SES SA FDR (Class A) · EURONEXT:SESG

SES SA FDR (Class A) — SES Global — Investor Day (2006)

22 slides from SES SA FDR (Class A)'s investor day presentation, 2006

  1. Slide 1: Investor Day 2006

    Investor Day 2006 Romain BAUSCH President & CEO

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimer

    Disclaimer • This presentation does not constitute or form part of, and should not be construed as, any offer for sale of, or solicitation of any offer to buy, any securities of SES GLOBAL S.A. (“SES GLOBAL”) nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any

  3. Slide 3: Contents

    Contents Section One FSS Industry Overview FSS Overview 4 Relative market share 5 Revenues – Geographical Mix 6 Revenues – Product Mix 7 Section Two FSS Industry Comparatives 2005 Revenue development 9 Cost development 10 EBITDA margins 11 Cash conversion rates 12 Per transponder comparatives 13 Net

  4. Slide 4: Section One: FSS Overview

    — SESAGLOBAL Section One FSS Overview

  5. Slide 5: FSS Overview – Relative Market Share

    FSS Overview – Relative Market Share In MEUR Others 20.2% 22.3% 3.4% 5.3% 16.7% 5.8% 12.3% 14.0% SES Intelsat Eutelsat PanAmSat New Skies Revenues* 1,258.0 936.7 789.9 688.5 192.3 EBITDA 881.0 586.2 622.0 508.6 123.0 Net Income 381.8 (217.7) (31.2) 76.5 (1.1) *Based on a total FSS consolidated marke

  6. Slide 6: FSS Overview – Revenues – Geographical Mix

    FSS Overview – Revenues – Geographical Mix* New Intelsat New SES 10.0% 56.6% 11.5% 15.8% North Am erica & Caribbean Europe Asia Pacific 4.8% 12.4% Africa and Middle East 2.4% 44.0% 1.5% Latin Am erica 34.8% 6.4% Undefined / Other 17.0% 9.0% 15.0% 20.0% 18.0% 11.0% 62.0% 4.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0%

  7. Slide 7: FSS Overview – Revenues – Product Mix

    FSS Overview – Revenues – Product Mix New Intelsat New SES 5.0% 5.3% 1.5% 8.4% 16.3% 10.1% 36.5% 11.0% 21.0% 65.6% 45.7% 73.5% 24.0% 21.0% 14.0% Video 31.0% 80.0% 4.0% 63.0% 10.0% 0.4% Netw ork / data 6.5% 3.0% 17.0% Governm ent Services 61.6% 34.0% 9.5% 21.0% Other 7

  8. Slide 8: Section Two: FSS Industry Comparatives 2005

    Section Two FSS Industry Comparatives 2005 Source: SES calculation based on publicly available information 8

  9. Slide 9: FSS Industry Analysis – Revenue Development

    In MEUR FSS Industry Analysis – Revenue Development 1,500 16.7% 1,258.0 1,200 1,077.8 11.0% 934.8 5.3% 9.7% 900 842.5 789.9 750.4 2.9% 764.7 687.1 667.5 697.2 37.0% 600 1.0% 458.3 391.9 387.9 12.9% 334.4 (13.2%) 300 191.9 170.0 90.3 104.0 SES Global Intelsat Eutelsat PanAm Sat Inm arsat New Skies EM

  10. Slide 10: FSS Industry Analysis – Cost Development

    FSS Industry Analysis – Cost Development In MEUR 420.0 377.0 360.0 308.3 291.0 300.0 269.6 240.0 192.7 180.2 175.1 178.6 180.0 155.8 160.4 142.8 140.4 134.8 117.0 120.0 78.0 66.8 60.0 21.2 24.3 0.0 SES Global Intelsat Eutelsat PanAm Sat Inm arsat New Skies Am ericom EMEA AsiaSat • SES Global increas

  11. Slide 11: FSS Industry Analysis – Normalised EBITDA Margins

    FSS Industry Analysis – Normalised EBITDA Margins* 100% 77.8% 79.9% 78.9% 80.7% 76.5% 80% 74.2% 73.9% 70.3% 69.5% 71.4% 67.1% 67.7% 64.7% 64.6% 64.3% 65.0% 59.6% 60% 53.6% 40% 20% 0% Eutelsat PanAm Sat SES Global Intelsat Inm arsat New Skies EMEA AsiaSat Am ericom • SES Global decline due to change

  12. Slide 12: FSS Industry Analysis – Cash Conversion Rates

    FSS Industry Analysis – Cash Conversion Rates* 150% 132.9% 120% 104.9% 90.4% 93.2% 90% 81.7% 80.7% 75.8% 73.4% 70.2% 70.7% 68.9% 65.1% 60% 30% 0% SES Global New Skies Inm arsat Eutelsat Intelsat PanAm Sat • SES Global efficiently converts EBITDA into cash. • The SES Global decrease in 2005 is princi

