Duke Energy Corporation (holding Company) · NYSE:DUK
Duke Energy Corporation (holding Company) — Corporate Update (March 2015)
46 slides from Duke Energy Corporation (holding Company)'s corporate update, Mar 17, 2015
Slide 1: 2015 Integrated Resource Plan Stakeholder Workshop #1
2015 Integrated Resource Plan Stakeholder Workshop #1 March 17, 2015 Plainfield, IN
Slide 2: Welcome
Doug Esamann, State President- Indiana, Duke Energy Welcome 2
Slide 3: Welcome
Welcome Safety message Why are we here today? Objectives for stakeholder process Introduce the facilitator 3
Slide 4: The Facilitator
The Facilitator Duke Energy Indiana hired Dr. Marty Rozelle of The Rozelle Group and her colleagues to: Help us develop the IRP stakeholder engagement process Facilitate and document stakeholder workshops 4
Slide 5: Why are we here today?
Why are we here today? Duke Energy Indiana developing 2015 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Proactively complying with proposed Commission IRP rule Today is the first of four stakeholder workshops prior to filing the IRP by November 1, 2015 5
Slide 6: Objectives for Stakeholder Process
Objectives for Stakeholder Process Listen: Understand concerns and objectives Inform: Increase stakeholders’ understanding of the IRP process, key assumptions, and challenges we face Consider: Provide a forum for productive stakeholder feedback at key points in the IRP process to inform Duke E
Slide 7: Agenda
Agenda 08:30 Registration & Continental Breakfast 09:00 Welcome, Introductions, Agenda 09:30 Overview of Duke Energy Indiana 09:45 Review of 2013 Stakeholder Process and IRP 10:15 Break 10:30 Lessons Learned 11:00 Overview of 2015 Stakeholder Process and IRP 11:45 Lunch 12:30 Scenario Planning Overv
Slide 8: Overview of Duke Energy Indiana
Brian Bak, Lead Planning Analyst Overview of Duke Energy Indiana 8
Slide 9: Duke Energy Indiana: Overview
Duke Energy Indiana: Overview Indiana’s largest electric utility 790,000 customers 22,000 square miles Lafayette Portions of 69 counties including cities of Bloomington, Terre Haute, Lafayette, and suburban Indianapolis areas near Indianapolis, Louisville and Cincinnati Terre Haute Bloomingt
Slide 10: Existing generation resources
Existing generation resources Coal (4,765 MW) Combustion Turbine Cayuga 1 & 2 Gas Fired (1619MW) Gallagher 2 & 4 Oil Fired (166MW) Gibson 1-5 Wabash River 2-6 (668MW) Hydro (45 MW) IGCC (595 MW) Wind (100 MW PPA) Combined Cycle (285 MW) Solar (20 MW PPA) Type Of Power Facil
Slide 11: Planned Near-term Retirements & Additions
Planned Near-term Retirements & Additions Retirement of Wabash River 2-5 Suspension of Wabash River 6 Retirement of oil-fired CTs Additional environmental controls: Gibson: Precipitator refurbishments, monitoring Cayuga: SCR addition, monitoring 11
Slide 12: Existing Generation Mix: Capacity and Energy
Existing Generation Mix: Capacity and Energy 12
Slide 13: Review of 2013 Process and IRP
Jim Hobbs, Lead Engineer Review of 2013 Process and IRP 13
Slide 14: Meetings
5 Meetings Meeting 1 – December 5, 2012 Meeting 2 – January 30, 2013 Meeting 3 – April 4, 2013 Meeting 4 – July 19, 2013 Meeting 5 – October 9, 2013 IRP Filing – November 1, 2013 14
Slide 15: Meetings and Topics
Meetings 1 and 2 Meeting 1 Process Overview Scenario Development Driving Forces Exercise Meeting 2 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Scenario Development Exercise 15
Slide 16: Meetings and Topics
Meetings 3 and 4 Meeting 3 Load and Energy Forecasting Fundamentals Forecasting Scenario Consolidation Exercise: Range of Assumptions Meeting 4 Portfolios Sensitivities 16
Slide 17: Three Scenarios and Three Portfolios
Meeting 5 – Three Scenarios and Three Portfolios Low Regulation Scenario: Traditional Portfolio Carbon Emissions Price: $0/ton Lower Environmental Requirements Higher Fuel Prices Reference Case Scenario: Blended Approach Portfolio Carbon Emissions Price: $17/ton in 2020, $50/ton in 2033 In
Slide 18: Modeling Results
Meeting 5 – Modeling Results TRADITIONAL PORTFOLIO (Optimized for Low Regulation Scenario) Energy Efficiency Renewable Energy 2014-2033 (% of Retail Sales) (% of Total Sales) Coal (948 MW) Retirements 2% in 2020 Oil CTs (166 MW) 6% in 2020 4% in 2033 12% in 2033 WR 6 NG Conversion 672 MW in 2033 Add
