Pinnacle West Capital Corporation · NYSE:PNW

Pinnacle West Capital — Investor Day (April 2002)

56 slides from Pinnacle West Capital's investor day presentation, Apr 22, 2002

  1. Slide 1: April 23-24, 2002

    April 23-24, 2002 dif-fereeneti-ate PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION

  2. Slide 2: Forward-Looking Statements

    Forward-Looking St: This presentation contains forward-looking statements based on current expectations and the company assumes no obligation to update these statements. Because actual results may differ materially from expectations, the company readers not to place undue reliance on these statement

  3. Slide 3: Presentation Agenda

    Presentation Agenda Strategic overview Western power market oven Power marketing and hedging Regulated delivery issues Generation operations and expansion Financial objectives and results ® 2002 Pinnacle Wes

  4. Slide 4: Chairman's Strategic Overview

  5. Slide 5: Western Power Market Overview, Marketing & Trading and Hedging

    Western Power Market Overview Marketing & Trading and Hedging

  6. Slide 6: Western power market prices

    2002. iia May rege CIM e Ui eet oS fe NI

  7. Slide 7: Natural gas prices

    SIMMBTU 10 JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND 2001 2002. @ =

  8. Slide 8: Gas to power price ratio

    MMBTUIMWh 80 40 JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND 2001 2002. *Based on Pala Verde on-peak electri @ 2002 Pinnade West CoRMEOORHCT Ti

  9. Slide 9: Western Power Market Influences

    Western-Poy Influences e Regulatory pressures flatten spark spreads « FERC market interference California DWR contracts and issues ® 2002 Pinnacle Wes =

  10. Slide 10: Enterprisewide hedge strategy

    MWs 8,000 i ms Hedge 6,000 a a Sa mm West Phoenix 5 = Saguaro pa mm Redhawk 1 & 2 2,000 == Existing Resources — Retail Peak Load Enterprisewide fetes Strategy 2002 2003 2004 @ 2002 Pinnacle West CAPIESINGBHBoRStion™

  11. Slide 11: Supply requirements

    im Requirements = Current Supply 2002 2003 2004 (Remaining) @ 2002 Pinnacle West CAPIESINGBHBoRStion™

  12. Slide 12: El Paso FERC Issues

    ELPaso FERC Issues Arizona companies signed firm contracts California shippers contesting firm requirements contracts Staff recommendation would reduce Arizona rights Technical conference @ 2002 Pi

  13. Slide 13: Regulatory Update

  14. Slide 14: APS filed with ACC in October 2001

    APS filed with ACC in October 2001 requests for: # — Variance from competitive k ing requirements — Approval of purchase power agreement Hearing to begin on April 29, 2002 Major issues — Competitive bidding amounts — Purchase power agreement pricing — Certain terms and conditions — Market power @ 20

  15. Slide 15: Generation asset transfer

    e Generation asset transfer — Still required by end of 2002 . — ACC Staff has recommended “stay” pending outcome of generic proceedings e« Related developments — ACC generic review proceedings on electric restructuring — Panda show-cause motion on bidding

  16. Slide 16: Electric Competition Rules re-look

    e All three commissioners desire to “re-look” at Electric Competition Rules a e Interested parties have responded to commissioners’ questions e« ACC Staff report recommends continued wholesale/retail competition, but also unspecified rule changes @ 2002 Pinnacle West CCSEsIRAINEIGG SCOT

  17. Slide 17: ACC Generic Review of Electric Restructuring

    ACC Generic-Re: Bee ‘pe Electric Restructuring e ACC staff urges commission review in six specific areas ¥ - ACC monitoring of market conditions and market power — Competitive bidding process guidance — Alternatives to generation asset transfers — Transmission constraints — Adjustor mechanisms for s

  18. Slide 18: Related Regulatory Matters

    Related toR Regula, Matters « 1999 APS Settlement Agreement — Affirmed by Arizona oun e Electric Competition Rules — Declared unconstitutional by Arizona Superior Court — Still in effect pending review by Arizona Court of Appeals @ 2002 Pi

  19. Slide 19: Regulated Delivery Update

  20. Slide 20: WestConnect RTO

    West-Connect—R1TO weston Cheyenne Light, Power Admini Fuel & Power Co, Arizona Public Service Co. Arzona Elecbig Power Coop, ne. Tucson Elect Power Co ' © 2002 Pinnacle West Capital\corporation

