv Shah at ESC Congress 2026 on August 29, 2026

  32. Slide 32: NT-proBNP: Predicted Effect on HF Events

    ↓ NT-proBNP: Predicted Effect on ↓ HF Events Data presented by Dr. Sanjiv Shah at ESC Congress 2026 on August 29, 2026 Activin trap SGLT2i Relaxin agonist MRA PROJECTED Levosimendan HF event rate reduction based on LEVEL results GLP1-RA ARNI ERA

  33. Slide 33: What LEVEL Tells Us

    What LEVEL Tells Us KEY LEARNINGS FROM THE FIRST PHASE 3 TRIAL *Prespecified analysis; nominal p-values are not adjusted for multiplicity. PK: pharmacokinetics; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; RVSP: right ventricular systolic pressure; HELP: Hemodynamic Evaluation of Levosimend

  34. Slide 34: Building on LEVEL: A Data-Driven Enrichment Strategy for LEVEL-2

    Building on LEVEL A DATA-DRIVEN ENRICHMENT STRATEGY FOR LEVEL-2 6MWD: 6-minute walk distance; RAVI: right atrial volume index; CI: confidence interval; PH: pulmonary hypertension; HF: heart failure. Multivariable analyses were used to identify a sub-population with strong treatment effects. 6MWD at

  35. Slide 35: Right Atrial Volume Index (RAVI) Identifies Strong Responders

    Right Atrial Volume Index (RAVI) Identifies Patients with Strong Response to a Volume-Reduction Strategy The excess blood entering the heart initially enters the right atrium, where the effect of this excess can be measured during a right heart catheterization (RHC) as right atrial pressure (RAP) LE

  36. Slide 36: LEVEL-2 Update: Protocol Amendment Implementation

    LEVEL-2 Update: Protocol Amendment Implementation TEMPORARY ENROLLMENT PAUSE; FDA INTERACTIONS FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; PH-HFpEF: pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Effective execution of the Amended LEVEL-2 protocol requires a temporary pause in

  37. Slide 37: IP Portfolio Protects Global Rights to Levosimendan Use in PH-HFpEF

    IP Portfolio Protects Global Rights to Levosimendan Use in PH-HFpEF United States: US 11,213,524, issued January 4, 2022, expires November 14, 2039 (SC Formulation/Use) US 11,607,412, issued March 21, 2023, expires December 15, 2040 (IV Use) US 11,701,355, issued July 18, 2023, expires December 15,

  38. Slide 38: Evidence-Driven Phase 3 Program

    Evidence-Driven Phase 3 Program LEVEL DATA ENHANCES HELP TRIAL PROOF OF CONCEPT TO DE-RISK ONGOING PHASE 3; WELL-ESTABLISHED SAFETY PROFILE PH-HFpEF: pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; MOA: mechanism of action. TNX-103, or Oral Levosimendan, is a potential firs

  39. Slide 39: Developing a therapy uniquely suited for PH-HFpEF

    Developing a therapy uniquely suited for PH-HFpEF

Tenax Therapeutics — Investor Presentation (October 2026) on 6ix