Slide 19: Lessons Learned
Scott Park, Director IRP Analytics - Midwest Lessons Learned 19
Slide 20: Lessons Learned
Lessons Learned Feature 2013 We heard/observed… 2015 Exercise considered Appeared to be too much Scenario Participant exercise to focus on driving driving forces to define information to process in a Development forces that will be used to develop scenarios a scenario short period of time Need more
Slide 21: Lessons Learned
Lessons Learned Feature 2013 We heard/observed… 2015 Portfolio attributes will be solicited from Optimized Participants want to propose Portfolios participants and included in portfolio portfolios evaluated portfolios for consideration development We are working to get relevant Not modeled due to CH
Slide 22: Lessons Learned
Lessons Learned Feature 2013 We heard/observed… 2015 Modeled as a load We are planning to model EE Energy Efficiency Model as a resource reduction as a resource Trends, ranges, and Specific data will be shared in-person at Confidentiality of Access to confidential publicly available the DEI-Plainfie
Slide 23: Lessons Learned
Lessons Learned Feature 2013 We heard/observed… 2015 Difficult for in-person Presentation slides will be web-posted and Remote Live Meeting attendees to hear callers callers will be provided a dial in number to participation questions/comments participate Significant revisions Presentation made afte
Slide 24: IRP Overview
Scott Park, Director IRP Analytics - Midwest IRP Overview 24
Slide 25: Overview of IRP Process
Overview of IRP Process Meeting 1- Process Overview & Scenario Development (Today) Meeting 2 - Resource discussion & Portfolio Development (early June) Meeting 3 - Preliminary Modeling Results (August) Meeting 4 - Final Modeling Results (early October) Note- The scenarios and sensitivities a
Slide 26: IRP is about "filling the gap"
IRP is about “filling the gap” 26
Slide 27: Serving load requires a variety of resource types
Serving load requires a variety of resource types Traditional supply side • Combustion turbines Peaking • Hydro • Coal Intermediate • Combined cycle • Hydro • Coal & IGCC • Nuclear Baseload • Combined cycle • Biomass Demand side Variable energy • Energy efficiency • Wind • Demand response • Solar •
Slide 28: How does the IRP process work?
How does the IRP process work? Complex process involving input from many internal and external groups Some components mandated (e.g. MISO reserve margin requirement) Requires extensive modeling and analysis Step 1: Step 3: Gather data, create Step 2: Step 4: Analyze portfolios, scenarios, deve
Slide 29: Step 1: Data, assumptions, technology screening and scenarios
Step 1: Data, assumptions, technology screening and scenarios Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Gather data Create scenarios Develop input Screen technologies assumptions • Gather data such as: • Identify range of • Develop input • Screen technologies to • Operational driving forces and input assumptions
Slide 30: Step 2: Develop portfolios
Step 2: Develop portfolios Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Review scenarios Develop Optimized Portfolios Develop Stakeholder Portfolios • Review scenarios and impact on • Use model to develop portfolios • Create portfolios that reflect fuel costs, energy and capacity optimized for each scenario stakehol
Slide 31: Step 3: Analyze Portfolios & Identify Preferred Portfolio
Step 3: Analyze Portfolios & Identify Preferred Portfolio Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Analyze portfolios Risk assessment Identify preferred portfolio • Evaluate portfolios in each • Consider portfolio risks • Identify the portfolio that scenario • Variability of costs performs best overall • Stress
Slide 32: Step 4: Develop IRP report
Step 4: Develop IRP report Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Develop draft report Management approval File report • Work with internal groups to • Gain approval and ensure the • File 2015 IRP by Nov. 1, 2015 write sections of report proposed plan meets all • Develop tables and regulatory requirements appe
Slide 33: Lunch
Lunch DUKE 8 & ENERGY.