  21. Slide 21: WestConnect filing made October 15, 2001

    Filing made October 15, 2001 No action by FERC to date Filing parties — Arizona Public Service — El Paso Electric — Public Service of New Mexico — Tucson Electric Power @ 2002 Pi

  22. Slide 22: Entities supporting the filing

    e Entities supporting the filing — Salt River Project ra — Washington Area Power Administration — Southwest Transmission Corporation e Discussions with Translink and Public Service of Colorado ® 2002 Pinnacle Wes

  23. Slide 23: Capitalize on superior customer growth

    e Capitalize on superior custom @ 2002 Pi

  24. Slide 24: Superior Retail Customer Growth

    Superior-Retail-Customer Groy iit Percent 4.0 2 4 ™=EAPS — Industry Average 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Estimates © 2002 Pinnacle West Capital\corporation

  25. Slide 25: @ 2002 Pi

    @ 2002 Pi

  26. Slide 26: Overall Customer Satisfaction

    Overall Customer Satisfaction Index 103 , A 2 of 10 Power Quality & Reliability 103 97 3 of 10 Company Image Price & Value Billing & Payment Customer Service J.D. Power Performance ‘Compa I West APS _Region_ 105 93 2 of 10 104 93 2 of 10 107 97 1 of 10 @ 2002 Pinnade West COUREMENROOICT 0

  27. Slide 27: Capitalize on superior customer growth

    Capitalize on superior customer growth Maintain high customer si ction: Provide reliable service @ 2002 Pi

  28. Slide 28: Retail Customer Strategy

    Retail-Custem ¢ Capitalize on superior customer growth e Maintain high customer satisfaction e « Provide reliable service Achieve constructive regulatory plan @ 2002 Pi

  29. Slide 29: Power Markets and Regulated Delivery Summary

    Power Markets, and Regulated Delivery ‘Summary Superior retail customer growth continues Western market conditions provide challenges, yet opportunities, for marketing and trading results Hedging manages risks of power and fuel procurement Constructive regulatory outcomes being sought — @ 2002 Pinna

  30. Slide 30: Generation Overview

    Generation Overview

  31. Slide 31: Pinnacle West Generation

    Pinnacle West.G e Existing generation e Generation exaflfion e Market position

  32. Slide 32: Pinnacle West generation capacity

    14,000. Pinnacle West = Operated lanned der Construction isting

  33. Slide 33: Production cost $/MWh vs national average

    $IMWh 25 20 19 18 LJ 410 1995 2000 imi Pinnacle West _ —National Average @ 2002 Pinnacle West CAPIESINGBHBoRStion™

  34. Slide 34: Plant capacity factors vs national average

    50% National Average Oe 60% National Average 50% + ‘95 ‘98 ‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 ‘D1 ‘02 ‘95 96 '97 98 ‘99 ‘0D ‘D1 ‘02 > Year-to-date April 15, 2002

  35. Slide 35: Plant performance

    e Coal plant performance . — Surpassed generation records in 2001 — 2001 capacity factor of 84% e Gas units — High availability — West Phoenix CC4: 99.8% availability e Nuclear performance — Fourth consecutive INPO 1 — Met the challenges of two simultaneous outages

  36. Slide 36: Palo Verde Refueling

    Palo Verde-Refuelit e Unit 2 - Spring 2002 — Reactor vessel head inspection complete - no repairs required — Modifications made for steam generator replacement in Fall 2003 e Unit 1 - Fall 2002 — Reactor vessel head inspection — Steam generator chemical cleaning —_

  37. Slide 37: Control element

    trol Element ‘Mechanism || 3/8 inch stainless steel cladding

  38. Slide 38: Steam Generator Replacement

    Steam-Generator_ Replacement © 2002 Pinnacle West Capital\corporation

  39. Slide 39: Copper Eagle

    Copper Eagle Drilling, testing, analysis Negotiate bids for storage capaci d First Prepare permits Targeted Cavern Project in approval operation