  13. Slide 13: FSS Industry Analysis – Per-transponder comparatives

    FSS Industry Analysis – Per-transponder comparatives In MEUR 3.50 3.26 Infrastructure revenues per utilised transponder 3.00 Infrastructure operating costs per utilised transponder 2.50 2.05 2.10 2.00 1.50 1.23 1.06 1.08 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.62 0.55 0.39 0.50 0.33 0.27 0.32 0.29 0.29 0.00 SES Global Int

  14. Slide 14: FSS Industry Analysis – Utilisation rates

    FSS Industry Analysis – Utilisation rates 100% 80% 76.5% 78.5% 73.7% 73.0% 70.8% 64.0% 62.0% 60% 54.0% 40% 20% 0% Eutelsat SES Global PanAm Sat New Skies Intelsat EMEA Am ericom AsiaSat • Key satellites in Europe (SES EMEA, Eutelsat) have very high fill rates • Excluding Astra 4A, SES Astra / SES Si

  15. Slide 15: FSS Industry Analysis – Net Debt/EBITDA

    FSS Industry Analysis – Net Debt/EBITDA* 8.0 6.7 6.3 5.9 6.0 5.5 5.1 4.9 3.7 4.0 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 0.0 Intelsat PanAm Sat Eutelsat Inm arsat New Skies SES Global Estimated after-merger 2006 Net debt / EBITDA ratios: SES Global / New Skies 2.8 Intelsat / PanAmSat 7.5 • The new Intelsat / PanAmS

  16. Slide 16: FSS Industry Analysis – EBITDA valuation multiples

    FSS Industry Analysis – EBITDA valuation multiples* 15 11.6x 12 10.2x 9.8x 8.2x 9 7.7x 6 3 0 Inm arsat SES Global PanAm Sat Eutelsat AsiaSat • SES Global shares trade at highest multiple in the FSS industry • Inmarsat (MSS industry) shares currently trade at 11.6x EBITDA * Enterprise Value / 2005 EB

  17. Slide 17: FSS Industry Analysis – Backlog

    In BnEUR FSS Industry Analysis – Backlog 8.0 7.1 * 6.5 * 6.0 6.5 6.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.3 2.1 2.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 SES Global Eutelsat PanAm Sat Intelsat New Skies EMEA Am ericom AsiaSat • Video-centric FSS companies tend to have the highest backlog • SES Global’s backlog will

  18. Slide 18: FSS Industry Analysis – Return on Invested Capital

    FSS Industry Analysis – Return on Invested Capital* 15% 12.2% 11.5% 12% 9.6% 8.5% 8.8% 9% 7.9% 7.0% 6.9% 6.0% 5.7% 6% 4.0% 3% 1.9% 0.6% 0.4% 0% PanAm Sat SES Global AsiaSat Inm arsat Eutelsat New Skies Intelsat • SES Global favourable to most of peer group • Intelsat is weak in comparison, even befo

  19. Slide 19: FSS Industry Analysis – Interest Cover

    FSS Industry Analysis – Interest Cover* 6.0 5.00 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.85 2.0 1.33 1.28 1.26 1.0 0.54 0.0 SES Global Eutelsat New Skies Inm arsat PanAm Sat Intelsat • High gearing levels introduced by the Private Equity companies have led to increased interest payments • Intelsat has not generated enough op

  20. Slide 20: FSS Industry Analysis – Dividend Cover

    FSS Industry Analysis – Dividend Cover* 1.89 2.00 1.60 1.32 1.20 0.74 0.69 0.80 0.55 0.40 0.00 SES Global New Skies Intelsat PanAm Sat Eutelsat • High dividend payments introduced by the Private Equity companies • For Intelsat, PanAmSat and Eutelsat, dividends paid have exceeded residual cash flow •

  21. Slide 21: Summary – FSS industry comparatives 2005

    Summary – FSS industry comparatives 2005 Revenue Increase in revenues across FSS industry; SES Global showing highest rate of growth Many FSS companies have been affected by one-time restructuring costs, but the general industry Costs trend is towards reduction of recurring costs. Whilst SES is show

  22. Slide 22: Conclusion and outlook

    Conclusion and outlook ¾SES Global is financially well-positioned to continue as the leader in the FSS industry ¾Post-merger with PanAmSat, “New” Intelsat will be forced to focus on debt reduction and exit of shareholders ¾It will be interesting to see how Eutelsat will develop from their current po

SES Global — Investor Day (2006) on 6ix