Slide 34: Scenario Planning
Scott Park, Director IRP Analytics - Midwest Scenario Planning 34
Slide 35: What are scenarios?
What are scenarios? A scenario is a well reasoned story that defines a plausible future worth considering in long term planning. When combined, several scenarios can describe a range of futures that add to the breadth and depth of the analysis. “Each scenario….tells a logical “story” about the futur
Slide 36: Scenarios should…
Scenarios should… Help us find an “always acceptable” solution across a range of possible futures instead of an “optimal” solution for one potential future Force us to consider a robust range of possible futures Focus on key drivers and input variables that drive action and change outcomes I
Slide 37: Why do we use scenarios?
Why do we use scenarios? Future is uncertain Scenarios are plausible views of what the world might look like over the next 20 years Scenario planning intended to make decision-making process more robust Preferred portfolio performs best overall across the multiple scenarios and sensitivities
Slide 38: What are the key driving forces?
What are the key driving forces? Economic outlook Energy & environmental •Fiscal policies policy and regulations •Economic growth •Renewable energy •Interest rates Energy & •Energy efficiency •International trade policies Economic environ. •Air emissions outlook policy and •Water & waste regulations
Slide 39: Driving Forces Determine Key Input Variables
Driving Forces Determine Key Input Variables Driving Forces Scenarios Key model input variables Capital & Natural gas Price of Load growth Coal prices construction prices carbon costs 39
Slide 40: Clean Power Plan
Clean Power Plan What is the Clean Power Plan (CPP)? EPA’s proposed rule for regulating CO2 emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired power plants As proposed, the rule is intended to reduce power sector CO2 emissions by 30% from 2005 levels by 2030 Emission reduction “building blocks” Blo
Slide 41: Clean Power Plan (continued)
Clean Power Plan (continued) Proposed Indiana reduction goal: 2012 Baseline After Applying After Applying After Applying After Applying Total Percentage (lbs CO2/MWh) Building Block 1 Building Block 1 & 2 Building Block 1 - 3 Building Block 1 - 4 Reduction 1923 1817 1772 1707 1531 -20% How is Du
Slide 42: Driving Force & Scenario Discussion
Scott Park, Director IRP Analytics - Midwest Driving Force & Scenario Discussion 42
Slide 43: Overview of driving forces and scenario discussion
Overview of driving forces and scenario discussion Purpose Gather a range of information and perspectives on the driving forces that will inform the development of scenarios Things to remember Consider the range and plausibility of input Consider various/other stakeholder perspectives for each
Slide 44: Wrap up
Wrap up Combine stakeholder feedback that we heard today and from any post meeting comments Develop a number of scenarios that reflect the themes of the discussion and comments Specify details of scenarios that will be used for analysis Manageable number of scenarios Quantifiable Plausib
Slide 45: Closing Comments, Stakeholder Comments
Marty Rozelle, President, Rozelle Group Closing Comments, Stakeholder Comments 45
Slide 46: Next Steps
Next Steps Please complete comment cards or send by March 24 to Marty at: RGL97marty@rozellegroup.com Meeting summary and other materials will be posted on website by March 31 (http://www.duke-energy.com/indiana/in-irp-2015.asp) Next workshop tentatively scheduled for June 4 46