  40. Slide 40: Disciplined, flexible expansion

    e Disciplined e Flexible to meet load gro @ 2002 Pi

  41. Slide 41: Growing Generation Capability

    Pinnack Growing Generation Capability Commercial Operation New Facilities MWs 2001 West Phoen 120 2002 Redhawk 1 & 2 1,060 2002 Saguaro CT 3 80 2003 West Phoenix 5 530 2004 Silverhawk 570 2006/2007 Redhawk 3 and 4 1,060 @ 2002

  42. Slide 42: Capacity vs peak load plus reserves

    MWs 10,000 -Peak load plus reserves 7,500 Redhawk 3,4 aE silverhawk sone Redhawk Phoenixs West Saguaro Phoenix 4 2,500 0 2001 2002 + ©2003 :«=- 2004 «2005 += «2008 ©2007 = @ 2002 Pinnacle West CAB epeoretion

  43. Slide 43: Generation vs peak load with reserves

    MWs 75,000 60,000 Z i tl i 30,000 + 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 ‘mm Existing Generation 1mm New Generation Peak Load with Reserves = ® 2002 Pinnacle West

  44. Slide 44: Dependable, stable supply mix

    e Dependable, stable supply mix e PNWwill benefit from the market during low hydro or high gas years Juclear Coal as Hydro @ 2002 Pinnacle West’

  45. Slide 45: Total Generation Cost

    Pinnacle-W. Total Generation Cost SIMWh 75 a Pinnacle Regional West Merchants 50 25

  46. Slide 46: Generation Summary

    Generation Summary e Favorable fuel mix « Competitive production ae e Top nuclear and coal production e High plant reliability Disciplined expansion plan @ 2002 Pi

  47. Slide 47: Financial Objectives and Results

    Financial Objectives and Results @ 2002 Pinnacle West Capea

  48. Slide 48: Three Months Ended March

    Three Months Ended March 31 $ per share 0.75 $0.73 0.50 0.25 0.00 2002 @ 2002 Pinnacle West CORINERIOOIUC 0

  49. Slide 49: Earnings Drivers 2002 - 2003

    Earnings Drivers 2002 - 2003 Strong retail customer growth Reversal of 2001 reliability program costs Regulatory asset amortization Retail price reductions Power marketing and trading results Regulatory and legislative developments SFAS No. 133 Weather effects Economic conditions @ 2002 Pinnacle Wes

  50. Slide 50: Realized margin

    $ Millions 250 200 450, "Realized margin $40M @ 2002 Pinnade West COUREMENROOICT 0

  51. Slide 51: Pinnacle West versus S&P Electric Utilities

    Pinnacle West-versus In $ per Share 10.00 Cash Flow Per Share 6.00 4.00. 2.00. 0.00. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 = Pinnacle West ‘a S&P Electric Utilities —_—_— © 2002 Pinnacle West Capital Corporation

  52. Slide 52: Compound Annual Growth Rate

    Compound Annual Growth Rate 15% 10% 5% 0% 5% I Pinnacle West 10% 15% 20% 25% Excludes companies that eliminated their dividends during the period

  53. Slide 53: Consolidated Debt Ratio

    Pinnacle-West Consolidated Debt Ratio* 2004 Target of < 55% 60%: yA | 50%. 40%. 30% | vA | Va 2000 2001 2004 * Adjusted for Palo Verde unit 2 saleleaseback © 2002 Pinnacle West Capital\corporation

  54. Slide 54: Managing Growth with Financial Strength

    Managing Growth with Financial Strengt) Capital Expenditures Financing Requirements $ Millions $ Millions 1,200 900 2001 = Other = Generation Expansion = Existing Generation = Delivery 2002 2003 2004 2001 2002 2003 2004 = Net New Financing = Redemptions ® 2002 Pinnacle West

  55. Slide 55: Pinnacle West Strategy

    Pinnacle-Westin: Manage business strategies for superior shareholder value gugaton Continue superior combined earnings and dividend growth Maintain balance sheet strength @ 2002 Pi

  56. Slide 56: Closing quote from 2001 Annual Report

    “As a company, we strive to remain flexible in the face of changing markets, yet unwavering ete commitments to increasing customer satisfaction and shareholder value.” — Pinnacle West 2001 Annual Report Letter to Shareholders dif-fereeneti-ate PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION — ® 2002 Pinnacle Wes

Pinnacle West Capital — Investor Day (April 2002) on 6ix